help button home button Endocrine Society Molecular Endocrinology ENDO 08 Sessions Library
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Logie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Logie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. F.
Molecular Endocrinology 12 (8): 1120-1132
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society

Positive and Negative Discrimination of Estrogen Receptor Agonists and Antagonists Using Site-Specific DNA Recombinase Fusion Proteins

Colin Logie1, Mark Nichols2, Kathy Myles, John W. Funder and A. Francis Stewart

Gene Expression Program European Molecular Biology Laboratory (C.L., M.N., A.F.S.) 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Baker Medical Research Institute (K.M., J.W.F.) Prahran, 3181, Victoria, Australia

Activation of the estrogen receptor (ER) by hormone involves at least two steps. First, hormone binding initially relieves repression, a property imposed on ER in cis by its ligand-binding domain (EBD). Subsequently, the derepressed ER binds specific genomic sites and regulates transcription. In addition to the natural hormone, ER binds a broad range of ligands that evoke a spectrum of responses ranging from full ER activation by agonists to partial activation and inhibition by partial or complete antagonists. How these different ligands evoke different ER responses remains unclear. To address this issue, we have developed a nontranscriptional assay for ER ligand responsiveness based on Flp recombinase/human EBD protein chimeras. These fusion proteins transduce the transient event of ligand binding into a permanent DNA change in a human cell line system. A fusion protein including ER D, E, and F domains was activated by all the ER ligands tested, demonstrating that both agonists and antagonists serve to relieve initial repression, and that differences between them lie downstream in the activation pathway. Mutant variants of the Flp-ER protein that distinguish between agonists and antagonists, and a mutant EBD that selectively lost the ability to respond to 17ß-estradiol but not to other ligands, were also identified. Thus, agonists and antagonists can be functionally distinguished in a nontranscriptional assay.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Paulmurugan, A. Tamrazi, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, B. S. Katzenellenbogen, and S. S. Gambhir
A Human Estrogen Receptor (ER){alpha} Mutation with Differential Responsiveness to Nonsteroidal Ligands: Novel Approaches for Studying Mechanism of ER Action
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 22(7): 1552 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Paulmurugan and S. S. Gambhir
An intramolecular folding sensor for imaging estrogen receptor-ligand interactions
PNAS, October 24, 2006; 103(43): 15883 - 15888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society