This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, C. L. Articles by Hager, G. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, C. L. Articles by Hager, G. L.

Characterization of Transiently and Constitutively Expressed Progesterone Receptors: Evidence for Two Functional States

Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Activated steroid receptors induce chromatin remodeling events in the promoters of some target genes. We previously reported that transiently expressed progesterone receptor (PR) cannot activate mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter when it adopts the form of ordered chromatin. However, when expressed continuously, the PR acquires this ability. In this study we explored whether this gain of function occurs through alterations in nucleoprotein structure at the MMTV promoter or through changes in receptor status. We observed no major structural differences at the MMTV promoter in the presence of constitutively expressed PR and found its mechanism of activation to be very similar to that of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). However, a systematic comparison of the functional behavior of the transiently and constitutively expressed PR elucidated significant differences. The transiently expressed PR is activated in the absence of ligand by cAMP and by components in FBS and has significantly increased sensitivity to progestins. In contrast, the constitutively expressed PR is refractory to activation by cAMP and serum and has normal sensitivity to its ligand. In addition, while the PR is localized to the nucleus in both cases, a significant fraction of the transiently expressed PR is tightly bound to the nucleus even in the absence of ligand, while the majority of constitutively expressed PR is not. These results strongly suggest that the PR undergoes processing in the cell subsequent to its initial expression and that this processing is important for various aspects of its function, including its ability to productively interact with target genes that require chromatin remodeling for activation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Graham, M. L. Yager, H. D. Hill, K. Byth, G. M. O'Neill, and C. L. Clarke Altered Progesterone Receptor Isoform Expression Remodels Progestin Responsiveness of Breast Cancer Cells Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2005; 19(11): 2713 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Katso, J. H. Parham, M. Caivano, W. C. Clay, J. P. Condreay, D. W. Gray, K. M. Lindley, S. J. Mason, J. Rieger, N. C. Wakes, et al. Evaluation of Cell-Based Assays for Steroid Nuclear Receptors Delivered by Recombinant Baculoviruses J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2005; 10(7): 715 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hu and N. H. Colburn Histone Deacetylase Inhibition Down-Regulates Cyclin D1 Transcription by Inhibiting Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B/p65 DNA Binding Mol. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 3(2): 100 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Botos, W. Xian, D. F. Smith, and C. L. Smith Progesterone Receptor Deficient in Chromatin Binding Has an Altered Cellular State J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 2004; 279(15): 15231 - 15239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kariko, H. Ni, J. Capodici, M. Lamphier, and D. Weissman mRNA Is an Endogenous Ligand for Toll-like Receptor 3 J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12542 - 12550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Qiu, A. Olsen, E. Faivre, K. B. Horwitz, and C. A. Lange Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Regulates Nuclear Association of Human Progesterone Receptors Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2003; 17(4): 628 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hernandez-Munain and M. S. Krangel Distinct Roles for c-Myb and Core Binding Factor/Polyoma Enhancer-Binding Protein 2 in the Assembly and Function of a Multiprotein Complex on the TCR {delta} Enhancer In Vivo J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4362 - 4369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Deppe, P. J. Heering, S. Viengchareun, B. Grabensee, N. Farman, and M. Lombes Cyclosporine A and FK506 Inhibit Transcriptional Activity of the Human Mineralocorticoid Receptor: A Cell-Based Model to Investigate Partial Aldosterone Resistance in Kidney Transplantation Endocrinology, May 1, 2002; 143(5): 1932 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. T. Baumann, H. Ma, R. Wolford, J. C Reyes, P. Maruvada, C. Lim, P. M. Yen, M. R. Stallcup, and G. L. Hager The Glucocorticoid Receptor Interacting Protein 1 (GRIP1) Localizes in Discrete Nuclear Foci That Associate with ND10 Bodies and Are Enriched in Components of the 26S Proteasome Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2001; 15(4): 485 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. A. Sheldon, M. Becker, and C. L. Smith Steroid Hormone Receptor-mediated Histone Deacetylation and Transcription at the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Promoter J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2001; 276(35): 32423 - 32426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.-N. Song, B. Huse, S. Rusconi, and S. S. Simons Jr. Transactivation Specificity of Glucocorticoid Versus Progesterone Receptors. ROLE OF FUNCTIONALLY DIFFERENT INTERACTIONS OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS WITH AMINO- AND CARBOXYL-TERMINAL RECEPTOR DOMAINS J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 24806 - 24816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]