help button home button Endocrine Society Molecular Endocrinology ENDO 08 Sessions Library
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porter, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Molecular Endocrinology 11 (11): 1569-1580
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society

Functional Synergy between the Transcription Factor Sp1 and the Estrogen Receptor

W. Porter, B. Saville, D. Hoivik and S. Safe

Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALs AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
A GC-rich oligonucleotide containing an estrogen responsive element (ERE) half-site from the heat shock protein 27 (Hsp 27) gene promoter (-105 to -84) [i.e. GGGCGGG(N)10GGTCA; Sp1(N)10ERE] forms a complex with the Sp1 and estrogen receptor (ER) proteins. Moreover, promoter-reporter constructs containing this sequence (-108 to -84 or -108 to +23) are also estrogen-responsive. Mutation of the ERE half-site in the Hsp 27-derived oligonucleotides did not result in loss of estrogen responsiveness in transient transfection studies, suggesting that estrogen inducibility was mediated through the Sp1-DNA motif. Gel mobility shift assays using 32P-labeled wild type and ERE mutant Sp1(N)10ERE and consensus Sp1 oligonucleotides showed that Sp1 protein formed a DNA-protein complex with all three nucleotides, and the intensities of retarded bands were enhanced by coincubation with wild type ER and 11C-ER, which does not contain the DNA-binding domain. ER mutants in which N-terminal (19C-ER) and C-terminal (15C-ER) regions were deleted did not enhance Sp1-DNA binding or hormone-induced transactivation of GC-rich promoter-reporter constructs in ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells, whereas both wild type and 11C-ER restored inducibility. Immunoprecipitation studies also confirmed that the Sp1 and ER proteins physically interact. The interaction of the Sp1 and ER proteins and the resulting enhanced Sp1-DNA binding is observed in the presence or absence of estrogen (hormone-independent), whereas transactivation of promoter-reporter constructs is estrogen-dependent. Thus, the results illustrate a new estrogen-dependent transactivation pathway that involves ER-protein interactions and is ERE-independent.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALs AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Modulation of genetic and cellular responses at the level of transcription by physiological or environmental stimuli may involve synergistic or antagonistic interactions of transcription factors with target gene promoter sequences (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Transactivation through nuclear hormone receptors are regulated by lipophilic hormones, which include steroids, retinoids, thyroid hormones, and vitamin D3 (2). Structural characterization of nuclear receptors has shown that these proteins are comprised of six domains (10). The DNA-binding domain, C, is involved in binding and recognizes specific DNA sequences referred to as hormone response elements. The E domain comprises a large structural component of the protein, which contains ligand-binding and dimerization motifs, and the F domain plays a role in transactivation. The A/B and E domains, located in the N-terminal and ligand-binding regions of the receptor, contain activator function 1 (AF1) and AF2, respectively. In combination, the two domains associate and subsequently synergize to activate transcription (11).

The molecular mechanism by which nuclear receptors modulate gene transcription has, in its simplest form, been recognized for some time (12). For example, 17ß-estradiol (E2) modulates transcription by binding with the estrogen receptor (ER); the liganded ER homodimerizes and binds to its cognate sequence, the estrogen responsive element (ERE), in the promoter of a target gene, resulting in either transcriptional activation or repression in a cellular and promoter-specific manner (13, 14, 15). This selectivity by steroid hormone receptors can be the result of ligand modification, such as differences in pharmacokinetics and metabolism (16), or changes in the receptor through splice variants (17, 18), or covalent modifications (2, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). In the context of complex promoters, EREs are generally found in multiple copies or encased among binding motifs for other transcription factors. For example, analysis of 5'-promoter regions in the c-myc and rat creatine kinase B (CKB) genes identified estrogen-responsive regions that did not contain classic palindromic EREs (1, 24). Dubik and Shiu (1) pointed out that both of these promoter sequences contained Sp1 and ERE-half sites, and it was suggested that transactivation of the c-myc and CKB genes may be due to interactions between ER and Sp1 complexes, which are stabilized by interactions with an Sp1(N)xERE half-site DNA-binding motif. Research in this laboratory has identified a functional Sp1(N)23ERE half-site in the noncoding strand of the cathepsin D gene (25, 26). Using the Sp1(N)23ERE sequence in both gel mobility shift and functional transient transfection studies in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and HeLa cells, it was shown that an ER/Sp1 complex binds to the Sp1(N)23ERE oligonucleotide, and E2 induces reporter gene activity using a cathepsin D Sp1/ERE-CAT construct. Although the results clearly demonstrated that a DNA-bound ER/Sp1 complex was formed, the nature of this interaction and the involvement of other proteins was not determined. Subsequent studies have also demonstrated that Sp1(N)xERE motifs also play a role in estrogen-regulated retinoic acid receptor {alpha} (RAR{alpha}) and heat shock protein 27 (Hsp 27) gene expression in human breast cancer cells (27, 28). Thus, the cooperative interactions of Sp1 and ER proteins play a role in regulation of at least five estrogen-inducible genes, including c-myc, CKB, cathepsin D, RAR{alpha}, and Hsp 27, and requires the presence of Sp1 and ERE half-site motifs in which there is considerable variability in the ERE half-site sequences, their orientation, and the number of intervening nucleotides between Sp1 and ERE DNA-binding sites. This study reports that estrogen induces reporter gene activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with a human ER expression plasmid and constructs containing GC-rich Sp1-binding sequences linked to a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter gene. In gel mobility shift assays, ER enhanced Sp1 binding to 32P-labeled oligonucleotides containing GC-rich binding sites, and, in the absence of DNA, [35S]ER and Sp1 proteins could be coimmunoprecipated with Sp1 antibodies. Thus, the functional synergy between ER and Sp1 is associated with protein-protein interactions and represents an estrogen-induced transactivation pathway that does not require ER-DNA binding.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALs AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Previous studies have identified an Sp1(N)10ERE motif in the 5'-promoter region of the Hsp 27 gene that confers estrogen inducibility on promoter-reporter constructs (28). Mutation of both Sp1- and ERE-binding sites resulted in loss of estrogen inducibility and failure to form an ER/Sp1 complex in gel mobility shift assays (28). The results in Fig. 1Go compare the induction of CAT activity by E2 in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with wild type Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE (lanes 1 and 2) and Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE (lanes 7 and 8) plasmids and with the corresponding mutant plasmids Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE and Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE plasmids, which contain mutations in the ERE half-sites. The results show that E2 induced CAT activity using both wild type (lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8) and ERE mutant (lanes 3, 4, 9, and 10) plasmids, suggesting that hormone responsiveness of these constructs did not require an intact ERE half-site. Moreover, E2 induced CAT activity in cells transfected with the Sp1-CAT(Hsp) plasmid, which contains only the Sp1 oligonucleotide insert from the Hsp 27 gene promoter. The role of Sp1 DNA-binding sites on E2-responsiveness was confirmed in MCF-7 cells transiently cotransfected with a construct containing an consensus Sp1 element (Sp1-TATA-CAT) and human ER (hER) expression plasmids. E2 caused a concentration-dependent induction of CAT activity (1.4- to 10.6-fold) (Fig. 2Go, lanes 1 through 4), and the effects were similar to those observed for wild-type Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE and Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE plasmids and constructs containing mutations in their ERE half-sites (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Role of Sp1 Motifs on E2-Induced CAT Activity in MCF-7 Cells Transiently Transfected with Plasmids Containing Wild Type or Mutant Oligonucleotide Inserts from the Hsp 27 Gene Promoter

The cells were transiently cotransfected with Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE (lanes 1 and 2), Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE (lanes 3 and 4), Sp1-CAT(Hsp) (lanes 5 and 6), Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE (lanes 7 and 8), Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE plasmids (lanes 9 and 10), and hER. The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with Me2SO (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) or 10 nM E2 (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). The relative intensities of lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, when compared with control (arbitrarily set at 100) (lane 1, 100 ± 13; lane 3, 100 ± 21; lane 5, 100 ± 2; lane 7, 100 ± 10; and lane 9, 100 ± 21) were 1013 ± 13, 1263 ± 189, 1166 ± 46, 251 ± 21 and 391 ± 17, respectively (means ± SD for three determinations).

 


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Dose-Dependent Effects of E2 on Consensus Sp1-TATA-CAT in MCF-7 Cells

MCF-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with hER and Sp1-TATA-CAT. The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with Me2SO (lane 1) or 10-10, 10-9, and 10-8 M E2 (lanes 2 through 4, respectively). The relative intensities of lanes 2 through 4, when compared with control (arbitrarily set at 100) (lane 1, 100 ± 12), were 136 ± 13, 269 ± 19, and 1057 ± 79, respectively (means ± SD for three determinations).

 
The effects of ER on Sp1 binding to a [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short oligonucleotide were determined in gel mobility shift assays. Increasing amounts of Sp1 protein (0, 10, 20, and 40 ng) caused a dose-dependent increase in an Sp1-oligonucleotide retarded band (Fig. 3Go, lanes 1 through 4). In the presence of in vitro translated ER, the dose-dependent increase in retarded band formation by the same concentration gradient of Sp1 protein was further enhanced (Fig. 3Go, lanes 5 through 8). The intensity of the ER-enhanced retarded band (lane 8) was significantly decreased by competition with a 100-fold excess of unlabeled Sp1 oligonucleotide (lane 10), but not by a 100-fold excess of wild type or mutant ERE oligonucleotides (lanes 9 and 10, respectively). Intensity of the retarded band was not decreased in competition with 100-fold excess wild type ERE (lane 9). The results summarized in Fig. 4Go also demonstrate that Sp1 binding to the mutated [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short oligonucleotide (lanes 1 through 4) is enhanced by the ER (lanes 5 through 8), and the retarded band intensity (lane 8) is decreased by unlabeled Sp1 (lane 10) but not by mutant ERE oligonucleotides (lane 9). The pattern of enhanced Sp1-DNA binding by ER using GC-rich sites in the Hsp 27 promoter was also observed using a consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide (Fig. 5AGo). The intensity of the bound Sp1-[32P]Sp1 band (lanes 2 through 4) was enhanced after incubation with ER (lanes 6 through 8), decreased by competition with 100-fold excess unlabeled Sp1 oligonucleotide (lane 9), but not affected by unlabeled mutant ERE (lane 10). The time-dependent formation of the Sp1-DNA retarded band was determined in the presence or absence of ER (Fig. 5BGo). The results show that binding was maximal after 10 min, and the overall on rate was increased 2.0- to 3.2-fold over the 15-min incubation period. In contrast, the time-dependent loss of the Sp1-DNA complex was independent of ER, and the off rate for decomposition of the complex was comparable in the presence or absence of ER (data not shown). In all of the protein-DNA-binding studies (Figs. 3 through 5GoGoGo) enhanced Sp1-DNA binding by ER was hormone-independent, since comparable results were obtained in the presence or absence of 10-8 M E2 (data not shown).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Enhanced Binding of Sp1 to Wild Type [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE Short Oligonucleotide by in Vitro Translated ER

In vitro translated proteins were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. In vitro translated ER (3 µl) or unprogrammed rabbit reticulocyte lysate (3 µl, UPL) was incubated with 2 x 10-8 M E2 on ice for 15 min. Increasing amounts of Sp1 (0, 10, 20, and 40 ng) were added to the preincubated proteins and then subjected to gel electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay using [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short oligonucleotide. The retarded Sp1 bands (see arrow) were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry using a Molecular Dynamics Zero-D software package and a Sharp JX-330 scanner. The intensity values of lanes 2 through 4 and 6 through 11 relative to the control bands (arbitrarily set at 100) (lane 1, 100 ± 29 and lane 5, 100 ± 7) were 90 ± 3, 127 ± 3, and 367 ± 11 (lanes 2 through 4, respectively) and 213 ± 5, 436 ± 12, 627 ± 10, 649 ± 9, 289 ± 8, and 534 ± 1 (lanes 6 through 11, respectively) (means ± SD for three determinations). Similar results were seen with Baculovirus expressed ER (data not shown).

 


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Enhanced Binding of Sp1 to the Mutant [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE Short Oligonucleotide by in Vitro Translated ER

In vitro translated proteins were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. In vitro translated ER (3 µl) or unprogrammed rabbit reticulocyte lysate (3 µl, UPL) was incubated with 2 x 10-8 M E2 on ice for 15 min. Increasing amounts of Sp1 (0, 10, 20, and 40 ng) were added to the preincubated proteins and then subjected to gel electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay using mutant [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short oligonucleotide. The retarded Sp1 bands (see arrow) were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry. The intensity values of lanes 2 through 4 and 6 through 10 relative to the control bands (arbitrarily set at 100) (lane 1, 100 ± 3; and lane 5, 100 ± 2) were 124 ± 1, 160 ± 2, and 310 ± 2 (lanes 2 through 4, respectively) and 211 ± 1, 389 ± 7, 918 ± 6, 917 ± 3, and 266 ± 5 (lanes 6 through 10, respectively) (means ± SD for three determinations).

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Enhanced Binding of Sp1 to [32P]Sp1 Oligonucleotide by ER

A, Enhanced binding of Sp1 to a consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide by in vitro translated ER. In vitro translated proteins were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. In vitro translated ER (3 µl) or unprogrammed rabbit reticulocyte lysate (3 µl, UPL) was incubated with 2 x 10-8 M E2 on ice for 15 min. Increasing amounts of Sp1 (0, 10, 20, and 40 ng) were added to the preincubated proteins and then subjected to gel electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay using a consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide. The retarded Sp1 bands (see arrow) were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry. The intensity values of lanes 2 through 4 and 6 through 10 relative to the control bands (arbitrarily set at 100) (lane 1, 100 ± 3; and lane 5, 100 ± 3) were 154 ± 5, 219 ± 10, and 285 ± 15 (lanes 2 through 4, respectively) and 286 ± 16, 336 ± 18, 345 ± 15, 215 ± 9, and 343 ± 16 (lanes 6 through 10, respectively) (means ± SD for three determinations). B, Effect of ER on the rate of Sp1-[32P]Sp1 retarded band formation. The time-dependent Sp1-DNA complex formation in absence (left) or presence (right) of ER was also investigated using procedures as described above. There was a significant increase in Sp1-DNA complex formation after incubation for 2, 5, 10, or 15 min, and the overall on rate was increased 2.0- to 3.2-fold in the presence of ER at these time points.

 
Although wild type hER does not bind to the [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide in gel mobility shift assays, this does not exclude the possibility of a weak ER-DNA association that stabilizes ER-Sp1 interactions. The results summarized in Fig. 6Go compare the effects of wild type hER and mutant 11C-ER, in which the ER-DNA-binding domain has been deleted, on Sp1-[32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short retarded band formation. Both wild type hER and 11C-ER (lanes 4 and 6, respectively) caused a 2-fold increase in formation of the retarded band, whereas the mutant 15C-ER and 19C-ER (containing C- and N- terminal deletions, respectively) do not affect retarded band formation (lanes 8 and 10, respectively). The 11C-ER interactions with Sp1 were observed in the absence of E2, and addition of the hormone did not affect the interaction (data not shown). These results indicate that the DNA- binding domain of the ER is not required for enhancement of Sp1-DNA complex formation. The binding data also complement transactivation assays in ER-negative MDA-MBA-231 cells transiently transfected with Hsp-CAT{ell} or Sp1-TATA-CAT (Fig. 7Go) plasmids and hER or 11C-ER expression plasmids. CAT activity is not induced by 10-8 M E2 using either Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE or Sp1-TATA-CAT plasmids, whereas hormone inducibility is restored with both plasmids after cotransfection of wild type or 11C-ER. In contrast, hormone inducibility was not observed using 15C-ER or 19C-ER expression plasmids.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Enhanced Binding of Sp1 to Wild Type [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE Short Oligonucleotide by in Vitro Translated ER

In vitro translated proteins were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. Equivalent amounts of in vitro translated UPL (lanes 1 and 2), WT-ER (lanes 3 and 4), 11C-ER (lanes 5 and 6), 15C-ER (lanes 7 and 8), and 19C-ER (lanes 9 and 10), as determined by [35S]methionine labeling, were incubated with 2 x 10-8 M E2 on ice for 15 min. Sp1 (30 ng) was added to the preincubated proteins (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 12) and then subjected to gel electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay using [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short oligonucleotide. The retarded Sp1-DNA bands (see arrow) were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry. The intensity values of bands in lanes 4, 6, 10, 11, and 12 relative to the control band (arbitrarily set at 100) (lane 2, 100 ± 1) were 234 ± 2, 226 ± 6, 115 ± 4, 126 ± 5, 10 ± 1, and 230 ± 10 (lanes 4, 6, 10, 11, and 12, respectively) (means ± SD for three determinations).

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effect of Wild Type and ER Variants on Induction of CAT Activity by E2 in MDA-MB-231 Cells Transiently Transfected with Wild Type Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE or Sp1-TATA-CAT Plasmids

MDA-MB-231 cells were cotransfected with Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE or Sp1-TATA-CAT with pCDNA3-NEO (as control) plasmids, WT-ER, 11C-ER, 15C-ER, or 19C-ER (total amount of DNA was kept constant). The transient transfection and CAT assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with Me2SO or 10-8 M E2. Results as compared with control(s) (arbitrarily set at 100) are means ± SD for three determinations.

 
The direct interactions between Sp1 and ER were investigated in coimmunoprecipitation experiments. In vitro translated [35S]ER and Sp1 were mixed and treated with the bifunctional, reversible cross-linking reagent dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate). The resulting complexes were then immunoprecipitated with Sp1 or ER polyclonal antibodies, reduced to cleave the cross-linker, and resolved by SDS-PAGE. The results in Fig. 8Go demonstrate that ER can be reversibly cross-linked to Sp1. The radiolabeled [35S]ER was immunoprecipitated by both Sp1 and ER antibodies (Fig. 8Go, lanes 2 and 5, respectively); [35S]ER alone was immunoprecipitated with ER antibodies (lane 4). Incubation of Sp1 plus 35S-labeled unprogrammed lysate (UPL) followed by immunoprecipitation with ER or Sp1 antibodies (lanes 3 and 6, respectively) did not give a radiolabeled protein. The Sp1 antibody (Ab) did not immunoprecipitate [35S]ER alone (data not shown). Experiments performed without the utilization of cross-linking reagents did not co-precipitate Sp1, indicating that the protein-protein interaction between Sp1 and ER is transient under the conditions used (data not shown). These data show that the ER and Sp1 proteins physically interact and form a protein-protein complex in the absence of DNA. Moreover, the interaction of ER and Sp1 proteins was observed in the presence or absence of E2 and therefore was hormone-independent.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Immunoprecipitation of Chemically Cross-Linked 35S-Labeled in Vitro Translated ER and Sp1 Proteins

35S-Labeled in vitro translated proteins were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. In vitro translated [35S]ER (3 µl) or 35S-labeled unprogrammed rabbit reticulocyte lysate (3 µl, UPL) were incubated with 2 x 10-8 M E2 on ice for 15 min and then treated with 5 mM dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) in the presence (lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6) or absence (lane 4) of 40 ng Sp1. The cross-linked complexes were then immunoprecipitated with either Sp1 Ab (lanes 2 and 3), ER Ab (lanes 4, 5, and 6), or preimmune serum (lane 7). The immunoprecipitated proteins were then eluted with 2x SDS sample buffer to reverse the cross-links and resolved by SDS-PAGE. The Sp1 Ab had no cross-reactivity with ER (data not shown).

 
To further characterize the interaction between Sp1 and ER, glutathione S-transferase (GST) pulldown experiments were performed. GST alone or GST-Sp1 was incubated with UPL to show the absence of specific interactions with 35S-labeled proteins in the lysate (Fig. 9Go, lanes 3 and 5, respectively). As an additional control, [35S]ER was incubated with GST alone, and negligible binding was observed (lane 4). Sp1 and ER were shown to interact through a GST-Sp1 fusion protein incubated with [35S]ER (lane 6). To further examine interactions between Sp1 and ER, truncated GST-Sp1 fusion proteins containing various regions of the Sp1 were incubated with [35S]ER and analyzed. Incubation of GST-Sp1 [amino acids (aa) 1–293] with [35S]ER showed undetectable binding to [35S]ER; however, incubation of GST-Sp1 (aa 1–621) and GST-Sp1 (aa 622–788) with [35S]ER showed that both fusion proteins bound to [35S]ER (lanes 8 and 9, respectively). These results indicate an interaction of [35S]ER with two different GST-Sp1 fusion proteins; however, the major site of interaction of ER with Sp1 protein is associated with the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of Sp1.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. In Vitro Interaction between GST-Sp1 (Wild Type and Various Truncations) with [35S]ER

Equal molar amounts of GST, GST-Sp1, GST-Sp1 (aa 1–293), GST-Sp1 (aa 1–621), and GST-Sp1 (aa 622–788) were incubated with either 35S-labeled unprogrammed lysate (UPL) or in vitro translated [35S]ER as indicated. Samples were then analyzed and visualized as described in Materials and Methods. Lane 1: 33% of total amount of UPL used in GST pulldown experiment. Lane 2: 2% of total amount of [35S]ER used for experiment. Results from incubating GST with either UPL or [35S]ER are shown in lanes 3 and 4 as indicated. Results from incubating wild type GST-Sp1 or various truncated GST-Sp1 fusion proteins with [35S]ER are shown in lanes 5 through 9 as indicated.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALs AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
The steroid hormone receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors that induce gene expression upon interaction with hormone-responsive elements, coactivators, and other proteins associated with the general transcription apparatus. Interaction of the liganded ER homodimer with both perfect and imperfect palindromic EREs has been characterized for multiple estrogen-responsive genes (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43). Recent studies have reported that Sp1(N)xERE half-site motifs located within the 5'-promoter region of the CKB, fos, cathepsin D, RAR{alpha}, and Hsp 27 genes are also sequences that bind ER in association with the Sp1 protein (1, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). For example, the results illustrated in Fig. 1Go confirm the estrogen inducibility of wild type Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE and Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE plasmids (lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8), which contain the Sp1(N)10ERE half-site (-108 to -84) identified in the Hsp 27 gene promoter (28). However, estrogen responsiveness was also observed with the same plasmids containing mutations in the ERE half-sites (lanes 3, 4, 9, and 10). These results suggested that E2-induced transactivation may require only GC-rich Sp1-binding sites, and the results illustrated in Figs. 2 through 5GoGoGoGo demonstrate 1) E2-responsiveness of constructs or oligonucleotides containing consensus Sp1 promoter sequences (Fig. 2Go), and 2) enhanced Sp1-[32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide retarded band formation after coincubation with ER protein (Figs. 3 through 5GoGoGo). Interestingly, after incubation of Sp1 and ER proteins with [32P]Sp1, a ternary Sp1/ER-[32P]Sp1 complex is not observed in gel mobility shift assays; however, ER enhances the on rate of Sp1-[32P]Sp1 formation (Fig. 5BGo). This type of protein (ER) enhancement of protein-DNA complex formation is comparable to results of other studies showing that HTLV-1 Tax, SREPB, and cyclin D1 enhance bZIP, Sp1, and ER binding to their respective enhancer sequences without forming a ternary complex (44, 45, 46). The interactions of ER with Sp1 are also similar to the functional synergy previously reported for Sp1 and the erythroid cell transcription factor, GATA, in which GATA synergistically enhances Sp1-induced transactivation in Schneider cells using Sp1-dependent promoters (47, 48, 49). Moreover, in the same cell line, RB protein and E2F1 enhanced Sp1-induced responses utilizing several different constructs containing functional Sp1- binding sites (50, 51).

The functional synergy between the ER and Sp1 nuclear transcription factors was further investigated using mutant ERs containing deletions in the DNA-binding (11C-ER), N-terminal (19C-ER), and C-terminal (15C-ER) domains. The latter two ER mutants did not enhance Sp1 binding in gel mobility shift assays using wild type [32P]Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE, which contains the Sp1(N)10ERE half-site motif from the Hsp 27 gene promoter (Fig. 6Go), or transactivation using Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE or cSp1-TATA-CAT plasmids in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (Fig. 7Go). In contrast, both wild type and 11C-ER enhance both Sp1 binding and transactivation (Figs. 6Go and 7Go), indicating that deletion of the DNA-binding domain of ER (11C-ER) does not abolish the synergy of the ER with Sp1. These results are similar to those reported for ER-AP1 interactions in which the AP1 complex serves as a tether, when bound to its cognate DNA element, to target steroid receptors such as the ER in the absence of a consensus ERE (52). This functional interaction also occurs independently of ER binding to DNA and parallels results observed for Sp1-ER interactions (Figs. 6Go and 7Go).

Both ER and Sp1 physically interact with other nuclear proteins (45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52), and the results illustrated in Fig. 8Go show that an ER/Sp1 protein complex can be coimmunoprecipitated. The interaction of Sp1 and ER proteins and enhancement of Sp1-DNA binding by ER (Figs. 3 through 5GoGoGo) was observed in the presence or absence of E2, whereas transactivation was hormone-dependent (Figs. 1Go, 2Go, and 7Go). The effects of E2 on interactions of ER with other nuclear proteins are variable; for example, GATA-1 binds ER only in the presence of E2 (47), whereas binding of cyclin D1 to the ER is E2-independent (46). Cyclin D1 enhancement of ERE-dependent reporter gene activity is also observed in the absence of hormone, whereas ER-mediated inhibition of GATA-induced responses are E2-dependent. The rationale for the hormone-independent or dependent responses associated with ER interactions with other nuclear proteins is unclear and requires further research. In this study, [35S]ER also bound to GST-Sp1 fusion protein prebound to GST-Sepharose beads. [35S]ER interacted with truncated GST-Sp1 fusion proteins containing the C-terminal (aa 622 to 788) but not the N-terminal region of the protein (Fig. 9Go). Similar results have been reported previously for interactions of Sp1 with E2F1 and GATA-1 in which binding is also mediated through the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of Sp1 (47, 51). Our results also indicated that [35S]ER interacted with regions of the B (partial) and C domains (aa 294 to 621) of Sp1 (Fig. 9Go), suggesting that interactions of Sp1 with the ER may involve more than one domain of Sp1. Our results showed that ER primarily interacted with the C-terminal region of Sp1, and the importance of the weaker interactions with other domains in the Sp1 protein requires further study.

The Sp1 protein plays a major role in regulating expression of diverse cellular and viral genes, most of which are not affected by hormones. Nevertheless, results of this study demonstrate that GC-rich binding sites are potential targets for ER-mediated transactivation. This suggests that hormone responsiveness via Sp1/ER interactions will be highly promoter- and cell-specific, and current studies in this laboratory are focused on identification of estrogen-responsive Sp1 enhancer sequences and their cell-specific hormone-induced transactivation.


    MATERIALs AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALs AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals, Cells, Oligonucleotides, and Antibodies
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). Cells were maintained in MEM with phenol red and supplemented with 10% FBS plus 10 ml antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO) in an air-carbon dioxide (95:5) atmosphere at 37 C. Cells were grown in DMEM/F12 medium without phenol red and 2.5% stripped FBS 2 days before dosing. The hER was kindly provided by Dr. Ming Tsai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). The ER deletion mutants 11C-ER, 15C-ER, and 19C-ER were kindly provided by Dr. Pierre Chambon. The wild type and mutant ERE for gel mobility shift assays has previously been described (26). The Hsp 27 and Sp1 oligonucleotides (see below) were synthesized by the Gene Technologies Laboratory, Texas A&M University (College Station, TX). Human ER Ab (H222) was purchased from Abbott Laboratories (North Chicago, IL). Sp1 monoclonal antibody (Sp1 Ab) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech (Santa Cruz, CA). Dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) was used as solvent for E2 and the antiestrogens. All other chemicals and biochemicals were the highest quality available from commercial sources.

The oligonucleotides structures and their descriptors are given below and used throughout the manuscript to identify the specific oligonucleotide. The Sp1 and ERE half-sites are underlined, and mutated bases are indicated with an asterisk. Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE Short Oligo (Sense Strand):

5'-AGCTTGGAGGGGCGGCCCTCAAACGGGTCATTGCG-3' Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short oligo (sense strand):

5'-AGCTTGGAGGGGCGGCCCTCAAACGA*A*TCATTGCG-3' Hsp 27-Sp1 oligo (sense strand):

5'-AGCTTGGAGGGGCGGCCCTCG-3' consensus Sp1 oligo (sense strand):

5'-AGCTTATTCGATCGGGGCGGGGCGAGCG-3' Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE long oligo (sense strand):

5'-AGCTTGGAGGGGCGGCCCTCAAACGGGTCATTGC-CATTA

ATAGAGACCTCAAACACCGCCTGCTAAAAATACCCGA-CTGG

AGGAGCATAAAAGCGCAGCCGAGCCCAGCGCCCCGC-ACTT

TTCTGAGGT-3' Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE long oligo (sense strand):

5'-AGCTTGGAGGGGCGGCCCTCAAACGA*A*TCATTGC-CATTA

ATAGAGACCTCAAACACCGCCTGCTAAAAATACCCGA-CTGG

AGGAGCATAAAAGCGCAGCCGAGCCCAGCGCCCCG-CACTT

TTCTGAGGT-3' E1B-TATA oligo (sense strand):

5'-GATCCGTCGACGCTGTAGGGGTATATAATGGTTGC-GGATC-3'

Cloning
The pBLTATA-CAT plasmid was made by digesting the pBLCAT2 vector with BamHI and XhoI to remove the thymidine kinase promoter; the double-stranded E1B-TATA oligonucleotide containing complementary 5'-overhangs was then inserted into the corresponding sites. The wild type Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short and mutant Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE short and consensus Sp1 oligonucleotides were cloned into the pBLTATA-CAT at the HindIII and BamHI sites as previously described (28) to give the Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE, Hsp-CATs Sp1/ERE, and Sp1-TATA-CAT plasmids, respectively. Wild type Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE and mutant Hsp-Sp1/ERE-CAT{ell} plasmids were constructed using the Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE long and Hsp 27-Sp1/ERE long oligonucleotides (see above) which were cloned into the HindIII/BamHI site of pBLCAT2 as previously reported (28). The thymidine kinase (TK) promoter was then removed by digesting wild type Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE and mutant Hsp-CAT{ell} Sp1/ERE plasmids with BamHI and XbaI and religating the complementary sites. Ligation products were transformed into DH5{alpha} cells, and clones were verified by sequencing.

Transient Transfection Assay
Cultured MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected by the calcium phosphate method with 10 µg reporter plasmid and 5 µg of either the appropriate hER plasmid or empty construct (pCDNA3-Neo, In Vitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) as a control. After 18 h, the media was changed and the cells were treated with Me2SO (0.2% total volume) or E2 (10-8 M) in Me2SO for 44 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and scraped from the plates. Cell lysates were prepared in 0.16 ml of 0.25 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, by three freeze-thaw-sonication cycles (3 min each). Cell lysates were incubated at 56 C for 7 min to remove endogenous deacetylase activity. CAT activity was determined using 0.2 mCi d-threo-[dichloroacetyl-1-14C]chloramphenicol and 4 mM acetyl-CoA as substrates. The protein concentrations were determined using BSA as a standard. After TLC, acetylated products were visualized and quantitated using a Betascope 603 Blot analyzer (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, CA). CAT activity was calculated as the percentage of that observed in cells treated with Me2SO alone (arbitrarily set at 100%), and results are expressed as means ± SD. The experiments were carried out at least three times for each treatment group.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays Using in Vitro Translated Proteins
Plasmids containing the WT-ER, 11C-ER, 15C-ER, and 19C-ER were used to in vitro transcribe and translate the corresponding proteins in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Parallel reactions with [35S]methionine were also performed to monitor translational efficiency and control for loading. Gel electromobility shift assays were performed by assembling the appropriate in vitro translated proteins in 1x binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 5% glycerol, 100 mM potassium chloride, 5 mM magnesium chloride, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA in a final volume of 25 µl). E2 was added to the reaction at a final concentration of 20 nM and then incubated on ice for 15 min. Sp1 and the labeled oligonucleotides (30,000 cpm) were then added to the reaction mixtures in the presence of 1 µg poly(deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic)acid, and the mixtures were incubated for 15 min at 25 C. Samples were loaded onto a 4% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide-bisacrylamide ratio, 30:0.8) and run at 110 V in 0.09 M Tris-0.09 M borate-2 mM EDTA, pH 8.3. Protein-DNA binding was visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry using the Scanalytics Zero-D software package (Scanalytics, Billerica, MA) and a Sharp JX-330 scanner (Mahwah, NJ).

Immunoprecipitation and Protein Cross-Linking
35S-labeled ER was synthesized and incubated with Sp1 as described above. The reaction mixture was diluted with 1x binding buffer and cross-linked with 5 mM dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate), a bifunctional, reversible cross-linker, for 1 h at 25 C, then quenched with 0.22 M lysine as described by Lin et al. (50). Radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) was carried out by adding 500 µl of RIPA buffer (PBS-1% NP40–0.5% sodium deoxycholate-0.1%DNA-10 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)-aprotinin 30 µl/ml-sodium orthovanadate 10 µl/ml) and 1 µg of antisera. After incubating for 1 h at 4 C, 20 µl of Agarose A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz) was added and incubated (rocking) for 1 h at 4 C. The bound complex was then washed four times with RIPA buffer containing 2 M urea. The precipitated proteins were then eluted with 2X SDS sample buffer to reverse the crosslinks and resolved on a 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, dried and visualized by autoradiography.

GST Pulldown Experiment
GST, GST-Sp1, or GST-Sp1 (truncated) fusion proteins were purified essentially as described by the manufacturer in GST: Gene Fusion System (Pharmacia Biotech). DH5{alpha} bacterial cells transformed with either pGEX-4T-1 or with plasmids pGEX-2TK-MCS-Sp1, pGEX-2TK-MCS-Sp1 (1–293), pGEX-2TK-MCS-Sp1 (1 -621), or pGEX-2TK-MCS-Sp1 (622–788) kindly provided by Professor Erhard Wintersberger (51) were grown overnight in Lauria broth + 50 µg/ml ampicillin at 37 C. Cultures were then diluted 1:10 with Lauria broth + 50 µg/ml ampicillin and grown at 37 C until A600 reached between 0.5 to 0.7 (about 2–3 h). Protein expression was induced with 0.05 mM isopropyl-D-thiogalactopyranoside, and cultures were allowed to grow for an additional 1.5 h; 1.5 ml were transferred to an eppitube and centrifuged, and the pellet was resuspended in 300 µl of sonication buffer [150 mM KCl, 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.5 mM EDTA, 5.0 mM MgCl2, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 0.05% Nonidet P-40] supplemented with 1.0 mM PMSF, and 10 µg/µl aprotinin. Cells were lysed by sonication, and the crude bacterial extract was either frozen at -80 C or used immediately. Ten microliters of a 50% slurry of glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads were added to bacterial extracts containing either GST, wild type, or truncated GST-Sp1 fusion proteins and incubated at room temperature for 30 min with shaking; the beads were then washed twice with sonication buffer and once with hER wash buffer (250 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5.0 mM EDTA]. After the final wash, 80 µl of hER binding buffer (hER wash buffer supplemented with 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1.0 mM PMSF, 10 µg/µl aprotinin) and 3 µl of transcription and translation rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) and in vitro translated hER were added to the beads. This reaction was incubated at 4 C for 2 h and the beads were washed four times with hER wash buffer. Ten microliters of SDS loading buffer were added to the beads and heated at 100 C for 3 min, and samples were analyzed on a 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were fixed to the gel with 30% methanol/10% acetic acid solution for 20 min. The gel was then treated with EN3HANCE (DuPont), dried and exposed to film.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Address requests for reprints to: Stephen Safe, Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466.

This work was supported by NIH Grant ES-04176, the Robert A. Welch Foundation, and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Received for publication January 6, 1997. Revision received June 24, 1997. Accepted for publication July 17, 1997.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALs AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Dubik D, Shiu RP 1992 Mechanism of estrogen activation of c-myc oncogene expression. Oncogene 7:1587–1594[Medline]
  2. Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1994 Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Annu Rev Biochem 63:451–486[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Truss M, Beato M 1993 Steroid hormone receptors: interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid and transcription factors. Endocr Rev 14:459–479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lee JW, Choi HS, Gyuris J, Brent R, Moore DD 1995 Two classes of proteins dependent on either the presence or absence of thyroid hormone for interaction with the thyroid hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 9:243–254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Smith CL, Onate SA, Tsai MJ, Omalley BW 1996 CREB binding protein acts synergistically with steroid receptor coactivator-1 to enhance steroid receptor-dependent transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8884–8888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Liu F, Green MR 1994 Promoter targeting by adenovirus E1a through interaction with different cellular DNA-binding domains. Nature 368:520–525[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Liu M, Freedman LP 1997 Transcriptional synergism between the vitamin D3 receptor and other nonreceptor transcription factors. Mol Endocrinol 8:1593–1604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cheng X, Reginato MJ, Andrews NC, Lazar MA 1997 The transcriptional integrator CREB-binding protein mediates positive cross talk between nuclear hormone receptors and the hematopoietic bZip protein p45/NF-E2. Mol Cell Biol 17:1407–1416[Abstract]
  9. Carlone DL, Richards JS 1997 Functional interactions, phosphorylation, and levels of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate-regulatory element binding protein and steroidogenic factor-1 mediate hormone-regulated and constitutive expression of aromatase in gonadal cells. Mol Endocrinol 11:292–304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Carson-Jurica MA, Schrader WT, O’Malley BW 1990 Steroid receptor family: structure and functions. Endocr Rev 11:201–220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kraus WL, McInerney EM, Katzenellenbogen BS 1995 Ligand-dependent, transcriptionally productive association of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of a steroid hormone nuclear receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:12314–12318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. McDonnell DP, Clemm DL, Hermann T, Goldman ME, Pike JW 1995 Analysis of estrogen receptor function in vitro reveals three distinct classes of antiestrogens. Mol Endocrinol 9:659–669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. McDonnell DP, Vegeto E, O’Malley BW 1992 Identification of a negative regulatory function for steroid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10563–10567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Pham TA, Hwung YP, Santiso-Mere D, McDonnell DP, O’Malley BW 1992 Ligand-dependent and -independent function of the transactivation regions of the human estrogen receptor in yeast. Mol Endocrinol 6:1043–1050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Metzger D, Losson R, Bornert JM, Lemoine Y, Chambon P 1992 Promoter specificity of the two transcriptional activation functions of the human oestrogen receptor in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 20:2813–2817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yang NN, Venugopalan M, Hardikar S, Glasebrook A 1996 Identification of an estrogen response element activated by metabolites of 17ß-estradiol and raloxifene. Science 273:1222–1225[Abstract]
  17. Fuqua SA, Fitzgerald SD, Chamness GC, Tandon AK, McDonnell DP, Nawaz Z, O’Malley BW, McGuire WL 1991 Variant human breast tumor estrogen receptor with constitutive transcriptional activity. Cancer Res 51:105–109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gotteland M, Desauty G, Delarue JC, Liu L, May E 1995 Human estrogen receptor messenger RNA variants in both normal and tumor breast tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol 112:1–13[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Gonzalez GA, Montminy MR 1989 Cyclic AMP stimulates somatostatin gene transcription by phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133. Cell 59:675–680[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kato S, Endoh H, Masuhiro Y, Kitamoto T, Uchiyama S, Sasaki H, Masushige S, Gotoh Y, Nishida E, Kawashima H, et al 1995 Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Science 270:1491–1494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Joel PB, Traish AM, Lannigan DA 1995 Estradiol and phorbol ester cause phosphorylation of serine 118 in the human estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 9:1041–1052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bunone G, Briand PA, Miksicek RJ, Picard D 1996 Activation of the unliganded estrogen receptor by EGF involves the MAP kinase pathway and direct phosphorylation. EMBO J 15:2174–2183[Medline]
  23. Arnold SF, Obourn JD, Yudt MR, Carter TH, Notides AC 1995 In vivo and in vitro phosphorylation of the human estrogen receptor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 52:159–171[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Wu-Peng XS, Pugliese TE, Dickerman HW, Pentecost BT 1992 Delineation of sites mediating estrogen regulation of the rat creatine kinase B gene. Mol Endocrinol 6:231–240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Krishnan V, Wang X, Safe S 1994 Estrogen receptor-Sp1 complexes mediate estrogen-induced cathepsin D gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 269:15912–15917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Krishnan V, Porter W, Santostefano M, Wang X, Safe S 1995 Molecular mechanism of inhibition of estrogen-induced cathepsin D gene expression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in MCF-7 cells. Mol Cell Biol 15:6710–6719[Abstract]
  27. Rishi AK, Shao ZM, Baumann RG, Li XS, Sheikh MS, Kimura S, Bashirelahi N, Fontana JA 1995 Estradiol regulation of the human retinoic acid receptor alpha gene in human breast carcinoma cells is mediated via an imperfect half-palindromic estrogen response element and Sp1 motifs. Cancer Res 55:4999–5006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Porter W, Wang F, Wang W, Duan R, Safe S 1996 Role of an Sp1/ERE in E2-induced Hsp-27 gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 10:1371–1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hyder SM, Shipley GL, Stancel GM 1995 Estrogen action in target cells: selective requirements for activation of different hormone response elements. Mol Cell Endocrinol 112:35–43[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Burch JB, Evans MI, Friedman TM, O’Malley PJ 1988 Two functional estrogen response elements are located upstream of the major chicken vitellogenin gene. Mol Cell Biol 8:1123–1131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Klein-Hitpass L, Ryffel GU, Heitlinger E, Cato AC 1988 A 13 bp palindrome is a functional estrogen responsive element and interacts specifically with estrogen receptor. Nucleic Acids Res 16:647–663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hyder SM, Stancel GM, Nawaz Z, McDonnell DP, Loose-Mitchell DS 1992 Identification of an estrogen response element in the 3'-flanking region of the murine c-fos protooncogene. J Biol Chem 267:18047–18054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hyder SM, Stancel GM 1994 In vitro interaction of uterine estrogen receptor with the estrogen response element present in the 3'-flanking region of the murine c-fos protooncogene. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 48:69–79[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Tora L, Gaub MP, Mader S, Dierich A, Bellard M, Chambon P 1988 Cell-specific activity of a GGTCA half-palindromic oestrogen-responsive element in the chicken ovalbumin gene promoter. EMBO J 7:3771–3778[Medline]
  35. Darwish H, Krisinger J, Furlow JD, Smith C, Murdoch FE, Deluca HF 1991 An estrogen-responsive element mediates the transcriptional regulation of calbindin D-9K gene in rat uterus. J Biol Chem 266:551–558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Maurer RA, Notides AC 1987 Identification of an estrogen-responsive element from the 5'-flanking region of the rat prolactin gene. Mol Cell Biol 7:4247–4254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Shupnik MA, Rosenzweig BA 1991 Identification of an estrogen-responsive element in the rat LH beta gene. DNA-estrogen receptor interactions and functional analysis. J Biol Chem 266:17084–17091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Slater EP, Redeuihl G, Theis K, Suske G, Beato M 1990 The uteroglobin promoter contains a noncanonical estrogen responsive element. Mol Endocrinol 4:604–610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Berry M, Nunez A, Chambon P 1989 Estrogen-responsive element of the human pS2 gene is an imperfectly palindromic sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:1218–1222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Richard S, Zingg HH 1990 The human oxytocin gene promoter is regulated by estrogens. J Biol Chem 265:6098–6103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Savouret JF, Bailly A, Misrahi M, Rarch C, Redeuilh G, Chauchereau A, Milgrom E 1991 Characterization of the hormone responsive element involved in the regulation of the progesterone receptor gene. EMBO J 10:1875–1883[Medline]
  42. Weisz A, Rosales R 1990 Identification of an estrogen response element upstream of the human c-fos gene that binds the estrogen receptor and the AP-1 transcription factor. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5097–5106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Liu Y, Teng CT 1996 Estrogen response module of the mouse lactoferrin gene contains overlapping chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor and estrogen receptor-binding elements. Mol Endocrinol 6:355–364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Wagner SA, Green MR 1993 HTLV-1 Tax protein stimulation of DNA binding of bZIP proteins by enhancing dimerization. Science 266:395–399
  45. Sanchez HB, Yieh L, Osborne TF 1995 Cooperation by sterol regulatory element-binding protein and Sp1 in sterol regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem 270:1161–1169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Zwijsen RML, Wientjens E, Klompmaker R, Sman J, Bernards R, Michalides RJAM 1997 CDK-independent activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Cell 88:405–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Merika M, Orkin SH 1995 Functional synergy and physical interactions of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 with the Krüppel family proteins Sp1 and EKLF. Mol Cell Biol 15:2437–2447[Abstract]
  48. Shivdasani RA, Orkin SH 1996 The transcriptional control of hematopoiesis. Blood 87:4025–4039[Free Full Text]
  49. Gregory RC, Taxman DJ, Seshasayee D, Kensinger MH, Bieker JJ, Wojchowski DM 1996 Functional interaction of GATA1 with erythroid Krüppel-like factor and Sp1 at defined erythroid promoters. Blood 87:1793–1801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Lin S-Y, Black AR, Kostic D, Pajovic S, Hoover CN, Azizkhan JC 1996 Cell cycle-regulated association of E2F1 and Sp1 is related to their functional interaction. Mol Cell Biol 16:1668–1675[Abstract]
  51. Karlseder J, Rotheneder H, Wintersberger E 1996 Interaction of Sp1 with the growth- and cell cycle-regulated transcription factor E2F. Mol Cell Biol 16:1659–1667[Abstract]
  52. Webb P, Lopez GN, Uht RM, Kushner PJ 1995 Tamoxifen activation of the estrogen receptor/AP-1 pathway: potential origin for the cell-specific estrogen-like effects of antiestrogens. Mol Endocrinol 9:443–456[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Castellano, G. Giamas, J. Jacob, R. C. Coombes, W. Lucchesi, P. Thiruchelvam, G. Barton, L. R. Jiao, R. Wait, J. Waxman, et al.
The estrogen receptor-{alpha}-induced microRNA signature regulates itself and its transcriptional response
PNAS, September 15, 2009; 106(37): 15732 - 15737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
V. Matagne, C. Mastronardi, R. A. Shapiro, D. M. Dorsa, and S. R. Ojeda
Hypothalamic Expression of Eap1 Is Not Directly Controlled by Ovarian Steroids
Endocrinology, April 1, 2009; 150(4): 1870 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. Bhat-Nakshatri, G. Wang, H. Appaiah, N. Luktuke, J. S. Carroll, T. R. Geistlinger, M. Brown, S. Badve, Y. Liu, and H. Nakshatri
AKT Alters Genome-Wide Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Binding and Impacts Estrogen Signaling in Breast Cancer
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2008; 28(24): 7487 - 7503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Safe and K. Kim
Non-classical genomic estrogen receptor (ER)/specificity protein and ER/activating protein-1 signaling pathways
J. Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 41(5): 263 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. Wu, R. Xu, K. Kim, J. Martin, and S. Safe
In Vivo Profiling of Estrogen Receptor/Specificity Protein-Dependent Transactivation
Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5696 - 5705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S.-H. Park, L. W. T. Cheung, A. S. T. Wong, and P. C. K. Leung
Estrogen Regulates Snail and Slug in the Down-Regulation of E-Cadherin and Induces Metastatic Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells through Estrogen Receptor {alpha}
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2008; 22(9): 2085 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Grasselli, S. Nanni, C. Colussi, A. Aiello, V. Benvenuti, G. Ragone, F. Moretti, A. Sacchi, S. Bacchetti, C. Gaetano, et al.
Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} and Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Nuclear Complex Regulates Transcription of Human Telomerase
Circ. Res., July 3, 2008; 103(1): 34 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. R. Hawse, M. Subramaniam, D. G. Monroe, A. H. Hemmingsen, J. N. Ingle, S. Khosla, M. J. Oursler, and T. C. Spelsberg
Estrogen Receptor {beta} Isoform-Specific Induction of Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Inducible Early Gene-1 in Human Osteoblast Cells: An Essential Role for the Activation Function 1 Domain
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 22(7): 1579 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Ray, F. Xu, H. Wang, and S. K. Das
Cooperative Control via Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1/T Cell Factor 3 and Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} for Uterine Gene Regulation by Estrogen
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1125 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. Hewetson and B. S. Chilton
Progesterone-Dependent Deoxyribonucleic Acid Looping between RUSH/SMARCA3 and Egr-1 Mediates Repression by c-Rel
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 22(4): 813 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Hu, H. K. Kinyamu, L. Wang, J. Martin, T. K. Archer, and C. Teng
Estrogen Induces Estrogen-related Receptor {alpha} Gene Expression and Chromatin Structural Changes in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2008; 283(11): 6752 - 6763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. J. Higgins, S. Liu, M. Abdelrahim, K. Vanderlaag, X. Liu, W. Porter, R. Metz, and S. Safe
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Expression Is Down-Regulated by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells by Estrogen Receptor {alpha}/Sp Proteins
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 22(2): 388 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Bagamasbad, K. L. Howdeshell, L. M. Sachs, B. A. Demeneix, and R. J. Denver
A Role for Basic Transcription Element-binding Protein 1 (BTEB1) in the Autoinduction of Thyroid Hormone Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2275 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. D. DuSell, M. Umetani, P. W. Shaul, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and D. P. McDonnell
27-Hydroxycholesterol Is an Endogenous Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 22(1): 65 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. R. Cederroth, O. Schaad, P. Descombes, P. Chambon, J.-D. Vassalli, and S. Nef
Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Is a Major Contributor to Estrogen-Mediated Fetal Testis Dysgenesis and Cryptorchidism
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5507 - 5519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Khan, F. Wu, S. Liu, Q. Wu, and S. Safe
Role of specificity protein transcription factors in estrogen-induced gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 39(4): 289 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Li, D. Mitchell, J. Luo, Z. Yi, S.-G. Cho, J. Guo, X. Li, G. Ning, X. Wu, and M. Liu
Estrogen Regulates KiSS1 Gene Expression through Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and SP Protein Complexes
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4821 - 4828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Martin, M. B. Taylor, G. Krikun, C. Lockwood, G. E. Akbas, and H. S. Taylor
Differential Cell-Specific Modulation of HOXA10 by Estrogen and Specificity Protein 1 Response Elements
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1920 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Mauro, S. Catalano, G. Bossi, M. Pellegrino, I. Barone, S. Morales, C. Giordano, V. Bartella, I. Casaburi, and S. Ando
Evidences that Leptin Up-regulates E-Cadherin Expression in Breast Cancer: Effects on Tumor Growth and Progression
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3412 - 3421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. A. Stoner, S. S. Auerbach, S. M. Zamule, S. C. Strom, and C. J. Omiecinski
Transactivation of a DR-1 PPRE by a human constitutive androstane receptor variant expressed from internal protein translation start sites
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2007; 35(7): 2177 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
P. Galluzzo, F. Caiazza, S. Moreno, and M. Marino
Role of ER{beta} palmitoylation in the inhibition of human colon cancer cell proliferation
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2007; 14(1): 153 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. G. Monroe, F. J. Secreto, J. R. Hawse, M. Subramaniam, S. Khosla, and T. C. Spelsberg
Estrogen Receptor Isoform-specific Regulation of the Retinoblastoma-binding Protein 1 (RBBP1) Gene: ROLES OF AF1 AND ENHANCER ELEMENTS
J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28596 - 28604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. S. Carroll and M. Brown
Estrogen Receptor Target Gene: An Evolving Concept
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 20(8): 1707 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. J. Higgins, S. Liu, M. Abdelrahim, K. Yoon, K. Vanderlaag, W. Porter, R. P. Metz, and S. Safe
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 Expression Is Induced by 17{beta}-Estradiol in ZR-75 Breast Cancer Cells by Estrogen Receptor {alpha}/Sp Proteins
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3285 - 3295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Stossi, V. S. Likhite, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Estrogen-occupied Estrogen Receptor Represses Cyclin G2 Gene Expression and Recruits a Repressor Complex at the Cyclin G2 Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16272 - 16278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Haeger, M. E. Andres, M. I. Forray, C. Daza, S. Araneda, and K. Gysling
Estrogen receptors alpha and beta differentially regulate the transcriptional activity of the Urocortin gene.
J. Neurosci., May 3, 2006; 26(18): 4908 - 4916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
M L Panno, L Mauro, S Marsico, D Bellizzi, P Rizza, C Morelli, M Salerno, F Giordano, and S Ando'
Evidence that the mouse insulin receptor substrate-1 belongs to the gene family on which the promoter is activated by estrogen receptor {alpha} through its interaction with Sp1
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 36(1): 91 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. Malakooti, R. Sandoval, V. C. Memark, P. K. Dudeja, and K. Ramaswamy
Zinc finger transcription factor Egr-1 is involved in stimulation of NHE2 gene expression by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): G653 - G663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
V. Gburcik, N. Bot, M. Maggiolini, and D. Picard
SPBP Is a Phosphoserine-Specific Repressor of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2005; 25(9): 3421 - 3430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
A. Droit, G. G Poirier, and J. M Hunter
Experimental and bioinformatic approaches for interrogating protein-protein interactions to determine protein function
J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 263 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Kim, R. Barhoumi, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Analysis of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}-Sp1 Interactions in Breast Cancer Cells by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 19(4): 843 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
L. Bjornstrom and M. Sjoberg
Mechanisms of Estrogen Receptor Signaling: Convergence of Genomic and Nongenomic Actions on Target Genes
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 19(4): 833 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
N. Kanda and S. Watanabe
17{beta}-Estradiol enhances heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor production in human keratinocytes
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): C813 - C823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. Yuan, A. Gong, and C. Y.F. Young
Involvement of transcription factor Sp1 in quercetin-mediated inhibitory effect on the androgen receptor in human prostate cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2005; 26(4): 793 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. E. Lee, K. Kim, J. C. Sacchettini, C. V. Smith, and S. Safe
DRIP150 Coactivation of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} in ZR-75 Breast Cancer Cells Is Independent of LXXLL Motifs
J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 8819 - 8830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
Y-L Zhao, W-D Han, Q Li, Y-M Mu, X-C Lu, L Yu, H-J Song, X Li, J-M Lu, and C-Y Pan
Mechanism of transcriptional regulation of LRP16 gene expression by 17-{beta} estradiol in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 77 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Bardin, F. Moll, R. Margueron, C. Delfour, M. L. Chu, T. Maudelonde, V. Cavailles, and P. Pujol
Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of Fibulin-1 by Estrogens Leads to Differential Induction of Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Variants in Ovarian and Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 760 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
N. Fujita, M. Kajita, P. Taysavang, and P. A. Wade
Hormonal Regulation of Metastasis-Associated Protein 3 Transcription in Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 18(12): 2937 - 2949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Hong, I. Samudio, S. Liu, M. Abdelrahim, and S. Safe
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Dependent Activation of p21 in Panc-28 Pancreatic Cancer Cells Involves Sp1 and Sp4 Proteins
Endocrinology, December 1, 2004; 145(12): 5774 - 5785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Ahn, M. D. Gammon, R. M. Santella, M. M. Gaudet, J. A. Britton, S. L. Teitelbaum, M. B. Terry, A. I. Neugut, P. D. Josephy, and C. B. Ambrosone
Myeloperoxidase Genotype, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 64(20): 7634 - 7639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. E. Damdimopoulos, A. Miranda-Vizuete, E. Treuter, J.-A. Gustafsson, and G. Spyrou
An Alternative Splicing Variant of the Selenoprotein Thioredoxin Reductase Is a Modulator of Estrogen Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38721 - 38729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A Bardin, N Boulle, G Lazennec, F Vignon, and P Pujol
Loss of ER{beta} expression as a common step in estrogen-dependent tumor progression
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 537 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. O'Lone, M. C. Frith, E. K. Karlsson, and U. Hansen
Genomic Targets of Nuclear Estrogen Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2004; 18(8): 1859 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Grummer, S.W. Hewitt, O. Traub, K.S. Korach, and E. Winterhager
Different Regulatory Pathways of Endometrial Connexin Expression: Preimplantation Hormonal-Mediated Pathway Versus Embryo Implantation-Initiated Pathway
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 273 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. N. Dieudonne, M. C. Leneveu, Y. Giudicelli, and R. Pecquery
Evidence for functional estrogen receptors {alpha} and {beta} in human adipose cells: regional specificities and regulation by estrogens
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): C655 - C661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Huang, D. Sun, Z. Wu, C. Yan, M. A. Carroll, H. Jiang, J. R. Falck, and G. Kaley
Estrogen Elicits Cytochrome P450--Mediated Flow-Induced Dilation of Arterioles in NO Deficiency: Role of PI3K-Akt Phosphorylation in Genomic Regulation
Circ. Res., February 6, 2004; 94(2): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Spychala, E. Lazarowski, A. Ostapkowicz, L. H. Ayscue, A. Jin, and B. S. Mitchell
Role of Estrogen Receptor in the Regulation of Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase and Adenosine in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 708 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. E. Colosimo, S. Tran, and P. Sengupta
The Divergent Orphan Nuclear Receptor ODR-7 Regulates Olfactory Neuron Gene Expression via Multiple Mechanisms in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1779 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. C. Spink, B. H. Katz, M. M. Hussain, B. T. Pentecost, Z. Cao, and B. C. Spink
Estrogen regulates Ah responsiveness in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2003; 24(12): 1941 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. L. Zheng, W. Zheng, B.-l. Chang, X.-O. Shu, Q. Cai, H. Yu, Q. Dai, J. Xu, and Y.-T. Gao
Joint Effect of Estrogen Receptor {beta} Sequence Variants and Endogenous Estrogen Exposure on Breast Cancer Risk in Chinese Women
Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7624 - 7629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Liu, Z. Zhang, W. Gladwell, and C. T. Teng
Estrogen Stimulates Estrogen-Related Receptor {alpha} Gene Expression through Conserved Hormone Response Elements
Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4894 - 4904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Kinoshita and S. Chen
Induction of Aromatase (CYP19) Expression in Breast Cancer Cells through a Nongenomic Action of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}
Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 63(13): 3546 - 3555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. R. Davie
Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase Activity by Butyrate
J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2485S - 2493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Khan, M. Abdelrahim, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Estrogen Receptor/Sp1 Complexes Are Required for Induction of cad Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2325 - 2335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Harendza, D. H. Lovett, U. Panzer, Z. Lukacs, P. Kuhnl, and R. A. K. Stahl
Linked Common Polymorphisms in the Gelatinase A Promoter Are Associated with Diminished Transcriptional Response to Estrogen and Genetic Fitness
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 20490 - 20499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Ngwenya and S. Safe
Cell Context-Dependent Differences in the Induction of E2F-1 Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 and ZR-75 Cells
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1675 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Kim, N. Thu, B. Saville, and S. Safe
Domains of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) Required for ER{alpha}/Sp1-Mediated Activation of GC-Rich Promoters by Estrogens and Antiestrogens in Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2003; 17(5): 804 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Wormke, M. Stoner, B. Saville, K. Walker, M. Abdelrahim, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mediates Degradation of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} through Activation of Proteasomes
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 1843 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
V. Sriraman, S. C. Sharma, and J. S. Richards
Transactivation of the Progesterone Receptor Gene in Granulosa Cells: Evidence that Sp1/Sp3 Binding Sites in the Proximal Promoter Play a Key Role in Luteinizing Hormone Inducibility
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2003; 17(3): 436 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Pedram, M. Razandi, M. Aitkenhead, C. C. W. Hughes, and E. R. Levin
Integration of the Non-genomic and Genomic Actions of Estrogen. MEMBRANE-INITIATED SIGNALING BY STEROID TO TRANSCRIPTION AND CELL BIOLOGY
J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50768 - 50775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Bjornstrom and M. Sjoberg
Mutations in the Estrogen Receptor DNA-binding Domain Discriminate between the Classical Mechanism of Action and Cross-talk with Stat5b and Activating Protein 1 (AP-1)
J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 48479 - 48483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Jakacka, M. Ito, F. Martinson, T. Ishikawa, E. J. Lee, and J. L. Jameson
An Estrogen Receptor (ER){alpha} Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding Domain Knock-In Mutation Provides Evidence for Nonclassical ER Pathway Signaling in Vivo
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2002; 16(10): 2188 - 2201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
L. Molero, M. Garcia-Duran, J. Diaz-Recasens, L. Rico, S. Casado, and A. Lopez-Farre
Expression of estrogen receptor subtypes and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in neutrophils from women and men: Regulation by estrogen
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2002; 56(1): 43 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Abdelrahim, I. Samudio, R. Smith III, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Small Inhibitory RNA Duplexes for Sp1 mRNA Block Basal and Estrogen-induced Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Progression in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28815 - 28822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Lethimonier, G. Flouriot, O. Kah, and B. Ducouret
The Glucocorticoid Receptor Represses the Positive Autoregulation of the Trout Estrogen Receptor Gene by Preventing the Enhancer Effect of a C/EBP{beta}-Like Protein
Endocrinology, August 1, 2002; 143(8): 2961 - 2974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. Qin, T. Nguyen, J. Stewart, I. Samudio, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Estrogen Up-Regulation of p53 Gene Expression in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Is Mediated by Calmodulin Kinase IV-Dependent Activation of a Nuclear Factor {kappa}B/CCAAT-Binding Transcription Factor-1 Complex
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2002; 16(8): 1793 - 1809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. R. Ediger, S.-E. Park, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Estrogen Receptor Inducibility of the Human Na+/H+ Exchanger Regulatory Factor/Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin Binding Protein 50 (NHE-RF/EBP50) Gene Involving Multiple Half-Estrogen Response Elements
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2002; 16(8): 1828 - 1839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. Meisel
Cancer, genes and gender
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2002; 23(6): 1087 - 1088.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. R. Levin
Genome and Hormones: Gender Differences in Physiology: Invited Review: Cell localization, physiology, and nongenomic actions of estrogen receptors
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2001; 91(4): 1860 - 1867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. Nilsson, S. Makela, E. Treuter, M. Tujague, J. Thomsen, G. Andersson, E. Enmark, K. Pettersson, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson
Mechanisms of Estrogen Action
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1535 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. G. V. Martini and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Regulation of Prothymosin {alpha} Gene Expression by Estrogen in Estrogen Receptor-Containing Breast Cancer Cells via Upstream Half-Palindromic Estrogen Response Element Motifs
Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3493 - 3501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. M. Klinge
Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements
Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2001; 29(14): 2905 - 2919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Li, M. R. Briggs, T. E. Ahlborn, F. B. Kraemer, and J. Liu
Requirement of Sp1 and Estrogen Receptor {{alpha}} Interaction in 17{beta}-Estradiol-Mediated Transcriptional Activation of the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Gene Expression
Endocrinology, April 1, 2001; 142(4): 1546 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. Morin, G. R. Woodcock, L. A. Nichols, and L. J. Holland
Heterodimerization between the Glucocorticoid Receptor and the Unrelated DNA-Binding Protein, Xenopus Glucocorticoid Receptor Accessory Factor
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2001; 15(3): 458 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. Samudio, C. Vyhlidal, F. Wang, M. Stoner, I. Chen, M. Kladde, R. Barhoumi, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Polymerase {{alpha}} Gene Expression in MCF-7 Cells by 17{{beta}}-Estradiol
Endocrinology, March 1, 2001; 142(3): 1000 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. E. Compston
Sex Steroids and Bone
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2001; 81(1): 419 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Razandi, A. Pedram, and E. R. Levin
Plasma Membrane Estrogen Receptors Signal to Antiapoptosis in Breast Cancer
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2000; 14(9): 1434 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
O. Loudig, C. Babichuk, J. White, S. Abu-Abed, C. Mueller, and M. Petkovich
Cytochrome P450RAI(CYP26) Promoter: A Distinct Composite Retinoic Acid Response Element Underlies the Complex Regulation of Retinoic Acid Metabolism
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2000; 14(9): 1483 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Sugawara, M. Saito, and S. Fujimoto
Sp1 and SF-1 Interact and Cooperate in the Regulation of Human Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Gene Expression
Endocrinology, August 1, 2000; 141(8): 2895 - 2903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
L. N. Petz and A. M. Nardulli
Sp1 Binding Sites and An Estrogen Response Element Half-Site Are Involved in Regulation of the Human Progesterone Receptor A Promoter
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2000; 14(7): 972 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
W. Xie, R. Duan, I. Chen, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of Thymidylate Synthase by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2000; 141(7): 2439 - 2449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Misiti, S. Nanni, G. Fontemaggi, Y.-S. Cong, J. Wen, H. W. Hirte, G. Piaggio, A. Sacchi, A. Pontecorvi, S. Bacchetti, et al.
Induction of hTERT Expression and Telomerase Activity by Estrogens in Human Ovary Epithelium Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2000; 20(11): 3764 - 3771.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Salvatori, L. Ravenna, M. P. Felli, M. R. Cardillo, M. A. Russo, L. Frati, A. Gulino, and E. Petrangeli
Identification of an Estrogen-Mediated Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding Independent Transactivation Pathway on the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Promoter
Endocrinology, June 1, 2000; 141(6): 2266 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Lethimonier, G. Flouriot, Y. Valotaire, O. Kah, and B. Ducouret
Transcriptional Interference Between Glucocorticoid Receptor and Estradiol Receptor Mediates the Inhibitory Effect of Cortisol on Fish Vitellogenesis
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2000; 62(6): 1763 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. van den Wijngaard, W. R. Mulder, R. Dijkema, C. J .C. Boersma, S. Mosselman, E. J. J. van Zoelen, and W. Olijve
Antiestrogens Specifically Up-Regulate Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 Promoter Activity in Human Osteoblastic Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2000; 14(5): 623 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Oesterreich, Q. Zhang, T. Hopp, S. A. W. Fuqua, M. Michaelis, H. H. Zhao, J. R. Davie, C. K. Osborne, and A. V. Lee
Tamoxifen-Bound Estrogen Receptor (ER) Strongly Interacts with the Nuclear Matrix Protein HET/SAF-B, a Novel Inhibitor of ER-Mediated Transactivation
Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2000; 14(3): 369 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Saville, M. Wormke, F. Wang, T. Nguyen, E. Enmark, G. Kuiper, J.-A. Gustafsson, and S. Safe
Ligand-, Cell-, and Estrogen Receptor Subtype (alpha /beta )-dependent Activation at GC-rich (Sp1) Promoter Elements
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2000; 275(8): 5379 - 5387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Poukka, P. Aarnisalo, H. Santti, O. A. Janne, and J. J. Palvimo
Coregulator Small Nuclear RING Finger Protein (SNURF) Enhances Sp1- and Steroid Receptor-mediated Transcription by Different Mechanisms
J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2000; 275(1): 571 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Kyo, M. Takakura, T. Kanaya, W. Zhuo, K. Fujimoto, Y. Nishio, A. Orimo, and M. Inoue
Estrogen Activates Telomerase
Cancer Res., December 1, 1999; 59(23): 5917 - 5921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. S. Jones, E. Parrott, and I. N. H. White
Activation of Transcription by Estrogen Receptor alpha and beta Is Cell Type- and Promoter-dependent
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 1999; 274(45): 32008 - 32014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Dong, W. Wang, F. Wang, M. Stoner, J. C. Reed, M. Harigai, I. Samudio, M. P. Kladde, C. Vyhlidal, and S. Safe
Mechanisms of Transcriptional Activation of bcl-2 Gene Expression by 17beta -Estradiol in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 1999; 274(45): 32099 - 32107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Duan, W. Porter, I. Samudio, C. Vyhlidal, M. Kladde, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of c-fos Protooncogene by 17{beta}-Estradiol: Mechanism of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Mediated Inhibition
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 1999; 13(9): 1511 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. C. Sharma, J. W. Clemens, M. D. Pisarska, and J. S. Richards
Expression and Function of Estrogen Receptor Subtypes in Granulosa Cells: Regulation by Estradiol and Forskolin
Endocrinology, September 1, 1999; 140(9): 4320 - 4334.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
W. Wang, L. Dong, B. Saville, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of E2F1 Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 Cells Is Regulated by NF-Y-Sp1/Estrogen Receptor Interactions
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 1999; 13(8): 1373 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Ahlgren, G. Suske, M. R. Waterman, and J. Lund
Role of Sp1 in cAMP-dependent Transcriptional Regulation of the Bovine CYP11A Gene
J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 1999; 274(27): 19422 - 19428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. S. Hunter, L. C. Hodges, P. M. Vonier, R. Fuchs-Young, M. M. Gottardis, and C. L. Walker
Estrogen Receptor Activation via Activation Function 2 Predicts Agonism of Xenoestrogens in Normal and Neoplastic Cells of the Uterine Myometrium
Cancer Res., July 1, 1999; 59(13): 3090 - 3099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Qin, P. Singh, and S. Safe
Transcriptional Activation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-4 by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 Cells: Role of Estrogen Receptor-Sp1 Complexes
Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2501 - 2508.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. Machinal, M.-N. Dieudonne, M.-C. Leneveu, R. Pecquery, and Y. Giudicelli
In Vivo and in Vitro ob Gene Expression and Leptin Secretion in Rat Adipocytes: Evidence for a Regional Specific Regulation by Sex Steroid Hormones
Endocrinology, April 1, 1999; 140(4): 1567 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porter, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals