| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pharmacology (N.R.B., M.M.M.) and Institute of Pathology (G.P., M.A.S.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106; and Department of Pathology (D.J.T.), University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0214
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Monica M. Montano, Ph.D., Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, H. G. Wood Building W307, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106. E-mail: mxm126{at}po.cwru.edu.
Recent studies have shown that the antiestrogens tamoxifen and raloxifene may protect against breast cancer, presumably because of a blockade of estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated transcription. Another possible explanation is that antiestrogen-liganded ER transcriptionally induces genes that are protective against cancer. We previously reported that antiestrogen-liganded ERß transcriptionally activates the major detoxifying enzyme quinone reductase (QR) [NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase]. It has been established that metabolites of estrogen, termed catecholestrogens, can form DNA adducts and cause oxidative DNA damage. We hypothesize that QR inhibits estrogen-induced DNA damage by detoxification of reactive catecholestrogens. We report here that physiological concentrations of 17ß-estradiol cause oxidative DNA damage, as measured by levels of 8- hydroxydeoxyguanine, in ER-positive MCF7 breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (ER
negative/ERß positive) and nontumorigenic MCF10A breast epithelial cells (very low ER), which is dependent on estrogen metabolism. Estrogen-induced 8-hydroxydeoxyguanine was inversely correlated to QR and ERß levels and was followed by downstream induction of the DNA repair enzyme XPA. Trans-hydroxytamoxifen, raloxifene, and the pure antiestrogen ICI-182,780 protected against estradiol-mediated damage in breast cancer cells containing ERß. This is most likely due to the ability of these antiestrogens to activate expression of QR via ERß. We conclude that up-regulation of QR, either by overexpression or induction by tamoxifen, can protect breast cells against oxidative DNA damage caused by estrogen metabolites, representing a possible novel mechanism of tamoxifen prevention against breast cancer.
NURSA Molecule Pages Link:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-C. Hong, C. B. Ambrosone, J. Ahn, J.-Y. Choi, M. L. McCullough, V. L. Stevens, C. Rodriguez, M. J. Thun, and E. E. Calle Genetic Variability in Iron-Related Oxidative Stress Pathways (Nrf2, NQ01, NOS3, and HO-1), Iron Intake, and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1784 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Yu, B. M. Dietz, T. Dunlap, I. Kastrati, D. D. Lantvit, C. R. Overk, P. Yao, Z. Qin, J. L. Bolton, and G. R.J. Thatcher Structural modulation of reactivity/activity in design of improved benzothiophene selective estrogen receptor modulators: induction of chemopreventive mechanisms Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2007; 6(9): 2418 - 2428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Fowke, X.-O. Shu, Q. Dai, F. Jin, Q. Cai, Y.-T. Gao, and W. Zheng Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk: Modification by NAD(P)H:Quinone Oxoreductase (NQO1) Genetic Polymorphisms Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2004; 13(8): 1308 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Frasor, F. Stossi, J. M. Danes, B. Komm, C. R. Lyttle, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Discrimination of Agonistic versus Antagonistic Activities by Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1522 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Ansell, C. Espinosa-Nicholas, E. M. Curran, B. M. Judy, B. J. Philips, M. Hannink, and D. B. Lubahn In Vitro and in Vivo Regulation of Antioxidant Response Element-Dependent Gene Expression by Estrogens Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 311 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |