Molecular Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/me.2003-0327
Molecular Endocrinology 18 (8): 1906-1918
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society
The Protein Kinase C Signaling Pathway Regulates a Molecular Switch between Transactivation and Transrepression Activity of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor
Christophe Blanquart,
Roxane Mansouri,
Réjane Paumelle,
Jean-Charles Fruchart,
Bart Staels and
Corine Glineur
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité de Recherche 545, Département dAthérosclérose, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 59019 Lille, and Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Lille II, 59000 Lille, France
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Corine Glineur, UR 545 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Département dAthérosclérose, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 1 rue du Pr. Calmette, 59019 Lille, France. E-mail: Corine.Glineur{at}pasteur-lille.fr.
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
is a nuclear receptor implicated in several physiological processes such as lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and the inflammatory response. PPAR
is activated by natural fatty acids and synthetic compounds like fibrates. PPAR
activity has been shown to be modulated by its phosphorylation status. PPAR
is phosphorylated by kinases such as the MAPKs and cAMP-activated protein kinase A. In this report, we show that protein kinase C (PKC) inhibition impairs ligand-activated PPAR
transcriptional activity. Furthermore, PKC inhibition decreases PPAR
ligand-induction of its target genes including PPAR
itself and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I. By contrast, PKC inhibition enhances PPAR
transrepression properties as demonstrated using the fibrinogen-ß gene as model system. Finally, PKC inhibition decreases PPAR
phosphorylation activity of hepatocyte cell extracts. In addition, PPAR
purified protein is phosphorylated in vitro by recombinant PKC
and ßII. The replacement of serines 179 and 230 by alanine residues reduces the phosphorylation of the PPAR
protein. The PPAR
S179A-S230A protein displays an impaired ligand-induced transactivation activity and an enhanced trans-repression activity. Altogether, our data indicate that the PKC signaling pathway acts as a molec-ular switch dissociating the transactivation and transrepression functions of PPAR
, which involved phosphorylation of serines 179 and 230.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR
(PPAR
) is a ligand-activated transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily. PPAR
is mainly expressed in liver, heart, kidney, muscle, and cells from the vascular wall (1, 2). PPAR
transactivation function occurs after heterodimerization with the retinoic X receptor (RXR) (3) and binding to specific DNA sequences called peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) constituted of a direct repeat of the AGGTCA sequence separated by one or two nucleotides, named respectively DR1 and DR2 (4). Natural PPAR
ligands are fatty acids (FAs), FA derivatives generated via the cyclooxygenase pathway or oxidized phospholipids from oxidized low-density lipoprotein. The fibrates, a widely used class of hypolipemic drugs, are synthetic ligands (5). PPAR
is implicated in the regulation of numerous physiological functions. First, PPAR
is a major controller of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. PPAR
agonist treatment increases high-density lipoprotein and decreases plasma low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein levels (6). PPREs were identified in several genes coding for ß-oxidation enzymes such as carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-I), FA binding proteins, FA transport proteins, and proteins implicated in the reverse cholesterol transport pathway (7, 8, 9). Moreover, PPAR
stimulates its own expression (10). Recently, it was shown that PPAR
displays antiinflammatory properties by repressing major inflammatory pathways, such as nuclear factor-
B, activator protein-1 (AP-1), and also CAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBPß), which controls hepatic fibrinogen-ß gene expression (11, 12, 13).
In addition to ligand regulation of PPAR
activity, it was demonstrated that posttranslational modifications can also modify the activities of this nuclear receptor. For instance, PPAR
is phosphorylated by the MAPKs and the protein kinase A (PKA) pathways (14, 15, 16, 17). Several studies have revealed that this phosphorylation occurs mainly in the N-terminal A/B part of PPAR
. The consequence of this phosphorylation is an increase of the activating function (AF)-1.
The protein kinases C (PKC) are signal transducers implicated in the phosphorylation of several nuclear receptors including retinoic acid receptor
1 and vitamin D receptor (18, 19, 20, 21, 22). PKC isoenzymes are classified in three groups on the basis of their structure and ability to bind diacylglycerol (DAG) and calcium (Ca2+) (23). The classical PKC (cPKC
, ßI, ßII, and
) display a physiological requirement for DAG and need Ca2+ for activation. The novel PKC isotypes (nPKC
,
,
, µ, and
) require DAG for activity. By contrast, the atypical PKC (aPKC
and
/
) are insensitive to DAG and Ca2+. Only PKC
, ßI, ßII,
,
, and
seem to be ubiquitous isoenzymes and are found in most tissues. PKC
expression is largely restricted to the central nervous system and spinal cord. PKC
is strongly expressed in skin and lung. PKC
is predominantly present in skeletal muscle and, to a lower extent, in lung, spleen, skin and brain. PKCµ has been found in numerous tissues and is strongly expressed in thymus and lung. Given the plethora of substrates, numerous functions have been attributed to PKC. Among many functions, PKCs are involved in receptor desensitization, in modulating membrane structure, in regulating transcription, in mediating immune responses and in regulating cell growth. Several PKC inhibitors have been identified and classified according to their site of interaction with the PKC protein. Inhibitors of the regulatory domain can target the DAG binding site, whereas inhibitors of the catalytic domain are directed to either the substrate site or ATP-binding site. Ro 31-8220 that belongs to the class of binsindolylmaleimides, is an ATP-binding site competitive inhibitor. Ro 31-8220 inhibits specifically classical PKC isoenzymes (24, 25).
It was recently shown that PKC control PPAR
expression in rat hepatocytes (26). However, to date, no information is available whether human PPAR
is regulated by the PKC pathway. Here, we have investigated the effect of PKC on the activity of PPAR
in human hepatocytes. We report that inhibition of PKC activity leads to a decrease of the ligand-activated transcriptional activity of PPAR
. As a consequence, the induction of PPAR
target genes, such as CPT-I and PPAR
itself, is abolished. By contrast, inhibition of PKC activity increases the transrepression properties of PPAR
as demonstrated for fibrinogen-ß promoter activity and mRNA expression. The inhibition of PKC is associated with a decrease in kinase activities in hepatic cells that phosphorylate PPAR
. Finally, it is shown that PPAR
protein is phosphorylated by PKC
and ßII in vitro. The replacement of the two potential PKC phosphorylation sites at serines 179 and 230 by alanine residues in the PPAR
protein reduces more than half the in vitro phosphorylation of PPAR
by PKC
and ßII. The reduction in the phosphorylation of the mutant PPAR
S179A-S230A protein is associated with a loss of function for the ligand-induced transcriptional activity and a gain of function for the transrepression activity. These data demonstrate, for the first time, that the PKC pathway enhances PPAR
transactivation activity and inhibits its transrepression function in human liver cells and that the serines 179 and 230 in the PPAR
protein are involved in these activities.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
The Ligand-Induced Transcriptional Activity of PPAR
Is Regulated by PKC Activity
To determine whether PKC modulate the transcriptional activity of PPAR
, HuH-7 cells were transfected with a reporter vector containing six copies of the J site PPRE of the apolipoprotein A-II gene promoter (J6-TK-Luc) and pSG5 or pSG5 human PPAR
(hPPAR
). The transfected cells were treated or not with the PKC inhibitor Ro 31-8220 for 2 h before activation with the synthetic PPAR
agonists Wy 14,643 or GW7647. In the absence of Ro 31-8220, the transcriptional activity of PPAR
was induced 1.5- and 2-fold by Wy 14,643 and GW7647, respectively. Pretreatment of the cells with Ro 31-8220 blocked the induction of PPAR
transcriptional activity by either compounds (Fig. 1
). To determine that the effect of PKC inhibition occurs via PPAR
ligand binding domain (LBD), HuH-7 cells were transfected with an expression vector for a chimeric protein consisting of the DNA binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gal4 transcription factor fused to the LBD of PPAR
(Gal4-PPAR
-LBD) and a reporter vector containing five response elements for the Gal4 protein (Gal5-TK-Luc). As expected, both ligands induced the reporter activity. By contrast, treatment of cells with Ro 31-8220 decreased the ligand-induction of the reporter vector by 50% for both compounds (Fig. 2A
). Furthermore, cotransfection of HuH-7 cells with an expression vector for a dominant-negative form of PKC (DnPKC) and the Gal4-PPAR
-LBD expression vector decreased the activation of the Gal5-TK-Luc reporter vector by Wy 14,643 and by GW7647 (Fig. 2B
). As a control, we have tested the functionality of the Ro 31-8220 compound and the DnPKC expression vector on a promoter known to be regulated by PKC. In this experiment, HuH-7 cells were cotransfected with the AP1-TK-Luc reporter construct and treated with the PKC activator phorbol myristate acetate in the presence of Ro 31-8220 or the DnPKC expression vector. These data (not shown) indicate that Ro 31-8220 compound and DnPKC expression vector inhibit efficiently PKC activity in human hepatic cells. To determine whether the PPAR
N terminus may be sensitive to PKC inhibition, HuH-7 cells were transfected with an expression vector for a chimeric protein consisting of the DNA binding domain of the Gal4 transcription factor fused to N terminus of PPAR
and the reporter vector Gal5-TK-Luc. The results indicate that Ro 31-8220 and DnPKC have no effect on the activity of the N-terminal part of the PPAR
protein (Fig. 2
, C and D). As controls, we have also tested the effect of PKC inhibition on promoter nonregulated by PPAR
such as the TK promoter. As expected, no effect was observed (data not shown). These data suggest that PKC can modulate PPAR
activation by its ligands in a DNA-independent manner acting via the PPAR
LBD.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. PKC Inhibition Decreases Ligand-Induction of PPAR Transactivation Activity
HuH-7 cells were transfected with the pSG5hPPAR expression vector or the control pSG5 vector and the reporter vector J6-TK-Luc. After 24 h of transfection, cells were treated with or without Ro 31-8220 (1 µM) for 2 h before addition of Wy 14,643 (50 µM) or GW7647 (100 nM) for 24 h. RLU, Relative light units; Ctrl, control.
|
|
The PKC Signaling Pathway Influences Basal and Ligand-Induced PPAR
Target Gene Expression
To demonstrate the physiological relevance of PKC inhibition on PPAR
activity, the influence of PKC inhibition on basal and ligand-induced expression of PPAR
target genes expression was analyzed. Therefore, HepG2 cells were pretreated with or without Ro 31-8220 for 2 h before the treatment with Wy 14,643 or GW7647 for 24 h. RNA was extracted and the expression of two well-characterized PPAR
target genes, CPT-I and PPAR
(7, 8, 10), was measured by quantitative PCR. As expected, treatment with both agonists alone resulted in a significant activation of CPT-I gene expression (Fig. 3A
), whereas a smaller induction of PPAR
mRNA was observed with both compounds (Fig. 3B
). However, pretreatment of cells with Ro 31-8220 not only decreased basal mRNA level of PPAR
and CPT-I, but also blocked the activation of these genes by both PPAR
ligands (Fig. 3
). These results demonstrate that modulation of PKC activity influences basal and ligand-induced PPAR
target genes expression.
PKC Inhibition Increases the Repression of Fibrinogen-ß Expression by PPAR
In addition to regulating gene expression via PPRE, PPAR
can also repress inflammation response genes in a PPRE-independent manner. To test the effect of PKC on the transrepression activity of PPAR
, the influence of Ro 31-8220 on the repression of fibrinogen-ß gene expression by Wy 14,643 or GW7647 was tested in HepG2 cells. Because PKC inhibition interferes with the IL-6-induced signaling pathway, these experiments were performed on basal fibrinogen-ß mRNA expression. Treatment with both Wy 14,643 and GW7647 decreased basal fibrinogen-ß mRNA levels slightly (Fig. 4
). Treatment with Ro 31-8220 also slightly decreased basal fibrinogen-ß mRNA levels (Fig. 4
). However, combined treatment with Ro 31-8220 and either PPAR
ligand resulted in a stronger inhibition of fibrinogen-ß mRNA levels (Fig. 4
). These results suggest that PKC inhibition enhances the fibrinogen-ß expression repression by PPAR
.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Inhibition of PKC Potentiates the PPAR Ligand-Induced Repression of Fibrinogen-ß mRNA Expression
HepG2 cells were treated with Ro 31-8220 (2 µM) for 2 h before addition of Wy 14,643 (50 µM) or GW7647 (100 nM) for 24 h. Then, RNA was extracted and fibrinogen-ß expression was measured by quantitative PCR. Statistical analysis was performed using Students t test. *, 0.01< P < 0.05; **, 0.0001< P < 0.01.
|
|
PKC Inhibition Enhances the Transrepression Properties of PPAR
To study whether PKC inhibition modulates the trans-repression properties of PPAR
, the activity of the 400-bp proximal region of the human fibrinogen-ß promoter (400 hFib-ß-TK-Luc), shown to be negatively regulated by PPAR
, was tested in transfection experiments (12). Cotransfection with PPAR
decreased fibrinogen-ß promoter activity by 44% (Fig. 5
), an effect that was enhanced by addition of ligand, similar as shown by Gervois et al. (12). Treatment of HuH-7 cells with Ro 31-8220 in the absence of the PPAR
expression vector induced a slight decrease of reporter vector activity (P = 0.0435), whereas Wy 14,643 and GW7647 did not influence promoter activity in the absence of PPAR
(P > 0.05) (Fig. 5
). Interestingly, in the presence of PPAR
, treatment with the PKC inhibitor induced a further 43% decrease of the reporter activity (P = 0.0044) (Fig. 5
). By contrast, Ro 31-8220 did not enhance fibrinogen-ß promoter repression in the presence of the PPAR
ligands. These results suggest that PKC inhibition increases the ligand-independent transrepression properties of PPAR
, but does not influence the response to ligands (Fig. 5
).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Inhibition of PKC Increases the Ligand-Independent Transrepression Property of PPAR
HuH-7 cells were transfected with the reporter 400 hFib-ß-TK-Luc and pSG5hPPAR expression vectors or the control pSG5 vector. After 24 h of transfection, cells were treated with Ro 31-8220 (1 µM) for 2 h before activation with Wy 14,643 (50 µM) or GW7647 (100 nM) for 24 h. Statistical analysis was performed using Students t test. *, 0.01< P < 0.05; **, 0.0001< P < 0.01. NS, Not significant.
|
|
Overexpression of a DnPKC Enhances the Transrepression Properties of PPAR
To demonstrate directly that PKC inhibition modulates PPAR
transrepression properties, HuH-7 cells were cotransfected with the 400 hFib-ß-TK-Luc reporter vector, the DnPKC expression vector with or without the PPAR
expression vector. Cotransfection of the DnPKC expression vector has no significant effect on the activity of the reporter vector (P > 0.05), whereas in the presence of Wy 14,643 or GW7647 a significant effect was observed (P = 0.0342 and P = 0.0184, respectively) (Fig. 6
). In the presence of PPAR
, a 29% decrease of the reporter activity was obtained. Interestingly, cotransfection of PPAR
with the DnPKC expression vector induced a further 41% decrease of reporter activity in the absence of ligand (P = 0.0003) (Fig. 6
). However, in the presence of PPAR
, no additional inhibitory effect of the DnPKC was observed in cells treated with Wy 14,643 and GW7647 contrary to what we have observed in untreated cells. These observations suggest that PKC inhibition increases the transrepression activity of PPAR
, on the human fibrinogen-ß promoter, in a ligand-independent manner.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Overexpression of DnPKC Increases the Transrepression Properties of PPAR
HuH-7 cells were transfected with the reporter vector 400 hFib-ß-TK-Luc and pSG5hPPAR expression vectors or the control pSG5 vector in the presence of the DnPKC expression vector or the control pSV40 vector. After 24 h of transfection, cells were treated with Wy 14,643 (50 µM) or GW7647 (100 nM) for 24 h. Statistical analysis was performed using Students t test. *, 0.01< P < 0.05; **, 0.0001< P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.0001. NS, Not significant.
|
|
The Replacement of Serines 179 and 230 in the PPAR
Protein Results in a Protein which Has Lost Its Ligand-Induced Transcriptional Activity
We have identified by computer analysis five potential phosphorylation sites in the PPAR
protein (Fig. 7A
). By directed mutagenesis, we have replaced, in the PPAR
protein, serine residues by alanine residues and the amino acid threonine by a valine residue individually or by pairs. We have tested all these mutant PPAR
proteins for their transactivation activities in a reporter assay. HuH-7 cells were transfected with the reporter vector J6-TK-Luc and wild-type (wt) hPPAR
or mutant hPPAR
expression vectors. Our results show that only the double mutant PPAR
S179A-S230A protein has completely lost its PPRE-dependent activation by the ligand (Fig. 7B
) similarly to the effect of the PKC inhibitor, Ro 31-8220. This suggests that the serines 179 and 230 in the PPAR
protein are crucial for the ligand-induced transcriptional activity of the protein and that these amino acids could be targets for PKC.
The Replacement of Serines 179 and 230 in the PPAR
Protein Results in a Protein with Enhanced Transrepression Activity
To test the transrepression properties of the PPAR
S179A-S230A protein compared with the PPAR
wt protein, HuH-7 cells were transfected with the 400 hFib-ß-TK-Luc and increasing amounts of the pSG5hPPAR
wt or pSG5hPPAR
S179A-S230A (Fig. 8A
). The results indicate that at lower doses of the transfected PPAR
expression vectors, the PPAR
S179A-S230A protein exhibits enhanced transrepression activity compared with the PPAR
wt protein. This gain of function is not due to a difference in the expression of wt and S179A-S230A proteins as shown in Fig. 8B
. Cell extracts from transfected cells were subjected to immunoblotting using a specific PPAR
antibody. The results show that the PPAR
S179A-S230A protein is expressed at lower level than the wt protein arguing that the increase of the trans-repression activity is not the result of a higher expression of the mutant protein. We have also tested the expression of the PKC
in these cell extracts by immunoblotting. Our results indicate that the expression of PPAR
do not influence the expression of PKC
. Altogether, these results suggest that serines 179 and 230 in the PPAR
protein play a role in the transrepression properties and need to be dephosphorylated for optimal repression activity of the protein.
PPAR
Is Phosphorylated by PKC
and ßII and the Replacement of Serines 179 and 230 by Alanine Residues in the PPAR
Protein Reduces Its Phosphorylation by PKC
To demonstrate that PPAR
is a target for PKC, the purified PPAR
protein was incubated with HepG2 protein extracts from cells treated or not with Ro 31-8220. The results obtained show that PPAR
protein is phosphorylated by kinases from HepG2 cell extracts and that treatment of cells with Ro 31-8220 decreases this phosphorylation (Fig. 9
). This result suggests that PPAR
could be directly phosphorylated by PKC. To verify this hypothesis, an in vitro kinase test of purified PPAR
protein was performed using recombinant classical PKC isotypes that are the targets for Ro 31-8220. PPAR
protein is phosphorylated by PKC
and ßII (Fig. 10
). To test whether the serines 179 and 230 in PPAR
are targets for phosphorylation by PKC, we have produced and purified the PPAR
S179A-S230A proteins from bacteria. We have realized an in vitro kinase test by incubating the PPAR
proteins with PKC
(Fig. 10A
) or PKCßII (Fig. 10B
) in the presence of [
-32P]ATP. The result indicates that the PPAR
S179A-S230A is 2.5 times less phosphorylated than the wt by the classical PKC. Thus, our data suggest that the serines 179 and 230 are the major phosphorylation sites for classical PKC and that these serines are crucial for the transactivation and trans-repression activities of the PPAR
protein.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The activity of several nuclear receptors is under control of signal transduction pathways. Like numerous other nuclear receptors (27), PPAR
can be phosphorylated by different kinases including the MAPK, p38, and PKA (14, 15, 16, 17). The transcription activation domain AF-1 in the N-terminal A/B region of PPAR
harbors two consensus MAPK sites that are phosphorylated in response to insulin and both sites are necessary for the insulin-induced transcriptional activation. The effect of this posttranslational modification of PPAR
is an increase of its transcriptional activity independently of the presence of ligand (AF-1 activity) (16). p38 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of PPAR
results in an enhanced ligand-dependent activation due to improved cooperation with the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1 (15). In vitro kinase assays demonstrated that p38 kinase phosphorylates serine residues located in the N-terminal A/B domain of the PPAR
protein. PKA activators stimulate PPAR
activity in a ligand-independent manner. However, cotreatment with PKA activators and PPAR
ligands increases this activation, suggesting that PKA stabilizes the binding of the liganded PPAR
to the DNA (17). PKCs have been shown to phosphorylate and control the activity of numerous nuclear receptors (18, 19, 20, 22). However, so far a direct regulation of PPAR
by the PKC pathway has not been demonstrated. In our report, we demonstrate by using a pharmacological PKC inhibitor and by overexpressing a DnPKC protein that PKC activity is necessary for optimal induction of PPAR
transcriptional activity by its ligands. The reduction of PPAR
activity was observed not only on full-length PPAR
but also on a chimeric construct containing the Gal4 DNA binding domain fused to the C-terminal part of PPAR
containing the D (hinge region), E (LBD), and F domains. These data suggest that the target sites for PKC could be localized in the C-terminal part of PPAR
via which PKC influences its ligand-dependent transcriptional activity. The fact that the N-terminal part of the PPAR
protein is not regulated by PKC reinforce this idea. This observation provides the first evidence of a regulation of the PPAR
activity by kinases via the C-terminal part of the protein. Indeed, the previous identified phosphorylation sites are located in the N-terminal A/B part of PPAR
(15, 16). Moreover, we show that PKC inhibition increases the transrepression properties of PPAR
in a ligand-independent manner as determined using the fibrinogen-ß gene as model. Finally, we show in an in vitro kinase assay that PKC inhibition, in HepG2 cells, is associated with a decrease of PPAR
protein phosphorylation and that purified PPAR
is phosphorylated by the classical recombinant PKC
and ßII. Altogether, these results suggest that PPAR
transactivation and transrepression activities are regulated by the classical PKC. PPAR
contains five potential phosphorylation sites that might be phosphorylated by the classical PKC but only the mutation of the two serines (serines 179 and 230) in the PPAR
protein located in the domain D modulates the transactivation and transrepression activities leading to a loss of function and a gain of function of the protein, respectively. In addition, the phosphorylation of the mutant PPAR
protein S179A-S230A by classical PKC is reduced compared with the wt PPAR
protein. It has been shown that the domain D may be involved in the recruitment of some cofactors. The role of phosphorylation in this case could be to regulate protein-protein interactions.
Interestingly, both Ser-Thr PKC kinases and PPAR
are lipid-activated signaling pathways. When activated, PKC bind to DAG and phosphatidylserine (PS) in membranes anchoring the enzyme in a subcellular compartment. Unsaturated FAs, such as oleic and arachidonic acids, known activators of PPAR
, can synergize with DAG and PS in activating the classical PKC. Saturated FAs are ineffective. To date, it is not clear whether FA and eicosanoid effects on PPAR
activity are exclusively mediated through their binding to PPAR
. In vitro assays to identify natural PPAR
ligands have shown that not all FAs that activate PPAR
in reporter gene assays demonstrated direct binding to PPAR
(28). Thus, it can be suggested that FAs modulate PPAR
activity via two synergistic pathways.
Peroxisome proliferators, especially hypolipidemic drugs such as fibrates and acyl-coenzyme A derivatives, strongly activate PKC. The identity of the PKC isozymes targeted by peroxisome proliferators in rat hepatocytes remain to be elucidated. However, such activity has been reported only to occur in rat, but not in human hepatocytes (29). Moreover, in our study, we have used two structurally different PPAR
ligands to be sure that observed effects of these compounds are not due to an eventual PKC regulation. One of the downstream effects of PKC activity in rat hepatocytes is to increase PPAR
gene expression (26). In human hepatoma HepG2 cells, we observed a decrease of the basal expression level of PPAR
mRNA in the presence of the PKC inhibitor Ro 31-8220, which extends the results of Yaacob et al. (26) to human cells. This decrease of PPAR
mRNA expression is associated with a decrease of the basal expression level of CPT-I showing that PKC influence the activity of PPAR
in part by controlling its expression level also in human hepatocytes. Moreover, treatment with Ro 31-8220 dramatically reduced the ligand-induction of PPAR
target gene expression. Thus, PKC may control PPAR
activity by regulating its expression level and by controlling the response of PPAR
to its ligands.
In addition to PPRE-mediated transcriptional regulation, PPAR
also represses transcription of acute phase response proteins, like fibrinogen-ß, in liver (30, 31). Repression of basal and IL-6-induced fibrinogen-ß mRNA expression occurs via negative interference between PPAR
and C/EBP-ß pathway (12). To evaluate the effect of PKC inhibition on the PPAR
transrepression property, we have studied basal fibrinogen-ß expression because IL-6-induction of fibrinogen-ß mRNA expression is dependent on PKC (data not shown and Ref. 32). Interestingly, PKC inhibition increased the PPAR
ligand-induced repression of the fibrinogen-ß mRNA expression, whereas treatment with either PPAR
agonist or Ro 31-8220 only slightly repressed fibrinogen-ß mRNA levels. To demonstrate the implication of PKC in PPAR
regulation of fibrinogen-ß gene expression, transient transfection experiments using the 400 proximal human fibrinogen-ß promoter were performed. As previously shown (12), overexpression of PPAR
decreased the activity of the human fibrinogen-ß promoter and this reduction was further enhanced by the PPAR
ligands. Because the inhibition of the fibrinogen-ß promoter by PPAR
ligands was observed in the absence of the PKC inhibitor, it appears that PKC inhibition is not required for transrepression by PPAR
ligands. Indeed, PKC inhibition enhanced ligand-independent PPAR
protein transrepression activity, whereas the ligand-induced repression is not influenced. These data demonstrate, for the first time, a regulation of PPAR
transrepression activity by a kinase signaling pathway.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates the implication of the PKC pathway in the regulation of PPAR
activity and provides, for the first time, a specific regulation mechanism allowing a switch from transactivation to transrepression activity (Fig. 11
). These results suggest that under conditions of PKC inhibition, PPAR
acts as a transrepression factor and displays enhanced antiinflammatory properties. In contrast, when PKC are active, PPAR
switch to transactivation factor regulating PPRE-dependent genes (Fig. 11
). Further investigations are necessary to identify the physiological factors controlling PPAR
activity via the PKC pathway.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11. Mechanism Proposed for the Regulation of PPAR Transactivation and Transrepression Activities by the PKC Pathway
Under conditions of PKC inhibition, ligand-independent PPAR transrepression properties are strongly enhanced, whereas its ligand-induced transactivation function is reduced.
|
|
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Materials
DMEM and fetal calf serum (FCS) were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Cergy-Pontoise, France), and Ultroser was obtained from BioSepra (Cergy-Saint-Christophe, France). Glutamine, gentamycine, sodium pyruvate, and nonessential amino acids were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies. Wy 14,643 was from Chemsyn Science Laboratories (Lenexa, KS), and GW7647 was kindly provided by Peter Brown (GlaxoSmithKline, New York, NY). Ro 31-8220 was from Calbiochem (Meudon, France). ExGen 500 was purchased from Euromedex (Souffelweyersheim, France). HepG2 cells were obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) and the human hepatoma cell line HuH-7 was originally established by Nakabayashi et al. (33). The expression vector for the DnPKC was kindly provided by Peter Parker (Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK) (34). The plasmid Gal4-hPPAR
was constructed by Delerive et al. (11). The pSG5hPPAR
and J6-TK-Luc were described previously (35). The plasmid 400 hFib-ß-TK-Luc was constructed by Gervois et al. (12). The plasmid Gal4-AF-1 was constructed by PCR-amplifying the hPPAR
A/B domain (amino acids 1101) using pSG5hPPAR
as template. The AP-1-TK-Luc (Stratagene, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) contains three copies of an AP-1 enhancer. The efficiency of transfection was monitored using the control plasmid pSV-ßGal or the pRL-Null vector (Promega France, Charbonnières-les-Bains, France). Purified PKC isotypes were purchased from Euromedex.
Transfection Experiments
HuH-7 cells were grown in 24-well plates in DMEM containing 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 25 µg/ml gentamycine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and nonessential amino acids. Cells were transfected with 10 ng of J6-TK-luciferase reporter (36) and 10 ng of pSG5hPPAR
expression vector or with 30 ng of Gal5-TK-Luc and 10 ng of Gal4-hPPAR
-LBD using ExGen 500 according to the manufacturers protocol. For human fibrinogen-ß promoter experiments, cells were transfected with 200 ng of 400 hFib-ß TK-Luc (12) and 100 ng of pSG5hPPAR
expression vector using ExGen 500 as previously described. After 24 h, the cells were treated, in DMEM containing 2% Ultroser, 2 mM glutamine, and 25 µg/ml gentamycine, with PKC inhibitor for 2 h. Then 50 µM Wy 14,643, 100 nM GW 7647, or dimethylsulfoxide (Me2SO) were subsequently added with or without PKC inhibitor for 24 h. Cell extracts were prepared and luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities was measured as previously described (35).
Immunoblotting Analyses
Expression of transfected PPAR
cDNA was monitored using antihuman PPAR
mouse monoclonal antibody directed against the N terminus part of PPAR
(amino acids 496) generously provided by Dr. Kodama (Perseus Proteomics, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Cells were rinsed in ice-cold PBS and lysed in passive lysis buffer (Promega France). The proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with the anti-PPAR
antiserum or the anti-PKC
antiserum (C-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) as the primary antibody and detected using the ECL (enhanced chemiluminescence) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Orsay, France).
RNA Analysis
HepG2 cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 25 µg/ml gentamycine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and nonessential amino acids. Cells were treated, in DMEM containing 2% Ultroser, 2 mM glutamine, and 25 µg/ml gentamycine, with 2 µM of Ro 31-8220 for 2 h. Then, 50 µM Wy 14,643, 100 nM GW 7647, or Me2SO were added with or without PKC inhibitor for 24 h. RNA extraction was performed using TRIzol (Invitrogen) reagent according to the manufacturers protocol. Reverse transcription was realized with 1 µg RNA using random hexamer primers and Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies). RNA levels were measured by quantitative PCR using the Brilliant SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Stratagene) on the MX 4000 detection system (Stratagene) and as primers for human CPT-I, 5'-ACA GTC GGT GAG GCC TCT TAT GAA and 5'-TCT TGC TGC CTG AAT GTG AGT TGG, for human fibrinogen-ß, 5'-CTG AAA GAC CTG TGG CAA AA and 5'-TCC AGG ATT GAA CGA AGC ACA CG and for hPPAR
, 5'-GGT GGA CAC GGA AAG CCC AC and 5'-GGA CCA CAG GAT AAG TCA CC. As control, cyclophilin mRNA was measured using 5'-GCATAC GGG TCC TGG CAT CTT GTC C sense and 5'-ATG GTG ATC TTC TTG CTG GTC TTG C antisense primers. For each primer pair, the linearity of the reaction was confirmed to have a correlation coefficient of at least 0.98 and a PCR efficiency of 100% over the detection area by measuring a 10-fold dilution curve with cDNA isolated from HepG2 cells. Samples were analyzed in duplicate in two independent runs. Crossing threshold (Ct) values, defined as the cycle number in which the detected fluorescence exceeds the threshold value, were determined for CPT-I and fibrinogen-ß and normalized to the Ct of cyclophilin using the following equation: relative values = 2(ct target gene ct cyclophilin)
Kinase Assay
Production of the purified PPAR
protein was performed with the Impact T7 system from Ozyme (Montigny le bretonneux, France) using the pTyb12 expression vector. PPAR
protein was expressed in bacteria [Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)pLysS] as a fusion protein with the self-cleavage intein protein and a chitin binding domain. The expression of the fusion protein was induced for 3 h with isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside 1 mM at room temperature. Bacteria were harvested and lysed in a lysis buffer [50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100]. After centrifugation of the lysate, the supernatant was loaded on the chitin column. After washes, the column was equilibrated in cleavage buffer [50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 30 mM dithiothreitol] and left at 4 C for 48 h. In the presence of dithiothreitol, the intein undergoes specific self-cleavage that releases PPAR
resulting in a single column purification of the PPAR
protein. After verification of the purified PPAR
protein functionality by EMSAs (data not shown), this protein was used in a kinase assay. For this test, HepG2 cells were treated for 2 h with 2 µM Ro 31-8220 in DMEM containing 2% Ultroser, 2 mM glutamine, and 25 µg/ml gentamycine. Cells were lysed in a kinase buffer [25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.25 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 10 mM NaF]. Purified PPAR
protein (500 ng) was incubated with cell extracts (5 µg) in the presence of [
-32P] ATP (5 µCi) for 30 min at 30 C in reaction buffer [50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 20 µM ATP, 500 µM EGTA, 25 mM ß-glycerophosphate, and 1 mM orthovanadate]. PPAR
protein was immunoprecipitated with PPAR
antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After four washes with 1 ml of RIPA (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% desoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate), 1 ml RIPA-1 M NaCl, 1 ml RIPA-TNE (vol/vol) [TNE, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA], 1 ml TNE, samples were boiled in Laemmli buffer and loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE. After the run, the gel was treated for 30 min in neutral fixator (40% methanol, 3.5% paraformaldehyde) where all phosphoproteins are preserved, washed with 10% EtOH, 4% glycerol and dried. The gel was autoradiographed.
Oligonucleotide-Directed Mutagenesis
The cDNA encoding mutant PPAR
proteins were generated using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). Point mutations were introduced in the hPPAR
cDNA using Pfu DNA polymerase, double-stranded DNA plasmid and two synthetic complementary oligonucleotide primers containing the desired mutation. The mutated cDNAs have been completely sequenced.
In Vitro Phosphorylation Test
Phosphorylation test of the PPAR
protein was performed by using purified PKC
,and ßII (Euromedex) according to the manufacturers protocol. PPAR
protein (
200 ng) was incubated with 10 ng of purified PKC, the lipid activator and [
-32P] ATP in the appropriate buffer. After 30 min at 30 C, the labeled proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. After the run, the gel was treated 30 min in neutral fixator (40% methanol, 3.5% paraformaldehyde), washed with 10% EtOH, 4% glycerol and dried. The gel was autoradiographed. Myelin basic protein (Euromedex) was used as a control substrate for phosphorylation by PKC
and PKCßII.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
The authors would like to thank Dr. Brown and Dr. Willson (Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC) for providing the GW7647 compound, Pr. Parker (Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, UK) for the DnPKC expression vector, and Dr. Kodama for the PPAR
antibody.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
Christophe Blanquart is supported by a fellowship from Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais and the Institut Pasteur de Lille. Réjane Paumelle is supported by a fellowship from Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. Grants were provided by Fondation Leducq, by the Fonds Européen de Développement Régional and Conseil Régional Région Nord/Pas-de-Calais (Genopole Project No. 01360124).
Abbreviations: AF, Activating function; AP-1, activator protein-1; CPT-I, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I; Ct, crossing threshold; DAG, diacylglycerol; DnPKC, dominant-negative PKC; FA, fatty acid; FCS, fetal calf serum; hPPAR
, human PPAR
; LBD, ligand binding domain; Me2SO, dimethylsulfoxide; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response element; RXR, retinoic X receptor; TK, thymidine kinase; wt, wild-type.
Received for publication August 27, 2003.
Accepted for publication April 30, 2004.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Braissant O, Wahli W 1998 Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
, -ß, and -
during rat embryonic development. Endocrinology 139:27482754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Buchan KW, Hassall DG 2000 PPAR agonists as direct modulators of the vessel wall in cardiovascular disease. Med Res Rev 20:350366[CrossRef][Medline]
- Kliewer S, Umesono K, Noonan DJ, Heyman RA, Evans RM 1992 Convergence of 9-cis retinoic acid and peroxisome proliferator signalling pathways through heterodimer formation of their receptors. Nature 358:771774[CrossRef][Medline]
- Tugwood JD, Issemann I, Anderson RG, Bundell KR, McPheat WL, Green S 1992 The mouse peroxisome proliferator activated receptor recognizes a response element in the 5' flanking sequence of the rat acyl CoA oxidase gene. EMBO J 11:433439[Medline]
- Willson TM, Brown PJ, Sternbach DD, Henke BR 2000 The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery. J Med Chem 43:527550[CrossRef][Medline]
- Fruchart JC, Duriez P, Staels B 1999 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
activators regulate genes governing lipoprotein metabolism, vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 10:245257[CrossRef][Medline]
- Kersten S, Seydoux J, Peters JM, Gonzalez FJ, Desvergne B, Wahli W 1999 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
mediates the adaptive response to fasting. J Clin Invest 103:14891498[Medline]
- Mascaro C, Acosta E, Ortiz JA, Marrero PF, Hegardt FG, Haro D 1998 Control of human muscle-type carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene transcription by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J Biol Chem 273:85608573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Barbier O, Torra IP, Duguay Y, Blanquart C, Fruchart JC, Glineur C, Staels B 2002 Pleiotropic actions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22:717726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pineda Torra I, Jamshidi Y, Flavell DM, Fruchart JC, Staels B 2002 Characterization of the human PPAR
promoter: identification of a functional nuclear receptor response element. Mol Endocrinol 16:10131028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Delerive P, De Bosscher K, Besnard S, Vanden Berghe W, Peters JM, Gonzalez FJ, Fruchart JC, Tedgui A, Haegeman G, Staels B 1999 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
negatively regulates the vascular inflammatory gene response by negative cross-talk with transcription factors NF-
B and AP-1. J Biol Chem 274:3204832054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gervois P, Vu-Dac N, Kleemann R, Kockx M, Dubois G, Laine B, Kosykh V, Fruchart JC, Kooistra T, Staels B 2001 Negative regulation of human fibrinogen gene expression by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
agonists via inhibition of CCAAT box/enhancer-binding protein ß. J Biol Chem 276:3347133477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kleemann R, Gervois PP, Verschuren L, Staels B, Princen HM, Kooistra T 2003 Fibrates down-regulate IL-1-stimulated C-reactive protein gene expression in hepatocytes by reducing nuclear p50-NF
B-C/EBP-ß complex formation. Blood 101:545551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shalev A, Siegrist-Kaiser CA, Yen PM, Wahli W, Burger AG, Chin WW, Meier CA 1996 The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
is a phosphoprotein: regulation by insulin. Endocrinology 137:44994502[Abstract]
- Barger PM, Browning AC, Garner AN, Kelly DP 2001 p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
: a potential role in the cardiac metabolic stress response. J Biol Chem 276:4449544501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Juge-Aubry CE, Hammar E, Siegrist-Kaiser C, Pernin A, Takeshita A, Chin WW, Burger AG, Meier CA 1999 Regulation of the transcriptional activity of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
by phosphorylation of a ligand-independent trans-activating domain. J Biol Chem 274:1050510510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lazennec G, Canaple L, Saugy D, Wahli W 2000 Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) by their ligands and protein kinase A activators. Mol Endocrinol 14:19621975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tahayato A, Lefebvre P, Formstecher P, Dautrevaux M 1993 A protein kinase C-dependent activity modulates retinoic acid-induced transcription. Mol Endocrinol 7:16421653[Abstract]
- Delmotte MH, Tahayato A, Formstecher P, Lefebvre P 1999 Serine 157, a retinoic acid receptor
residue phosphorylated by protein kinase C in vitro, is involved in RXR. RAR
heterodimerization and transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem 274:3822538231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Boskovic G, Desai D, Niles RM 2002 Regulation of retinoic acid receptor
by protein kinase C in B16 mouse melanoma cells. J Biol Chem 277:2611326119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cho Y, Talmage DA 2001 Protein kinase C
expression confers retinoic acid sensitivity on MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Exp Cell Res 269:97108[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hsieh JC, Jurutka PW, Galligan MA, Terpening CM, Haussler CA, Samuels DS, Shimizu Y, Shimizu N, Haussler MR 1991 Human vitamin D receptor is selectively phosphorylated by protein kinase C on serine 51, a residue crucial to its trans-activation function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:93159319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Liu WS, Heckman CA 1998 The sevenfold way of PKC regulation. Cell Signal 10:529542[CrossRef][Medline]
- McKenna JP, Hanson PJ 1993 Inhibition by Ro 31-8220 of acid secretory activity induced by carbachol indicates a stimulatory role for protein kinase C in the action of muscarinic agonists on isolated rat parietal cells. Biochem Pharmacol 46:583588[CrossRef][Medline]
- Davis PD, Elliott LH, Harris W, Hill CH, Hurst SA, Keech E, Kumar MK, Lawton G, Nixon JS, Wilkinson SE 1992 Inhibitors of protein kinase C. 2. Substituted bisindolylmaleimides with improved potency and selectivity. J Med Chem 35:9941001[CrossRef][Medline]
- Yaacob NS, Norazmi MN, Gibson GG, Kass GE 2001 The transcription of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
gene is regulated by protein kinase C. Toxicol Lett 125:133141[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rochette-Egly C 2003 Nuclear receptors: integration of multiple signalling pathways through phosphorylation. Cell Signal 15:355366[CrossRef][Medline]
- Forman BM, Chen J, Evans RM 1997 Hypolipidemic drugs, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and eicosanoids are ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors
and
. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:43124317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Passilly P, Jannin B, Latruffe N 1995 Influence of peroxisome proliferators on phosphoprotein levels in human and rat hepatic-derived cell lines. Eur J Biochem 230:316321[Medline]
- Kockx M, Princen HM, Kooistra T 1998 Fibrate-modulated expression of fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and apolipoprotein A-I in cultured cynomolgus monkey hepatocytesrole of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
. Thromb Haemost 80:942948[Medline]
- Corton JC, Fan LQ, Brown S, Anderson SP, Bocos C, Cattley RC, Mode A, Gustafsson JA 1998 Down-regulation of cytochrome P450 2C family members and positive acute-phase response gene expression by peroxisome proliferator chemicals. Mol Pharmacol 54:463473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- La Porta CA, Franchi C, Comolli R 1998 c-PKC-dependent modulation of plasma fibrinogen levels during the acute-phase response in young and old rats. Mech Ageing Dev 103:317326[CrossRef][Medline]
- Nakabayashi H, Taketa K, Miyano K, Yamane T, Sato J 1982 Growth of human hepatoma cells lines with differentiated functions in chemically defined medium. Cancer Res 42:38583863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bornancin F, Parker PJ 1996 Phosphorylation of threonine 638 critically controls the dephosphorylation and inactivation of protein kinase C
. Curr Biol 6:11141123[CrossRef][Medline]
- Staels B, Koenig W, Habib A, Merval R, Lebret M, Pineda Torra I, Delerive P, Fadel A, Chinetti G, Fruchart JC, Najib J, Maclouf J, Tedgui A 1998 Activation of human aortic smooth-muscle cells is inhibited by PPAR
but not by PPAR
activators. Nature 393:790793[CrossRef][Medline]
- Vu-Dac N, Schoonjans K, Kosykh V, Dallongeville J, Fruchart JC, Staels B, Auwerx J 1995 Fibrates increase human apolipoprotein A-II expression through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J Clin Invest 96:741750
NURSA Molecule Pages Link:
- Nuclear Receptors:
PPARα
- Ligands:
GW 7647
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Qiu, X. Wu, J. F. L. Chau, I. Y. Y. Szeto, W. Y. Tam, Z. Guo, S. K. Chung, P. J. Oates, S. S. M. Chung, and J. Y. Yang
Aldose Reductase Regulates Hepatic Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {alpha} Phosphorylation and Activity to Impact Lipid Homeostasis
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2008;
283(25):
17175 - 17183.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sun, V. Montana, K. Chellappa, Y. Brelivet, D. Moras, Y. Maeda, V. Parpura, B. M. Paschal, and F. M. Sladek
Phosphorylation of a Conserved Serine in the Deoxyribonucleic Acid Binding Domain of Nuclear Receptors Alters Intracellular Localization
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2007;
21(6):
1297 - 1311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Paumelle and B. Staels
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Mediate Pleiotropic Actions of Statins
Circ. Res.,
May 25, 2007;
100(10):
1394 - 1395.
[ |