| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Medicine Branch (T.W.S., L.M.N.) National Cancer Institute
National Institutes of Health Rockville, Maryland 20850
Pharmaceutical Research Institute Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co.
Ltd. (S.A., T.M., T.A.) Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan 411
Tokyo Research Laboratories (S.S., H.N.) Kyowa Hakko Kogyo
Co. Ltd. Machida-shi, Tokyo 194, Japan Laboratory of
Ocular Therapeutics (Y.S.L.) National Eye Institute Bethesda,
Maryland 20892
Department of Pathology (B.B.S., Y.A.) The
University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637
Department
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (S.F., D.O.T.) Mayo Graduate
School Rochester, Minnesota 55905
Department of
Microbiology and Immunology (S.V.S.) University of Tennessee
Memphis, Tennessee 38163
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß, Grp94, and Trap-1
(Hsp75). Radicicol, an antifungal antibiotic that inhibits various
signal transduction proteins such as v-src, ras, Raf-1, and mos, was
found to bind to Hsp90, thus making it the prototype of a second class
of Hsp90 inhibitors, distinct from the chemically unrelated
benzoquinone ansamycins. We have used two novel methods to immobilize
radicicol, allowing for detailed analyses of drug-protein interactions.
Using these two approaches, we have studied binding of the drug to
N-terminal Hsp90 point mutants expressed by in vitro
translation. The results point to important drug contacts with amino
acids inside the N-terminal ATP/ADP-binding pocket region and show
subtle differences when compared with geldanamycin binding. Radicicol
binds more strongly to Hsp90 than to Grp94, the Hsp90 homolog that
resides in the endoplasmic reticulum. In contrast to Hsp90, binding of
radicicol to Grp94 requires both the N-terminal ATP/ADP-binding domain
as well as the adjacent negatively charged region. Radicicol also
specifically binds to yeast Hsp90, Escherichia coli HtpG,
and a newly described tumor necrosis factor receptor-interacting
protein, Trap-1, with greater homology to bacterial HtpG than to Hsp90.
Thus, the radicicol-binding site appears to be specific to and is
conserved in all members of the Hsp90 family of molecular chaperones
from bacteria to mammals, but is not present in other molecular
chaperones with nucleotide-binding domains. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß, Grp94, and Trap-1 (Hsp75) (reviewed
in Ref. 1). The two Hsp90 isoforms exist in the cytosol and the nucleus
and associate with a number of signaling proteins. These proteins
include ligand-dependent transcription factors such as steroid
receptors (2, 3, 4) and aryl hydrocarbon receptors (5, 6),
ligand-independent transcription factors such as myoD (7), mutated p53
(8), and hypoxia-inducible factor 1
(9), tyrosine kinases such as
v-src and (10, 11), src family kinases (12, 13), and serine/threonine
kinases such as Raf-1 (14, 15) and Cdk4 (16). Association of these
signaling proteins with Hsp90 is essential for their stability, correct
intracellular location, and biological activity. Geldanamycin and
herbimycin A, both benzoquinone ansamycin antibiotics, bind
specifically to Hsp90 at its amino-terminal nucleotide-binding site
(17, 18, 19), thereby disrupting its association with a number of the
signaling proteins listed above. Upon dissociation from Hsp90, these
signaling proteins become unstable and are rapidly degraded (20, 21). Grp94 is an Hsp90 homolog that occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and is involved in protein processing in this compartment (22). Benzoquinone ansamycins cause a robust ER stress response (23), probably due to accumulation in the ER of multiple incompletely glycosylated proteins. Trap-1 (Hsp75) has only recently been described and displays more homology with the bacterial Hsp90 homolog HtpG than with either Hsp90 or Grp94 (24, 25). Its function is still under investigation, but its binding to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor (TNFR1) and retinoblastoma protein (Rb) has been reported (24, 25).
Radicicol, a macrocyclic antifungal antibiotic originally isolated from the fungus Monosporium bonorden (26) was shown to be a potent tranquilizer of low toxicity (27) and inhibited in vivo angiogenesis (28). In addition, radicicol has been shown to suppress cellular transformation by a variety of oncogenes such as src, ras, and mos (29, 30, 31, 32). In the case of src-transformed cells, treatment with radicicol was accompanied by enhanced gelsolin expression (33). In addition, in cells treated with radicicol, Raf-1, p185erbB2, and mutated p53 proteins became destabilized and subject to proteasome-mediated proteolysis (32, 34). One of the major intracellular targets of radicicol is the molecular chaperone, Hsp90. This was demonstrated in two different ways. First, radicicol, which is structurally dissimilar to benzoquinone ansamycins, efficiently competed with solid-phase geldanamycin for binding to Hsp90 (34). Second, biotinylated radicicol was able to identify Hsp90 in a pseudo-Western blot format (35). However, neither of these studies directly demonstrated radicicol binding to Hsp90 in solution, nor did they characterize the radicicol-binding site. Most recently, cocrystallization of radicicol with yeast Hsp90 has been reported (36).
To better understand the mechanism of interaction of radicicol with Hsp90 and its family members, we analyzed the binding of both biotinylated radicicol bound to streptavidin Sepharose and radicicol linked to Sepharose beads (Rd-Sepharose) to a series of Hsp90 point and deletion mutants previously characterized for their ability to bind to immobilized geldanamycin. Additionally, to determine whether the drug can also recognize other members of the Hsp90 family, we characterized the ability of immobilized radicicol to bind wild-type Grp94 and several Grp94 deletion mutants. Finally, we tested the ability of immobilized radicicol to bind to Trap-1, the bacterial Hsp90 homolog HtpG, and yeast Hsp90. All Hsp90 family members display binding of varying affinities to immobilized radicicol.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
C507) that contains the nucleotide/geldanamycin-binding
domain bound to both biotinylated radicicol and to Rd-Sepharose, and
binding was competed by preincubation with excess soluble radicicol
(Fig. 5
|
|
H deletion mutant (lacking amino acids 112171) failed to bind
to Rd-Sepharose. These data are not unexpected since this mutant lacks
a significant portion, although not all, of the region homologous to
the Hsp90 nucleotide-binding site (see Fig. 7
A
deletion mutant (which lacks amino acids 259549) and the
P mutant
(lacking amino acids 281344), which both lack the first negatively
charged domain of Grp94, did not bind to Rd-Sepharose even though they
contain an intact nucleotide/geldanamycin-binding domain. The
B
mutant (amino acids 452671 missing) bound to Rd-Sepharose as
efficiently as the wild-type protein. The mutant Npart2 (expressing
only the first 255 amino acids) did not bind radicicol in this assay,
although the mutant Npart3 (expressing the first 355 amino acids) did.
The mutant Cpart1 (expressing amino acids 256675), which again lacked
the N-terminal domain but contained the first negatively charged
domain, also failed to bind to radicicol. Thus, in contrast to its
binding to Hsp90, radicicol binding to Grp94 requires the
nucleotide-binding domain as well as the adjacent negatively charged
region of this chaperone.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
kinase (43), among
others (for a review see Ref. 44). In addition, genetic evidence points
to interactions between Hsp90/cdc37 and molecules such as torso,
sevenless, mps1, kin28, cdc28, and fus3 (reviewed in Ref. 45).
Therefore, radicicol has the potential to impinge on a large array of
signal transduction networks. Consistent with this hypothesis,
radicicol has been shown to suppress cellular transformation by a
number of oncogenes including v-src, Ras, and Mos (29, 30, 31, 32). The
molecular mechanism was shown to involve inhibition of Hsp90, and
radicicol was thus identified as the prototype of a new class of Hsp90
inhibitors chemically unrelated to the benzoquinone ansamycins (34, 35). Because of the importance of Hsp90 inhibitors as research tools
(46, 47), and because of their potential as antitumor agents (1, 48),
we have studied the interaction between radicicol and the various Hsp90
family members in more detail. The two earlier studies that demonstrated binding of radicicol to Hsp90 depended on indirect approaches (34, 35). Sharma et al. separated protein lysates by denaturing SDS-PAGE and incubated the protein transferred to nitrocellulose membranes with biotinylated radicicol, which was then detected by streptavidin-coupled horseradish peroxidase. Even though specificity was shown by appropriate positive and negative controls, the binding of radicicol to Hsp90 after denaturing electrophoresis might not completely reflect the situation in vivo. In the study of Schulte et al., binding of radicicol to Hsp90 was demonstrated by competition of radicicol with immobilized geldanamycin. We now use two direct approaches to show binding of Hsp90 to immobilized radicicol under nondenaturing conditions. As these methods directly assess radicicol binding to Hsp90, mutants that either do not bind or bind poorly to geldanamycin can be adequately tested. Our analyses reveal that immobilized radicicol specifically immunopurifies Hsp90 and that binding is readily competed by radicicol, geldanamycin, ATP, and ADP.
The marked difference between the structures of radicicol and geldanamycin and the results of an earlier study (35) had suggested possible differences in the Hsp90-binding sites of the two drugs. For this reason, we compared binding of immobilized radicicol to a number of Hsp90 point mutations that altered amino acids in the N-terminal nucleotide-binding domain. Asp92 (93 in human Hsp90) lies at the bottom of the inner face of the nucleotide-binding pocket and forms a hydrogen bond network with the carbamate group of geldanamycin and a water molecule (18, 36, 49). As expected, both D92A and G94D mutations cause a significant reduction in geldanamycin binding. These mutations also strongly inhibit binding to radicicol. Glu46 (47 in human Hsp90) and its homologous Glu residues are important for the ATPase function of gyrase B and Hsp90. Mutations of this residue eliminate gyrase function in E. coli (50). In yeast Hsp90, mutation of this residue leads to a protein that can bind but not hydrolyze ATP and cannot functionally replace wild-type Hsp90 in vivo (51, 52). In our model system, both immobilized geldanamycin and radicicol clearly bind to Hsp90 E46D, suggesting that these inhibitors do not require interaction with a functional ATPase domain on Hsp90.
Lys111 (112 in human Hsp90) makes hydrogen bonds with one of the benzoquinone oxygen atoms of geldanamycin at the solvent-exposed entrance to the binding pocket. The K111A and G113D mutations both partially inhibit binding to geldanamycin. Interestingly, K111A binds well to radicicol, which does not have a benzoquinone ring, while the G113D mutation, which presumably leads to changes in the protein backbone structure of Hsp90, strongly decreases radicicol binding.
The amino acids Gly131, Gly134, and Gly136 form a GXXGXG motif that is conserved not only in all Hsp90 family proteins but also in bacterial DNA gyrase B and mutL proteins. In E. coli Gyrase B, two glycines of this motif are in direct contact with ATP based on the crystal structure (53), while mutations of this motif in E. coli mutL produce a dominant mutator phenotype (54). In Hsp90, these amino acids lie at the opening face of the pocket opposite to Lys111 and form hydrogen bonds with the magnesium ion that is required for stabilization of ATP binding (18). Mutation of Gly131 alone does not completely abrogate geldanamycin binding to Hsp90, although the mutation of all three glycine residues does abrogate binding. In the case of radicicol, G131D itself shows a markedly reduced binding, suggesting important contacts of this residue with radicicol. Arg181, Gly182, and Lys190 are highly evolutionarily conserved amino acids in ß-sheet 7, which forms another part of the binding pocket. R181Q and K190A bind well to geldanamycin and radicicol while G182D does not, which might be related to a possible disruption in the backbone of the protein structure. These data are in general agreement with the recently published crystal structure of radicicol bound to yeast Hsp90 (36) and, taken together, they demonstrate surprisingly subtle differences between radicicol and geldanamycin contacts with this chaperone, even though these drugs are structurally distinct.
Careful examination of benzoquinone ansamycin activity has revealed that the ER is another site of drug action. For example, both geldanamycin and radicicol have been shown to be potent inducers of the ER stress response, leading to transcriptional up-regulation of ER chaperones (Ref. 23 and L. Hendershot, personal communication). For this reason, we wanted to compare radicicol binding to Grp94 with its binding to Hsp90. Grp94 was specifically bound by immobilized radicicol, and binding was competed by both soluble radicicol and geldanamycin. However, radicicol displayed a 5-fold higher apparent affinity for Hsp90 than for Grp94.
While mapping the Grp94 radicicol-binding site with a series of deletion mutants, we identified a major difference in drug binding compared with Hsp90. Not surprisingly, a deletion in the N-terminal domain that includes the sequence homologous to the nucleotide-binding pocket of Hsp90 led to abrogation of radicicol binding to Grp94. Interestingly, a deletion of the adjacent negatively charged domain, which follows the putative nucleotide-binding pocket after a linking region, also abrogated radicicol binding even though the nucleotide-binding domain remained intact. A deletion in the more C-terminal part of the molecule that included the second negatively charged domain of Grp94 did not interfere with radicicol binding. The importance of the amino-terminal charged domain for radicicol binding is emphasized by the fact that a deletion mutant that only expresses the N-terminal domain of the molecule containing the putative nucleotide-binding site does not bind radicicol, while a mutant that expresses both the N-terminal domain and the first negatively charged domain does bind to immobilized drug. This represents a clear difference with Hsp90, where a mutant expressing only the N-terminal domain containing the ATP/ADP binding pocket was bound by immobilized radicicol. The apparent requirement of an additional domain for radicicol binding to Grp94 suggests that novel drug-protein contacts may be made, although confirmation of this hypothesis awaits the crystallization of Grp94. If so, it would appear theoretically possible to design radicicol derivatives with specificity for either Hsp90 or Grp94.
Trap-1 (Hsp75) is a recently described member of the Hsp90 family of proteins that resembles the bacterial HtpG protein in both size and structural organization (24, 25). The function of this protein in mammalian cells still remains to be determined, but it may be of importance to tumor cell biology since it binds to the type 1 TNF receptor (TNFR1) (24) and the retinoblastoma protein (25). Trap-1 shares the N-terminal nucleotide-binding domain of Hsp90 and Grp94 but lacks the charged region of Hsp90 and differs in the C terminus. Our experiments with immobilized radicicol demonstrate binding of Trap-1 to the drug, and binding is competed by excess radicicol, geldanamycin, and ATP. However, the apparent affinity of radicicol for Trap-1 is 10-fold less than for Hsp90 and half that for Grp94.
The N-terminal nucleotide-binding domain is highly conserved throughout the Hsp90 family, as emphasized by the fact that radicicol binds to all members of the family so far examined, from bacteria to man. This uniquely structured nucleotide binding site differs from other more common ATP-binding motifs. Intriguingly, although this motif is conserved in the gyrase B and MutL families, neither radicicol nor geldanamycin bind to or affect the activity of these proteins. Hsp90-inhibitory drugs that bind to this domain lock the protein into a conformation that is similar to its ADP-bound state. In Hsp90, nucleotide binding seems to function as a molecular switch regulating two opposing conformational states, which, in turn, have distinct binding affinities for a series of chaperones and cochaperones critical to Hsp90 function. However, the function of this domain in other Hsp90 family members remains to be determined.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid Constructions
pGEM99.2 encoding a full-length wild-type mouse GRP94 cDNA in
pGEM3 was a kind gift from Dr. Michael Green (55). pGEM3-d
A was
constructed by partial digestion of pGEM99.2 with AlwNI and
religation of the 4.8-kb fragment. pGEM3-
B was constructed by
digestion of pGEM99.2 with BclI and religation of the 5.0-kb
fragment. pGEM3-
H was constructed by partial digestion of pGEM99.2
with HpaI and MscI and religation of the 5.4-kb
fragment. Subsequently, a region corresponding to amino acids 1524 of
the full-length protein was amplified by PCR, sequenced, and subcloned
back into pGEM-
H using XbaI and XhoI to
produce pGEM3-
H-ss. pGEM3-
P was constructed by partial digestion
of pGEM99.2 with PstI and religation of the 5.4-kb fragment.
Subsequently, a region corresponding to amino acids 1132 of the
full-length protein was amplified by PCR, sequenced, and subcloned back
into pGEM3-
P using XbaI and HpaI to produce
pGEM3-
P-ss. To construct pGEM-Npart2, a region corresponding to
amino acids -21 to 255 was amplified by PCR and subcloned into
pGEM-T Easy (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). pGEM-Npart3 and
pGEM-Cpart1 were constructed in analogous fashion using PCR products
spanning amino acids -21 to 355 and 256675, respectively. The
antisense primers for the latter three constructs all contained the ER
retention signal KDEL.
Point and deletion mutants of Hsp90 were as described in Ref. 19 . pBluescript-Trap-1 encoding the full-length wild-type Trap-1 cDNA was generously provided by D. B. Donner (Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN) (24).
Cell Culture and Preparation of Lysates
SKBR3 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The cells were maintained in DMEM
with 10% FCS and 10 mM HEPES. For metabolic labeling,
cells were washed with PBS and kept in methionine-free medium for 30
min before the addition of 100 µCi/ml [35S]methionine
for 2 h. Cells were lysed with TNES buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% NP40, 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM
NaCl) containing 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 20 µg/ml
aprotinin, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF).
RAS-3T3 cells were maintained as described previously (35). For affinity precipitations using the biotinylated radicicol reagent, 2-day-old subconfluent cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS. Cells were then resuspended in hypotonic lysis buffer RSBT (10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 10 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 mM PMSF. Cells were allowed to swell in RSBT for 10 min, after which they were homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer (B pestle) with 30 strokes. Unbroken cells were removed by a slow speed spin (2000 rpm/4 C for 10 min), and the resulting lysates were then clarified by a hard spin (microfuge, 4 C for 30 min).
Yeast strain GYC86 was grown to saturation, at which time cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in SORB buffer (0.3 M Sorbitol, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 mM PMSF). Cells were lysed by vortexing with glass beads (10 times, 30 sec each), and the unbroken cells were removed by low-speed centrifugation (6000 rpm for 10 min). The cell lysates were clarified by a hard spin (microfuge, 4 C for 30 min). Supernatants were collected and subjected to affinity precipitation analysis with biotinylated radicicol. E. coli strain DH1 was grown to saturation, at which time cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in RSBT containing 1 mM dithiothreitol. Cells were subjected to a cycle of freeze-thaw followed by sonication (10 times, 30 sec each). The unbroken cells were removed by low-speed centrifugation (6000 rpm for 10 min). The cell lysates were clarified by a hard spin (microfuge, 4 C for 30 min), and supernatants were collected and subjected to affinity precipitation analysis with biotinylated radicicol.
Preparation and Use of Biotinylated Radicicol-Streptavidin
Sepharose Complex
Biotinylated radicicol (KT8529) was resuspended in DMSO to yield
a stock solution of 10 mM. Titrations were performed to
determine the amount of KT8529 that would be sufficient to saturate 25
µl of packed Streptavidin Sepharose beads (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) (Fig. 2B
, top panel).
Based on the result of this titration, 1 µl of the KT8529 was added
to 50 µl of Streptavidin Sepharose beads (50% solution) and
incubated in the dark at room temperature for 10 min. Unbound KT8529
was removed by washing the beads three times with PBS containing 0.2%
Tween (PBST). The biotinylated radicicol-Streptavidin Sepharose beads
(BR-SS) were used as an affinity matrix to capture radicicol-binding
proteins from cell lysates. Briefly, 1.5 ml of RSBT cell lysates
(equivalent to one subconfluent 100-mm dish of cells) were incubated
with the BR-SS affinity matrix. In some cases where competition was
examined, the cell lysates were preincubated with varying
concentrations of natural radicicol (UCS1006) or geldanamycin for
2 h before incubation with the BR-SS affinity matrix. Proteins
bound to the affinity matrix were collected by brief centrifugation,
and the beads were washed three times with PBST, resuspended in 50 µl
of Laemmlis sample buffer, boiled, and separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE
(56). Electrophoretically separated proteins were transferred to
polyvinylidene fluoride membranes and probed with
-HSP90
antibody (1:1000 dilution),
-GRP94 antibody (1:2000 dilution),
-yeast HSP90 antibody (1:4000 dilution), or
-HtpG antibody
(1:20,000 dilution) in blocking solution (90 min at room temperature).
Filters were then washed briefly with PBST and incubated with either
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
-rabbit or goat
-mouse
antibodies (1:4000 dilution) in blocking solution (60 min at room
temperature) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL
detection kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington
Heights, IL) as described (30).
Production and Use of Radicicol and Geldanamycin Affinity
Beads
Purified radicicol derivative KF66658 (25 mg) was dissolved in
tetrahydrofuran and added to 1 ml of EAH-Sepharose beads
(Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). After 5 days
of end-over-end mixing at room temperature, the beads were transferred
into tetrahydrofuran-methanol (1:1), and 20 mg of acetic anhydride were
added. After end-over-end mixing at room temperature for 1 h, 2
vol of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) were added for 15 min.
Finally, the resin was washed three times in TNES buffer and blocked in
1% BSA before use. Geldanamycin was derivatized and immobilized as
previously reported (17).
Recombinant proteins were expressed by in vitro transcription/translation using the TNT rabbit reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega Corp.) in the presence of 1458 Ci/mmol translation grade [35S]methionine (ICN Biochemicals, Inc., Aurora, OH) using the appropriate DNA polymerase and following the manufacturers instructions. Material from in vitro translation reactions (1224 µl) or cellular lysates (100 µg of total protein) were incubated with various concentrations of radicicol or geldanamycin. After mixing at 4 C for 30 min, 40 µl of resin with immobilized radicicol or geldanamycin were added and incubated for 60 min at 4 C with end-over-end mixing. Resins were washed three times with TENS buffer and boiled in Laemmli sample buffer (56). After separation of proteins by SDS-PAGE, proteins were visualized by silver stain, immunoblotting, or autoradiography. Western blotting was performed as previously described (57). We used horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody to rabbit or mouse IgG (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in conjunction with Western blot chemiluminescence reagent (Renaissance, DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co., Wilmington, DE). Films were scanned into a Macintosh computer and processed using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA) and NIH image (NIH, Bethesda, MD) software.
Analysis of Trap-1-Radicicol Binding
Trap-1 was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the
inducible expression vector pET-9a-Trap-1. Induced bacteria were
suspended in PBS, disrupted by sonication, and diluted in TNES buffer
containing 1 mM sodium orthovanadate and 1 mM
dithiothreitol. After centrifugation, 500 µl of supernatant were
incubated with 10 µl of the solvent DMSO or competitors for 45 min
before adding EAH Sepharose beads or radicicol beads for 45 min. After
two washes with TNES buffer and one wash with TE buffer, pellets were
boiled in Laemmli sample buffer and used for SDS-PAGE. The identity of
an affinity-purified protein of 68 kDa size was determined by
N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Alternatively, Trap-1 was in
vitro translated from pBluescript-Trap-1 in rabbit reticulocyte
lysate and affinity purified using Rd-Sepharose beads as described
above.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication March 17, 1999. Revision received May 20, 1999. Accepted for publication May 25, 1999.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. B. Berry, M. Fan, and K. P. Nephew Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Hinge-Region Lysines 302 and 303 Regulate Receptor Degradation by the Proteasome Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 22(7): 1535 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sud, S. M. Wells, S. Sharma, D. A. Wiseman, J. Wilham, and S. M. Black Asymmetric dimethylarginine inhibits HSP90 activity in pulmonary arterial endothelial cells: role of mitochondrial dysfunction Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): C1407 - C1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Leskovar, H. Wegele, N. D. Werbeck, J. Buchner, and J. Reinstein The ATPase Cycle of the Mitochondrial Hsp90 Analog Trap1 J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11677 - 11688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sharma, N. Sud, D. A. Wiseman, A. L. Carter, S. Kumar, Y. Hou, T. Rau, J. Wilham, C. Harmon, P. Oishi, et al. Altered carnitine homeostasis is associated with decreased mitochondrial function and altered nitric oxide signaling in lambs with pulmonary hypertension Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): L46 - L56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Frey, A. Leskovar, J. Reinstein, and J. Buchner The ATPase Cycle of the Endoplasmic Chaperone Grp94 J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 35612 - 35620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Arthur, J. D. Lich, R. K. Aziz, M. Kotb, and J. P.-Y. Ting Heat Shock Protein 90 Associates with Monarch-1 and Regulates Its Ability to Promote Degradation of NF-{kappa}B-Inducing Kinase J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 6291 - 6296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wanderling, B. B. Simen, O. Ostrovsky, N. T. Ahmed, S. M. Vogen, T. Gidalevitz, and Y. Argon GRP94 Is Essential for Mesoderm Induction and Muscle Development Because It Regulates Insulin-like Growth Factor Secretion Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2007; 18(10): 3764 - 3775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. McLellan, T. J. Turbyville, E.M. K. Wijeratne, A. Kerschen, E. Vierling, C. Queitsch, L. Whitesell, and A.A. L. Gunatilaka A Rhizosphere Fungus Enhances Arabidopsis Thermotolerance through Production of an HSP90 Inhibitor Plant Physiology, September 1, 2007; 145(1): 174 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Aschner, S. L. Foster, M. Kaplowitz, Y. Zhang, H. Zeng, and C. D. Fike Heat shock protein 90 modulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and vascular reactivity in the newborn piglet pulmonary circulation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): L1515 - L1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|