| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
q Coupling Specificity
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (M.Y., W.W., M.Z., B.M.S.), University of Texas Medical School Houston, Houston, Texas 77030; and Department of Human Genetics (A.P., O.L.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Barbara Sanborn, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical School, P.O. Box 20708, Houston, Texas 77225. E-mail: .
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q coupling in the oxytocin receptor (OTR), intracellular domains were exchanged between OTR and G
s-coupled vasopressin V2 receptors (V2Rs). Substitution of sequence from the second (2i) and third (3i) intracellular domains of V2R into comparable positions in OTR markedly reduced ligand affinity and resulted in a loss of G
q coupling. Substitution of the 2i domain of OTR into V2R decreased ligand affinity and vasopressin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity and only slightly increased phosphatidylinositide turnover. In contrast, substitution of the OTR3i domain into V2R produced a receptor chimera with high ligand affinity, decreased vasopressin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, and markedly enhanced ligand-stimulated phosphatidylinositide turnover. The C-terminal 36 amino acids, but not the N-terminal 13 amino acids, of the OTR3i domain contained the determinants critical for enhanced activation of PLC. Mutation of a single lysine in the C-terminal OTR3i sequence to the corresponding V2R residue (valine) eliminated the enhanced ability of the V2R chimera to stimulate PLC but did not affect maximal adenylyl cyclase stimulation. Furthermore, mutation of this residue (K270) in wild-type OTR completely abolished the ability of the receptor to stimulate phosphatidylinositide turnover, with only a small reduction in ligand affinity. These data demonstrate that OTR K270 is critically important in the stimulation by OTR of phosphatidylinositide turnover and that this determinant can also increase this activity in the V2R chimera. Mutation of K270 also adversely affects the ability of OTR to stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Therefore, this residue plays an important role in the specificity of OTR/G
q/PLC coupling. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q/11 (5). These data, together with results from microinjection experiments (6), indicate that OTR couples functionally to G
q. In addition, OTR has been reported to couple to G
i (7) and G
h (8).
Random and site-directed mutagenesis, substitution of putative interaction sites in receptor chimeras, and interference assays have implicated the second (2i), third (3i), and fourth (4i) intracellular domains of GPCRs in mediating the specificity and efficacy of coupling to G proteins (1, 2, 3). N- and C-terminal regions of GPCR 3i domains appear particularly important for defining G protein specificity in some GPCRs. However, although there is recognizable sequence homology in a given receptor subgroup, there is often a minimum of conservation of specific residues in these regions between receptor subgroups coupling to the same G proteins. This has led to the suggestion that G protein specificity is determined by short sequences defining amphipathic
-helices at the transmembrane domain/intracellular loop boundaries that may be important only in the context of the specific GPCR sequence (1).
In comparison with the adrenergic and muscarinic subfamilies, relatively little is known about structure/function relationships relating to G protein coupling specificity in the OTR/vasopressin subfamily. Liu and Wess (9) concluded from studies with receptor chimeras that the 2i domain of the vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) contained determinants necessary for coupling to G
q/PLC, whereas the 3i domain of the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) conferred specificity for coupling to G
s/adenylyl cyclase. In contrast, Qian et al. (10) found that the 3i domain of the OTR, when coexpressed in COSM6 cells with OTR and G
q, effectively inhibited oxytocin-stimulated phosphatidylinositide turnover. Moreover, all of the intracellular domains of OTR had some influence on G
q-mediated coupling to PLC in this study, whereas the 3i domain of the G
s-coupled dopamine 1A receptor did not. These data suggested that all or some of the multiple OTR determinants involved in G protein coupling might contribute to interaction specificity.
We constructed OTR/V2R chimeras to probe the relationship of structural elements to specific G protein coupling, as reflected in effector stimulation. We found that transfer of the C-terminal 36 amino acids of 3i domain of OTR into V2R produced a receptor with enhanced ability to activate PLC. Importantly, a single amino acid substitution (OTR K270 to V), attenuated the ability of both the V2R chimera receptor and wild-type OTR to stimulate PLC. These data indicate that this residue in the 3i domain of OTR plays an important role in defining the specificity of OTR/G
q/PLC coupling.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
At high density, V2R can couple to the G
q family of G proteins and stimulate PLC activity (15). However, using 0.25 µg of V2R plasmid for transfection, vasopressin only increased this activity about 2-fold over basal (data not shown). The V2ROTR2i receptor chimera exhibited a small but statistically significant enhanced ability to increase ligand-dependent phosphatidylinositide turnover (Fig. 2A
). In marked contrast, the V2ROTR3i receptor chimera was considerably more active; 40 nM vasopressin elicited a 5.8-fold stimulation (Fig. 2A
). This activity was comparable to the oxytocin-induced stimulation by OTR (
5-fold) under comparable conditions. The effect of vasopressin on V2ROTR3i was dose dependent (Fig. 2B
), with an EC50 comparable to that of wild-type V2R (Table 1
). Hence, substitution of the OTR 3i sequence into V2R resulted in a receptor chimera with considerably enhanced capability to couple effectively to G proteins that stimulate PLC. Importantly, this occurred with no loss in ligand affinity.
|
q Coupling
q coupling, receptors chimeras in which only N- or C-terminal portions of the V2R 3i domain were replaced with OTR sequence were created (Fig. 1
|
K270 Near the OTR Transmembrane (TM)VI/3i Junction Is Critical for V2ROTR3iC/G
q Coupling
Examination of oxytocin and vasopressin receptor sequences in the C-terminal 3i domain regions revealed considerable similarity in the immediate vicinity of the 3i/TMVI transition (Fig. 1B
). However, differences were noted at position 6.28 [defined relative to TMVI conserved residue P6.50 (14)], which is K in OTR and R in the G
q-coupled V1aR but A in the G
s-coupled V2R and position 6.30, which is K in OTR and V1aR and V in V2R. Accordingly, we generated a series of mutations in the OTR sequence (K268A, K270V, and the double mutants) in the V2ROTR3iC chimera. In the following discussion, V2ROTR3iC-KA denotes the K268A mutant, V2ROTR3iC-KV denotes the K270V mutant, and V2ROTR3iC-KKAV denotes the (K268A, K270V) double mutant.
V2ROTR3iC-KA showed an affinity for [3H]-8-AVP similar to V2R, whereas the affinity of the comparable K270V chimera was reduced 3-fold and that of the KKAV double-mutant chimera was reduced 10-fold (Fig. 4A
and Table 1
). Both V2ROTR3iC-KA and V2ROTR3iC-KV still coupled efficiently to G
s. (Fig. 4B
and Table 1
). V2ROTR3iC-KKAV exhibited ligand-dependent adenylyl cyclase stimulation, but, like V2ROTR3iN, this did not appear to be concentration dependent (Fig. 4B
and data not shown). Notably, V2ROTR3iC-KA, like V2ROTR3i and V2ROTR3iC, demonstrated enhanced ability to stimulate PLC compared with wild type V2R (Fig. 4C
and Table 1
). In marked contrast, the single amino acid mutation K270V, as well as the double mutation KKAV, produced receptors that did not increase phosphatidylinositide turnover more than wild-type V2R (Fig. 4C
and Table 1
). Importantly, this reversal in the V2ROTR3iC-KV chimera occurred although the affinity for ligand was only slightly decreased and the maximal ability to activate G
s was unaffected.
|
q coupling in the context of the OTR receptor itself, we created comparable mutants in OTR. OTR and OTR-K268A showed similar affinity for 3H-oxytocin, whereas the dissociation constant (Kd) values for OTR-K270V and the double mutant OTR-KKAV were 5- to 6-fold higher (Fig. 5A
|
q/PLC signaling pathway (16). Determinants for ERK activation have been reported to lie in the fourth but not the third intracellular domain of the receptor (7). To determine whether the activation of ERK1/2 by the OTR was affected by the K270V mutation, we measured ERK1/2 phosphorylation in COSM6 cells transiently transfected with OTR and mutant receptors. Oxytocin (10 nM) significantly stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation when OTR was expressed (basal: 1.0 ± 0.4 P-ERK/ERK; OT, 3.4 ± 0.6, n = 3, P < 0.05) and when OTR-K268A was expressed (basal, 1.6 ± 0.2 P-ERK/ERK; OT, 4.8 ± 0.8, n = 3, P < 0.05). In contrast, OTR-K270V and OTR-KKAV completely lost the ability to stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation, even at 1000 nM oxytocin (basal, 1.5 ± 0.3 P-ERK/ERK; OT/OTR-K270V, 1.2 ± 0.08; and basal, 1.7 ± 0.26 P-ERK/ERK; OT/OTR-KKAV, 1.8 ± 0.5, n = 3). These data indicate that the same amino acid, K270, in the OTR 3i domain, is important for OTR-mediated PLC and for ERK1/2 activation. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and
-subunits (12, 21). In the G protein
-subunit N-terminal regions, the region between
4 and
5 helices including the ß6 loop, and the extreme C-terminal regions have been predicted or directly shown to interact with GPCRs (2, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). The C-terminal five amino acid residues are considered particularly important for determining coupling specificity; interactions with ß
-subunits have also been suggested (2). Therefore, the points of interaction between GPCRs and G proteins are not confined to single locations on these proteins. Accordingly, determinants for specificity of interaction may differ from those required to trigger G protein activation, and there is some promiscuity in coupling specificity. Because there is significant heterogeneity in amino acid sequence between GPCR subclasses, particularly in the regions between the transmembrane segments, different residues or even regions in a given receptor may assume primary importance for forming the critical contact points with specific G proteins.
To determine the factors that influence the activation of G proteins stimulating PLC, we constructed a series of chimeras that interchanged sequences between OTR and V2R. Although it has not been tested directly in this study, the most likely G proteins involved are the G
q subfamily (5, 6). Substitution of OTR sequence into V2R demonstrated that the C-terminal 36 amino acids of the OTR 3i domain contained determinants sufficient for enhanced activation of PLC by the receptor chimera. Importantly, the 3i domain chimeras are gain-of-function constructs. Mutation of K270 in either V2ROTR3iC or wild-type OTR to V, the corresponding V2R residue, eliminated the enhanced stimulation of phosphatidylinositide turnover; however, V2ROTR3iC-KV still stimulated G
s-coupled adenylyl cyclase activity. These data indicate that K270 contributes significantly to the specificity requirement for G
q activation by OTR and the V2R chimera.
Enhancement of PLC activation in V2R by substitution of the OTR 3i or OTR 3i C-terminal 36-amino acid sequence implies that other requirements for G protein coupling are fulfilled by the remaining V2R sequence. The proximal portion of the 4i domain of OTR has been implicated in specific coupling to G
q on the basis of studies with truncated mutants (7). However, these results may not be directly comparable to results obtained when domains are interchanged in the context of the intact receptor. The V2R 4i domain has been reported to enhance G
s coupling activity (30) and may function in a general manner in the chimeras studied here.
In adrenergic and muscarinic receptors, amino acids in the proximal and distal 3i domains have been implicated in G protein coupling (2). The six-amino acid motif AAXXLS (residues 6.336.38, located in the rhodopsin structure at positions within the TMVI
-helix) distinguished muscarinic receptors coupling primarily to G
q from those coupling to G
i/o (2, 31). This sequence is not conserved in the oxytocin/vasopressin receptor family, where the analogous residues for OTR and V2R are essentially equivalent (TV[K/R]MT[F/L]) (Fig. 1
).
Many GPCRs coupling to different G proteins contain positively charged residues near the C terminus of the 3i domain (positions 6.286.32) that are predicted to form interactions with the head groups of phospholipids at the membrane interface (14). The exact positions and number of charges vary between receptors and may contribute to receptor-specific properties. In rhodopsin, these charged residues form an extension of the TMVI
-helix (12). A positively charged receptor surface has been predicted at the G protein interface in the rhodopsin receptor (2, 24). R6.32 is conserved as K or R in many receptors coupling to different G proteins, including OTR (R272) and V2R (K268). Therefore, although this residue contributes to interaction with and/or activation of G proteins (2), it is unlikely to confer coupling specificity. Our data show that OTR K268 (K6.28) is not critical for coupling efficiency or specificity. In contrast, OTR K270 (K6.30) is required for effective G
q coupling. This residue is located in a region implicated in major conformational changes in rhodopsin upon activation and in multiple interactions with the cytoplasmic end of TMIII in a number of GPCRs (12, 14, 19, 20, 22, 32). In both the OTR and the V2ROTR3iC chimera, mutation of K270 to V, alone and in combination with the mutation of K268 to A, resulted in some loss in ligand affinity, consistent with a change in some intrareceptor interactions. The exact function of K270, either in interactions with other residues in OTR or with G
q, remains to be determined.
Substitution of the OTR 3i domain markedly enhanced phosphatidylinositide turnover in the V2ROTR3i chimera, whereas a related V2RV1aR3i chimera did not show this property (9). There are no major differences between V1aR and OTR in the C-terminal sequences of the transmembrane/cytosol transition region that would account for this difference. Substitution of C-terminal 3i sequences of V2R that included V6.30 into V1aR did not eliminate the ability of the resulting chimeras to stimulate phosphatidylinositide turnover (30). Therefore, K6.30 is apparently not an absolute requirement for G
q activation in the context of the V1aR, where other residues or receptor domains may be more important in determining coupling specificity. Position 6.30 is occupied by a negatively charged residue in muscarinic and adrenergic receptors. Hence, the importance of OTR K270 for coupling to G
q may well be context dependent.
There are also differences in G
s coupling between OTR/V2R and V1aR/V2R 3i chimeras. OTRV2R3i did not stimulate adenylyl cyclase, whereas V1aV2R3i was active (9, 30). A greater structural perturbation, reflected in decreased ligand affinity, or differences in specific residues exchanged may be responsible for the inactivity of OTRV2R3i. Q225 and E231 in the N-terminal region of the V2R 3i domain have been implicated in effective G
s coupling (30). Consistent with this observation, V2ROTR3iC and V2ROTR3iCD chimeras, both of which retained V2R Q225 and E231, stimulated adenylyl cyclase. Notably, V2ROTR3i, in which Q225 but not E231 was present, did not stimulate adenylyl cyclase, suggesting an especially critical role for E231.
The role of the OTR 2i domain in G protein coupling specificity is less clear. Replacement of the OTR 2i domain with V2R sequence eliminated the ability of the chimeras to stimulate phosphatidylinositide turnover, consistent with our previous observation that both OTR 2i and 3i peptides interfered with OTR/PLC coupling (10). Unfortunately, because affinity for oxytocin was significantly diminished in these chimeras, it is not possible to distinguish between loss of coupling ability due to absence of specific determinants or to changes in receptor configuration. Similarly, V2ROTR2i did not simulate cAMP production as effectively as the V2RV1a2i chimera. On the other hand, somewhat enhanced G
q coupling by the V2ROTR2i chimera is consistent with results with V1aR/V2R chimeras, where G
q coupling determinants were found in the V1aR 2i domain (9), and with peptide competition studies examining OTR coupling (10). Consistent with these observations, substitution of L for M at position 3.58 in the 2i domain of V2R resulted in enhanced interaction in yeast with a G protein containing C-terminal sequence of G
q (33).
In summary, this study illustrates important differences between OTR and other members of its subfamily and between OTR and other GPCRs with respect to determinants of G protein coupling specificity. In the context of the intact OTR, K270 plays an important role in coupling to G
q and activation of PLC. In the context of the V2R, the C-terminal 36 amino acids of OTR, together with existing V2R sequence, can activate G
q, and OTR K270 plays a critical role in the specificity of this interaction. Additional studies are needed to explore other interactions between the members of this subfamily and the G proteins they stimulate.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q from Dr. M. I. Simon (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA). The human V2R cDNA clone was obtained from Dr. M. Birnbaumer (UCLA, Los Angeles, CA) and subcloned into the EcoRI and ApaI sites of pCR3-Uni (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) for expression studies. Cell culture reagents and Lipofectamine were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). cAMP Direct Correlate-EIA kit was purchased from Assay Designs Inc. (Ann Arbor, MI). Advantage-GC cDNA polymerase mix was purchased from CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc. (Palo Alto, CA). The Gene Editor in vitro site-directed mutagenesis kit was purchased from Promega Corp., (Madison, WI). The antiphospho-p44/42 MAPK monoclonal antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA), and polyclonal anti-p44/42 MAPK was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz CA).
Sequence Alignment and Construction of Receptor Chimeras
A global alignment of class I (opsin-related) GPCRs, including the OTR and V2R subfamily, was performed using an evolutionary trace analysis algorithm (26, 34). The analysis allowed identification of cognate residues in the various receptors and was also used to make a conservative prediction of the extent of helical regions including and extending from the transmembrane domains. Receptor chimeras containing 2i or 3i sequences from human OTR and V2R were constructed using PCR splicing by overlap extension techniques (35). The indicated 2i or 3i domains of OTR or V2R were interchanged between comparable regions as defined in the alignment analysis shown in Fig. 2B
. Other less extensive substitutions were generated by standard PCR procedures. Amino acid mutagenesis was accomplished using Gene Editor (Promega Corp.). All sequence changes were verified by DNA sequencing.
Cell Culture and Transfection
COS-M6 cells were grown in DMEM-high glucose (DMEM) containing 8% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. For transient transfection, COS-M6 cells were plated in six-well plates in 1-ml aliquots at a density of 1.8 x 105 cells per well and transfected the following day. After rinsing with DMEM, each well received 750 µl of DMEM containing plasmid DNA mixed with 6 µl Lipofectamine. For ligand binding and cAMP studies, 1 µg receptor plasmid was transfected. For phosphatidylinositide turnover, 1 µg receptor and 0.05 µg G
q plasmid DNA (OTR and OTR chimeras) or 0.25 µg receptor and 0.02 µg G
q plasmid DNA (V2R and V2R chimeras) were transfected. After 5 h at 37 C, the cells were returned to growth medium, and the medium was changed again 24 h after transfection. Transfection efficiency was estimated by ß-galactosidase activity in cotransfection experiments. Protein content on the day of assay ranged between 250 and 330 µg/well. Values in the cAMP and phosphatidylinositide turnover assays in the absence of ligand and in untransfected cells were similar.
Ligand Binding Assay
Two days after transfection, the cells were washed twice with cold HBSS without Ca2+ or Mg2+. Each well received 0.75 ml Ca2+-free HBSS containing 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% BSA, and different concentrations of 3H-labeled ligand as indicated in the absence (total binding) or presence (nonspecific binding) of 20 µM unlabeled ligand for 2.5 h at room temperature as described previously (36). The reaction was terminated by aspirating the medium, and the cells were washed with cold HBSS containing 0.1% BSA. Cells were lysed with 0.7 ml 1 N NaOH, and the lysate was neutralized with 0.7 ml 1 M HCl. One milliliter of the neutralized lysate was counted in ScintiSafe Econo 1 (Fisher, Fairlawn, NJ). Specific binding was defined as the difference between total and nonspecific binding.
cAMP Assay
Two days after transfection, cells were washed twice with HBSS and preincubated in HBSS containing 20 mM HEPES and 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine for 15 min at 37 C. Cells were stimulated with increasing concentrations of ligand as indicated for 1 h at 37 C. The reaction was terminated by aspiration of the medium and addition of 0.5 ml 0.1 N HCl. cAMP was measured in the cell lysates by immunoassay after acetylation as recommended by the kit manufacturer.
Phosphatidylinositide Turnover
COS-M6 cells were labeled 24 h after transfection with 0.4 µM 3H-myoinositol in DMEM with 2% FBS for 1518 h at 37 C. After labeling, cells were preincubated for 30 min in Dulbeccos PBS supplemented with 10 mM glucose, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM LiCl, pH 7.4, and then stimulated for 30 min with increasing concentrations of agonist as indicated. 3H-Inositol phosphates were isolated and counted in a modification of a previously described procedure (37). Briefly, after the stimulation, the cells were lysed in 1 ml of cold 20 mM formic acid, scraped, and centrifuged. The supernatant was neutralized with 370 µl 150 mM NH4OH. The extract was applied to a 1-ml AG 1-X8 column, washed with 4 ml of distilled water, and then 4 ml 5 mM sodium borate/60 mM sodium formate. IP3 was eluted with 4 ml of 1 M ammonium formate in 0.1 N formic acid, and 1 ml of sample was counted in Scintisafe.
ERK1/2 Phosphorylation
Two days after transfection, cells were washed twice with HBSS and stimulated in glucose- and phenol red-free DMEM with oxytocin for 5 min. pERK1/2 and the total amount of ERK1/2 were detected with anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK and anti-p44/42 MAPK antibody, respectively, in Western blots. Immunoblots were analyzed with a Bio-Rad imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA).
Data Analysis
Affinity and maximal binding were determined by Scatchard plot and least squares analysis and were verified by analysis of the pooled data using the LIGAND program (P. J. Munson, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD). Enzymatic assay concentration dependence was analyzed by a four-parameter logistics curve fitting program (M. L. Jaffe, Silver Spring, MD) and was verified by analysis of the pooled data using the LIGAND program. Where noted, data were analyzed by ANOVA and Duncans modified range test.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Drs. Yang and Wang are equal coauthors. ![]()
Abbreviations: DMEM, DMEM-High glucose; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; G
q, members of the G
q subfamily; hOTR, human OTR; 2i, 3i, and 4i, second, third, and fourth intracellular domains of GPCRs; KA, K268A mutant of OTR and V2ROTR3iC; KV, K270V mutant of OTR and V2ROTR3iC; KKAV, K268A-K270V double mutant of OTR and V2ROTR3iC; OTR, oxytocin receptor; TM, transmembrane; V2R, vasopressin V2 receptor; V1aR, vasopressin V1a receptor.
Received for publication July 9, 2001. Accepted for publication December 6, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q/11. Endocrinology 136:15091515[Abstract]
family protein in human myometrium. Biochem J 315:739744
q/11. Cell Signal 10:101105[CrossRef][Medline]
-helices. Nature (Lond) 389:203206[CrossRef][Medline]
-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. J Mol Biol 272:144164[CrossRef][Medline]
binding sites in the
subunit of the retinal G protein transducin. Science 275:381384
-protein that recognizes heptahelical receptors. J Biol Chem 276:32623269
1b-adrenergic receptor; involvement of basic and hydrophobic residues in receptor activation and G protein couping. J Biol Chem 276:4648546494This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Zhong, D. A. Murtazina, J. Phillips, C.-Y. Ku, and B. M. Sanborn Multiple Signals Regulate Phospholipase CBeta3 in Human Myometrial Cells Biol Reprod, June 1, 2008; 78(6): 1007 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhong, B. Parish, D. A. Murtazina, C.-Y. Ku, and B. M. Sanborn Amino acids in the COOH-terminal region of the oxytocin receptor third intracellular domain are important for receptor function Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2007; 292(4): E977 - E984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Saito, M. Tetsuka, S. Saito, K. Imai, A. Yoshikawa, H. Doi, and K. Maruyama Arginine Residue 155 in the Second Intracellular Loop Plays a Critical Role in Rat Melanin-Concentrating Hormone Receptor 1 Activation Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3452 - 3462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Deshpande, T. A. White, S. Dogan, T. F. Walseth, R. A. Panettieri, and M. S. Kannan CD38/cyclic ADP-ribose signaling: role in the regulation of calcium homeostasis in airway smooth muscle Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): L773 - L788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Neumann, G. Krause, M. Claus, and R. Paschke Structural Determinants for G Protein Activation and Selectivity in the Second Intracellular Loop of the Thyrotropin Receptor Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 477 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhong, M. Yang, and B. M. Sanborn Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activation by Myometrial Oxytocin Receptor Involves G{alpha}qG{beta}{gamma} and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Activation Endocrinology, July 1, 2003; 144(7): 2947 - 2956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |