This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nordeen, S. K. Articles by Lieberman, B. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nordeen, S. K. Articles by Lieberman, B. A.

Extreme Position Dependence of a Canonical Hormone Response Element

Department of Pathology and Program in Molecular Biology University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Denver, Colorado 80262

Hormone response elements (HREs) are considered enhancers, activating transcription in a relatively position- and orientation-independent fashion. Upon binding to an HRE, steroid receptors presumably contact coactivators and/or proteins associated with the transcription initiation complex. As a receptor target site is moved further from a fixed position such as the TATA box, not only will the spatial separation of the receptor with respect to its interaction partners change, so will the orientation due to the rotation of the DNA helix. Additional constraints may be imposed by the assembly of DNA into chromatin. Therefore, we have endeavored to test rigorously the assertion that HRE action is position independent. We have constructed a series of 42 chloramphenicol acetyltransferase expression vectors that contain a single progesterone/glucocorticoid receptor-binding site separated from a TATA box by 4 to 286 bp. The enhancer activity of the HRE was assessed after transient transfection of progesterone receptor-expressing fibroblasts. We find that the position of the HRE has a dramatic influence on induction by progestins. When closely juxtaposed to the TATA box, the HRE was unable to support a hormone response, perhaps due to direct steric hindrance with the transcription initiation complex. Full activity was gained by moving the HRE 10 bp further from the TATA sequence. As the HRE was moved incrementally further, activity remained near maximal over the next 26 bp. HRE activity then declined over the subsequent 26 bp and remained low for another 2.5 helical turns. Surprisingly, a narrow window of HRE activity occurred at an HRE-TATA box separation of 90–100 bp. Little or no hormone-induced transcriptional activity was observed when the HRE was positioned further from the TATA box. The addition of a second HRE or a basal (nuclear factor-1) element failed to relieve this constraint. A similar series of experiments was carried out in a mammary carcinoma cell line that expressed high levels of both glucocorticoid and progestin receptors. Data in these cells indicate that glucocorticoids and progestins supported a similar HRE position-activity profile, but this pattern of HRE activity was quite distinct from that seen in fibroblasts. This may be indicative of cell type-specific interactions between steroid receptors and adapter/coactivator proteins or cell type-specific activities such as acetylases or deacetylases participating in the steroid response.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M. Jacobsen, P. Jambal, S. A. Schittone, and K. B. Horwitz ALU Repeats in Promoters Are Position-Dependent Co-Response Elements (coRE) that Enhance or Repress Transcription by Dimeric and Monomeric Progesterone Receptors Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2009; 23(7): 989 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C M Klinge, S C Jernigan, K A Mattingly, K E Risinger, and J Zhang Estrogen response element-dependent regulation of transcriptional activation of estrogen receptors {alpha} and {beta} by coactivators and corepressors J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 33(2): 387 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Peng, P. J. Malloy, and D. Feldman Identification of a Functional Vitamin D Response Element in the Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Promoter Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2004; 18(5): 1109 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Klinge Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2001; 29(14): 2905 - 2919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wan, K. K. Coxe, V. G. Thackray, P. R. Housley, and S. K. Nordeen Separable Features of the Ligand-Binding Domain Determine the Differential Subcellular Localization and Ligand-Binding Specificity of Glucocorticoid Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2001; 15(1): 17 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. A. Iñiguez-Lluhí and D. Pearce A Common Motif within the Negative Regulatory Regions of Multiple Factors Inhibits Their Transcriptional Synergy Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2000; 20(16): 6040 - 6050. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Verrijdt, E. Schoenmakers, P. Alen, A. Haelens, B. Peeters, W. Rombauts, and F. Claessens Androgen Specificity of a Response Unit Upstream of the Human Secretory Component Gene Is Mediated by Differential Receptor Binding to an Essential Androgen Response Element Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 1999; 13(9): 1558 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text]