| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pharmacology University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1109
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A) were used to probe the importance of
receptor phosphorylation on the regulation of receptor functions. The
mutant receptor binds hCG with high affinity and transduces the
hormonal signal into increases in cAMP and inositol phosphate
accumulation comparable in magnitude to those elicited by the wild-type
receptor.
In contrast to cells expressing rLHR-wt, which respond to hCG or
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate stimulation with an increase in rLHR
phosphorylation, the phosphorylation of rLHR in cells expressing
rLHR-5S/T
A is severely blunted. Likewise, the phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate-induced desensitization of hCG-induced cAMP accumulation is
drastically reduced in cells expressing rLHR-5S/T
A. In contrast, the
hCG-induced desensitization of hCG-induced cAMP accumulation is
delayed, but not abolished, in cells expressing rLHR-5S/T
A. Lastly,
the rate of internalization of the receptor-bound hCG is slower in
cells expressing rLHR-5S/T
A than in cells expressing rLHR-wt.
These results show that phosphorylation of rLHR is necessary, but not sufficient, for uncoupling of the receptor from adenylyl cyclase and for endocytosis of the receptor-bound hormone.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In an ongoing series of experiments we set out to formally test the hypothesis that phosphorylation is involved in the desensitization of gonadotropin receptors. Using human kidney 293 cells stably transfected with the rat LHR (rLHR) complementary DNA (cDNA), we showed that rLHR becomes rapidly phosphorylated in serine residues when the cells are exposed to hCG or a phorbol ester [phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)], and that these two stimuli also induce desensitization of the hCG-responsive adenylyl cyclase (1, 10, 11, 12, 13). Further analysis of three progressive C-terminal truncations of the rLHR showed that most of the hCG- or PMA-induced phosphorylation occurs in one or more of four serine residues (S635, S639, S649, and S652) located in the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of the rLHR (12, 13). Furthermore, our data showed that two C-terminally truncated species of rLHR (designated rLHR-t628 and rLHR-t631) that cannot be phosphorylated also display a delay in hCG-induced desensitization, a severe impairment in PMA-induced desensitization, and an increase in the rate of hCG-induced receptor down-regulation (10, 13). In contrast, another C-terminally truncated species of rLHR (designated rLHR-t653) that can be phosphorylated behaved similarly to the wild-type rLHR with regard to hCG- or PMA-induced desensitization as well as hCG-induced receptor down-regulation (13).
The experiments presented herein were designed to determine whether the different functional properties of rLHR-t653, rLHR-t631, and rLHR-t628 described above are due to removal of the entire 632653 region or to removal of the phosphorylation sites contained within this region. In addition, we wanted to determine whether rLHR phosphorylation is needed for the efficient endocytosis of the receptor-bound hormone. To this end we constructed and analyzed a full-length rLHR mutant in which the four serines and single threonine present in the 632653 region were simultaneously mutated to alanines. This mutant was analyzed for hCG- and PMA-induced phosphorylation, uncoupling, and down-regulation as well as for its ability to mediate the endocytosis of the bound ligand.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A
A) is a full-length mutant
in which S635, T638, S639,
S649, and S652 were simultaneously mutated to
alanines (Fig. 1
|
A, several clonal cell lines were obtained expressing
different numbers of cell surface receptors. One of these cell lines
that expressed a high density of mutant receptors [designated
293L(5S/T
A-2); binding capacity, 237,000 ± 13,000 molecules of
hCG/cell] and a cell line that expressed a comparable density
wild-type rLHR [designated 293L(wt-17); binding capacity, 232,000
± 15,000 molecules of hCG/cell] were chosen for further analysis. The
Kd values for the binding of hCG to 293L(wt-17)
and 293L(5S/T
A-2) cells were 301 ± 1 and 365 ± 60
pM, respectively.
As shown in Table 1
, the basal levels of cAMP, the
EC50 for cAMP accumulation, and the maximal cAMP response
to hCG are somewhat higher in 293L(5S/T
A-2) cells than in
293L(wt-17) cells. To correct for the possibility of clonal variation
we also measured the cAMP response to cholera toxin and calculated a
ratio for the maximal cAMP response to hCG and the maximal cAMP
response to cholera toxin. This ratio is somewhat lower in
293L(5S/T
A-2) cells than in 293L(wt-17). As this response ratio is
comparable to those previously reported for other cell lines expressing
rLHR-wt (12, 13), we conclude that the 5S/T
A mutation of rLHR has
only a minimal effect on the transduction of the cAMP signal. The same
can be said for the effects of this mutation on the transduction of the
inositol phosphate signal. When corrected for the inositol response
induced by NaF, the hCG-induced inositol phosphate response is
comparable in 293L(wt-17) and 293L(5S/T
A-2) cells (data not
shown).
|
A. Longer exposures and
densitometic scanning of the autoradiograms indicated that
phosphorylation is not completely abolished, however. In two
independent experiments quantitated by densitometry, hCG-induced
phosphorylation was reduced by 92 ± 2%, and PMA-induced
phosphorylation was reduced by 89 ± 1%. These findings are
consistent with previous data showing that phosphorylation is largely
preserved in a C-terminal truncation of rLHR at residue 653, but is
completely abolished when truncations are performed at residue 631 or
628 (12, 13). The reduced phosphorylation in cells expressing
rLHR-5S/T
A cannot be explained by differential immunoprecipitation
of rLHR-wt and rLHR-5S/T
A, as both receptors can be readily detected
in immunoprecipitates of [35S]cysteine/methionine-labeled
cells (Fig. 2B
|
|
A agrees well with previous
data obtained for receptor truncations. Thus, cells expressing
rLHR-t653, a rLHR truncation that retains the phosphorylation sites
mutated here, uncouple normally when incubated with hCG (12, 13). In
contrast, cells expressing rLHR-t631 or rLHR-t628, two rLHR truncations
that remove the phosphorylation sites mutated here, show a delay in
uncoupling indistinguishable from that shown in Fig. 3A
A (10, 12, 13). The delay in the time course of
uncoupling detected in cells expressing rLHR-5S/T
A is obvious at
early time points. During a 15-min preincubation with a saturating
concentration of hCG, 293L(wt-17) cells lose 4060% of their ability
to respond to a subsequent challenge with any concentration of hCG,
whereas the ability of 293L(5S/T
A-2) cells to respond to a
subsequent challenge with any concentration of hCG is not impaired
(Fig. 4
|
A.
Thus, we must now conclude that other amino acids in the 632653
region are important to the process of down-regulation.
The addition of PMA to 293 cells transfected with rLHR-wt also leads to
receptor phosphorylation and desensitization of the cAMP response to
hCG that is due to uncoupling rather than receptor down-regulation (1, 12, 13). In contrast to the hCG-induced uncoupling, which results in a
reduction in the cAMP response to all concentrations of hCG tested
(5200 ng/ml; as illustrated in Fig. 4
), the PMA-induced uncoupling
leads to a reduction in the cAMP response only when the cells are
rechallenged by low concentrations of hCG (i.e. <5 ng/ml;
see Fig. 5
). As the concentrations of hCG used in the
rechallenge increase, the inhibitory effect of PMA wanes to the point
where there is no effect or even an increase in the cAMP response (Fig. 5
). The data presented in Fig. 5
also show that, in keeping with the
impairment in PMA-induced phosphorylation, 293L(5S/T
A-2) cells
display a substantial impairment in the magnitude of PMA-induced
uncoupling. This finding is consistent with previous data for receptor
truncations, which showed that a reduction in PMA-induced uncoupling
correlates with the removal of the phosphorylation sites mutated here
(13).
|
A allows us to determine whether the increased
internalization rate of the truncated receptors is due to the removal
of phosphorylation sites.
The data summarized in Fig. 6
show that the
internalization of [125I]hCG is slower in
293L(5S/T
A-2) cells than in 293L(wt-17) cells. Additional
experiments in which the rate constants for endocytosis (ke) were
measured in these two cell lines indicated that [125I]hCG
is internalized with a half-life of 74 ± 4 min (n = 3) in
293L(wt-17) cells and 103 ± 8 min (n = 3) in
293L(5S/T
A-2) cells. Thus, we can now conclude that the enhanced
rate of internalization previously detected in C-terminally truncated
forms of rLHR is not due to the removal of phosphorylation sites. In
fact, our data suggest that the agonist-induced phosphorylation of rLHR
facilitates its internalization.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As only phosphoserine is detectable in the phosphorylated rLHR (12),
there are only seven potential phosphorylation sites present in the
intracellular regions of this receptor. Two of these (S365
and S617) can be readily excluded by the finding that
receptor phosphorylation is completely abolished in two downstream
truncations (rLHR-t628 and rLHR-t631) that retain these two residues
(12, 13). Studies with these two truncations and an additional
truncation at residue 653 where phosphorylation is minimally affected
(12, 13) have indicated that the four serines mutated here
(S635, S639, S649, and
S653) are the major loci of phosphorylation. A small
decrease in the phosphorylation signal detected in rLRH-t653 (12, 13)
led us to suspect that S659 may represent an additional
phosphorylation site. The fact that the phosphorylation of 5S/T
A is
severely impaired, but not lost, confirms the conclusion that
S635, S639, S649, and/or
S653 represent the major loci of phosphorylation and
further indicates that S659 represents the residue
responsible for the residual phosphorylation detected in this
mutant.
The time course of hCG-induced uncoupling in cells expressing rLHR-wt
suggests the existence of two phases (13). These consist of a fast
phase that occurs within 5 min of hCG addition and leads to a 4060%
reduction in hCG-stimulated cAMP synthesis and a slower phase that
ensues for the next 5060 min and leads to a further 2040%
reduction in hCG-stimulated cAMP synthesis. The removal (12, 13) or
mutation of phosphorylation sites delays the early phase of hCG-induced
uncoupling, but has little or no effect on the slow phase. We would
argue that this delay in the onset of uncoupling is caused by the
phosphorylation of S635, S639,
S649, and/or S652, and that the phosphorylation
of S659 (discussed above) is functionally silent. Thus, the
functional properties of the agonist-induced uncoupling of rLHR-t631
and rLHR-t628 (both of which show no residual phosphorylation and lack
S635, S639, S649, S652,
and S659) (12, 13) are identical to those of rLHR-5S/T
A,
in which only S635, S639, S649, and
S652 were mutated and show minimal residual
phosphorylation. Clearly then, agonist-induced uncoupling is delayed
regardless of the presence or absence of S659. The converse
is also true, in that the removal of S659 without removing
S635, S639, S649, and
S652 (which was accomplished in rLHR-t653) results in a
receptor that displays a minimal reduction in phosphorylation and a
normal time course and magnitude of agonist-induced uncoupling (12, 13). Taken together, our results indicate that phosphorylation is
necessary, but not alone sufficient, for the hCG-induced uncoupling of
rLHR.
The delay in the time course of hCG-induced uncoupling (as opposed to a change in magnitude) observed in the phosphorylation-deficient mutants of rLHR is not peculiar to this receptor, nor unexpected from previous reports on the ß2-adrenergic receptor (22). In fact, the removal (by truncation) or mutation of the C-terminal phosphorylation sites of the ß2-adrenergic receptor also results in a delay in the time course of agonist-induced desensitization, but has little or no effect on the magnitude of desensitization detected upon prolonged incubation with agonist (22).
In contrast to the data discussed above for hCG-induced
uncoupling, the magnitude of PMA-induced uncoupling is severely
impaired by the removal (13) or mutation of phosphorylation sites. We
would again argue that this decrease in the magnitude of PMA-induced
uncoupling is caused by the phosphorylation of S635,
S639, S649, and/or S652, and that
the phosphorylation of S659 (discussed above) is
functionally silent. Thus, there is little or no PMA-induced
phosphorylation or uncoupling in cells expressing rLHR-t631 and
rLHR-t628 (both of which lack S635, S639,
S649, S652, and S659) (12, 13) or
in cells expressing rLHR-5S/T
A, in which only S635,
S639, S649, and S652 were mutated.
In contrast, the removal of S659 without removing
S635, S639, S649, and
S652 (which was accomplished in rLHR-t653) results in a
receptor that displays a minimal reduction in PMA-induced
phosphorylation and a normal magnitude of PMA-induced uncoupling (12, 13). Taken together our data argue that the PMA-induced phosphorylation
of this locus is the most important (if not the only) posttranslational
modification involved in the PMA-induced uncoupling of the rLHR.
The data presented here also show that the hCG-induced phosphorylation
of the rLHR at residues S635, S639,
S649, and/or S652 is needed for the efficient
endocytosis of the receptor-bound hormone. This is the only case where
previous data obtained with rLHR truncations that remove or maintain
phosphorylation sites do not match the data obtained with the
simultaneous mutation of the phosphorylation sites. Thus, rLHR-t653
(phosphorylation-positive truncation) and rLHR-t631
(phosphorylation-negative truncation) were previously shown to exhibit
a faster rate of internalization than rLHR-wt (20), whereas as shown
here, rLHR-5S/T
A exhibits a slower rate of internalization. These
results are also interesting because of recent reports of the possible
importance of activation and/or phosphorylation of G protein-coupled
receptors in the process of internalization. There is a growing body of
evidence indicating that the activation of G protein-coupled receptors
in general (23, 24, 25, 26, 27) is needed for the efficient internalization of the
hormone-receptor complex. Likewise, although initial experiments argued
against a role for phosphorylation on the sequestration of
ß2-adrenergic receptors (22, 28, 29), emerging models for
this (30, 31, 32) as well as the M2 muscarinic receptor (33) indicate that
agonist-induced phosphorylation facilitates the agonist-induced
sequestration of these two receptors.
We have previously reported that the rate of endocytosis of the antagonist-occupied mouse LHR is slower than the rate of endocytosis of the agonist-occupied mouse LHR (26) and that two mutations of the rLHR that impair signal transduction also slow down the endocytosis of the bound agonist in transfected 293 cells (27). Although we interpreted these data to indicate that an agonist-induced conformational change in the LHR and/or a physical association of the LHR with its cognate G protein(s) were needed for efficient endocytosis of the bound ligand, the data presented here argue that we should also consider the possibility that LHR phosphorylation is an important component of this process.
In summary, the data presented herein clearly show that phosphorylation of the rLHR at S635, S639, S642, and/or S649 is necessary for hCG- and PMA-induced uncoupling and for the efficient endocytosis of the receptor-bound hormone. Additional studies are currently underway to determine the phosphorylation state and functional properties of additional mutants of the LHR in which S635, S639, S642, and S649 as well as S659 and T638 are individually mutated to alanine. Although we predict that the S659A or T638A mutations would have little or no impact on phosphorylation, uncoupling, or internalization, the analysis of the other four mutants will allow us to more accurately determine the identity of the phosphorylation sites and their impact on function. Additional experiments are also being performed to determine whether other posttranslational modifications of the rLHR are involved in hCG-induced uncoupling and to determine whether the previously described transduction-deficient mutants of rLHR do not internalize efficiently simply because they are not phosphorylated in response to hCG binding.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A, in which
S635, T638, S639, S649,
and S652 were simultaneously mutated to alanines in the
full-length LH/CG receptor, was created by PCR with overlap extension
(35) to alter the nucleotides coding for these residues. The sequence
of the entire region of each mutant cDNA generated by PCR was verified
by dideoxy sequencing (36). The mutant and wild-type rLHR cDNAs were
subcloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pcDNAI/Neo (Invitrogen,
San Diego, CA) for transfection. The origin and handling of the parental human embryonic kidney (293) cells and the methods used for transfection and isolation of clonal cell lines stably transfected with the wild-type or mutant rLHR cDNAs have been described in detail previously (12, 27, 37, 38).
Other Methods
Metabolic labeling of cells and subsequent immunoprecipitation
of the rLHR were achieved as previously described (1, 2, 12, 13, 14).
Autoradiograms of the dried gels were obtained using intensifying
screens, and the autoradiograms were scanned using a Bio-Rad Molecular
Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). All of the
autoradiograms shown here are reproductions from the scanned images.
Equilibrium binding parameters for hCG were measured during an
overnight incubation (4 C) of intact cells with a fixed concentration
of [125I]hCG and increasing concentrations of hCG as
described previously (37, 38). Concentration-response curves for
the hCG-induced increases in cAMP and inositol phosphate accumulation
were performed during a 30- and 60-min incubations at 37 C,
respectively. These were analyzed as described previously (12, 13).
Measurements of hCG-induced desensitization were performed after
incubation of cells with a fixed concentration of hormone (100 ng/ml)
for increasing periods of time. After removal of the free and bound
hormone, the cAMP response of the cells was assessed during a 15-min
incubation with the indicated concentrations of hCG (12, 13).
PMA-induced desensitization was measured after incubating the cells
with 200 nM PMA for 30 min. The cAMP response of the cells
was then assessed during a 15-min incubation with the indicated
concentrations of hCG (12, 13). The methodology used to asses the
endocytosis of hCG and to measure the rates of internalization have
also been described (27, 39, 40). For these experiments, the
surface-bound hormone was removed after a brief exposure of the cells
to an isotonic pH 3 buffer. The radioactivity that remains cell
associated was considered to be internalized hormone. Degraded hormone
was measured by solubility in trichloroacetic acid.
Hormones and Supplies
Purified hCG (CR-127) was obtained from the National Hormone and
Pituitary Agency of the NIDDK. [125I]hCG was prepared as
described previously (41), to give a specific radioactivity of
25,00030,000 cpm/ng. [32P]orthophosphate was obtained
from DuPont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). Methionine/cysteine- and
phosphate-free DMEM as well as Tran35S-Label were purchased
from ICN Biomedicals (Irvine, CA). Nonidet P-40, protease inhibitors,
N,N',N'-triacetylchitotriose, protein
A-agarose, fibronectin-like engineered polymer, and BSA were obtained
from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Okadaic acid and cypermethrin
were purchased from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA). Wheat germ agglutinin
was obtained from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA), and Geneticin
was obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). The rabbit
antibody to the rLHR (Bugs) has been previously described (42). Cell
culture supplies were obtained from Corning (Corning, NY) and Life
Technologies, respectively. All other materials were obtained from
commonly used suppliers.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from the NIH (CA-40629). The services and facilities provided by the Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center of the University of Iowa (supported by NIH Grant DK-25295) are also gratefully acknowledged.
Received for publication October 3, 1996. Revision received November 13, 1996. Accepted for publication November 14, 1996.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R S Bhaskaran and M Ascoli The post-endocytotic fate of the gonadotropin receptors is an important determinant of the desensitization of gonadotropin responses J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 447 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.M.J. Menon, U. M. Munshi, C. L. Clouser, and A. K. Nair Regulation of Luteinizing Hormone/Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Receptor Expression: A Perspective Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 861 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Galet, T. Hirakawa, and M. Ascoli The Postendocytotic Trafficking of the Human Lutropin Receptor Is Mediated by a Transferable Motif Consisting of the C-Terminal Cysteine and an Upstream Leucine Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2004; 18(2): 434 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hunzicker-Dunn, G. Barisas, J. Song, and D. A. Roess Membrane Organization of Luteinizing Hormone Receptors Differs between Actively Signaling and Desensitized Receptors J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 42744 - 42749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Muller, J. Gromoll, and M. Simoni Absence of Exon 10 of the Human Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Receptor Impairs LH, But Not Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Action J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 2242 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Galet, L. Min, R. Narayanan, M. Kishi, N. L. Weigel, and M. Ascoli Identification of a Transferable Two-Amino-Acid Motif (GT) Present in the C-Terminal Tail of the Human Lutropin Receptor that Redirects Internalized G Protein-Coupled Receptors from a Degradation to a Recycling Pathway Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2003; 17(3): 411 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Conti Specificity of the Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Signal in Granulosa Cell Function Biol Reprod, December 1, 2002; 67(6): 1653 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mukherjee, V. V. Gurevich, A. Preninger, H. E. Hamm, M.-F. Bader, A. T. Fazleabas, L. Birnbaumer, and M. Hunzicker-Dunn Aspartic Acid 564 in the Third Cytoplasmic Loop of the Luteinizing Hormone/Choriogonadotropin Receptor Is Crucial for Phosphorylation-independent Interaction with Arrestin2 J. Biol. Chem., May 10, 2002; 277(20): 17916 - 17927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ascoli, F. Fanelli, and D. L. Segaloff The Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor, A 2002 Perspective Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2002; 23(2): 141 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirakawa, C. Galet, and M. Ascoli MA-10 Cells Transfected with the Human Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor (hLHR): A Novel Experimental Paradigm to Study the Functional Properties of the hLHR Endocrinology, March 1, 2002; 143(3): 1026 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kishi, X. Liu, T. Hirakawa, D. Reczek, A. Bretscher, and M. Ascoli Identification of Two Distinct Structural Motifs That, When Added to the C-Terminal Tail of the Rat LH Receptor, Redirect the Internalized Hormone-Receptor Complex from a Degradation to a Recycling Pathway Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2001; 15(9): 1624 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Horvat, B. G. Barisas, and D. A. Roess Luteinizing Hormone Receptors Are Self-Associated in Slowly Diffusing Complexes during Receptor Desensitization Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2001; 15(4): 534 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Min and M. Ascoli Effect of Activating and Inactivating Mutations on the Phosphorylation and Trafficking of the Human Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2000; 14(11): 1797 - 1810. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. N. Themmen and I. T. Huhtaniemi Mutations of Gonadotropins and Gonadotropin Receptors: Elucidating the Physiology and Pathophysiology of Pituitary-Gonadal Function Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2000; 21(5): 551 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kishi and M. Ascoli The C-Terminal Tail of the Rat Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin (CG) Receptor Independently Modulates Human (h)CG-Induced Internalization of the Cell Surface Receptor and the Lysosomal Targeting of the Internalized hCG-Receptor Complex Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2000; 14(6): 926 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nakamura, X. Liu, and M. Ascoli Seven Non-contiguous Intracellular Residues of the Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor Dictate the Rate of Agonist-induced Internalization and Its Sensitivity to Non-visual Arrestins J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2000; 275(1): 241 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nakamura and M. Ascoli A Dileucine-Based Motif in the C-Terminal Tail of the Lutropin/Choriogonadotropin Receptor Inhibits Endocytosis of the Agonist-Receptor Complex Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1999; 56(4): 728 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
|