This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tu, Z. J. Articles by Kiang, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tu, Z. J. Articles by Kiang, D. T.

Differential Up-Regulation of Gap Junction Connexin 26 Gene in Mammary and Uterine Tissues: The Role of Sp Transcription Factors

Breast Cancer Research Laboratory Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

The mRNA and protein expressions of connexin 26 (Cx26) in rat mammary gland and uterus can be up-regulated during pregnancy as well as by the administration of human CG (hCG). In the present study, we found that the time course and magnitude of Cx26 induction by hCG was different in these two tissues. The molecular mechanism underscoring this difference was therefore investigated. We had previously demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors play a functional role in Cx26 expression. By the electrophoretic mobility shift assay, nuclear extracts from both virgin mammary gland and uterus were capable of binding to a labeled oligonucleotide probe that contained the proximal GC box and formed three protein-DNA complexes (C1, C2, and C3). In the mammary gland, pregnancy enhanced the intensity of all three complexes, whereas in the uterine tissue there was a decrease in the C2 and C3 complexes and an emergence of a new major component, C4 complex. In the supershift study, the C1 complex could be supershifted only by an antibody against Sp1, whereas C2, C3, and C4 could all be supershifted by an antibody against Sp3, suggesting a potential presence of Sp3 isoforms of various sizes. We therefore conclude that the basal Sp profiles in virgin mammary gland and uterine tissue are similar. However, in response to pregnancy, the changes in Sp profile are tissue specific and may account for the temporal and quantitative differences between these two tissues in Cx26 induction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Ratchford, C. R. Esguerra, and K. H. Moley Decreased Oocyte-Granulosa Cell Gap Junction Communication and Connexin Expression in a Type 1 Diabetic Mouse Model Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 22(12): 2643 - 2654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ordovas, R. Roy, S. Pampin, P. Zaragoza, R. Osta, J. C. Rodriguez-Rey, and C. Rodellar The g.763G>C SNP of the bovine FASN gene affects its promoter activity via Sp-mediated regulation: implications for the bovine lactating mammary gland Physiol Genomics, July 1, 2008; 34(2): 144 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Grummer, S.W. Hewitt, O. Traub, K.S. Korach, and E. Winterhager Different Regulatory Pathways of Endometrial Connexin Expression: Preimplantation Hormonal-Mediated Pathway Versus Embryo Implantation-Initiated Pathway Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 273 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Ormandy, M. Naylor, J. Harris, F. Robertson, N. D. Horseman, G. J. Lindeman, J. Visvader, and P. A. Kelly Investigation of the Transcriptional Changes Underlying Functional Defects in the Mammary Glands of Prolactin Receptor Knockout Mice Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2003; 58(1): 297 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]