This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chang, C.-Y. Articles by McDonnell, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chang, C.-Y. Articles by McDonnell, D. P.

Evaluation of Ligand-Dependent Changes in AR Structure Using Peptide Probes

Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Donald P. McDonnell, Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3813, Durham, North Carolina 27710. E-mail: donald.mcdonnell{at}duke.edu.

Mutations in the AR are frequently found in relapsed prostate cancers, some of which permit antiandrogens as well as nonandrogenic compounds to function as androgens. However, the molecular mechanism(s) by which these mutations enable this aberrant AR pharmacology is still unknown. To explore this issue, we used a series of LxxLL-containing peptides (L, leucine; x, any amino acid) to probe the conformation of the AF-2/coactivator binding pocket of AR and AR mutants when complexed with different ligands. We have identified in a previous study two peptides that bind to the wild-type AR in an agonist-dependent manner. Interestingly, we found these same peptides also interacted with several AR variants that are frequently found in antihormone refractory prostate cancers, in the presence of either androgens or antiandrogens. This suggests that the agonist activity of antiandrogens and other physiologically relevant ligands occurs because they, in the background of these mutations, allow AR-AF2 to adopt an active conformation. Initially, this result appeared to contradict the findings of others that suggest that coactivator binding to AR-AF2 is not required for AR activity. In probing this paradox further, however, we determined that the role of AR-AF2 appears to be to stabilize the overall structure of the receptor, allowing the amino terminus to interact with appropriate coactivators. This conclusion is supported by our finding that overexpression of the AF2-binding peptides blocks the interaction between the amino and carboxyl termini of AR but does not attenuate AR transcriptional activity. This can be explained by the fact that overexpression of the LxxLL-containing peptide or the amino terminus of AR appears to have a similar effect on the AR-ligand binding domain, as both have the ability to stabilize agonist binding by decreasing ligand off-rate. Thus, we believe that resistance in certain prostate cancers occurs as a consequence of receptor mutations that enable antagonist-and/or nonclassical ligand-bound AR to present a wild-type-like AF-2 conformation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Hodgson, H. C. Shen, A. N. Hollenberg, and S. P. Balk Structural basis for nuclear receptor corepressor recruitment by antagonist-liganded androgen receptor Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2008; 7(10): 3187 - 3194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Miner, B. Ardecky, K. Benbatoul, K. Griffiths, C. J. Larson, D. E. Mais, K. Marschke, J. Rosen, E. Vajda, L. Zhi, et al. Antiinflammatory glucocorticoid receptor ligand with reduced side effects exhibits an altered protein protein interaction profile PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19244 - 19249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Heemers and D. J. Tindall Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: A Diversity of Functions Converging on and Regulating the AR Transcriptional Complex Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2007; 28(7): 778 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-S. Yang, H.-W. Xin, J. B. Kelley, A. Spencer, D. L. Brautigan, and B. M. Paschal Ligand Binding to the Androgen Receptor Induces Conformational Changes That Regulate Phosphatase Interactions Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(9): 3390 - 3404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Gao and J. T. Dalton Ockham's Razor and Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs): Are We Overlooking the Role of 5{alpha}-Reductase? Mol. Interv., February 1, 2007; 7(1): 10 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Miner, W. Chang, M. S. Chapman, P. D. Finn, M. H. Hong, F. J. Lopez, K. B. Marschke, J. Rosen, W. Schrader, R. Turner, et al. An Orally Active Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Is Efficacious on Bone, Muscle, and Sex Function with Reduced Impact on Prostate Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 363 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Dubbink, R. Hersmus, A. C. W. Pike, M. Molier, A. O. Brinkmann, G. Jenster, and J. Trapman Androgen Receptor Ligand-Binding Domain Interaction and Nuclear Receptor Specificity of FXXLF and LXXLL Motifs as Determined by L/F Swapping Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 20(8): 1742 - 1755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. van de Wijngaart, M. E. van Royen, R. Hersmus, A. C. W. Pike, A. B. Houtsmuller, G. Jenster, J. Trapman, and H. J. Dubbink Novel FXXFF and FXXMF Motifs in Androgen Receptor Cofactors Mediate High Affinity and Specific Interactions with the Ligand-binding Domain J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19407 - 19416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kazmin, T. Prytkova, C. E. Cook, R. Wolfinger, T.-M. Chu, D. Beratan, J. D. Norris, C.-y. Chang, and D. P. McDonnell Linking Ligand-Induced Alterations in Androgen Receptor Structure to Differential Gene Expression: A First Step in the Rational Design of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 20(6): 1201 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Callewaert, N. Van Tilborgh, and F. Claessens Interplay between Two Hormone-Independent Activation Domains in the Androgen Receptor Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 543 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Mulholland, S. Dedhar, G. A. Coetzee, and C. C. Nelson Interaction of Nuclear Receptors with the Wnt/{beta}-Catenin/Tcf Signaling Axis: Wnt You Like to Know? Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2005; 26(7): 898 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Farla, R. Hersmus, J. Trapman, and A. B. Houtsmuller Antiandrogens prevent stable DNA-binding of the androgen receptor J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2005; 118(18): 4187 - 4198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-L. Hsu, Y.-L. Chen, H.-J. Ting, W.-J. Lin, Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, C.-T. Wu, H.-C. Chang, S. Yeh, et al. Androgen Receptor (AR) NH2- and COOH-Terminal Interactions Result in the Differential Influences on the AR-Mediated Transactivation and Cell Growth Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 19(2): 350 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Masiello, S.-Y. Chen, Y. Xu, M. C. Verhoeven, E. Choi, A. N. Hollenberg, and S. P. Balk Recruitment of {beta}-Catenin by Wild-Type or Mutant Androgen Receptors Correlates with Ligand-Stimulated Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 18(10): 2388 - 2401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Dubbink, R. Hersmus, C. S. Verma, H. A. G. M. van der Korput, C. A. Berrevoets, J. van Tol, A. C. J. Ziel-van der Made, A. O. Brinkmann, A. C. W. Pike, and J. Trapman Distinct Recognition Modes of FXXLF and LXXLL Motifs by the Androgen Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2004; 18(9): 2132 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 276 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Wang, C.-L. Hsu, J. Ni, P.-H. Wang, S. Yeh, P. Keng, and C. Chang Human Checkpoint Protein hRad9 Functions as a Negative Coregulator To Repress Androgen Receptor Transactivation in Prostate Cancer Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2004; 24(5): 2202 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Smith and B. W. O'Malley Coregulator Function: A Key to Understanding Tissue Specificity of Selective Receptor Modulators Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 45 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Sathya, C.-y. Chang, D. Kazmin, C. E. Cook, and D. P. McDonnell Pharmacological Uncoupling of Androgen Receptor-mediated Prostate Cancer Cell Proliferation and Prostate-specific Antigen Secretion Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 8029 - 8036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Lee and C. Chang Expression and Degradation of Androgen Receptor: Mechanism and Clinical Implication J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 4043 - 4054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-L. Hsu, Y.-L. Chen, S. Yeh, H.-J. Ting, Y.-C. Hu, H. Lin, X. Wang, and C. Chang The Use of Phage Display Technique for the Isolation of Androgen Receptor Interacting Peptides with (F/W)XXL(F/W) and FXXLY New Signature Motifs J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23691 - 23698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Lutz, M. Jamnongjit, W.-H. Yang, D. Jahani, A. Gill, and S. R. Hammes Selective Modulation of Genomic and Nongenomic Androgen Responses by Androgen Receptor Ligands Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2003; 17(6): 1106 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]