| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Endocrinology, Vol 9, 1064-1076, Copyright © 1995 by Endocrine Society
ARTICLES |
AM Nardulli, C Grobner and D Cotter
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 61801, USA.
The estrogen receptor (ER) binds to DNA fragments containing estrogen response elements (EREs) and causes them to bend. To characterize this ER-induced DNA bend and determine if it is involved in transcription activation, three different lines of investigation were used. Using MCF- 7 human breast cancer cell extracts and circular permutation analysis, it was determined that molybdate-stabilized, unoccupied cytosolic ER was unable to bind to ERE-containing DNA fragments when maintained at 4 C, but that thermal activation enabled the cytosolic receptor to bind and bend ERE-containing DNA fragments to the same extent as ER present in whole cell extracts. DNA phasing analysis was utilized to determine that ER binding induced DNA fragments containing EREs to bend toward the major groove of the DNA helix. The orientation of this bend was the same with thermally activated, unoccupied cytosolic ER and with unoccupied ER, 17 beta-estradiol-occupied ER, and 4-hydroxytamoxifen- occupied ER present in whole cell extracts. Using transient cotransfection assays, the ability of an intrinsically bent DNA sequence to replace an ERE was tested. When a single consensus ERE, which is induced to bend 56 degrees on ER binding, was replaced with a 54 degrees intrinsic DNA bending sequence, transcription was effectively activated. Similar levels of transcription were also observed when promoters contained either a 108 degrees intrinsic DNA bending sequence or two consensus EREs. However, the 54 degrees DNA bending sequence and a single ERE were unable to cooperatively activate transcription. Because the magnitude and orientation of ER-induced DNA bends are the same with the unoccupied and occupied receptor, DNA bending alone probably does not function as a transcriptional switch to turn on gene transcription. However, DNA bending may be required to provide the architecture needed for modulation of target genes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Schultz-Norton, V. A. Gabisi, Y. S. Ziegler, I. X. McLeod, J. R. Yates, and A. M. Nardulli Interaction of estrogen receptor {alpha} with proliferating cell nuclear antigen Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2007; 35(15): 5028 - 5038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Herynk and S. A. W. Fuqua Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 869 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Schultz, M. A. Loven, V. M. S. Melvin, D. P. Edwards, and A. M. Nardulli Differential Modulation of DNA Conformation by Estrogen Receptors alpha and beta J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8702 - 8707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Klinge Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2001; 29(14): 2905 - 2919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. N. Petz and A. M. Nardulli Sp1 Binding Sites and An Estrogen Response Element Half-Site Are Involved in Regulation of the Human Progesterone Receptor A Promoter Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2000; 14(7): 972 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Jones, E. Parrott, and I. N. H. White Activation of Transcription by Estrogen Receptor alpha and beta Is Cell Type- and Promoter-dependent J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 1999; 274(45): 32008 - 32014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Romine, J. R. Wood, L. A. Lamia, P. Prendergast, D. P. Edwards, and A. M. Nardulli The High Mobility Group Protein 1 Enhances Binding of the Estrogen Receptor DNA Binding Domain to the Estrogen Response Element Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 1998; 12(5): 664 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Wood, G. L. Greene, and A. M. Nardulli Estrogen Response Elements Function as Allosteric Modulators of Estrogen Receptor Conformation Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 1998; 18(4): 1927 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sathya, W. Li, C. M. Klinge, J. H. Anolik, R. Hilf, and R. A. Bambara Effects of Multiple Estrogen Responsive Elements, Their Spacing, and Location on Estrogen Response of Reporter Genes Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 1997; 11(13): 1994 - 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lazennec, T. R. Ediger, L. N. Petz, A. M. Nardulli, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen Mechanistic Aspects of Estrogen Receptor Activation Probed with Constitutively Active Estrogen Receptors: Correlations with DNA and Coregulator Interactions and Receptor Conformational Changes Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 1997; 11(9): 1375 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Verrier, N. Roodi, C. J. Yee, L. R. Bailey, R. A. Jensen, M. Bustin, and F. F. Parl High-Mobility Group (HMG) Protein HMG-1 and TATA-Binding Protein-Associated Factor TAFII30 Affect Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Transcriptional Activation Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 1997; 11(8): 1009 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |