| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Physiology and Biophysics College of Medicine University of Illinois Chicago, Illinois 60612
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-macroglobulin
gene. This gene is silenced in vivo in the antimesometrial
cells and in the GG-AD cell line, derived from antimesometrial cells.
To examine whether the lack of
2-macroglobulin expression is due to
defective components in the PRL signaling pathway, we compared the
relative expression of Janus kinase 2 (Jak2), signal transducer and
activator of transcription 5 a and b (Stat5 a and b), suppressor
of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS-1), and the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2
mRNA in mesometrial and antimesometrial decidua on days 12 and 13 of
pseudopregnancy, the time of maximal
2-macroglobulin expression. We found no
significant differences in the relative expression of either Jak2,
Stat5 (a and b), or SHP-2 in the two cell populations. However, we
discovered a profound difference in the expression of SOCS-1, an
inhibitor of the Jak/Stat pathway. This gene was highly expressed in
the antimesometrial cells and in the GG-AD cells, which do not produce
2-macroglobulin. Immunoprecipitation
experiments with GG-AD cells revealed that although Jak2 and Stat5
coprecipitate in response to PRL stimulation, no phosphorylation of
Jak2 and Stat5 could be observed. To examine whether SOCS-1 plays a
role in silencing the
2-macroglobulin gene,
we cultured GG-AD cells in the presence of either a SOCS-1 antisense
oligonucleotide or an irrelevant oligonucleotide for 4, 12, and 28
h. Cells were also treated with PRL. Within 4 h of SOCS-1
antisense treatment,
2-macroglobulin mRNA
expression was initiated. After 28 h, only cells treated with PRL
and SOCS-1 antisense oligonucleotide retained the ability to express
the
2-macroglobulin gene. In summary,
results of this study reveal that constitutive expression of SOCS-1 can
prevent PRL signaling and that the lack of PRL-induced expression of
2-macroglobulin in a defined decidual cell
population is largely due to SOCS-1 expression in these cells. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-macroglobulin
(
2-MG) (5, 6), a protease inhibitor, which
appears to play an important role in limiting trophoblast invasion
(7, 8, 9, 10, 11) and whose expression is induced in several target tissues,
including the decidua, by PRL and PRL-related hormones (6, 12, 13, 14). Yet
despite the fact that the antimesometrial cells produce PRL and
PRL-related hormones and that the PRL-receptor (PRL-R) is present
in both cell types (15), only the mesometrial cells express the
2-MG gene. The reason why
2-MG expression is silenced in the
antimesometrial cells is not clear. One key event governing the
transduction of the PRL signaling is well characterized: the presence
of the effector induces membrane receptor dimerization which leads to
transphosphorylation of the associated tyrosine kinase, Janus kinase 2
(Jak2), followed by activation of the signal transducer and activator
of transcription 5 (Stat5) pathway (16, 17, 18), leading to Stat5
translocation to the nucleus and its binding to specific promoter
sequences (19, 20). PRL was shown to up-regulate
2-MG expression via activation of Stat5 in
ovarian primary granulosa cells (13, 21) and whole tissue (14, 22).
Although the paradigm of PRL signaling through the Stat pathway is well
established, very little is known as to how the signal is switched off.
Some evidence suggests the involvement of the protein tyrosine
phosphatase SHP-2 (SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2) in
PRL signaling, although this phosphatase acts as a positive rather than
negative regulator (23).
Recently a new family of SH2-containing proteins, named SOCS
(suppressor of cytokine signaling) was discovered and shown to block
cytokine signaling (24, 25, 26, 27). Structurally, this family is linked by the
presence of a central SH2 domain and a conserved carboxy-terminal
domain termed the SOCS box. SOCS genes are differentially induced by
different cytokines (28, 29, 30). At least eight members are presently
grouped in this category (SOCS-17 and CIS) (31). SOCS-1 and 3 have
been shown to block the activation of gene transcription by PRL and GH,
SOCS-1 being a more potent inhibitor (29, 32, 33, 34). SOCS-1 has been
independently discovered by three groups and named either SOCS-1 (24),
JAB (JAK binding protein) (25), or SSI-1 (Stat-inducible Stat
inhibitor) (26). The mouse and rat SOCS-1 genes encode proteins of 212
amino acids, whereas the human gene encodes a protein of 211 amino
acids. Mouse, rat, and human SOCS-1 proteins share 9599% amino acid
homology (24). SOCS-1 interacts with the catalytic region of Jak
kinase, suppresses its tyrosine kinase activity, and thus prevents the
phosphorylation of Stat5 (32). It was shown recently to suppress PRL
signaling at low levels of expression (32, 33). We have recently found
that the rat decidua express SOCS-1. This prompted us to examine the
level of SOCS-1 expression in the different decidual cell populations
and in PRL-producing and uterine-derived cell lines (35, 36) that
either express or do not express the
2-MG gene
and to examine whether inhibition of SOCS-1 expression with an
antisense oligonucleotide can lead to
2-MG
expression in cells where this gene is usually silenced.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-Macroglobulin mRNA Expression in the
Rat Mesometrial and Antimesometrial Decidua and in Two Uterine-Derived
Cell Lines
2-MG mRNA
is expressed principally in the mesometrial decidual cells and very
little, if any, in the antimesometrial decidual cells. The results also
revealed that the
2-MG gene is not expressed
in the GG-AD cells that were derived from antimesometrial cells (36)
but is expressed in UIII cell line. These cells,
which originate from endometrial stroma, behave similarly to decidual
cells in culture (35). Both cell lines were shown to produce PRL by
immunocytochemistry, Western blotting, and RT-PCR (37, 38).
|
2-MG
regulation, any impediment with the normal signaling pathway, such as a
deficiency in the expression of an essential transducing component, may
prevent the expression of target genes. To test this possibility, we
examined the expression of several components known to participate in
PRL signaling to the
2-MG gene in the two
different tissues forming the decidua and in the two uterine-derived
cell lines. Since maximal expression of
2-MG
in the mesometrial decidua occurs on days 1213 of pseudopregnancy,
decidual tissue was collected at these days of pseudopregnancy and
separated into mesometrial and antimesometrial decidua. Total RNA was
subjected to RT-PCR analysis with L19 as an internal control, and we
looked at the expression of the positive regulators Jak2, Stat5 (a and
b variants), the putative modulator SHP-2, and the negative controller
SOCS-1 with that of the target gene. No significant differences in the
expression of Jak2 (Fig. 2A
2-MG.
|
2-MG expressing
UIII cells than the
2-MG
silent GG-AD cell line.
|
|
|
|
2-MG mRNA
Levels in GG-AD Cells
2-MG gene, we challenged the cells with
a chimeric phosphorothioate antisense, directed against the 5'-terminus
of SOCS-1. An irrelevant chimeric phosphorothioate antisense, which was
shown to be devoid of any homology with any known gene product, served
as a negative control. As shown in Fig. 7
2-MG gene expression. As shown in Fig. 8
2-MG mRNA
became clearly detectable in GG-AD cells after 4 h exposure to the
antisense in serum-free medium (lane 2). The
2-MG mRNA levels were further increased after
8 h of culture in the presence of serum (Fig. 8
2-MG gene expression. The lower expression of
2-MG in the absence of antisense may be
related to decreased endogenous levels of SOCS-1 due to the first
period of culture in the absence of serum. However, 24 h later,
2-MG expression was observed only in cells
transfected with the phosphorothioate anti-SOCS-1 and further treated
with PRL (Fig. 8
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to SOCS-1, SOCS-3 was shown to inhibit the activation of gene transcription by PRL in human mammary cancer cells while SOCS-2 was able to restore PRL signaling (33). Whether SOCS-2 and SOCS-3 play an important role in PRL signal transduction in the decidua needs to be determined. The recent generation of SOCS-1 -/- mice does not allow investigation as to the role of this protein during pregnancy since SOCS-1-deficient mice die before weaning with fatty degeneration of the liver (39).
In many cells that do not express the SOCS proteins, cytokines and PRL
first activate the Jak/Stat pathway and thereafter stimulate the
expression of the SOCS protein that acts to switch off the signaling
pathway. In cells that constitutively express SOCS-1, PRL signaling
appears to be shut off and PRL-regulated gene expression silenced. This
appears to be the reason for which one defined population in the rat
decidua expresses the PRL-regulated gene
2-MG
and another population does not, although both cell types express the
PRL-R and are subjected not only to PRL produced by the decidua (38)
but also to pituitary PRL and rat placental lactogens produced by the
trophoblast. We first thought that the cells that do not express
2-MG may lack a critical component in PRL
signal transduction. Our results indicate that this is not the case but
that Stat5 in these cells is phosphorylated neither before PRL
treatment nor in response to PRL stimulation, most probably due to the
high levels of SOCS-1 expression. Expression of SOCS-1 and
2-MG are inversely related, and blocking
SOCS-1 expression leads within 4 h to the appearance of
2-MG mRNA in GG-AD cells. Thus, the
combination of an endogenously generated effector and inhibition of
SOCS-1 expression leads to
2-MG
expression.
The constitutive expression of SOCS-1 in the antimesometrial cells and
the lack of expression in the mesometrial cells may be of great
physiological importance in regard to which cells express
2-MG, leading to differential differentiation
of decidual cells and allowing for limited trophoblast invasion.
Indeed, it is the mesometrial decidua, which lacks SOCS-1 and expresses
2-MG, that is the site of trophoblast
invasion. These cells are much less differentiated than the
antimesometrial cells (1, 2) and remain loosely connected, allowing
trophoblast cells to invade without causing massive cell destruction.
The limited differentiation of these cells may well be due to
2-MG, which binds and prevents the activity of
several growth factors involved in cell differentiation (40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48). In
addition, the invasive nature of the trophoblast cells is related to
the secretion of proteolytic enzymes (49, 50). These trophoblast cells
invade without restraint any tissue other than the mesometrial decidua.
The abundant secretion of
2-MG, a potent
protease inhibitor known to limit trophoblast invasion (50), may be of
critical importance for the prevention of mesometrial tissue damage
during placentation.
The question as to why SOCS-1 is constitutively expressed in one cell type and not the other, causing differential responsiveness to PRL stimulation, remains a subject of further study. Nevertheless, the results of this investigation suggest that the constitutive expression of SOCS, or the lack of it in defined cells of the decidua, may play an important role in the normal development of the placenta.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and Surgical Procedures
Pseudopregnant Holztman rats were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. (Madison, WI). They were kept under
controlled temperature (2224 C) and light conditions of 14 h
light, 10 h dark with free access to standard rat chow and water.
Pseudopregnancy was induced by mating females with vasectomized males.
The day of vaginal plug was designated as day 1 of pseudopregnancy.
Decidualization of the uterine endometrium was induced, under ether
anesthesia, on day 5 of pseudopregnancy by scratching the
antimesometrial side with a hooked needle. Rats were killed at days 12
and 13 of pseudopregnancy, and uteri were isolated, trimmed of adherent
tissue, and washed thoroughly in ice-cold PBS. The mesometrial and
antimesometrial decidual tissues were separated as described by Martel
et al., (51). Tissue was kept at -80 C until used for RNA
isolation.
Cell Culture
Both the UIII and the GG-AD cell lines were stably
transfected with the PRL-R long form (34, 35) and shown to produce PRL
(36, 37) as previously described. The rat endometrial stromal cell
line, UIII, is derived from adult Sprague Dawley female
rats (34). They express the vimentin filament and have retained several
characteristics of uterine stromal cells including progesterone and PRL
receptors. These cells also have the ability to differentiate
spontaneously in culture, giving rise to large cells that express the
desmin intermediate filament and consequently behave as decidual cells.
GG-AD are temperature sensitive cells derived from pure rat
antimesometrial decidual cells (35). They have retained morphological
characteristics of antimesometrial cells: they are polynucleated,
large, and have a cytoplasm filled with lipids droplets. They also
express the same mRNAs as antimesometrial cells such as activin ßA
and decidual PRL-related protein (dPRP). They were grown in
media containing nonessential amino acids (1x), antibiotic-antimycotic
solution (2x), sodium pyruvate (1x), D-glucose (0.45%),
and FBS (10%). M199 culture medium was used for UIII cells
and RPMI-1640 for GG-AD cells. UIII cells were cultured at
37 C, whereas the temperature-sensitive GG-AD cells were first cultured
at 33 C to allow cell growth and then transferred to 39 C before
treatment as previously described (35). Culture media were replaced
every 48 h and cells were harvested at 7090% confluence.
RNA Isolation and RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells and tissue using
guanidium isothiocyanate and phenol in a commercial kit (RNA-NOW,
Biogentex, Houston, TX) according to the manufacturers protocol. One
microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Advantage RT for
PCR (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc. Palo Alto, CA), and the
final volume was adjusted to 100 µl. Diluted RT product (34 µl,
representing 3040 ng of total RNA) was amplified. The reaction
mixture consisted of 1xPCR buffer (ExTaq buffer, Panvera, Madison,
WI), 150 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 4.5%
dimethylsulfoxide, 20 pmol specific oligonucleotide primers, and
0.8 U ExTaq in a final volume of 40 µl. Two sets of amplification
cycles were used. In the first five cycles, the annealing and extension
temperature of 68 C for 5 min was followed by a denaturation
temperature of 93 C for 1 min. In the second set, the annealing
temperature of 63 C for 25 sec was followed by a 30-sec extension at 71
C and another 25-sec denaturation at 92 C. Cycle number varied for each
of the amplified products and was in the range of 2535 cycles. The
conditions were such that amplification of the product was in the
exponential phase, and the assay was linear with respect to the amount
of input cDNA. The ribosomal L19 protein was used as internal control
to normalize the data. L19 and the specific gene were amplified
separately, PCR products were mixed in 1:1 ratio, and 820 µl of the
mix resolved on 2.5% Metaphore agarose gel (FMC Corp.
BioProducts, Rockland ME) containing 0.5 µg/ml ethidium
bromide in 0.75xTris-borate-EDTA. The resulting gels were
photographed using UV transilluminator and a digital camera
(Electrophoresis Documentation and Analysis System 120, Eastman Kodak Co., New Haven, CT).
For the detection of Stat5a and Stat5b, a common sense primer
5'-GGGCATCACCATTGCTTGGAAG-3' was combined with a specific Stat5a
antisense 5'-GGAGCTTCTGGCAGAAGTGAAG-3' or with a specific Stat5b
antisense 5'-CACGACTAGTATTAACACTTCAC-3' based on the sequences of rat
Stat5a (Ref. 52 ; GenBank accession no. U24175) or 5b (Ref. 53 ; GenBank
accession no. X97541). The sizes of the coamplified cDNA products were
498 and 610 bp for Stat5a and Stat5b, respectively. The other primers
were as follows: PRL-RL (54), 5'-AAAGTATCTTGTCCAGACTCGCTG-3' and
5'-AGCAGTT-CTTCAGACTTGCCCTT-3' (279 bp cDNA fragment);
2-MG (55) 5'-GTAATCCTTCTAACTGTTCGGCGA-3' and
5'-CCAATGAAGATCGTTTCATACGGA-3' (343 bp cDNA fragment); Jak-1 (Ref. 56 ;
GenBank accession no. AJ000556), 5'-CTATGAG-CCAGCTGAGTTTCGATC-3'
and 5'- CATCTCGGACACAGA-CGCCGTA-3' (275 bp cDNA fragment); Jak-2
(Ref. 57 ; GenBank accession no. U13396),
5'-GTTCTTACCGAAGTGCGTG-CGA-3' and 5'-GGTAATGGTGTGCATCCGCAGTT-3'
(523 bp cDNA fragment); SHP-2 (Ref. 58 ; GenBank accession no. U09307),
5'- CGGGAGTTAAGCAAGCTAGCCG-3' and 5'-CCTCACACGCATGACGCCATAC-3' (465 bp
cDNA fragment); and SOCS-1, 5'-GCAGCTCGAAGAGGCAGTCGAA-3' and 5'-
GCTCCCACTCTGATTACCGGCG-3' (273 bp cDNA fragment). No rat SOCS-1 mRNA
was ever published in the GenBank database. Thus, we employed BLAST to
search for rat homologs to a published mouse sequence (GenBank
accession no. U88325). A 13.2-kb rat genomic sequence (GenBank
accession no. Z46939) was found that includes, in addition to other
genes, the rat SOCS-1 sequence (start site at position 12119, end of
last amino acid at position 13155). PCR primers were designed to a
piece of this cDNA sequence. A cDNA sequence from a SOCS-1
amplification experiment was sequenced and found to match the rat
SOCS-1 sequence. The primers for ribosomal protein L19 were as follows:
5'-CTGAAGGTCAAAGGGAATGTG-3' and 5'-CGTTCACCTTGATGAGCCCATT-3' (59).
Antisense Experiments
Chimeric oligonucleotides were designed for the antisense
experiments. The SOCS-1 antisense was designed as a 26-bp
single-stranded oligonucleotide, covering the ATG start site of the
gene with each of the four external nucleotides on both the 5'- and the
3'-ends carrying a modified phosphorothioate backbone:
5'-CACCTGGTTACGTGCTACCATCCTAC-3'. The control antisense oligomer had an
identical type of structure, 5'-CAGTGCATACGCTGTACGTCATGTAC-3'. Cells
were grown in RPMI-1640 medium. At 75% confluence, the cultures were
transferred to 39 C for 12 h and then washed twice with PBS. The
antisense oligomer, precoated with lipofectamine (Life Technologies) at a ratio of 1:26, was added to the cultures at a
final concentration of 250 nM in 2 ml Opti-Mem (Life Technologies). After 4 h, cells were washed with PBS and cultured
with RPMI-164010% FBS supplemented with or without 1 µg/ml
PRL.
Western and Immunoprecipitation Analysis
Cells were grown to 80% confluency, washed twice with cold PBS,
and lysed at 4 C for 1 h in ice-cold lysis buffer (PBS containing
2% SDS, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride and 2 µg/ml of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin). Cells
were scraped, sonicated, and cleared by centrifugation. Protein
concentrations were determined using a Protein Assay Dye Reagent kit
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). For
immunoprecipitation analysis, 800 µg protein extracts were incubated
overnight at 4 C with monoclonal anti-Stat5 (G-2) or anti-Jak2
antibodies. Complexes were then precipitated with Protein A/G Sepharose
(Santa Cruz Technology, Inc.) and boiled for 5 min in
sample buffer: 62.5 mM, Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 5%
ß-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 0.1% bromophenol
blue. Proteins were resolved on 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gels
according to the method described by Laemmli (60). After gel
electrophoresis, proteins were electrophoretically transferred to
nitrocellulose filters (Protran, Schleicher & Schuell, Inc., Keene, NH). The blots were incubated 1 h at room
temperature with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH
7.6) containing 0.1% Tween 20. Blots were washed and incubated
overnight at 4 C with the primary antibody (1:2000) and then washed and
incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antirabbit IgG
(1:5000) for 1 h at room temperature. Complexes were visualized
using the enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection kit
(Western Luminol Reagent; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).
Statistics
Data were examined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncans
multiple-range test. A level of P < 0.05 was accepted
as statistically significant.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH Grant HD-12356 (to G.G.) and Ernst Schering Research Foundation (to C.T.).
Received for publication October 15, 1999. Revision received December 22, 1999. Accepted for publication December 28, 1999.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-Macroglobulin expression in the
mesometrial decidua and its regulation by decidual luteotropin and
prolactin. Endocrinology 131:13211328
2-macroglobulin gene during pregnancy. J
Biochem 100:989993
2-macroglobulin.
Studies in vivo and in cultured fetal rat hepatocytes. Eur
J Biochem 171:703709
2-macroglobulin, by rat uterine
tissues during pregnancy and pseudopregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 108:289298
2-macroglobulin by luteinizing hormone and
prolactin during cell differentiation in the rat ovary. Mol Endocrinol 5:12801291
2-macroglobulin gene in rat ovarian granulosa
cells: Stat5 activation and binding to the interleukin-6 response
element. Mol Endocrinol 10:171184
2-macroglobulin
(
2M) promoter: relation to the expression of
2M in the rat
ovary. Biol Reprod 55:10291038
2-macroglobulin (
2-M) gene in rat ovarian
granulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol 12:13931409
inducible gene and confers resistance to interferons. Blood 92:16681676
2-macroglobulin, involving Jak 2, Stat5 in the
UIII rat uterine stromal cell line. Program of
the 81st Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, San Diego, CA, 1999,
p 390 (Abstract)
2-macroglobulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:342346
2-macroglobulin as a cytokine-binding plasma
protein. J Biol Chem 264:58185825
2-macroglobulin. J Biol Chem 265:69736977
2-macroglobulin as a carrier
protein for interleukin-6. J Immunol 142:148152
2-Macroglobulin is a binding protein for basic
fibroblast growth factor. J Biol Chem 264:72107216
2-MG complexes in rodent and
human. Endocrinology 125:791800
2-Macroglobulin is a binding protein of
inhibin and activin. Endocrinology 132:20382050
2-macroglobulin
inhibits neurite outgrowth and survival of embryonic sensory and
cerebral cortical neurons. J Neurosci Res 35:170182
2-macroglobulin, binds insulin-like growth
factor I via a protease-dependent mechanism. Mol Reprod Dev 44:103110
2-macroglobulin and acute phase control of
messenger RNA. J Biol Chem 262:446454
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. S. Devi, A. Shehu, C. Stocco, J. Halperin, J. Le, A. M. Seibold, M. Lahav, N. Binart, and G. Gibori Regulation of Transcription Factors and Repression of Sp1 by Prolactin Signaling Through the Short Isoform of Its Cognate Receptor Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3327 - 3335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Mei Feng, Ruopeng Sun, Chengmei Zhang, Enhua Sun, Shaochun Wei, Jiaqing Wan, and Ruopeng Sun Increased Expression of Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP2 in Experimental Pneumococcal Meningitis: Correlation With Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pleocytosis J Child Neurol, March 1, 2008; 23(3): 287 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Blumenstein, J A Keelan, J M Bowen-Shauver, and M D Mitchell Suppressors of cytokine signaling proteins in human preterm placental tissues J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 35(1): 165 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ueki, T. Kondo, Y.-H. Tseng, and C. R. Kahn Central role of suppressors of cytokine signaling proteins in hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome in the mouse PNAS, July 13, 2004; 101(28): 10422 - 10427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ueki, T. Kondo, and C. R. Kahn Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 (SOCS-1) and SOCS-3 Cause Insulin Resistance through Inhibition of Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Insulin Receptor Substrate Proteins by Discrete Mechanisms Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2004; 24(12): 5434 - 5446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Zoubiane, A. Valentijn, E. T. Lowe, N. Akhtar, S. Bagley, A. P. Gilmore, and C. H. Streuli A role for the cytoskeleton in prolactin-dependent mammary epithelial cell differentiation J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2004; 117(2): 271 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Curlewis, S. P. Tam, P. Lau, D. H. L. Kusters, J. L. Barclay, S. T. Anderson, and M. J. Waters A Prostaglandin F2{alpha} Analog Induces Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling-3 Expression in the Corpus Luteum of the Pregnant Rat: A Potential New Mechanism in Luteolysis Endocrinology, October 1, 2002; 143(10): 3984 - 3993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ling and H. Billig PRL Receptor-Mediated Effects in Female Mouse Adipocytes: PRL Induces Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling Expression and Suppresses Insulin-Induced Leptin Production in Adipocytes in Vitro Endocrinology, November 1, 2001; 142(11): 4880 - 4890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Tessier, A. Prigent-Tessier, S. Ferguson-Gottschall, Y. Gu, and G. Gibori PRL Antiapoptotic Effect in the Rat Decidua Involves the PI3K/Protein Kinase B-Mediated Inhibition of Caspase-3 Activity Endocrinology, September 1, 2001; 142(9): 4086 - 4094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Prigent-Tessier, U. Barkai, C. Tessier, H. Cohen, and G. Gibori Characterization of a Rat Uterine Cell Line, UIII Cells: Prolactin (PRL) Expression and Endogenous Regulation of PRL-Dependent Genes; Estrogen Receptor {{beta}}, {{alpha}}2-Macroglobulin, and Decidual PRL Involving the Jak2 and Stat5 Pathway Endocrinology, March 1, 2001; 142(3): 1242 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |