| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Francesc Villarroya, Department de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda Diagonal 645, E-08028-Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: gombau{at}porthos.bio.ub.es.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and PPAR
(also known as PPARß) mediate human UCP3 gene regulation by fatty acids through a direct-repeat (DR-1) element in the promoter. DR-1 mutation renders UCP3 promoter unresponsive to PPAR ligand in vitro and consistently blocks gene induction by fatty acids in vivo. Although they act through separate sites in the promoter, MyoD and PPAR-dependent regulatory pathways are functionally connected: only in the presence of MyoD, does UCP3 become sensitive to PPAR ligand-dependent regulation. MyoD controls UCP3 promoter activity through a noncanonical Ebox site located in the proximal region, close to transcription initiation site. Moreover, acetylation processes play a crucial role in the control of UCP3 gene regulation. The coactivator p300 protein enhances PPAR ligand-mediated regulation whereas a mutant form devoid of histone acetylase activity blocks the response of the promoter to fatty acids. Conversely, histone deacetylase-1 blunts MyoD-dependent expression of the UCP3 promoter and reduces PPAR-dependent responsiveness. A mutated form of MyoD unable to be acetylated has a lower transactivation capacity on the human UCP3 promoter with respect to wild-type MyoD. It is concluded that MyoD and PPAR-dependent pathways mediate human UCP3 gene regulation and that acetylase activity elicited by coregulators is implicated in the functional interaction between these regulatory pathways. Therefore the convergence of MyoD and PPAR-dependent pathways provides a molecular mechanism for skeletal muscle specificity and fatty acid regulation of human UCP3 gene. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Accumulating evidences indicate that UCP3 contributes to lipid handling by the skeletal muscle rather than uncoupling mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. There is preferential fatty acid oxidation with respect to glucose in human myotubes overexpressing UCP3 (11) and a tendency to an impaired fatty acid oxidation in UCP3 knockout mice (12). In humans, a splice-site mutation in the UCP3 gene that prevents the synthesis of the full-length UCP3 protein resulted in impaired fat oxidation (13), although other studies did not confirm these findings (14). On the other hand, a single nucleotide (T to C) polymorphism in the 5'-proximal noncoding region of the human UCP3 gene has been associated with disturbances in fat accumulation in several human populations (15, 16).
The preferential expression of UCP3 in the skeletal muscle is of interest because this tissue is an important site of energy homeostasis in mammals. UCP3 gene transcription in skeletal muscle is highly regulated in relation to cell differentiation. In cultured muscle cells, either from myogenic cell lines or primary cultures of human myotubes, differentiated in vitro UCP3 mRNA expression is induced in association with differentiation although at much lower levels than in muscle in vivo (17). UCP3 gene transcription is highly sensitive to several metabolic and hormonal signals, especially those related to fatty acid availability. In rodents, situations in which circulating free fatty acid levels are up-regulated, such as starvation, postnatal development, exercise, and high-fat diets (18), are associated with up-regulation of UCP3 mRNA expression whereas, when free fatty acid levels decrease, as in lactation, UCP3 mRNA levels are low (19). In this sense, lipid infusion to human volunteers causes a significant up-regulation of the UCP3 gene (20). There is a strong interaction between myogenic and fatty acid-dependent regulation of UCP3 gene expression. This interaction is highlighted during mouse development when the UCP3 gene transcription is switched on specifically in skeletal muscle only after birth and under the stimulus of the initiation of suckling and the appearance of high levels of free fatty acids in the circulation (21).
Accumulating evidence indicates that fatty acids may act through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) to induce UCP3 gene expression (21) although other events such as activation of AMP-activated protein kinase may also contribute to this regulation (22). Single injections of PPAR
or PPAR
+
activators into mice increase UCP3 mRNA levels in skeletal muscle, especially in physiological situations in which basal levels of circulating free fatty acids are low (starved neonates, lactating dams) (19, 21). In contrast, the capacity of PPAR
activators to induce UCP3 gene expression in vivo depends on the physiological situation, thus suggesting an indirect mechanism of action (19, 23, 24). In cell cultures, PPAR
activation has been claimed to be the main inducer of UCP3 mRNA expression, probably due to the lack of expression of PPAR
in myogenic cells differentiated in culture (25). However, the molecular mechanisms driving UCP3 gene transcription in skeletal muscle and in response to fatty acids have not been established.
In the present work, we report that fatty acids induce the UCP3 gene transcription through a PPAR-responsive site, we define a novel site for the action of MyoD, which is required for UCP3 promoter activity and PPAR-dependent responsiveness, and we propose a molecular mechanism for functional interaction of fatty acid- and MyoD-dependent activation based on the action of p300 protein (p300) coactivation and histone acetylation activity.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and PPAR
; MyoD Is Required for PPAR-Dependent Activation
or PPAR
(but not PPAR
) was cotransfected, the UCP3 promoter was induced by oleic acid. Similar results were found for linoleic acid (not shown). Cells were then cotransfected with PPAR subtypes in the presence of MyoD and exposed to agonists with a range of PPAR-subtype specificities. Then, 10 µM Wy14,643, which is specific for PPAR
activation, stimulated the UCP3 gene promoter activity only when PPAR
was cotransfected. Bezafibrate, which activates both PPAR
and PPAR
, induced the UCP3 promoter when either of the two receptors was cotransfected. Even in the presence of the specific PPAR
activator rosiglitazone and the cotransfected PPAR
receptor, the UCP3 promoter was not induced. To ensure that the lack of response to PPAR
-dependent activation was not due to impaired expression of the receptor, the three PPARs were transfected to L6 cells, and a specific antibody against each PPAR subtype was used to detect the protein. PPAR
as well as PPAR
and -
were highly expressed in the cells after transfection (Fig. 1B
(Fig. 1C
or PPAR
depending on MyoD. It is worth noting that the response to oleate through PPAR
or PPAR
and the lack of responsiveness to PPAR
activation was similar when a construct containing a longer sequence of the 5' region (-2903 hUCP3-Luc) was tested (data not shown).
|
per plate did not affect significantly the dose-response curve for MyoD. Although low amounts of MyoD were already permissive for PPAR
ligand-mediated activation by Wy14,643, PPAR
ligand-mediated activation of the UCP3 promoter increased with the amount of MyoD.
|
-expression vectors and treated with Wy14,643 (Fig. 3B
-dependent activation. The same was observed for PPAR
-mediated responsiveness to bezafibrate (data not shown). Therefore, it is concluded that this DR-1 at position -71/-59 mediates the response of the promoter to PPAR agonists.
|
. The same results were found for PPAR
-dependent activation (not shown).
EMSAs were performed to determine whether PPAR
present in muscle nuclear extracts binds to the DR-1 sequence (Fig. 3C
). As a labeled probe we used a oligonucleotide corresponding to the -79 to -50 region of the human UCP3 gene. After incubation of the labeled double-stranded probe with nuclear protein extracts, a characteristic pattern of DNA-protein binding complexes was formed. NS was a non-specific band as determined by the lack of competition when incubated with a 100-fold excess of cold oligonucleotide. The antibody against PPAR
prevented the formation of bands a and b, which otherwise were unaltered when the antibody against CCAAT enhancer binding protein (C/EBP
) (negative control) was used. Incubation of the extracts in the presence of 100 µM Wy14,643 did not strengthen the intensity of bands a and b (data not shown). In conclusion, both bands a and b are formed by protein-DNA complexes containing PPAR
.
In Vivo Gene Transfer Indicates a Major Role for the DR-1 PPAR-Responsive Region of UCP3 Gene Promoter in Mediating Fatty Acid Responsiveness
To investigate the relevance of this DR-1 in the responsiveness to fatty acids in vivo, somatic gene transfer to skeletal muscle was performed as reported in Materials and Methods. The plasmid constructs depicted on the left of Fig. 4
(wild type, DR-1-mutated and empty plasmid) were analyzed. The experiments were performed in neonatal mice, a situation in which mouse UCP3 gene expression is known to be dramatically up-regulated due to the rise in circulating fatty acids as a consequence of milk intake (21). The injected promoterless plasmid (pGL3-basic) showed negligible luciferase activity. The wild-type construct showed a significant activity, and the point-mutated version in the DR-1 showed a dramatic reduction in activity with respect to the parental construct. These findings indicate that the DR-1 PPAR-responsive element, in the proximal region of the human UCP3 promoter, is involved in fatty acid-dependent regulation in vivo.
|
|
Further sequence analysis of the proximal UCP3 promoter region for potential sites of MyoD responsiveness was performed. This led to the identification, at position -29 to -9, close to the transcriptional start site, of two consecutive noncanonical Eboxes (CANNAG sequence) and an identical third box separated from the other two by three bases. Site-directed mutagenesis changed three CAs to TTs on the three Ebox-like sequences, and transcriptional induction by MyoD was assessed. Results with this mutant construct, -165mutCAhUCP3-Luc, showed 80% reduction when cotransfected with MyoD compared with its control (-165 hUCP3-Luc). This result indicates that most of the effect of MyoD on the UCP3 gene promoter takes place through proximal noncanonical sites located close to the transcription initiation.
Binding of MyoD to the Proximal Region of the UCP3 Gene Promoter
The interaction of MyoD with the region of the UCP3 gene, which contains the three Ebox-like sequences, was established by EMSA (Fig. 6B
). Three double-stranded DNA probes were generated from the human UCP3 promoter sequence (Fig. 6A
). The first two are wild-type oligonucleotides of different sizes, and the third contains the three CAs changed to TTs (the same point-mutation tested functionally, Fig. 5
). The -29/+5 hUCP3 labeled probe, which includes the three Ebox-like sites plus the surrounding sequences to transcription initiation, was incubated with L6 nuclear extracts, which are devoid of MyoD (28). This led to the appearance of two retarded complexes, a1 and a2. The incubation of this oligonucleotide with recombinant MyoD alone generated two complexes, b1 and b2, of differing mobility. When MyoD was added to the incubation buffer together with the nuclear extracts b1 and b2, complexes remained and a novel low-mobility band, indicated as c, appeared. It appears, therefore, that complex c is formed as a consequence of the interaction of nuclear proteins from L6 with MyoD upon this DNA region. When the shorter oligonucleotide -29/-9 hUCP3, in which the Ebox-like elements remain but sequences surrounding the transcription start site are absent, was incubated with L6 nuclear protein extracts, the retarded complexes a1 and a2 did not form. Therefore, bands a1 and a2 contain proteins that interact with the DNA sequence between -9 and +5. When MyoD alone was incubated, complexes b1 and b2 were formed, similarly to those observed with the full-length probe. However, in this case the incubation of MyoD plus nuclear extracts caused only the appearance of the b1 and b2 complexes, but c did not appear. When -29/+5muthUCP3 was incubated with nuclear L6 protein extracts, retarded bands a1 and a2 were formed as with the non-Ebox-mutated version. No retarded bands b1, b2, or c were observed when MyoD was added to the incubation media either alone or in combination with extracts. These findings indicate that the Ebox-like sequences are required for MyoD binding to the human UCP3 promoter sequence, that other nuclear proteins bind sites around the transcription initiation site, and that they interact with MyoD when bound to DNA.
|
|
(Fig. 8A
(29) and to acetylate both histones and MyoD (30). To study the role of the acetylation activity of p300 on UCP3 promoter regulation, cotransfection experiments using a mutant form of p300 with no histone acetylase activity (p300
HAT) were performed. As shown in Fig. 8A
HAT did not significantly modify transactivation of the promoter by MyoD but completely blocked the induction by PPAR ligands, thus indicating that acetylation by p300 is crucial for PPAR-dependent activation of human UCP3.
|
and its ligand (Fig. 8A
To check whether the acetylation status of histones in the proximal region of the endogenous hUCP3 gene promoter was affected by gene activation elicited by MyoD and the PPAR
-dependent pathway, ChIP assays for acetylated histone H3 were performed using human skeletal muscle cells. As shown in Fig. 8B
, cotransfection with MyoD and PPAR
expression vectors in the presence of Wy14,643 enhanced the levels of acetylated histone H3 bound at the hUCP3 promoter. In addition, TSA treatment led to a further increase in the levels of acetylated histone H3 on the promoter.
MyoD Acetylation Is Necessary for the Full Activation of the Human UCP3 Promoter
Because p300 can acetylate not only histones but also MyoD and other transcription factors, we next tested whether the specific acetylation of MyoD was functionally relevant in the activity of the human UCP3 promoter. We performed transient transfections using a nonacetylable form of MyoD generated by direct mutagenesis from Lys-to-Arg substitutions at positions 99, 102, and 104 (MyoD-RRR), as reported previously (33). As shown in Fig. 9
, the human UCP3 promoter activity achieved by MyoD-RRR cotransfection was 50% of that observed by wild-type MyoD. In the presence of MyoD-RRR, the activity elicited by PPAR
plus Wy14,643 was lower than in the presence of MyoD, although sensitivity to ligand remained. This result indicates that acetylation of MyoD is necessary for the full activity of the promoter.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or PPAR
are necessary to mediate fatty acid-dependent regulation. Moreover, there is a functional interaction between myogenic differentiation-dependent and fatty acid activation of the UCP3 gene, which is also evidenced by UCP3 promoter regulation: MyoD is required not only for a high UCP3 promoter activity but also for sensitivity to ligand-dependent activation of PPARs. The sites mediating PPAR and MyoD-dependent activation were physically separated in the promoter. PPAR action occurs through a DR-1 element in the proximal promoter region that we previously reported to act also as a retinoic acid-responsive element (17). This site was critical for fatty acid induction of the promoter in vivo, as demonstrated here by the lack of responsiveness of point-mutated constructs of the promoter directly injected to the hind limb of newborn mice under the stimulus of fatty acids coming from milk intake (21).
The structure of this element as a DR-1 is in agreement with the characteristic alignment of PPAR-responsive elements. The presence of this sequence in the UCP3 promoter was also described previously by Acin et al. (34). However, the role of this DR-1 in mediating retinoic acid-dependent effects, not only through activation of the retinoid X receptor moiety of the PPAR/retinoid X receptor heterodimer, but also through retinoic acid receptor (17), indicates that it behaves as a multihormonal-regulatory element in the human UCP3 gene and agrees with the DR-1 structure which, is highly permissive for multiple nuclear receptor-mediated responses.
The specific responsiveness of the UCP3 gene promoter to PPAR
or PPAR
and their respective ligands, but the lack of sensitivity to PPAR
, is consistent with the responsiveness of the gene to physiological situations associated with increased circulating free fatty acids. A broad array of fatty acids of different lengths and saturations behave as natural activators of PPAR
and PPAR
subtypes, but PPAR
is less sensitive to them (35). PPAR-response elements in mammalian genes are often highly promiscuous in response to the different PPAR subtypes, and their activation by the different PPAR subtype-dependent pathways is due to the action of specific ligands or to the expression of specific PPAR subtypes in target cells (35, 36). However, there are also several examples of partially PPAR subtype-specific responsiveness (37), such as the present findings on the human UCP3 gene promoter. Further research will be needed to assess whether the specific sequence of the UCP3 DR-1 dictates the differential responsiveness to PPAR
and -
subtypes with respect to PPAR
or this is due to the particular placement of the DR-1 in the context of the UCP3 promoter structure.
Although several consensus sequences (Eboxes) have been described as putative sites for MyoD binding within the human UCP3 promoter (34), our results demonstrate that MyoD did not act in the UCP3 gene promoter through canonical Ebox elements but through a proximal region, close to the transcription initiation site, which contains degenerate Ebox elements. A similar atypical site of action for MyoD through interaction with elements close to transcription initiation has been reported for other skeletal muscle-specific genes such as skeletal myosin heavy chain IIB or acetyl CoA carboxylase-ß (27, 38). MyoD can interact with this region either alone or by forming complexes with other nuclear proteins in L6 cells, which are devoid of endogenous MyoD (28). Whereas degenerate Ebox elements are required for MyoD binding and MyoD-dependent transactivation, the presence of adjacent regions close to the transcription initiation site leads to the formation of ternary complexes also containing MyoD. Thus, the MyoD is likely to interact with proteins associated with basal transcription machinery. The location of MyoD binding close to transcription initiation and the interaction with other proteins associated with this region are consistent with the high dependency of the human UCP3 promoter activity on MyoD.
Despite the separate location of PPAR and MyoD sites in the UCP3 promoter, the functional interaction between the two pathways of UCP3 promoter regulation was explored. When the effects of several coactivators known to interact with nuclear hormone receptors was determined, only p300 potentiated PPAR-ligand dependent activation. P300 has been reported to interact with and coactivate PPAR
(29), and it also acetylates histones as well as MyoD, thus promoting MyoD transcriptional activity (39, 40). The dramatic silencing of PPAR-dependent activation mediated by the nonacetylating mutant form of p300 provides evidence for the involvement of histone acetylase activity driven by p300 in the regulation of human UCP3 promoter by PPAR.
The involvement of acetylation processes in UCP3 promoter regulation was confirmed by the repressing effects of cotransfection with an expression vector for HDAC-1, which has recently been reported to modulate transcriptional activity by deacetylation, not only of histones but also MyoD (31). Moreover, transcriptional activation of the hUCP3 gene by MyoD and PPAR
was associated with increased acetylation status of histones bound to the promoter. These findings suggest that the transcriptionally active complex formed when PPAR interacts with ligands in the presence of MyoD involves p300 as a bridging molecule and that acetylation of histones and MyoD are important events to provide active transcription and ligand-dependent sensitivity to the system. The direct effect of MyoD on the promoter without adding any further acetylating coactivator is also compatible with this proposal since most of MyoD is known to be acetylated when transfected to myoblastic cells (33). The specific role of MyoD acetylation in the UCP3 promoter activity was evidenced by the reduced transactivation capacity of a nonacetylable mutant form of MyoD. The finding that the nonacetylable form of MyoD remains partially permissive to PPAR-dependent activation can indicate either that other factors or histones are acetylated by p300 or that MyoD retains some activity and still binds to the same or other transcription factors despite the mutation.
In summary, we propose a tentative model for the transcriptional control of the UCP3 gene by MyoD and PPAR-dependent pathways (see Fig. 10
). Coactivators such as p300 may provide a bridging mechanism between PPAR-dependent activation and the basal transcription machinery, which includes MyoD. Acetylation elicited by p300 or other acetylases, on MyoD and histones, would be associated with the transcriptionally active status of the gene, both in basal conditions and especially in response to PPAR-dependent activation. Present findings suggest that these mechanisms provide the molecular basis for the transcriptional regulation of the UCP3 gene by fatty acids in human skeletal muscle.
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-32P]dCTP was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Arlington Heights, IL).
Construction of Transfection Plasmids
The insertion of the fragment from -2903 to +47 of the human UCP3 gene into pGL3-basic generates -2903 hUCP3-Luc and a SacI restriction, and religation generates the -1588 hUCP3-Luc construct, according to a previous report (17). A further deletion was generated from this last construct by restriction with SacI and BglII, blunt ending, and religation, thus generating -165 hUCP3-Luc.
Point mutation constructs were generated using a QuikChange Site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). In summary, two complementary oligonucleotides containing the desired mutations, flanked by unmodified nucleotide sequence, were synthesized. Of each oligonucleotide, 125 ng and 50 ng of double-stranded -165 hUCP3-Luc were incubated with 2.5 U of PfuTurbo DNA polymerase. PCR was done for 17 cycles at 95 C for 30 sec, 55 C for 1 min, and 68 C for 14 min. Then, 10 U of DpnI restriction enzyme were added to each PCR and incubated at 37 C for at least 1 h to digest parental DNA. One microliter of the DpnI-treated DNA was then transformed. To generate point mutations, the oligonucleotides used were: for the Ebox mutation (-165mutEboxhUCP3-Luc) 5'-GCCAGCCTCTTGTCcAtgGATCAGGCTGTC-3' (introducing a NcoI restriction site); for mutation of one half-site of the DR-1 (-1588mut1DR1 hUCP3-Luc and -165mut1DR1 hUCP3-Luc) 5'-GGATAAGGTTTCAtaTgAGCCCGTGTGTATAAGACCAGTGCC-3' (introducing a NdeI restriction site); for the mutation of the other half-site of the DR-1 (-165mutDR1 hUCP3-Luc) 5'-CCAACTTCTCTAGGATAAacgTTCAGGTCAGCCCGTGTG-3' (introducing an AclI restriction site); to study the presence of C instead of T according to the polymorphism described in the promoter, (-165mutC/T: 5'-GGTTTCAGGTCACCcGTGTGTATAAGACCAGTGC-3'; to mutate the three CA close to the transcription start site, 5' CCAGTGCCAAGCttGAAGttGCAGAGAttACAGTGAATGACAAGGAGGG-3' (introducing a HindIII restriction site). To generate pCMV-MyoD-RRR (change of Lys 99, 102, and 104 to Arg) the oligo used was 5'-GGGCCTGCAgGGCGTGCAgGCGCAgGACCACCAACG-3'. Point-mutated constructs were checked by direct DNA sequencing. The plasmid -60 hUCP3-Luc was generated from mut1DR1 hUCP3-Luc by digestion with KpnI and NdeI, blunt-ending, and ligation.
Cell Culture and Transient Transfection Assays
Myoblastic L6 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Human skeletal muscle cells obtained from normal human tissue were purchased from Cambrex (Verviers, Belgium) and were grown in the culture medium provided by the supplier (Skeletal Muscle Cell Growth Medium Bullet Kit). Transfection experiments were carried out in L6 or human skeletal muscle cells at 50% confluence by using FuGene6 Transfection Reagent (Roche Diagnostics Applied Science, Barcelona, Spain) and were performed according to the manufacturers instructions. For L6 transfection each point was assayed (unless indicated) in triplicate in a six-well plate and contained 1.5 µg of luciferase reporter vector, 0.3 µg of the mammalian expression vectors pCMV-MyoD (41), pSG5-PPAR
, pSG5-PPAR
, pSG5-PPAR
(42, 43, 44), pCMV-p300 and pCMV-p300
HAT (45), pcM/HDAC-1 (31), pcx-P/CAF (46), Tat-interactive protein-60 kDa (47) and pcDNA3-SRC1 (48) expression vectors, and 3 ng of pRL-CMV (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), an expression vector for the sea pansy (Renilla reniformis) luciferase used as an internal transfection control. Cells were incubated for 48 h after transfection and, when indicated, were treated for 24 h before harvest with or without 10 µM Wy14,643, 100 µM bezafibrate, 10 µM Rosiglitazone, 500 µM oleic acid, and 500 µM linoleic acid. TSA treatment was performed at 100 ng/ml for 24 h. For assays of the activity of apoAII-PPRE-TKpGL3 (a gift of Dr. L. Fajas), the same conditions were used but including only 0.25 µg luciferase reporter vector.
Firefly luciferase and Renilla luciferase activities were measured in a Turner Designs Luminometer (model TD20/20) using the Dual Luciferase Reporter assay system kit (Promega Corp.). Homogenates from cells were prepared with 500 µl of PLB (passive lysis buffer, Promega Corp.). Cells were lysed in agitation for 15 min and homogenate (20 µl) was used for measurement. Luciferase activity elicited by UCP3 promoter constructs was normalized for variation in transfection efficiency using Renilla luciferase as an internal standard.
Western Blot Analysis
Nuclear extracts were obtained as described (49). Protein (20 µg) was mixed with 2x sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer, incubated at 90 C for 5 min, and subjected to SDS-PAGE (12% wt/vol). Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidine difluoride membranes and immunological detection was performed with specific antibodies against PPAR
, PPAR
, or PPAR
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc; no. sc-9000; no. sc-1987; and no. sc-7196, respectively). Detection was achieved by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Somatic Gene Transfer via im DNA Injections
Direct injection of plasmid DNA to neonatal hind limb muscles was performed essentially as reported previously (50). All plasmids were purified using QIAGEN (Chatsworth, CA) columns and resuspended in NaCl (0.9% vol/vol). DNA concentrations were quantified by spectrophotometry at 260 nm. Each firefly luciferase reporter plasmid (100 µg) was mixed with 10 µg of pRL-CMV and directly injected into the hind limb leg muscle of neonatal Swiss mice before initiation of suckling. Wild-type construct (-1588 hUCP3-Luc) was injected to one hind limb and the mutated version (-1588mutDR1 hUCP3-Luc) to the other. Neonates were kept with their mothers for 72 h and total muscle from every hind limb was collected and homogenized with a Polytron in 500 µl of PLB buffer and analyzed for firefly and Renilla luciferase activity as described previously.
EMSAs
Nuclear protein extracts from L6 cells and from Swiss mice gastrocnemius muscle were isolated as reported previously (51, 52), and protein concentration was determined by the micromethod of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Richmond, CA) using BSA as standard. For gel retardation assays, the double-stranded UCP3-DR1 oligonucleotide corresponding to the -79 to -50 sequence of the UCP3 gene was end-labeled using [
32P]dCTP and Klenow enzyme. The DNA probe (25,000 cpm) was incubated for 30 min at 25 C with 5 µg of nuclear protein extract. Reactions were carried out in a final volume of 25 µl containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 2.5 µg of poly dI.dC (deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic acid). Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis at 4 C for 6080 min in nondenaturing 5% polyacrylamide gels in 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA. In the competition experiments, 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides was included in each respective binding reaction. When indicated 2 µl of antisera against PPAR
(Santa Cruz no. sc-9000) or C/EBP
(Santa Cruz no. sc-9314) was added to the incubation media for 15 min. The reactions including recombinant MyoD (Santa Cruz, no. sc-4080) were carried out in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 12.5 µM ZnSO4, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mg/ml BSA, 50 µg/ml poly dI.dC, and 300 ng MyoD.
ChIP Assay
Human skeletal muscle cells were transfected or not with MyoD expression vector. L6 cells were transfected with -165 hUCP3-Luc or -165mutCAhUCP3-Luc in the presence of MyoD expression vector. Protein-DNA cross-linking was achieved by adding formaldehyde (final concentration 1%) to the culture medium for 10 min at 37 C. The cells were washed twice with cold PBS containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin A (protease inhibitors). Cells were then scraped in PBS, centrifuged, and resuspended in 0.2 ml cell lysis buffer [5 mM PIPES (KOH) (pH 8.0), 85 mM KCl, 0.5% (vol/vol) Nonidet P-40 plus the protease inhibitors]. Samples were incubated on ice for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 C. Pellets were resuspended in 0.2 ml SDS buffer [1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1), plus the protease inhibitors] and incubated on ice for 10 min. The samples were sonicated and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 C, and supernatants were diluted 10-fold with immunoprecipitation dilution buffer [0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1), 167 mM NaCl plus the protease inhibitors]. To reduce nonspecific binding, samples were incubated at 4 C for 1 h, with 80 µl of protein G-sepharose slurry as 50% suspension Tris-EDTA, which was pretreated with salmon sperm DNA.
Precleared chromatin solutions were incubated overnight at 4 C with 20 µg of anti-MyoD antibody (Santa Cruz, no. sc-760) or an equal amount of an unrelated immunoglobulin (Santa Cruz no. sc-9314). The immunocomplex was then collected by binding to 60 µl protein G-sepharose slurry as before. After incubation for 1 h at 4 C, the sepharose beads were collected by centrifugation, subsequently washed with 1 ml low-salt buffer [0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1), 150 mM NaCl], high-salt buffer [0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1), 500 mM NaCl], LiCl buffer [0.25 M LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1)], and twice with Tris-EDTA. The complexes were eluted by two successive 15-min incubations with 250 µl of elution buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3) at room temperature. The pooled eluates were heated to 65 C for 4 h in the presence of 20 µl NaCl (5 M), to reverse the formaldehyde cross-links and then treated with proteinase K for 1 h at 45 C. After phenol-chloroform extraction, DNA was used for PCR analysis. ChIP analysis of acetyl-histone H3 was performed using the reagents (Acetyl-Histone H3 Immunoprecipitation, ChIP, Assay Kit) from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY) and following the specific instruction from the supplier. Input sample corresponds to cleared chromatin before immunoprecipitation with the antiacetylated histone H3 antibody.
Primers for amplifying a 191-bp fragment encompassing the noncanonical Eboxes of the human UCP3 promoter were forward 5'-GATCTGGAACTCACTCACC-3' and reverse 5'-CAGCAGGGATTGGATGGC-3' and those amplifying a 620-bp fragment of the human cyclophilin A gene, used as a control, were forward 5'-GTGTACTATTAGCCATGGTCAACCC-3' and reverse 5'-CTGCAGCGAGAGCACAAAGATTCT-3'. After 35 cycles of amplification, PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Statistical Analysis
Where appropriate, statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney nonparametric U test; significance is indicated in the text.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
G.S. and N.P. contributed equally to this work.
Abbreviations: C/EBP
, CCAAT enhancer binding protein; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; DR, direct repeat; HAT, histone acetyltransferase; HDAC1, histone deacetylase 1; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; PLB, passive lysis buffer; PPRE, PPAR-response element; p300, p300 protein; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; TSA, trichostatin A; UCP, uncoupling protein.
Received for publication November 25, 2002. Accepted for publication June 24, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
induce the expression of the uncoupling protein-3 gene in skeletal muscle: a potential mechanism for the lipid intake-dependent activation of uncoupling protein-3 gene expression at birth. Diabetes 48:12171222[Abstract]
and
mediate in vivo regulation of uncoupling protein (UCP-1, UCP-2, UCP-3) gene expression. Endocrinology 139:49204927
. J Biol Chem 272:3343533443
activates transcription of the brown fat uncoupling protein-1 gene. A link between regulation of the thermogenic and lipid oxidation pathways in the brown fat cell. J Biol Chem 276:14861493
is an APC-regulated target of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cell 99:335345[CrossRef][Medline]
NURSA Molecule Pages Link:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Amat, A. Planavila, S. L. Chen, R. Iglesias, M. Giralt, and F. Villarroya SIRT1 Controls the Transcription of the Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-{gamma} Co-activator-1{alpha} (PGC-1{alpha}) Gene in Skeletal Muscle through the PGC-1{alpha} Autoregulatory Loop and Interaction with MyoD J. Biol. Chem., August 14, 2009; 284(33): 21872 - 21880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fromme, C. Hoffmann, K. Nau, J. Rozman, K. Reichwald, M. Utting, M. Platzer, and M. Klingenspor An intronic single base exchange leads to a brown adipose tissue-specific loss of Ucp3 expression and an altered body mass trajectory Physiol Genomics, June 10, 2009; 38(1): 54 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Norris, M. F. Hirshman, J. Yao, N. Jessen, N. Musi, L. Chen, W. I. Sivitz, L. J. Goodyear, and C. R. Kahn Endogenous Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Augments Fatty Acid Uptake in Oxidative Muscle Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5374 - 5383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Seifert, V. Bezaire, C. Estey, and M.-E. Harper Essential Role for Uncoupling Protein-3 in Mitochondrial Adaptation to Fasting but Not in Fatty Acid Oxidation or Fatty Acid Anion Export J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2008; 283(37): 25124 - 25131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Lu and M. N. Sack ATF-1 Is a Hypoxia-responsive Transcriptional Activator of Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial-uncoupling Protein 3 J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2008; 283(34): 23410 - 23418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Rey, B. Sibille, C. Romestaing, M. Belouze, D. Letexier, S. Servais, H. Barre, C. Duchamp, and Y. Voituron Reptilian uncoupling protein: functionality and expression in sub-zero temperatures J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2008; 211(9): 1456 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Padova, G. Caretti, P. Zhao, E. P. Hoffman, and V. Sartorelli MyoD Acetylation Influences Temporal Patterns of Skeletal Muscle Gene Expression J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37650 - 37659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Amat, G. Solanes, M. Giralt, and F. Villarroya SIRT1 Is Involved in Glucocorticoid-mediated Control of Uncoupling Protein-3 Gene Transcription J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34066 - 34076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsuchiya, H. Sakai, N. Suzuki, F. Iwashima, T. Yoshimoto, M. Shichiri, and Y. Hirata Chronic Blockade of Nitric Oxide Synthesis Reduces Adiposity and Improves Insulin Resistance in High Fat-Induced Obese Mice Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4548 - 4556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. McCarthy, J. L. Andrews, E. L. McDearmon, K. S. Campbell, B. K. Barber, B. H. Miller, J. R. Walker, J. B. Hogenesch, J. S. Takahashi, and K. A. Esser Identification of the circadian transcriptome in adult mouse skeletal muscle Physiol Genomics, September 11, 2007; 31(1): 86 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. de Lange, A. Feola, M. Ragni, R. Senese, M. Moreno, A. Lombardi, E. Silvestri, R. Amat, F. Villarroya, F. Goglia, et al. Differential 3,5,3'-Triiodothyronine-Mediated Regulation of Uncoupling Protein 3 Transcription: Role of Fatty Acids Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 4064 - 4072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pedraza, M. Rosell, J. Villarroya, R. Iglesias, F. J. Gonzalez, G. Solanes, and F. Villarroya Developmental and Tissue-Specific Involvement of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} in the Control of Mouse Uncoupling Protein-3 Gene Expression Endocrinology, October 1, 2006; 147(10): 4695 - 4704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schrauwen, M. Mensink, G. Schaart, E. Moonen-Kornips, J.-P. Sels, E. E. Blaak, A. P. Russell, and M. K. C. Hesselink Reduced Skeletal Muscle Uncoupling Protein-3 Content in Prediabetic Subjects and Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Restoration by Rosiglitazone Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1520 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Baldan, J. Relat, P. F. Marrero, and D. Haro Functional interaction between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-{alpha} and Mef-2C on human carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1{beta} (CPT1{beta}) gene activation Nucleic Acids Res., September 8, 2004; 32(16): 4742 - 4749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |