| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Gene Expression Is Mediated by Janus Kinase 2 (Jak2) While Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b (Stat5b) Phosphorylation Involves Jak2 and a Second Tyrosine Kinase
Departments of Physiology and Biophysics (J.F., U.B., L.Z., G.G.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (A.T.F.), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Geula Gibori, Ph.D., 835 South Wolcott, M/C 901, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612. E-mail: ggibori{at}uic.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression at the level of transcription and that the
transcription factor Stat5 (signal transducer and activator of
transcription 5) mediates this stimulation. Since it is well
established that PRL activates Stat5 through the tyrosine kinase, Janus
kinase 2 (Jak2), the role of Jak2 in PRL regulation of ER
expression
was investigated. In primary luteinized granulosa cells, the general
tyrosine kinase inhibitors, genistein and AG18, and the Jak2
inhibitor, AG490, prevented PRL stimulation of ER
mRNA levels,
suggesting that PRL signaling to the ER
gene requires Jak2 activity.
However, using an antibody that recognizes the
tyrosine-phosphorylated forms of both Stat5a and Stat5b (Y694/Y699), it
was found that AG490 could inhibit PRL-induced Stat5a phosphorylation
only and had little or no effect on Stat5b phosphorylation. These
effects of AG490 were confirmed in COS cells overexpressing Stat5b.
Also in COS cells, a kinase-negative Jak2 prevented PRL stimulation of
ER
promoter activity and Stat5b phosphorylation while a
constitutively active Jak2 could stimulate both in the absence of PRL.
Furthermore, kinase-negative-Jak2, but not AG490, could inhibit Stat5b
nuclear translocation and DNA binding. Therefore, it seems that in the
presence of AG490, Stat5b remains phosphorylated, is located in the
nucleus and capable of binding DNA, but is apparently transcriptionally
inactive. These findings suggest that PRL may activate a second
tyrosine kinase, other than Jak2, that is capable of
phosphorylating Stat5b without inducing transcriptional activity. To
investigate whether another signaling pathway is involved, the src
kinase inhibitor PP2 and the phosphoinositol-3 kinase inhibitor (PI3K),
LY294002, were used. Neither inhibitor alone had any major effect
on PRL regulation of ER
promoter activity or on PRL-induced
Stat5b phosphorylation. However, the combination of AG490 and
LY294002 largely prevented PRL-induced Stat5b phosphorylation.
These findings indicate that PRL stimulation of ER
expression
requires Jak2 and also that PRL can induce Stat5b phosphorylation
through two tyrosine kinases, Jak2 and one downstream of PI3K.
Furthermore, these results suggest that the role of Jak2 in activating
Stat5b may be through a mechanism other than simply inducing Stat5b
phosphorylation. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERß expression (3).
Furthermore, this stimulation occurs at the level of transcription and
is mediated by the transcription factor Stat5 (signal transducer and
activator of transcription 5) (4). The PRL receptor (PRL-R) is a member of the cytokine/hematopoietic receptor superfamily. These receptors are characterized by four conserved cysteines, a Trp-Ser-X-Trp-Ser (WSXWS) motif in their extracellular domain, and no intrinsic kinase activity (5, 6). It is well established that the PRL-R is associated with the tyrosine kinase Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) and activates Jak2 rapidly upon exposure to PRL (7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Signaling through Jak2 has been shown to be necessary for both PRL-induced proliferation of Nb2 cells and regulation of gene transcription through the transcription factor Stat5 (12, 13, 14). Jak2 has been shown to activate Stat5 through phosphorylation of both Stat5a and Stat5b on specific tyrosine residues in the C terminus (15, 16). The ability of PRL to utilize Jak2 appears to be specific since overexpression of Jak1 or Jak3 does not amplify PRL signaling to milk proteins (17, 18).
In addition to the Jak/Stat pathway, PRL has been shown to activate
other signaling pathways including PKC (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24),
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (25, 26, 27), MAPK
(26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33), and the src family of tyrosine kinases
(36, 37, 38). Recently, a role for PKC
in PRL regulation of
relaxin expression in the rat corpus luteum has been identified
(39, 40, 41). Also, PRL is known to stimulate PI3K activity in
both Nb2 and CHO cells stably transfected with the PRL-R (25, 26). PRL stimulation of PI3K activity is necessary for the
activation of PKB kinase and the prevention of apoptosis in rat
decidual cells (42) and Nb2 cells (27).
Although the function of src tyrosine kinase activity in PRL signaling
has not been well studied, it may play a role in PRL activation of the
PI3K pathway (43, 44).
Our previous studies have indicated that PRL utilizes the transcription
factor Stat5 to mediate regulation of ER
gene transcription
(4). It is well established that PRL activates Stat5
through phosphorylation on specific tyrosine residues in the C terminus
of Stat5a and Stat5b (Y694 and Y699) by the tyrosine kinase Jak2
(15, 16). Although PRL has been shown to activate many
different signaling pathways, Stat5 activation has been shown only to
occur by PRL through Jak2. Therefore, it seems likely that the tyrosine
kinase Jak2 is involved in PRL regulation of ER
expression. The
purpose of this investigation was to examine the role of Jak2 in
PRL-stimulated, Stat5- mediated regulation of ER
expression. We have
found that while Jak2 activity is required for both PRL stimulation of
ER
expression and Stat5a and Stat5b phosphorylation, a second
tyrosine kinase, downstream of PI3K, can also mediate PRL-induced
Stat5b phosphorylation specifically, but not Stat5a phosphorylation.
This second tyrosine kinase, however, does not appear to be involved in
either Stat5b transcriptional activity or ER
expression.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mRNA expression is
tyrosine kinase dependent, primary luteinized granulosa cells were
treated with PRL in the presence of two different general tyrosine
kinase inhibitors, genistein or AG18. Interestingly, both of these
inhibitors have been used to prevent PRL stimulation of gene expression
(45, 46, 47) but failed to prevent PRL inhibition of
20
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression (10).
When cells were treated with genistein, both basal and PRL-stimulated
levels of ER
mRNA were decreased, as determined by semiquantitative
RT-PCR (Fig. 1
expression is
dependent upon the activation of a tyrosine kinase.
|
mRNA expression was examined using real-time quantitative
RT-PCR (Fig. 2A
mRNA expression in this
model, suggesting that the tyrosine kinase required for PRL action on
ER
expression is Jak2. Interestingly, AG490 alone (data not shown)
as well as genistein or AG18 alone appeared to decrease ER
mRNA
expression, suggesting that some level of signaling through Jak2 may be
required to maintain the basal level of ER
expression in primary
luteinized granulosa cells.
|
expression
is mediated by Stat5 (4), we next investigated whether the
effect of AG490 was due to its ability to block activation of Stat5.
Primary luteinized granulosa cells were treated with PRL for 5 min,
either alone or after a 30-min pretreatment with AG490. Stat5a and
Stat5b were then immunoprecipitated, and phosphorylation was examined
by Western blotting. Both Stat5a and Stat5b become highly
phosphorylated on Y694 and Y699, respectively, in response to PRL in
these cells; however, only PRL-induced phosphorylation of Stat5a was
prevented by AG490 whereas phosphorylation of Stat5b was unaffected
(Fig. 2B
It is possible that the inhibitory effect of AG490 on PRL-induced ER
mRNA expression may be due to the prevention of Stat5a phosphorylation.
However, as we have previously shown, both Stat5a and Stat5b can
mediate ER
expression to an equal extent (4).
Furthermore, we have found that Stat5b is highly expressed in luteal
cells whereas Stat5a is expressed at nearly undetectable levels (data
not shown). This suggests then that Stat5b may, in fact, be the major
regulator of ER
expression in vivo. Therefore, we decided
to further investigate the role of Jak2 in Stat5b phosphorylation and
transcriptional activity using COS cells, since these cells express
undetectable levels of endogenous Stat5 by Western analysis. In
addition, these experiments may eliminate the possibility that the
effect of AG490 on ER
mRNA expression was the result of blocking
Stat5a phosphorylation. COS cells were transfected with an
approximately 700-bp fragment of the ER
promoter, which has been
linked to the luciferase reporter gene and previously shown to be
responsive to PRL (4). These cells were also transfected
with an expression vector for Stat5b and for either the long form of
the PRL-R (PRL-RL), which in the absence of PRL
treatment served as the control, or with an expression vector for a
constitutively active PRL-R (PRL-RCA). This
active receptor has previously been shown to mediate gene transcription
of PRL-regulated genes (4, 53). Cells were then treated
with vehicle or 25 µM AG490 for 24 h.
PRL-RCA stimulation of ER
promoter-driven
luciferase activity was prevented by AG490 (Fig. 2C
). The effect of
AG490 was also examined on Stat5b phosphorylation in COS cells and, as
was the case in primary cells, AG490 had no inhibitory effect on Stat5b
phosphorylation (Fig. 2D
). These findings suggest that AG490 can
prevent PRL stimulation of ER
promoter activity and apparent Stat5b
transcriptional activity without affecting Stat5b phosphorylation.
Because it is well accepted that PRL activates Stat5b through Jak2, we
decided to confirm that Jak2 is involved in PRL stimulation of ER
promoter activity and Stat5b phosphorylation. To do this, we used
expression vectors for a kinase-negative and a constitutively active
Jak2 (KN-Jak2, CA-Jak2). The KN-Jak2 was created by mutation to the
kinase domain, rendering it inactive, while the CA-Jak2 was made by
deletion of a pseudokinase domain, which acts to negatively regulate
Jak2 kinase activity (54, 55). When COS cells were
transfected with the ER
promoter, Stat5b, and
PRL-RCA, the KN-Jak2 could completely prevent
PRL-RCA stimulation of ER
promoter activity
(Fig. 3A
). The effect of KN-Jak2 on
Stat5b phosphorylation was also examined. In contrast to AG490,
KN-Jak2 could, in large part, reverse the effect of
PRL-RCA on Stat5b phosphorylation (Fig. 3B
). When
COS cells were transfected with only the ER
promoter and Stat5b,
CA-Jak2 could stimulate promoter activity in the absence of any PRL
signal transduction (Fig. 3C
). In addition, CA-Jak2 induced a high
degree of Stat5b phosphorylation in the absence of PRL (Fig. 3D
). These
findings indicate that Jak2 is involved in PRL stimulation of ER
expression and can mediate Stat5b phosphorylation.
|
gene promoter.
|
|
-luc, Stat5b, and
either PRL-RL or PRL-RCA.
Cells were then treated for 24 h with PP2, a specific inhibitor of
src, and the effects on ER
promoter activity and Stat5b
phosphorylation were examined. PP2 was found to have no effect on
PRL-RCA-induced ER
promoter activity (Fig. 6A
|
-luc, Stat5b, and
PRL-RL or PRL-RCA. LY294002
had little effect on either ER
promoter activity or Stat5b
phosphorylation in the presence of PRL-RCA (Fig. 7
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcription requires Jak2 tyrosine kinase activity.
Furthermore, PRL activation of Stat5a appears to be dependent on Jak2
activity only since both AG490 and KN-Jak2 could prevent PRL-induced
phosphorylation of Stat5a. PRL activation of Stat5b, however, appears
to be multifaceted (summarized in Table 1
transcription could be inhibited by
KN-Jak2 and stimulated by CA-Jak2. In contrast, the Jak2 inhibitor,
AG490, prevented Stat5b transcriptional activity without affecting its
phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, or DNA binding activity. As a
control, AG490 was found to prevent Stat5a phosphorylation and nuclear
translocation. Only when the combination of AG490 and the PI3K
inhibitor, LY294002, was used could PRL-induced Stat5b phosphorylation
be prevented, suggesting that Jak2 and a tyrosine kinase downstream of
PI3K may be involved in Stat5b phosphorylation. However, this second
tyrosine kinase does not appear to be involved in PRL stimulation
of ER
promoter activity.
|
Second, it is not clear whether PRL activation of PI3K is dependent on Jak2 activity. The KN-Jak2 could, in large part, prevent Stat5b phosphorylation, suggesting that the tyrosine kinase downstream of PI3K is also prevented by KN-Jak2. In contrast, AG490 did not prevent Stat5b phosphorylation, suggesting that activation of this second tyrosine kinase is not Jak2 dependent. Previous studies in this area suggest that PRL can activate PI3K through two pathways, one involving Jak2 and the insulin receptor substrate and the other involving the src kinase fyn and the adaptor protein Cbl (43, 44, 64, 65, 66). It is possible that the activation of PI3K depends on the presence of Jak2 protein and not its activity. If the mutation to KN-Jak2 significantly changes its conformation, then the formation of a signaling complex could be disrupted and prevent PI3K activation. AG490, on the other hand, is a tyrphostin tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which presumably would only block the substrate binding site and perhaps not affect the ability of Jak2 to interact with PI3K.
Third, when Jak2 is active, Stat5b can regulate gene transcription. In
the absence of Jak2 activity, Stat5b can no longer stimulate ER
promoter activity even though it is phosphorylated, located in the
nucleus, and capable of binding DNA. These data suggest that Jak2
activity is required for PRL regulation of gene transcription in some
fashion beyond its ability to induce Stat5b phosphorylation on Y699.
The ability of src kinase to activate Stat5b phosphorylation and DNA
binding without transcriptional activity support this possibility
(56). Whether Jak2 may be involved in the activation of
signaling molecules in addition to Stat5, such as coactivators or other
transcription factors, has not been investigated.
And finally, the ability of PRL to activate Stat5b phosphorylation through two kinases appears to be specific for Stat5b and not Stat5a. Very few instances of differential regulation of Stat5a and Stat5b have been reported; however, one in particular is of interest. Insulin can induce tyrosine phosphorylation of both Stat5a and Stat5b (67). AG490 prevented phosphorylation of Stat5a only and had no effect on Stat5b phosphorylation. When an insulin receptor kinase inhibitor was used, Stat5b phosphorylation induced by insulin was completely prevented. Although additional data suggested that Stat5b is a direct target of the insulin receptor (67, 68), one of the downstream pathways of insulin is PI3K. Perhaps a similar tyrosine kinase downstream of both PRL and insulin activation of PI3K is involved in Stat5b-specific phosphorylation.
Taken together, our results indicate that PRL regulation of ER
expression requires Jak2 activity. In addition, our data suggest the
ability of PRL to induce Stat5b phosphorylation and transcriptional
activity through Jak2 whereas Stat5b phosphorylation, but not
transcriptional activity, may be mediated by novel tyrosine kinase
downstream of PI3K.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary Luteinized Granulosa Cell Culture and
Transfection
Immature female Sprague Dawley rats were obtained from Sasco
Animal Labs (Madison, WI) and housed under controlled conditions of
light and temperature with free access to standard rat chow and water.
All experiments were conducted in accordance with the principles and
procedures of the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Follicular development was induced in immature rats (2426 d of age)
by injection of 15 IU PMSG ip. An ovulatory dose of hCG (10 IU, ip) was
given 48 h later. Luteinized granulosa cells were harvested from
large preovulatory follicles 78 h after hCG injection. The ovarian
bursa and surrounding fat were removed, and the ovaries were incubated
sequentially in DMEM/F12 (1:1) containing 6 mM EGTA and
then 0.5 M sucrose. Granulosa cells were harvested by
puncturing the follicles with 25-g needles, washed in DMEM/F12, and
then cultured in six-well plates at a density of 0.25 x
106 cells per well for RNA extraction and at a
density of 1 x 106 cells per 60-mm plate
for protein extraction. The culture media was DMEM/F12 supplemented
with 1% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and
0.25 µg/ml Amphotericin. The cells were cultured
for 72 h at 37 C in a 5% CO2, humidified
atmosphere. After 72 h, media were changed and cells were cultured
overnight before the start of treatment. After treatment, cells were
washed twice with cold PBS and stored at -80 until processed.
RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription
RNA from cell cultures was isolated using Trizol according to
the manufacturers instructions. Reverse transcription was carried out
using reagents from the Advantage RT-for-PCR kit. One microgram of
total RNA was incubated with 1 µl oligo (dT)18
and 0.5 µl random hexamer at 70 C for 2 min. Four microliters of 5x
reaction buffer, 1 µl dNTP (10 mM each), 0.5 µl RNase
inhibitor, and 1 µl Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse
transcriptase were added to each sample, and the total volume was
brought to 20 µl with diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated
H2O. The reaction was carried out for
1 h at 42 C followed by 5 min at 94 C. The reverse transcribed
product was then diluted to a final volume of 100 µl by adding
DEPC-treated H2O. Five-microliter aliquots of the
diluted product were used for either semiquantitative or quantitative,
real-time RT-PCR.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR
For each sample to be analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR,
5-µl identical aliquots of diluted reverse transcribed mRNA were used
for the gene of interest and for the ribosomal protein L19, which
served as an internal control. Diluted RT product (5 µl, representing
50 ng of total RNA) was combined with 20 pmol primers, 1x PCR buffer,
150 µM dNTP, 0.8 U ExTaq, and
-32P-dCTP (2.5 µCi of 3,000 µCi/mmol) in a
final volume of 40 µl. The primers used have previously been
described (3, 69). The samples were overlaid with light
mineral oil, and PCR was carried out in two parts. First, five cycles
were carried out with an annealing and extension temperature of 69 C
for 5 min followed by denaturing at 95 C for 1 min. The second set
consisted of a varying number of cycles with annealing at 65 C for 25
sec, extension at 72 C for 30 sec, and denaturing at 95 C for 25 sec.
PCR reactions were carried out in a Perkin-Elmer/Cetus Thermal Cycler
(Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT). For ER
, 25 step 2
cycles were used and 18 cycles for L19. The conditions were such that
the amplification of the products was in the exponential phase and the
assay was linear with respect to the amount of input RNA. Reaction
products for ER
were combined with the corresponding L19 products
and electrophoresed on an 8% polyacrylamide nondenaturing gel. After
autoradiography, data were analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics, Inc. PhosphorImager and ImageQuant version 3 software
(Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The intensity
of the ER
signal was normalized to that of the ribosomal protein L19
internal control.
Real-time, Quantitative RT-PCR
To generate standard curves for quantitative PCR, rat
ER
cDNA, which was kindly provided by Dr. Maruyama, was diluted to
concentrations ranging from 103 to
107 copies/µl. Five-microliter aliquots of
standards or diluted RT products were combined with 2 µl 10x DNA
Master SYBR Green I, 1.6 µl MgCl2 (3
mM final concentration), and specific primers for rat ER
(0.5 µM 77 final concentration). Reactions were carried
out in glass capillary tubes in a total volume of 20 µl. The DNA
Master SYBR Green I mix contains Taq DNA polymerase,
reaction buffer, dNTP, 10 mM
MgCl2, and SYBR Green I dye, which is a specific
fluorescence dye for double-stranded DNA. PCR reactions were performed
in the Roche Lightcycler instrument, and the accompanying
software was used for data analysis (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). After a 2-min denaturation, PCR cycles were
carried out as follows: 0 sec at 95 C, 10 sec at the annealing
temperature, and 15 sec at 72 C. For ER
, 40 cycles at an annealing
temperature of 63 C was used. At the end of each cycle, the amount of
double-stranded DNA was monitored by measuring the level of SYBR Green
I fluorescence. After the completion of all cycles, a level of
fluorescence was selected at which all of the standards and samples
were within the linear range of amplification. The crossing point, or
the number of cycles necessary for each sample or standard to obtain
the selected level of fluorescence, was calculated using the
Roche Lightcycler software. Based on these crossing
points, a standard curve was generated, and the number of ER
copies
was calculated for each sample. The data presented represent the number
of copies of ER
in 1 µl of diluted RT product, which corresponds
to 10 ng of starting RNA.
Culture and Transfection of COS Cells
COS cells were routinely cultured in DMEM medium supplemented
with 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and
0.25 µg/ml Amphotericin. Cultures were carried out at 37
C in a 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere. For
transient transfections, 100K cells were seeded per well in six-well
plates and cultured as described above for 24 h. In general, cells
were 50% confluent at the start of transfection. For transfections,
DNA was combined with water (90 µl/well) and 2.5 M
CaCl2 (10 µl/well) and mixed. In general, a
total of 45 µg DNA were transfected per well, and the total amount
of DNA was equalized with empty vector when necessary. An equal
volume of 2x
N,-N-bis[2-hydroxyethyl]-2-amino-ethanesulfonic
acid-buffered saline was added, and DNA was allowed to
precipitate at room temperature for 10 min. The DNA was then added
dropwise to each well, and cells were cultured for 24 h at 3%
CO2. Twenty-four hours after the start of
transfection, media were changed to standard culture media supplemented
with 1% FBS, and cells were cultured for an additional 24 h at
5% CO2 in the presence or absence of various
inhibitors. After treatment, cells were washed twice with cold PBS and
stored at -80 C for reporter assays.
Reporter Assays
Luciferase and ß-gal activities were measured by first
preparing cell lysates in 1x reporter lysis buffer. Luciferase
activity driven by the ER
promoter was measure by combining lysate
with firefly luciferase assay substrate and measuring luminescence for
10 sec on a Lumat LB 9507 luminometer (EG&G Berthold, Oak Ridge,
TN). As a control, cells were cotransfected with an expression
vector for ß-gal. ß-gal Activity was measured in a separate aliquot
of lysate by incubating with a luminescent ß-gal substrate for 1
h at room temperature and then measuring luminescence for 5 sec. The
luciferase activity was normalized to the ß-gal activity within the
same well.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting
WCE from primary luteinized granulosa cells and COS cells were
prepared by lysing cells in RIPA buffer (1x PBS, 1% Nonidet, 0.5%
sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) containing 1 µM sodium
orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml PMSF, and 30 µl/ml aprotinin. For
immunoprecipitation, 500 µg of WCE were incubated with 4-µl
anti-Stat5a or anti-Stat5b antibodies for 1 h at 4 C. Protein A/G
agarose beads were added, and the mixture was incubated overnight at 4
C on a rocking platform. The beads were washed four times in PBS,
resuspended in 2x electrophoresis buffer, and boiled for 5 min. For
Western blots performed on WCE, protein was diluted in an equal volume
of 2x electrophoresis buffer and boiled for 5 min. Twenty microliters
of immunoprecipitated protein or 20 µg of WCE were separated on a
10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Western
blotting was performed by blocking nonspecific binding with 5% dry
milk in Tris-buffered saline buffer containing 0.05% Tween 20 for
1 h. Blots were then incubated with the primary antibody overnight
at 4 C on a rocking platform. After a series of washes, blots were
incubated with a secondary antibody linked to horseradish peroxidase
for 1 h. After extensive washing, blots were analyzed using an
enhanced chemiluminescence detection system and exposed to x-ray
film.
EMSA
Nuclear extracts were prepared from cell cultures by a published
method (70). A probe corresponding to the bovine
ß-casein Stat5 response element (15) was labeled by
incubating 0.5 pmol annealed oligonucleotides with 11 U T4 kinase and
25 µCi
-32P ATP (3,000 µCi/mmol). The
specific activity of the probes was greater than 8,000 cpm/fmol.
Ten-microgram nuclear extracts were incubated with 50K cpm of labeled
probes in 1x binding buffer (12 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 40
mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.12
mM EDTA, 0.06 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol) at room temperature for 30 min. The
samples were then run on a 4.5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel in
0.25x Tris-buffered EDTA buffer at 200 V for 23 h. The gels
were dried and analyzed by autoradiography.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Abbreviations: ß-gal, ß-Galactosidase; CA-Jak2, constitutively active Jak2; dNTP, deoxynucleotide triphosphate; Jak, Janus kinase; KN-Jak2; kinase-negative Jak2; PRL-R, PRL receptor; PRL-RCA, constitutively active PRL-R; PRL-RL, long form of PRL-R; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; WCE, whole-cell extract.
Received for publication March 26, 2001. Accepted for publication July 24, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß in the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy: regulation
by prolactin and placental lactogens. Endocrinology 139:24322442
and ß
transcription. Mol Endocrinol, in press
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
gene expression and the tyrosine kinase system. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun 235:587592[CrossRef][Medline]
signaling. Mol Endocrinol 14:576590
expression by
estrogen and rat placental lactogen-1 in luteinized rat ovarian
granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 162:181191[CrossRef][Medline]
2-macroglobulin gene in rat ovarian
granulosa cells: stat 5 activation and binding to the interleukin-6
response element. Mol Endocrinol 10:171184
. Blood 90:43414353This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Halperin, S. Y. Devi, S. Elizur, C. Stocco, A. Shehu, D. Rebourcet, T. G. Unterman, N. D. Leslie, J. Le, N. Binart, et al. Prolactin Signaling through the Short Form of Its Receptor Represses Forkhead Transcription Factor FOXO3 and Its Target Gene Galt Causing a Severe Ovarian Defect Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 22(2): 513 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Li, Y. S. Devi, L. Bao, J. Mao, and G. Gibori Involvement of Cyclin D3, CDKN1A (p21), and BIRC5 (Survivin) in Interleukin 11 Stimulation of Decidualization in Mice Biol Reprod, January 1, 2008; 78(1): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bao, C. Tessier, A. Prigent-Tessier, F. Li, O. L. Buzzio, E. A. Callegari, N. D. Horseman, and G. Gibori Decidual Prolactin Silences the Expression of Genes Detrimental to Pregnancy Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2326 - 2334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stocco, C. Telleria, and G. Gibori The Molecular Control of Corpus Luteum Formation, Function, and Regression Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2007; 28(1): 117 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bao, S. Devi, J. Bowen-Shauver, S. Ferguson-Gottschall, L. Robb, and G. Gibori The Role of Interleukin-11 in Pregnancy Involves Up-Regulation of {alpha}2-Macroglobulin Gene through Janus Kinase 2-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Pathway in the Decidua Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3240 - 3250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Y. Ma, G. M. Anderson, T. D. Gunn, V. Goffin, D. R. Grattan, and S. J. Bunn Prolactin Specifically Activates Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b in Neuroendocrine Dopaminergic Neurons Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5112 - 5119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cao, M. Wood, Y. Liu, T. Hoffman, J. Hyde, O.-K. Park-Sarge, and M. Vore Estradiol Represses Prolactin-Induced Expression of Na+/Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide in Liver Cells through Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} and Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 5a Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1739 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Hou, S. Srivastava, M. J. Mistry, M. P. Herbst, J. P. Bailey, and N. D. Horseman Two Tandemly Linked Interferon-{gamma}-Activated Sequence Elements in the Promoter of Glycosylation-Dependent Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 Gene Synergistically Respond to Prolactin in Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2003; 17(10): 1910 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. Calegari, R. M. N. Bezerra, M. A. Torsoni, A. S. Torsoni, K. G. Franchini, M. J. A. Saad, and L. A. Velloso Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 Is Induced by Angiotensin II in Heart and Isolated Cardiomyocytes, and Participates in Desensitization Endocrinology, October 1, 2003; 144(10): 4586 - 4596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stocco, J. Djiane, and G. Gibori Prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}) and Prolactin Signaling: PGF2{alpha}-Mediated Inhibition of Prolactin Receptor Expression in the Corpus Luteum Endocrinology, August 1, 2003; 144(8): 3301 - 3305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Graichen, J. Sandstedt, E. L. K. Goh, O. G. P. Isaksson, J. Tornell, and P. E. Lobie The Growth Hormone-binding Protein Is a Location-dependent Cytokine Receptor Transcriptional Enhancer J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 6346 - 6354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Grimm, T. N. Seagroves, E. B. Kabotyanski, R. C. Hovey, B. K. Vonderhaar, J. P. Lydon, K. Miyoshi, L. Hennighausen, C. J. Ormandy, A. V. Lee, et al. Disruption of Steroid and Prolactin Receptor Patterning in the Mammary Gland Correlates with a Block in Lobuloalveolar Development Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2002; 16(12): 2675 - 2691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |