| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Programme in Cell Biology (L.J., A.R., X.H., A.K.), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8; Department of Biochemistry (L.J.) and Institute of Medical Science (C.D.C.-O., A.K.), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8; and Department of Surgery (C.D.C.-O., A.K.), Toronto General Hospital, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Amira Klip, Ph.D., Programme in Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8. E-mail: amira{at}sickkids.ca.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
contributes to adipocyte actin dynamics downstream of Cbl-associated protein (CAP) and Cbl, independently of PI3-K. Given the importance of insulin action in both cell types, it is paramount to determine whether signaling pathways and actin manifestations are cell type specific. We found CAP expression and insulin-mediated Cbl phosphorylation in differentiated myotubes but not in myoblasts. Unlike adipocytes, Cbl is phosphorylated on Y774 and Y731 in myotubes. TC10
and ß-transcripts are amplified by RT-PCR in muscle cells, but the endogenous proteins are barely detectable using two unrelated antibodies. TC10
transfected into myoblasts is activated by insulin despite the lack of CAP expression and Cbl phosphorylation. Moreover, dominant-negative TC10
mutants do not prevent insulin-induced actin remodeling in either myoblasts or myotubes and do not interfere with insulin-mediated recruitment of c-myc epitope-tagged GLUT4 to the cell surface. In contrast to TC10
, endogenous Rac is readily detectable in both muscle cells and adipocytes and binds GTP after insulin in a PI3-K-dependent manner. These data suggest that whereas individual components of the CAP to TC10 pathway are regulated by insulin, a functional TC10-dependent signaling pathway leading to actin remodeling and GLUT4 translocation may not operate in myocytes, as it does in adipocytes. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in adipocytes (9, 11). Indeed, a dominant-negative mutant of Rac prevented actin remodeling and glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) translocation in L6 muscle cells (10), whereas dominant-negative TC10
prevented actin dynamics (9, 11) and GLUT4 translocation (12) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
In both muscle and fat cells, GLUT4 translocation from intracellular membrane compartments to the plasma membrane requires the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K) downstream of the insulin receptor (13, 14, 15, 16, 17), which phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate to generate phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate. The latter lipid recruits phosphoinositide-dependent kinase to the plasma membrane, as well as its downstream substrates Akt/protein kinase B and the atypical protein kinase Cs
and
. In muscle cells, actin remodeling depends on PI3-K activation (2) and specifically on its primary product, phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (7). These insulin-induced actin structures locally concentrate PI3-K subunits p85
and p110
, as well as Akt and GLUT4-containing endo-membranes (7, 10), all of which are required for GLUT4 translocation in response to insulin. In contrast, in adipose cells, insulin-induced cortical actin remodeling implicated in GLUT4 translocation is independent of PI3-K activity, relying instead on a newly characterized signaling pathway. In these cells, insulin induces Cbl phosphorylation on tyrosine residues, resulting in its migration to caveolae via an adapter protein, CAP (Cbl-associated protein) (18, 19, 20). In such plasma membrane microdomains, Cbl binds a series of adaptor proteins including APS (adapter protein with a Pleckstrin homology and Src homology domain) (21), resulting in Cbl phosphorylation (22) and formation of a multiprotein complex that includes CrkII and the guanidine exchange factor C3G. This complex assembly ultimately results in the activation of TC10
(12, 23), which in turn governs actin remodeling that is required for GLUT4 translocation. Thus, it was proposed that the CAP to TC10 pathway acts in parallel to the PI3-K axis to induce GLUT4 translocation (12). How TC10-induced actin dynamics then promote GLUT4 translocation is not clear. Yet, in a semi-in vitro system, TC10
contributes to comet tail formation on GLUT4 vesicles (9, 24) via neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (11). In intact adipocytes, dominant negative TC10
reduces the insulin-induced translocation of GLUT4 in parallel to inhibition of cortical actin dynamics (5).
The parallels and contrasts of the results obtained with muscle and fat cells have prompted us to test whether these are cell type-dependent idiosyncratic phenomena, or whether the CAP to TC10 pathway also operates in muscle cells. Similarly, it became important to explore whether insulin activates endogenous Rac in either cell type. Therefore, in this study we first examine the expression of elements of the CAP to TC10 pathway and whether insulin causes Cbl phosphorylation in muscle cells. We then compare Rac and TC10
activation in muscle and fat cells. We further explore whether PI3-K regulates the activation of such G proteins and how dominant negative mutant versions of TC10
affect actin remodeling and GLUT4 translocation in muscle cells. It is expected that these results will bring us closer to a more complete understanding of the particular role of small G proteins in insulin action and of the cell type-specific nature of the CAP to TC10 pathway.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
was overexpressed in myoblasts, a prominent band of approximately 25 kDa was readily observed with both antibodies (Fig. 1B
, migrating at 30 kDa (Fig. 1B
and TC10ß (Fig. 1B
and TC10ß transcripts as detected by RT-PCR. These data suggest that the TC10
and ß genes are transcribed in muscle cells, but that the endogenous protein levels of both isoforms are markedly lower than in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. To facilitate analysis of whether TC10 can be activated by insulin in muscle cells, subsequent studies were conducted with myoblasts overexpressing epitope-tagged TC10
, the same experimental approach used to characterize the CAP to TC10 pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (12). Furthermore, although in adipocytes both TC10
and ß have been shown to be activated by insulin and dependent on CAP, only TC10
significantly participated in insulin-mediated actin remodeling and GLUT4 translocation (31). Therefore, cells were transfected with only TC10
, and will be referred to as TC10 from here on.
|
Cbl Phosphorylation by Insulin
We next assessed whether insulin stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of Cbl in muscle cells as it does in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (18, 28). Cbl was immunoprecipitated from L6 myoblasts and L6 myotubes with polyclonal anti-Cbl antibodies conjugated to Sepharose beads and assayed for phosphorylation using antiphosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 2
). In L6 myoblasts, insulin did not stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation of Cbl, whereas differentiated L6 myotubes exhibited a 2- to 2.5-fold (P < 0.01) increase in its phosphotyrosine content by 3 min of insulin stimulation (Fig. 2D
). Although readily observed, this degree of tyrosine phosphorylation of Cbl in myotubes was significantly lower than that in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, where a 3.5- to 4.5-fold (P < 0.01) increase was detected (Fig. 2E
). Immunoblotting of the same membranes for total Cbl was used to verify equal loading of the gels (Fig. 2
, AC, lower panels). These results suggest that in muscle cells Cbl is tyrosine phosphorylated only after differentiation into myotubes, correlating with the increase in CAP expression (Fig. 1A
).
|
|
|
S, respectively. After 1 min, insulin caused a 3-fold increase in the amount of GTP-bound (activated) HA-TC10 in myoblasts. The level of activation of TC10 remained stable for 10 min after insulin stimulation (Fig. 5A
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several of the key elements in this signaling sequence (e.g. CAP, Cbl) were found to be expressed in the L6 skeletal muscle cell line. Moreover, CAP expression increased upon muscle cell differentiation, as reported in 3T3-L1 cells (28). However, endogenous levels of TC10 protein were very low in the muscle cells as shown using two different antibodies, one of which readily detected endogenous TC10 proteins in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Moreover, we were unable to detect activation of endogenous TC10 by insulin in L6 muscle cells using a pull-down assay. In contrast, insulin caused activation of this GTPase when L6 myoblasts overexpressed the protein. Yet, these nondifferentiated myoblasts express very little CAP compared with myotubes, and insulin-mediated Cbl phosphorylation in myoblasts is much weaker than in differentiated cells. These findings suggest that insulin can activate exogenous TC10 in muscle cells without the participation of CAP and p-Cbl. Hence, CAP does not define the TC10 pathway in muscle cells as it does in adipocytes.
The above differences between 3T3-L1 adipocytes and muscle cells in the functionality of the CAP to TC10 pathway are further highlighted by the analysis of insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of Cbl on specific tyrosine residues. Although in the differentiated state of both cell types, insulin causes overall tyrosine phosphorylation of Cbl, different tyrosine residues are involved. Our results show that in L6 myotubes, but not in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, insulin induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Y731 and Y774. These phosphotyrosine residues interact, respectively, with the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3-K and with CrkII. Because in 3T3-L1 adipocytes Cbl binds CrkII in response to insulin, it is somewhat surprising that Y774 was not phosphorylated when these cells were stimulated by the hormone. Yet, the Cbl-CrkII interaction in 3T3-L1 adipocytes may also be mediated by Y700, a second CrkII binding site (33). Intriguingly, the finding that Y731 was phosphorylated in insulin-stimulated L6 myotubes suggests a possible mechanism for cross-talk between the Cbl-dependent signaling pathway(s) and the PI 3-K pathway. This notion is further supported by the recent work of Farese et al. (36), whereby expression of Cbl-encoding mutations at Y731 and Y371, two tyrosine phosphorylation sites within a YXXM (p85 binding) motif, prevented glucose uptake and PI3-K-mediated insulin signaling. Furthermore, APS (adapter protein with a Pleckstrin homology and Src homology domain) has been recently documented to regulate insulin receptor phosphorylation and subsequent PI3-K signaling (37). Similarly, rosiglitazone caused Cbl phosphorylation in a PI3-K-dependent manner (38), and the PI3-K and Cbl pathways were suggested to converge at the level of atypical PKC complexed with Par 6 and Par3 (39). In the present study, we demonstrate that, after inhibition of PI3-K with wortmannin, insulin-induced TC10 activity was not reduced, but the basal level of GTP-loaded TC10 was increased. This tonic increase in basal activity suggests that PI3-K exerts a negative regulatory input on the GTP-loading of TC10 at the basal state. Possible targets for PI3-K input could be at the guanine activation protein level (i.e. hyperactivating GTP hydrolysis), or at the guanine exchange factor level (i.e. inhibiting GDP to GTP exchange). Importantly, the effect of wortmannin on TC10 in the absence of insulin was not examined in the previous studies with 3T3-L1 adipocytes. It therefore appears that cross-talk mechanisms do exist between the PI3-K and the CAP to TC10 pathways in L6 muscle cells.
Collectively, our study suggests that differentiated muscle cells express various components of the CAP to TC10 pathway, and that insulin induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Cbl. Yet, it is uncertain whether these proteins participate in a functional signaling pathway from the insulin receptor through CAP and Cbl to TC10, as was reported in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (also see below). This conclusion is supported by the findings of Thirone et al. (40), where CAP expression and Cbl phosphorylation were observed in mature rat adipocytes but not in muscle tissue. Furthermore, activation of exogenously expressed TC10 may receive regulatory input from PI3-K in muscle cells.
The Role of Rac and TC10 in Insulin Action
Previous findings indicated that the small GTPase Rac is involved in insulin-mediated actin remodeling in skeletal muscle cells (10) but not in adipocytes (41). Here we compared in parallel the expression and activation of Rac in both cell lines. Unlike TC10, endogenous levels of Rac were readily detected in both muscle cells and 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Moreover, after insulin stimulation, both cell types exhibited rapid activation of endogenous Rac in a PI3-K-dependent manner.
The following observations correlate Rac activation with actin remodeling in muscle cells in response to insulin stimulation: 1) Insulin-mediated actin reorganization in muscle cells is largely PI3-K dependent, based on pharmacological and molecular approaches (1, 3). Here we show that this also holds true when the cells are semidetached and rounded up. This PI3-K-dependent actin remodeling correlates with insulin-induced Rac activation that is wortmannin inhibitable. 2) A dominant negative Rac mutant prevented insulin-mediated actin remodeling and the gain in surface GLUT4 in muscle cells (10). In contrast to muscle cells, in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, even though Rac is activated by insulin (Fig. 6
), dominant negative Rac had no effect on hexose transport (41, 42). Thus, despite the fact that insulin can activate endogenous Rac both in adipocytes and muscle cells, it is possible that the role of Rac in insulin-mediated actin remodeling differs between the two cell types. Furthermore, it is possible that other GTPases may also participate in insulin signaling. Indeed, a recent study shows that Cdc 42, a GTPase with similarities to TC10, is required for the stimulation of glucose uptake into 3T3-L1 adipocytes (43).
As mentioned above, in L6 myoblasts, activation of exogenous TC10 by insulin occurred in the absence of CAP expression and Cbl phosphorylation. This renders this cell system ideal for assessing the role of TC10 in actin remodeling, independent from additional signals arising from the CAP-Cbl pathway. The following observations dissociate TC10 from insulin-mediated actin remodeling and GLUT4 translocation in muscle cells: 1) Wortmannin abolished insulin-mediated actin remodeling in this cell type but did not reduce TC10 activation. 2) A dominant negative TC10 mutant did not prevent insulin-mediated actin remodeling in myoblasts. Similar results were obtained in myotubes, in which the CAP and Cbl components are assembled and regulated by insulin. 3) Actin remodeling occurred in myoblasts that do not express CAP nor respond to insulin by phosphorylating Cbl. It is noteworthy, however, that upon constitutively active TC10 overexpression, the stress fiber architecture was altered and a prominent peripheral actin band was evident. This suggests a potential capacity of TC10 to regulate actin morphology in muscle cells. Alternatively, it is plausible that such action results from competition of the highly expressed TC10 mutant with guanine exchange factors and guanine activation proteins needed for the function of other small GTPase such as RhoA, which is known to control stress fiber morphology (44). Regardless of the changes in actin morphology observed in cells exogenously expressing constitutively active TC10, insulin still induced the characteristic formation of actin structures in muscle cells. 4) Finally, unlike in the adipocytes, TC10 had no effect on GLUT4 translocation in response to insulin in L6 myoblasts. When this manuscript was under review, a paper appeared dissociating TC10 activation from its downstream actions on actin remodeling and GLUT4 translocation in adipocytes (45), suggesting that the link between the upstream CAP and Cbl leading to TC10 activation may not be linearly linked to actin and GLUT4 via TC10.
In conclusion, muscle cells and adipocytes appear to differ in their reliance on TC10 and Rac for insulin-mediated actin remodeling and GLUT4 translocation. In skeletal muscle cells, a functional CAP to TC10 signaling pathway toward actin remodeling in response to insulin is deemed unlikely, although individual components of this pathway are assembled and regulated by insulin. TC10 protein was barely detectable, and actin remodeled in the absence of CAP or Cbl phosphorylation. Insulin-dependent actin remodeling was prevented by wortmannin as was Rac activation. Moreover, dominant negative Rac, but not dominant negative TC10, prevents insulin-dependent actin dynamics and GLUT4 translocation. Rac is therefore the likely candidate small GTPase involved in insulin-stimulated actin reorganization that is necessary for GLUT4 translocation in muscle cells, downstream of PI3-K.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
was kindly provided by Dr. Mark Rush (New York University, New York, NY). Three-X-HA-tagged versions of TC10
(HA TC10) were gifts provided by Dr. Ian Macara (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA). Plasmid encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein was purchased from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). Effectene transfection kits and plasmid DNA purification columns were purchased from Qiagen (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Lipofectamine 2000 transfection kits were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Human insulin was purchased from Eli Lilly (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). PI3-K inhibitors, wortmannin and LY 294002, were purchased from BIOMOL Research Laboratories, Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against Rac, Cbl, phosphotyrosine (4G10), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies for CAP were purchased form Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies for Cbl and myc (A-14) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Phospho-Cbl antibodies against Y731 and Y774, phospho-Akt against S473, and anti-HA antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA). Two different affinity-purified polyclonal TC10 antibodies recognizing rodent TC10 were used. One antibody (Ab:A) was a gift from Dr. Mark Rush (New York University) and was raised against amino acids 139152 of human TC10
. This peptide sequence shares 99% identity with the corresponding sequences in the mouse and rat TC10
(which are 100% identical within themselves), but not with TC10ß or TC10-like (TCL, the human ortholog), which is globally 77% identical to TC10
in amino acid sequence. A second antibody (Ab:B) was a gift from Dr. Alan Saltiel (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) and was raised against the peptide PASYYHNVQEEWVPELKDCMP (20). This sequence shares 100% identity to sequences from the human, mouse, and rat TC10ß/TCL, and 85% amino acid identity with sequences in the human, mouse, and rat TC10
(which are 100% identical between rat and mouse TC10
). Yet, this antibody cross-reacts with both proteins (20). Rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin and Alexa 488-conjugated goat antimouse antibodies were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR).
Cell Culture and Transfections
L6 muscle cells expressing c-myc epitope-tagged GLUT4 (GLUT4myc) were maintained in myoblast monolayer culture, or differentiated into multinucleated myotubes as described previously (2). Myotubes in six-well plates or 10-cm dishes were ready for experimentation 57 d post seeding. Transfection of L6 GLUT4myc myoblasts (24 h post seeding) and myotubes (on d 6) was performed using Effectene and Lipofectamine 2000 reagent, respectively, essentially as specified by the manufacturer. Experiments with transfected cells were conducted 2024 h after transfection.
3T3-L1 adipocytes were cultured to confluency in DMEM supplemented with 20% calf serum, 1% glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin cocktail. Forty-eight hours after confluence, differentiation was induced in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.11 mg/ml 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 1 µM dexamethasone, and 1 µg/ml insulin. Forty-eight hours later, the medium was changed to 10% fetal bovine serum DMEM containing 1µg/ml insulin for an additional 2 d. Experiments were performed on cells 1112 d after induction of differentiation, when exhibiting greater than 90% adipocyte morphology (46).
RNA Isolation and RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from 10-cm dishes of rat L6 myoblasts, myotubes, or mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes using the RNAqueous Midi Kit from Ambion (Austin, TX). RNA was purified and extracted as directed by the manufacturer (Ambion). RNA (5 µg) was reverse transcribed in a 40-µl reaction as described by the manufacturer (Invitrogen).
TC10 fragments from L6 muscle cells (rat origin) were amplified from the cDNA by PCR with the following primers
TC10
5'
3' primer: AAAGGTCTAAGCGGCAGCGAACAG
3'
5' primer: GAGCAACCGAAAGAAGAAGGCAGA;
TC10ß 5'
3' primer: GCGTGAAACTGGCGAAAGCGATAG
3'
5' primer: TGAGAGACAGGACTTGGTTACCGG
These primers amplified 1100- and 488-bp fragments of rat TC10
and ß, respectively. TC10 from 3T3-L1 adipocyte cells (mouse origin) was amplified with the following primers:
TC10
5'
3' primer: AAAGGTCTAAGCGGCAGCGAACAG
3'
5' primer: GTGTAGGTGTCGTCTTCCGTGTTG;
TC10ß 5'
3' primer: GACAGACCCTTTTCATCCCTCCTC
3'
5' primer: GTCCTGTCCTCCTAATGTTGGTCG
These primers amplified 855- and 425-bp fragments of mouse TC10
and ß, respectively. PCR was carried out in 50-µl reactions as described by the manufacturer (Invitrogen).
Immunoblot Analysis and Immunoprecipitation
Expression patterns of various proteins from total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting. Cells were treated with or without 100 nM insulin for the indicated time points. After stimulation, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS containing 1 mM Na3VO4. Total cell lysates were made with 2x Laemmli sample buffer containing freshly added inhibitors [1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, protease inhibitor cocktail (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and okadaic acid]. Lysates were then heated for 5 min at 65 C and passed through a 27-gauge needle. Forty Protein (40 µg) was resolved with 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane for 2 h. Membranes were blocked with 3% BSA in Tris-buffered saline (500 mM Tris-base, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) and then immunoblotted overnight at 4 C with primary antibodies as specified in the text. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were applied for 1 h at room temperature, and detection by chemiluminescence was performed as specified by the manufacturer (PerkinElmer Corp., Norwalk, CT). Immunoblots were quantified by scanning and analysis of pixel intensity of individual bands using NIH Image (version 1.61) graphics.
For immunoprecipitation, cells were treated with insulin as above, and lysates were prepared in immunoprecipitation buffer containing 135 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 10 mM NaF, 1% Triton X-100 and 1 mM each of EDTA, Na tetra-pyrophosphate, Na3VO4, and freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail. After 15 min of rotation and a quick 12,000 x g centrifugation at 4 C, lysates were incubated with 4 µg polyclonal anti-Cbl antibody, rotating at 4 C overnight, after which 70 µl protein beads (mix 50:50 of Protein A and G) were added for an additional 2 h at 4 C. Complexes were obtained by short centrifugation at 12,000 x g, washed on ice four to five times with immunoprecipitation buffer and eluted with 2x Laemmli sample buffer. The proteins were resolved on a 5% SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with phosphotyrosine (4G10) or monoclonal anti-Cbl antibodies.
Rac and TC10 Activation by Insulin
To determine whether TC10
or Rac was activated by insulin, cell lysates were subjected to pull-down experiments with a GST-fusion protein of the CRIB domain of p21 kinase conjugated to glutathione beads that specifically bind activated forms of Rho GTPases. Cells were grown as described above in 10-cm dishes (for TC10 activation, myoblasts were transfected with 5 µg HA-TC10
cDNA) and serum starved for 35 h before stimulation with 100 nM insulin for the indicated time periods. Cells were then washed twice with ice-cold PBS supplemented with 1 mM Na3VO4 and lysed in buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2 (or 30 mM for TC10 activation), 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 2% glycerol, 1% Igapal, 1 mM NaVO4, 1 mM EDTA, 20 µl/ml protease inhibitor cocktail (provided by BD Biosciences, Oakville, Ontario, Canada) and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Lysates were immediately centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 1 min at 4 C, an aliquot was removed for total lysate analysis, and the remainder was incubated with previously prepared GST-CRIB conjugated to glutathione Sepharose beads as described previously (47, 48). After 30 min rotation at 4 C, the active (GTP-bound) GTPases that bind the CRIB domain were pulled down by brief centrifugation at 12,000 x g, washed three times with lysis buffer, eluted with 2x Laemmli sample buffer, and heated for 35 min at 100 C. Pulled down proteins were resolved by 1012% SDS-PAGE gels, followed by immunoblotting using anti-Rac, anti-TC10, or anti-HA antibodies.
Fluorescence Microscopy
L6 GLUT4myc myoblasts grown on 25-mm diameter glass coverslips were transfected with 0.5 µg of cDNA encoding WT, DN, or CA HA-TC10
, whereas myotubes were transfected with 4 µg DN HA-TC10. Cells were deprived of serum for 4 h and then treated with 100 nM insulin for up to 10 min at 37 C. Cells were fixed with 3% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 5 min at 4 C and 25 min at room temperature, briefly permeabilized with 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 in PBS for 3 min, and blocked for 15 min with 5% milk in PBS. It was crucial to fix the cells immediately at 4 C after insulin stimulation, and to permeabilize in 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 for exactly 3 min to preserve actin morphology. To identify transfected cells, monoclonal anti-HA (1: 2000) antibody was used, followed by a secondary antibody conjugated to the fluorophore Alexa 488. Labeling of actin filaments with rhodamine-coupled phalloidin was carried out as described previously (7).
Rounded-up myoblasts were prepared as described previously (49). Briefly, L6-GLUT4myc myoblasts were detached from the substratum using Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS. Trypsin was avoided to better preserve cell surface proteins, such as the insulin receptor. After resuspending in HEPES-buffered RPMI, myoblasts were allowed to reattach onto glass coverslips for 10 min in the absence or presence of 100 nM insulin at 37 C. Where indicated, 100 nM wortmannin was added to the medium 20 min before cell detachment and during the 10-min incubation with insulin. Cells were then immediately fixed in ice-cold 4% formaldehyde in PBS containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ for 20 min and further processed to allow actin decoration with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin exactly as described above. Images were obtained by laser confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510, Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Acquisition parameters were adjusted to exclude saturation of the fluorescent pixels. The focal plane was chosen to best observe the actin structures in the basal and insulin-stimulated states, as described previously (7).
Surface GLUT4myc detection was performed as described previously (34). In short, after treatment, cells were processed on ice at 4 C to prevent internalization of GLUT4. Cells were then briefly fixed with 3% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 5 min, blocked with 5% milk in PBS, and allowed to react with a polyclonal anti-myc antibody (A-14, 1:250) for 1 h. After surface myc labeling, cells were permeabilized, blocked (15 min, 5% milk in PBS), and reacted with a monoclonal anti-HA. Secondary antirat and antimouse antibodies conjugated to the fluorophore Cy3 and Alexa 488, respectively, were used, followed by a final fixing with paraformaldehyde for 5 min at 4 C followed by 25 min at room temperature. Confocal microscopy was used as above, by choosing a focal plane immediately above the glass coverslip, and quantification of the intensity of the signal observed was performed as described previously (7). The results obtained from the ventral cell surface matched those in which a complete Z-stack was acquired, and a projection image was used for quantitation (data not shown).
Statistical Analysis
Unless otherwise specified in the figure legend, different groups were compared using ANOVA with Tukeys multiple comparison post hoc analysis using Prism version 3 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Abbreviations: CA, Constitutionally active; CAP, Cbl-associated protein; CRIB, Cdc 42/Rac interactive binding; DN, dominant negative; GLUT4, glucose transporter 4; GLUT4myc, c-myc epitope-tagged GLUT4; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; HA, hemagglutinin; PI3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; WT, wild type.
Received for publication July 25, 2003. Accepted for publication November 3, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GTPase, in adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem 278:1527915284
, and glucose transport in 3T3/L1 adipocytes. Endocrinology 143:17051716
/
is a convergent downstream target of insulin stimulated PI3-kinase and TC10 signaling pathways in adipocytes. Proc 63rd Scientific Sessions of The American Diabetes Association, New Orleans, LA, 2003 (p A307)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E Leney and J. M Tavare The molecular basis of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake: signalling, trafficking and potential drug targets J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 203(1): 1 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Coisy-Quivy, O. Touzet, A. Bourret, R. A. Hipskind, J. Mercier, P. Fort, and A. Philips TC10 controls human myofibril organization and is activated by the sarcomeric RhoGEF obscurin J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2009; 122(7): 947 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bashan, J. Kovsan, I. Kachko, H. Ovadia, and A. Rudich Positive and Negative Regulation of Insulin Signaling by Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Physiol Rev, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 27 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. K. Randhawa, S. Ishikura, I. Talior-Volodarsky, A. W. P. Cheng, N. Patel, J. H. Hartwig, and A. Klip GLUT4 Vesicle Recruitment and Fusion Are Differentially Regulated by Rac, AS160, and Rab8A in Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2008; 283(40): 27208 - 27219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shisheva Phosphoinositides in insulin action on GLUT4 dynamics: not just PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2008; 295(3): E536 - E544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Falasca, W. E. Hughes, V. Dominguez, G. Sala, F. Fostira, M. Q. Fang, R. Cazzolli, P. R. Shepherd, D. E. James, and T. Maffucci The Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase C2{alpha} in Insulin Signaling J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 28226 - 28236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Katz Modulation of glucose transport in skeletal muscle by reactive oxygen species J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1671 - 1676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. JeBailey, O. Wanono, W. Niu, J. Roessler, A. Rudich, and A. Klip Ceramide- and Oxidant-Induced Insulin Resistance Involve Loss of Insulin-Dependent Rac-Activation and Actin Remodeling in Muscle Cells Diabetes, February 1, 2007; 56(2): 394 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Hou, S. Shigematsu, H. C. Crawford, P. Z. Anastasiadis, and J. E. Pessin Dual Regulation of Rho and Rac by p120 Catenin Controls Adipocyte Plasma Membrane Trafficking J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2006; 281(33): 23307 - 23312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-Z. Liu, H.-L. Zhao, J. Zuo, S. K.S. Ho, J. C.N. Chan, Y. Meng, F.-D. Fang, and P. C.Y. Tong Protein Kinase C{zeta} Mediates Insulin-induced Glucose Transport through Actin Remodeling in L6 Muscle Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2006; 17(5): 2322 - 2330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C.P. Thirone, L. JeBailey, P. J. Bilan, and A. Klip Opposite Effect of JAK2 on Insulin-Dependent Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases and Akt in Muscle Cells: Possible Target to Ameliorate Insulin Resistance. Diabetes, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 942 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ilany, P. J. Bilan, S. Kapur, J. S. Caldwell, M.-E. Patti, A. Marette, and C. R. Kahn Overexpression of Rad in muscle worsens diet-induced insulin resistance and glucose intolerance and lowers plasma triglyceride level PNAS, March 21, 2006; 103(12): 4481 - 4486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ishiki and A. Klip Minireview: Recent Developments in the Regulation of Glucose Transporter-4 Traffic: New Signals, Locations, and Partners Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5071 - 5078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Sebastian and L. E. Nagy Decreased insulin-dependent glucose transport by chronic ethanol feeding is associated with dysregulation of the Cbl/TC10 pathway in rat adipocytes Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2005; 289(6): E1077 - E1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. S. L. Thong, C. B. Dugani, and A. Klip Turning Signals On and Off: GLUT4 Traffic in the Insulin-Signaling Highway Physiology, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 271 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Huang, A. C. P. Thirone, X. Huang, and A. Klip Differential Contribution of Insulin Receptor Substrates 1 Versus 2 to Insulin Signaling and Glucose Uptake in L6 Myotubes J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 19426 - 19435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Goldstein, K. Mahadev, and X. Wu Redox Paradox: Insulin Action Is Facilitated by Insulin-Stimulated Reactive Oxygen Species With Multiple Potential Signaling Targets Diabetes, February 1, 2005; 54(2): 311 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Brozinick Jr., E. D. Hawkins, A. B. Strawbridge, and J. S. Elmendorf Disruption of Cortical Actin in Skeletal Muscle Demonstrates an Essential Role of the Cytoskeleton in Glucose Transporter 4 Translocation in Insulin-sensitive Tissues J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 2004; 279(39): 40699 - 40706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sweeney, R. R. Garg, R. B. Ceddia, D. Li, M. Ishiki, R. Somwar, L. J. Foster, P. O. Neilsen, G. D. Prestwich, A. Rudich, et al. Intracellular Delivery of Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-Trisphosphate Causes Incorporation of Glucose Transporter 4 into the Plasma Membrane of Muscle and Fat Cells without Increasing Glucose Uptake J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32233 - 32242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |