| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Coactivator-1
, as a Transcription Amplifier, Is Not Essential for Basal and Hormone-Induced Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Gene Expression
Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0615
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Daryl K. Granner, Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, 707 Light Hall, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0615. E-mail: daryl.granner{at}vanderbilt.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
coactivator 1
(PGC-1
) plays an important role in energy homeostasis and is considered to be a key regulator of hepatic gluconeogenesis in response to fasting. It is not clear whether PGC-1
is obligatory for the activation of the transcription program of gluconeogenic genes, or whether it amplifies an existing process. H4IIE hepatoma cells were used to address this key point. These cells respond appropriately to all of the hormones involved in the regulation of gluconeogenic genes, yet they are devoid of PGC-1
. Also, these hormone responses occur in the absence of ongoing protein synthesis, so the necessary complement of transcription factors exists in untreated cells. However, exogenous expression of PGC-1
in these cells does enhance basal and hormone-induced expression of the PEPCK and glucose-6-phosphatase genes. Mutational analyses of the PEPCK gene promoter reveal that one element in the PEPCK gene promoter, glucocorticoid accessory factor 3, which binds chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor, is of particular importance. Taken together, these data suggest that, under chronic fasting conditions, i.e. when high levels of cAMP and glucocorticoids induce PGC-1
expression, this coactivator markedly amplifies PEPCK gene expression and gluconeogenesis. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For example, induction of PEPCK gene expression by glucocorticoids is mediated through a complex glucocorticoid response unit (GRU) composed of two nonconsensus, low-affinity glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding sites, three adjacent accessory factor elements [glucocorticoid accessory factor (gAF) 13] (see Fig. 6
), and a downstream cAMP response element (CRE). Each of these elements has been shown to bind several transcription factors, such as retinoic acid receptor (RAR), retinoid X receptor (RXR) (8) forkhead box (FOX) family members (9), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP)
, and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) (10), but various experimental approaches have demonstrated that chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor (COUP-TFI) and hepatic nuclear factor (HNF)-4
mediate the accessory activity of the gAF1 element, whereas FOXA2 (HNF-3ß), COUP-TFI, and C/EBPß mediate the accessory activity of gAF2, gAF3, and the CRE, respectively (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Mutation of any one of these elements results in a blunted glucocorticoid response and mutation of any two abolishes the response. Previous work suggests that these factors provide an environment that stabilizes GR binding to the PEPCK promoter (15, 16). Thus, the dissociation rate of GR is differentially slowed by the gAF1/gAF3 or gAF2 elements that bind functionally distinct accessory factors, COUP-TFI/HNF-4
and FOXA2, respectively. How these different accessory factors exert their function remains to be investigated. Some of these elements are also part of other hormone response units. For example, the gAF3 site is also part of the cAMP response unit (17).
|
are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors (18, 19), whereas FOXA2 (HNF-3ß) is a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors (20, 21) and C/EBPß is a member of the basic-leucine zipper family of proteins (22). These DNA-binding transcription factors function by recruiting coregulators to the promoter, which in turn results in the activation or repression of transcription (23). Several coactivators appear to be involved in transactivation through the PEPCK gene promoter, including steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), GR-interacting protein-1 (GRIP-1), cAMP response element binding protein-binding protein/p300 (CBP/p300), sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP-1), and SNF2-related-CBP-activator protein (SCRAP) (24, 25, 26, 27). It is not clear whether any or all of these proteins serve obligatory roles, whether a selection of different combinations suffices, or if some act to amplify an existing, lower level response.
Many coactivators are ubiquitously expressed and are recruited to specific promoters by ligand-activated nuclear receptors to form a functional complex with other components of the transcription machinery (23). Certain coactivators, however, are expressed in a tissue-specific manner and are involved in specific metabolic processes. For example, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
coactivator 1
(PGC-1
) is induced in brown adipose tissue by exposure to cold temperature, and it is a key regulator of the transcriptional program required for thermogenesis (28). PGC-1
is also expressed in muscle and heart as well as liver and kidney, the two organs primarily responsible for gluconeogenesis. Fasting leads to an induction of PGC-1
gene expression in liver (29), and glucocorticoids and cAMP induce PGC-1
mRNA expression in isolated hepatocytes (30). The induction of PEPCK, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) gene expression by PGC-1
has led to the suggestion that it is a critical regulator of gluconeogenesis in response to fasting (31, 32). In support of this view, insulin is an important regulator of PGC-1
expression as demonstrated by its altered regulation in mouse models of impaired insulin function (32) and in transfection studies in which insulin represses a PGC-1
promoter-driven reporter gene (33).
This paper presents studies concerning the role PGC-1
plays in basal and hormone-induced PEPCK gene expression. Although H4IIE cells are deficient in PGC-1
mRNA and protein, the PEPCK and G6Pase genes are regulated by glucocorticoids, cAMP and insulin, the major effectors of the gluconeogenic program. Glucocorticoids and cAMP do not induce PGC-1
in H4IIE cells, and the acute effects of these agents do not require ongoing protein synthesis. By contrast, the exogenous expression of PGC-1
enhances basal and hormone-induced expression of the PEPCK and G6Pase genes in H4IIE cells and in isolated hepatocytes. We used transient transfection and mutation analyses to identify the promoter elements responsible for the PGC-1
-mediated increase of basal and hormone-induced PEPCK gene expression. The gAF3 element (which binds COUP-TFI) is of critical importance for the effect of this coactivator on basal expression; gAF1 (which binds COUP-TFI and HNF-4
) contributes less to the effect, and gAF2 (which binds FOXA2) is not involved. Substitution of the weak, nonconsensus binding sites for the glucocorticoid receptor in the PEPCK GRU with a high-affinity, consensus GRE relieves the requirement for COUP-TFI and HNF-4
, which appear to promote complex formation between PGC-1
and GR in the wild-type PEPCK gene promoter (Fig. 6
). PGC-1
thus is not an obligatory factor for PEPCK gene expression, but it does play an important amplifying role.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and PEPCK Gene Expression in H4IIE Hepatoma Cells and Isolated Hepatocytes
mRNA cannot be detected in H4IIE rat hepatoma cells and in primary hepatocytes isolated from rats (Fig. 1A
protein in these cells (data not shown). Previous studies showed that fasting induces PEPCK and PGC-1
mRNA expression in rats (29, 30). cAMP and glucocorticoids, the main signals of fasting, fail to induce PGC-1
mRNA in H4IIE cells, but do induce this mRNA in isolated hepatocytes, as does fasting in liver (Fig. 1A
mRNA in treated hepatocytes is about 9.8; in fed liver, 5.7; and in fasted liver, 15.4. Similar results were obtained for PGC-1ß (data not shown), but this isoform is a weak activator of the expression of gluconeogenic genes and was therefore not further investigated (34). As noted previously, cAMP and glucocorticoids induce PEPCK mRNA expression by about 8-fold in H4IIE cells (35) (Fig. 1B
expression is induced about 20-fold after a 4-h treatment with dexamethasone and cAMP (Fig. 1A
is not required for basal expression of the PEPCK gene but that its expression amplifies the action of glucocorticoids and cAMP on the PEPCK and G6Pase genes. Finally, the induction of PEPCK gene expression by cAMP and glucocorticoids in H4IIE cells is independent of ongoing protein synthesis (Fig. 1D
, is not required for the acute effects of hormones on PEPCK gene expression.
|
Expression in H4IIE Cells Induces PEPCK and G6Pase Gene Expression and Enhances the Effect of Glucocorticoids
is proposed to be a key regulator of hepatic gluconeogenesis (32), a metabolic pathway that is stimulated by cAMP and glucocorticoids. Adenoviruses expressing either green fluorescent protein (GFP) and PGC-1
, or GFP alone, were used to investigate the relationship between PGC-1
and glucocorticoids. Total H4IIE cell RNA was harvested 48 h after infection and PEPCK, FBPase, G6Pase, and liver-pyruvate kinase (L-PK) mRNAs were quantified using real-time PCR. As illustrated in Fig. 2A
in the absence of hormones. The action of PGC-1
is specific for gluconeogenic genes because the expression of L-PK mRNA is not further increased by this coactivator. By contrast, the gene encoding FBPase, which is mainly regulated by allosteric effectors, is highly expressed in H4IIE cells but is minimally induced by PGC-1
(<2-fold, data not shown). PEPCK gene induction by PGC-1
was also observed in another hepatoma cell line (HepG2) to an extent comparable to that noted in H4IIE cells (data not shown). These observations show that PGC-1
can indeed activate the expression of genes that encode proteins involved in the gluconeogenic pathway in liver-derived cell lines.
|
on the induction of the PEPCK and G6Pase genes by glucocorticoids and cAMP was examined next. As illustrated in Fig. 2B
expression enhances PEPCK and G6Pase mRNA induction by glucocorticoids alone, or in combination with cAMP. The relative response of PEPCK gene expression, however, remains the same because PGC-1
causes about a 5-fold increase of the basal mRNA level. Similar results were observed with G6Pase. PGC-1
elevates basal expression of this gene about 8-fold and dexamethasone and cAMP further induce the expression of G6Pase mRNA.
To investigate the promoter elements required for the PGC-1
effect on genes of gluconeogenesis, we first needed to establish that reporter gene constructs, which contain the PEPCK, FBPase, or G6Pase gene promoters, respond like the endogenous genes. As shown in Table 1
, PGC-1
stimulates transcription of the PEPCK and G6Pase reporter gene constructs to a great extent; however, it has no effect on the FBPase reporter gene. The G6Pase and PEPCK reporter gene constructs are induced by dexamethasone, and the addition of PGC-1
results in an enhanced effect on expression from these reporter genes. Dexamethasone and PGC-1
have no effect on FBPase reporter gene expression (Table 1
).
|
Activates the PEPCK Promoter through the Orphan Nuclear Receptors HNF-4
and COUP-TFI
effect on the PEPCK gene, as shown in Fig. 3A
in the absence of hormones because block mutations of these elements, which have no effect on basal expression per se, resulted in a 50% and 90% loss of the PGC-1
effect, respectively (Fig. 3A
-enhanced expression of the reporter gene. A double mutation of gAF1 and gAF3 almost abolished the effect of PGC-1
(mAF1 + AF3). The gAF1 element binds HNF-4
and COUP-TFI and the gAF3 site binds only COUP-TFI (12, 14). The gAF3 element seems to be more important for the PGC-1
effect, as a mutation of this element almost eliminates the PGC-1
response, whereas a mutation of gAF1 resulted only in an about 50% reduction of this effect. We therefore tested whether the relative positions of these elements, or the factors that bind to them, are important. We found that the gAF1 and gAF3 sites are interchangeable, as replacing the gAF3 site with gAF1 had no effect on expression in response to PGC-1
(compare constructs WT and AF1AF1 in Fig. 3B
response, which leads us to conclude that the position relative to the transcription start site, rather than the exact sequence of these elements, is important.
|
and COUP-TFI. We used previously characterized consensus binding sites for each of these orphan nuclear receptors (12, 37) to test whether both can coactivate with PGC-1
. Replacing gAF1 with a consensus HNF-4
or COUP-TFI site resulted in comparable, wild-type PGC-1
responses (see AF1COUP vs. AF1HNF-4 in Fig. 3B
activation that is comparable to that elicited from the wild-type construct (AF1 + 3COUP in Fig. 3B
and COUP-TFI can mediate the PGC-1
effect in the absence of hormones.
The gAF3 element consists of three sites, defined by transcription factor contact points, termed
, ß, and
, respectively (8). The
site is critical for the binding of a RAR/RXR heterodimer, whereas the
site binds both COUP-TFI and RAR/RXR and is required for the glucocorticoid effect (14). HNF-4
does not bind to the gAF3 element (14). The
site of gAF3 was mutated to test whether a nonliganded RAR/RXR heterodimer contributes to the effect of PGC-1
on the PEPCK promoter. This mutation had no effect on the response to PGC-1
(mAF3
in Fig. 3B
), whereas a mutation of the
site in this element resulted in the same effect as the block mutation of gAF3 (compare mAF3 in Fig. 3A
and mAF3
in Fig. 3B
). Furthermore, replacing gAF1 and gAF3 with consensus RAR/RXR binding sites resulted in a construct that failed to show activation by PGC-1
in the absence of hormones (data not shown). These results suggest that nonliganded RAR/RXR heterdimers do not contribute to the PGC-1
effect and emphasize the importance of COUP-TFI at the gAF3 element.
COUP-TFI, HNF-4
, GR, and PGC-1
Bind to the PEPCK Promoter in Vivo
GR translocation to the nucleus and its binding to target DNA elements is ligand dependent (38). We performed the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay on untreated, or on dexamethasone and cAMP-treated H4IIE cells to test whether the in vivo binding of HNF-4
and COUP-TFI, which serve as accessory factors for GR on the PEPCK promoter, is hormone dependent. Cross-linked and sheared chromatin was subjected to precipitation with either anti-GR, anti-HNF-4
, anti-COUP-TFI antibodies or a no-antibody control. PEPCK gene promoter segments were amplified using primers spanning the GRU region, or a far upstream region (-1.7 kb), as a control. As shown in Fig. 4A
, we observed ligand-dependent binding of GR to the GRU-containing region of the PEPCK promoter, as expected (39). No binding to the upstream region was observed (data not shown). Treatment of cells with cAMP served as a control and showed, as anticipated, no GR recruitment. By contrast, we observed constitutive binding of COUP-TFI and HNF-4
to the promoter. This observation confirms previous results for the binding of HNF-4
and GR to the PEPCK gene promoter (39) and shows that COUP-TFI also binds to the GRU region of the promoter in H4IIE cells in vivo. PGC-1
is not bound to the PEPCK gene promoter in untreated H4IIE cells, nor is it bound after treatment of the cells with Dex and cAMP (Fig. 4C
). This is not surprising given the observation that these cells have undetectable amounts of PGC-1
mRNA and protein (see above). H4IIE cells were infected with an adenovirus that expresses PGC-1
to ascertain whether this coregulator can bind to the PEPCK gene promoter. As shown in Fig. 4C
, binding is readily detected in the infected cells in both the basal and Dex-induced conditions. The lack of hormone dependency in this binding is in accord with the functional data illustrated in Table 1
.
|
Requires an Intact PEPCK GRU to Enhance the Glucocorticoid Response
, on both the endogenous and reporter gene promoters (Fig. 2
can interact with and coactivate transcription with the glucocorticoid receptor (40). Therefore, additional reporter constructs were analyzed to test whether the glucocorticoid receptor and accessory factors contribute equally to PGC-1
-enhanced expression in the presence of glucocorticoids. As illustrated in Fig. 5A
in H4IIE cells. A mutation of any of the accessory elements results in a 50% reduction of the glucocorticoid response per se, as reported previously (15). However, the effect of these mutations differs significantly in the presence of PGC-1
and glucocorticoids. A mutation of gAF1 or gAF3 results in a blunted PGC-1
-enhanced glucocorticoid response, and the gAF3 mutation has the most profound effect. However, a reporter gene with a mutation of the gAF2 element retains most of the PGC-1
effect. These data suggest that HNF-4
and COUP-TFI are required for the formation of a functional complex between PGC-1
and GR, and that COUP-TFI may be the more important of the two.
|
Effect in the Presence of Glucocorticoids
by promoting the formation of complexes with coactivators like PGC-1
(Fig. 6
To further test this idea, we changed the GR1 site to a palindromic sequence that binds the glucocorticoid receptor with an approximately 30 times higher affinity than does GR1 (16). This maneuver results in a strong increase in the dexamethasone response because the palindromic GRE results in about a 60-fold induction compared with the 8-fold obtained with the wild-type GR1 (15) (Fig. 5
, A and B). The addition of PGC-1
further enhances this effect, to about a 500-fold induction. Mutation of both gAF1 and gAF3 (see palGRmAF1 + 3 in Fig. 5B
) resulted in a total loss of the basal PGC-1
effect, as expected (compare with Fig. 3A
), but only a minor reduction of the dexamethasone response, which is similar to results observed previously (15). However, when PGC-1
was provided and dexamethasone was added, mutations of the gAF1 and gAF3 sites had no effect. This result suggests that, in the presence of high affinity binding of GR to the GRE, the glucocorticoid receptor can interact directly with PGC-1
and that COUP-TFI and HNF-4
are no longer required to position this coactivator on the promoter (Fig. 6
).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These hormone effects have been defined in H4IIE cells. The observation that PGC-1
is not present in detectable amounts in these cells (Fig. 1
), nor is it detectable on the PEPCK gene promoter (Fig. 4
), implies that this coregulator may not be a necessary component of the PEPCK gene transcription complex. Nonetheless, our results do show that PGC-1
, when provided from an exogenous source, increases both basal and glucocorticoid/cAMP-induced expression of the PEPCK and G6Pase genes in H4IIE cells. In this context, it is noteworthy that glucocorticoids and cAMP, which are signals of fasting and regulate gluconeogenic demands in animals, induce PGC-1
in isolated hepatocytes. Interestingly, these cells show increased responses of the PEPCK and G6Pase genes to these effectors, as compared with H4IIE cells, in which PGC-1
is not expressed or induced. It is conceivable that PGC-1
induction by long-term fasting is important for increased hepatic glucose production as a second, delayed level of regulation. In fact, such a long-term effect of glucocorticoids in primary hepatocytes has been reported (42). It is also important to note that the induction of PEPCK gene expression by glucocorticoids and cAMP precedes that of PGC-1
(30).
PGC-1
coactivates transcription with a number of ligand-bound nuclear receptors (40). Using transient transfection and in vivo binding assays, we identified the orphan nuclear receptors COUP-TFI and HNF-4
as targets for PGC-1
on the PEPCK promoter. A previous report noted that HNF-4
is critical for this effect (32), and this was supported by the observation that PGC-1
does not induce PEPCK gene expression in hepatocytes derived from animals with a liver-specific HNF-4
knockout (32, 43). This observation is somewhat surprising because HNF-4
binds only to the gAF1 accessory element in the PEPCK promoter, whereas COUP-TFI binds to both gAF1 and gAF3. We also found that when gAF1 is replaced with an element that binds COUP-TFI but not HNF-4
, the response to PGC-1
is the same as that obtained with the wild-type gAF1 sequence. These apparently disparate observations can be reconciled if the HNF-4
knockout, which has a severe metabolic phenotype (44), results in a changed expression pattern of an hepatic transcription factor network which includes COUP-TFI.
The involvement of PGC-1
in target gene promoters is apparently quite complex. PGC-1
-mediated expression of the PEPCK gene requires both HNF-4
and COUP-TFI promoter binding elements, whereas PGC-1
has no effect on the L-PK gene promoter even though COUP-TFI and HNF-4
both bind to this promoter (45). Other hepatic genes, like carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, which are essential for fatty acid transport and oxidation, do not require HNF-4
for activation by PGC-1
(43). Interestingly, the PGC-1
effect on G6Pase gene expression is more profound than on PEPCK gene expression. An HNF-4
binding site that is critical for the PGC-1
effect has recently been identified in the G6Pase promoter. It is located much closer to the TATA box than are the gAF1 and gAF3 elements in the PEPCK promoter, which might account for this difference (46).
A recent study suggests that FOXO1, another member of the winged helix/forkhead transcription factor family, is critical for the regulation of gluconeogenesis by PGC-1
(47). FOXO1 is expressed in H4IIE cells and it binds to the gAF2 site in the PEPCK promoter (9, 48). However, a mutation of this promoter element does not affect the response to PGC-1
in either H4IIE cells (Fig. 3A
) or in Fao rat hepatoma cells (32). Alternatively, FOXO1 could bind to other promoter sites and thus contribute to the PGC-1
effect. This putative site must be located outside of the promoter region from -467 to +65 investigated in our study because a double mutation of the gAF1 and gAF3 sites (that do not bind FOXO1) completed abrogates the PGC-1
effect. Also, in the G6Pase gene promoter, a mutation of the FOXO1 binding element has no effect on the PGC-1
response (43, 46).
Glucocorticoids typically regulate genes through a complex array of promoter elements, referred to as a GRU (11, 14). Two elements in the PEPCK GRU, gAF1 and especially gAF3, are critical for the stimulatory effect of PGC-1
in the absence of hormones. These elements are also required for the glucocorticoid response. To study their importance in the presence of glucocorticoids, we performed a mutation analysis of the relevant promoter elements. We found that the glucocorticoid receptor alone, which binds weakly to the GR1/GR2 elements, cannot confer activation by PGC-1
on the PEPCK gene promoter when the gAF1 and gAF3 sites are mutated, although the interaction between GR and PGC-1
has been demonstrated in other promoter contexts (31). We have previously shown that these accessory factors enhance the affinity and stabilize the binding of the glucocorticoid receptor to its weak binding elements in the PEPCK promoter. However, these accessory factors appear to achieve this in different ways. For example FOXA2, the accessory factor at the gAF2 site, can interact directly with the glucocorticoid receptor (41). The FOXA2-mediated GR interaction with the PEPCK GREs is much more difficult to disrupt than the GR-GRE interaction promoted by HNF-4
or COUP-TFI (16). Also, the spatial orientation and alignment of FOXA2, with respect to GR, is much more stringent than that of HNF-4
and COUP-TFI (41). The FOXA2-gAF2 interaction is apparently not involved in the PGC-1
effect on the PEPCK gene promoter. By contrast, HNF-4
and COUP-TFI at gAF1, and COUP-TFI at gAF3, are essential. This combination of elements and associated accessory factors has two functions. It increases the affinity of GR binding to its weak binding elements, and it provides an environment for the interaction of PGC-1
with the GRU transcription complex. These may be related functions because the substitution of GR1 with a palindromic GRE, which binds GR with high affinity, obviates the requirement of the accessory factors, as illustrated in Fig. 6
.
The PEPCK gene promoter, with an array of interacting hormone response units and a complex assembly of coregulators, affords a wide range of response to numerous signals of the external environment. This is in keeping with the necessity to finely tune the gluconeogenic response of the hepatocyte and the role this plays in glucose homeostasis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Data were normalized to cyclophilin, which was amplified in parallel using primers 5'-AAGGTGAAAGAAGGCATGAGCA and 5'-AGTTGTCCACAGTCGGAGATGG. Samples were quantified relative to untreated cells using the comparative threshold cycle method, as described (Applied Biosystems, User Bulletin 2, 1997).
Adenovirus Infection
The adenovirus expressing PGC-1
was a gift from Daniel Kelly (Washington University, St. Louis, MO) (49). H4IIE cells were infected at a titer of about 7.5 x 108 plaque-forming units/ml for 48 h before hormone treatment. An infection efficiency of about 80% was estimated by fluorescent microscopy of GFP-expressing cells.
Plasmids
The construction of the PEPCK (-467/+69), FBPase (-405/+25), and G6Pase (-751/+66) reporter genes has been described previously (39, 50, 51). Mutations in the PEPCK gene promoter context have been described previously for mAF1 (52), mAF2, mGR1, mAF3, mAF3
, mAF3
, palGR (15), and AF1AF1 (41). Sequences for selective binding of COUP-TFI and HNF-4
were used to generate the constructs AF1COUP, and AF1HNF4 as described previously (12). The constructs AF1 + 3COUP, mAF1AF1, mAF1 + AF3, and palGR1mAF1 + 3 are double mutations in the PEPCK promoter context and were generated by cassette exchange using the EcoRI and NdeI restriction sites. The gAF3 element was replaced with a consensus COUP-TFI binding sequence using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis method (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and the primer (sense strand): 5'-CGTCCCGGCCCAAGGTCATGACCTGTGCCACCTGACAA. The expression plasmid for PGC-1
was a gift from Richard OBrien at Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN) (46).
Cell Culture and Transient Transfection
Maintenance and transfection of H4IIE rat hepatoma cells by calcium chloride precipitation has been described previously (53).
Antibodies
Anti HNF-4
(sc-8987), anti-GR (sc-1004), and anti-PGC-1
(SC-13067) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The antibody against COUP-TFI was a gift from Ming-Jer Tsai at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX) (54).
ChIP Assay
ChIP assays were performed based on a modified protocol obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). H4IIE cells were grown to 80% confluency in 150 mm dishes, incubated for 24 h in serum-free medium, followed by hormone treatment for 2 h. Chromatin was cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde (in DMEM) for 5 min at 37 C. The reaction was stopped with glycine (125 mM final concentration) for 5 min and cells were washed once in PBS. Cells were harvested by scraping with ice-cold PBS containing protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1 µg/ml each of pepstatin A, leupeptin, and aprotinin). Cells were then pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 2 min at 4 C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 600 µl sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis buffer [1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1)] and incubated for 10 min on ice. About 250 mg washed glass beads (MO-SCI Corp., Rollo, MO; GL-0191) were added and lysates were sonicated with a 2.5-mm tip, by using 10 x 10-sec pulses at 4 watts. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 C. Five hundred microliters supernatant were diluted 10-fold in immunoprecipitation buffer containing 0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1), 167 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/ml each of pepstatin A, leupeptin, aprotinin. Samples were precleared with 200 µl A/G PLUS-Agarose (SC-2003) containing 100 µg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA for 2 h at 4 C with rotation to reduce nonspecific background. Samples were centrifuged for 2 min at 1000 rpm at 4 C and the supernatant fractions were collected. One hundred and fifty microliters of this solution were saved as the input sample and to confirm shearing efficiency. The protein concentration was measured using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of chromatin (15 mg) per precipitation were used. Three micrograms of antibody were added to the samples and incubated overnight at 4 C with rotation. Immune complexes were precipitated with 40 µl A/G Agarose Plus for 3 h at 4 C with rotation. Pellets were washed for 10 min with low salt buffer [0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl (pH 8.1)], high salt buffer [0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl (pH 8.1)], LiCl buffer [0.25 M LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% (wt/vol) sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1)] and twice with TE buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, (pH 8.0)]. Immune complexes were eluted with 160 µl elution buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3) at room temperature for 2 h with rotation. Cross-linking was reversed by an overnight incubation at 65 C. DNA was purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Precipitated DNA was amplified by Standard (Taq) or real-time (SYBR-Green) PCR and primers: pPEPfo2: 5'-AGCTGTGGTGTTTTGACAACCA and pPEPre2: 5'-CCTCTTGGACTTCATATGCTGCT. Primers 5'-TTCTCCTCCTCCATCATTGG-3' and 5'-TGCATCCCTGGAAGGTTAAG-3' for a far upstream promoter region (-1713 to -1571) served as control for the specificity of antibody recognition.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Abbreviations: C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay; COUP-TF, chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor; CRE, cAMP response element; FBPase, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; FOX, forkhead box; G6Pase, glucose-6-phosphatase; gAF, glucocorticoid accessory factor; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; GRE, glucocorticoid response element; GRU, glucocorticoid response unit; HNF, hepatic nuclear factor; L-PK, liver-pyruvate kinase; PGC, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
coactivator; PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate.
Received for publication October 2, 2003. Accepted for publication January 12, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) is required for the regulation of hepatic GLUT2 expression and the maintenance of glucose homeostasis during a prolonged fast. J Biol Chem 276:4281242817
and cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB). J Biol Chem 277:3799138000
coactivator-1
(PGC-1): requirement for hepatocyte nuclear factor 4
in gluconeogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:40124017
(nuclear receptor 2A1) is essential for maintenance of hepatic gene expression and lipid homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol 21:13931403
mediates the stimulatory effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
co-activator-1 alpha (PGC-1
) on glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit gene transcription in H4IIE cells. Biochem J 369:1722[CrossRef][Medline]
interaction. Nature 423:550555[CrossRef][Medline]
and the forkhead transcription factor FKHR. Evidence for insulin response unit-dependent and -independent effects of insulin on promoter activity. J Biol Chem 275:3632436333
coactivator-1 promotes cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis. J Clin Invest 106:847856[Medline]
NURSA Molecule Pages Link:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Perilhou, C. Tourrel-Cuzin, I. Kharroubi, C. Henique, V. Fauveau, T. Kitamura, C. Magnan, C. Postic, C. Prip-Buus, and M. Vasseur-Cognet The Transcription Factor COUP-TFII Is Negatively Regulated by Insulin and Glucose via Foxo1- and ChREBP-Controlled Pathways Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2008; 28(21): 6568 - 6579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zhang, L. O'Loughlin, D. N. Brindley, and K. Reue Regulation of lipin-1 gene expression by glucocorticoids during adipogenesis J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1519 - 1528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, T. H. Peiris, A. Mowery, J. Le Lay, Y. Gao, and L. E. Greenbaum CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein-{beta} Is a Transcriptional Regulator of Peroxisome-Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Coactivator-1{alpha} in the Regenerating Liver Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 22(7): 1596 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Limesand, P. J. Rozance, D. Smith, and W. W. Hay Jr. Increased insulin sensitivity and maintenance of glucose utilization rates in fetal sheep with placental insufficiency and intrauterine growth restriction Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1716 - E1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Herzog, M. Hallberg, A. Seth, A. Woods, R. White, and M. G. Parker The Nuclear Receptor Cofactor, Receptor-Interacting Protein 140, Is Required for the Regulation of Hepatic Lipid and Glucose Metabolism by Liver X Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 21(11): 2687 - 2697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Hall, X. L. Wang, L. George, S. R. Koch, and D. K. Granner Insulin Represses Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Gene Transcription by Causing the Rapid Disruption of an Active Transcription Complex: A Potential Epigenetic Effect Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 21(2): 550 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Herzog, J. Cardenas, R. K. Hall, J. A. Villena, P. J. Budge, V. Giguere, D. K. Granner, and A. Kralli Estrogen-related Receptor {alpha} Is a Repressor of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Gene Transcription J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 99 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gautier-Stein, G. Mithieux, and F. Rajas A Distal Region Involving Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4{alpha} and CAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein Markedly Potentiates the Protein Kinase A Stimulation of the Glucose-6-Phosphatase Promoter Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 19(1): 163 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Stein, E. K. Thomas, B. Herzog, M. D. Westfall, J. V. Rocheleau, R. S. Jackson II, M. Wang, and P. Liang NDRG1 Is Necessary for p53-dependent Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 48930 - 48940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bhalla, C. Ozalp, S. Fang, L. Xiang, and J. K. Kemper Ligand-activated Pregnane X Receptor Interferes with HNF-4 Signaling by Targeting a Common Coactivator PGC-1{alpha}: FUNCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS IN HEPATIC CHOLESTEROL AND GLUCOSE METABOLISM J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 45139 - 45147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Yubero, E. Hondares, M. C. Carmona, M. Rossell, F. J. Gonzalez, R. Iglesias, M. Giralt, and F. Villarroya The Developmental Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Coactivator-1{alpha} Expression in the Liver Is Partially Dissociated from the Control of Gluconeogenesis and Lipid Catabolism Endocrinology, September 1, 2004; 145(9): 4268 - 4277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. L. Wang, B. Herzog, M. Waltner-Law, R. K. Hall, M. Shiota, and D. K. Granner The Synergistic Effect of Dexamethasone and All-trans-retinoic Acid on Hepatic Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Gene Expression Involves the Coactivator p300 J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34191 - 34200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |