| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Inhibits Insulin Signaling with Phosphorylating Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 on Serine Residues in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes
The First Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Isao Usui, M.D., Ph.D., The First Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan. E-mail: isaousui-tym{at}umin.ac.jp.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is also one of the proinflammatory cytokines; however, it has not been clarified whether IL-1
may also cause insulin resistance. Here, we investigated the effects of IL-1
treatment on insulin signaling in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. IL-1
treatment up to 4 h did not alter insulin-stimulated insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, whereas tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and the association with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase were partially inhibited with the maximal inhibition in around 15 min. IRS-1 was transiently phosphorylated on some serine residues around 15 min after IL-1
stimulation, when several serine kinases, I
B kinase, c-Jun-N-terminal kinase, ERK, and p70S6K were activated. Chemical inhibitors for these kinases inhibited IL-1
-induced serine phosphorylation of IRS-1. Tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 was recovered only by the IKK inhibitor or JNK inhibitor, suggesting specific involvement of these two kinases. Insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation and 2-deoxyglucose uptake were not inhibited only by IL-1
. Interestingly, Akt phosphorylation was synergistically inhibited by IL-1
in the presence of IL-6. Taken together, short-term IL-1
treatment transiently causes insulin resistance at IRS-1 level with its serine phosphorylation. IL-1
may suppress insulin signaling downstream of IRS-1 in the presence of other cytokines, such as IL-6. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(10, 11, 12, 13) or IL-6 (14, 15). Especially, proinflammatory cytokines have recently been attracting considerable attention for their role as mediators or coordinators of the insulin resistance observed in insulin resistance with the inflammatory diseases or obesity (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18).
IL-1 is one of the major proinflammatory cytokines. It induces fever, synthesis of hepatic acute phase proteins, and the release of neutrophils as a mediator of acute inflammatory responses together with some other cytokines. The close relationships between IL-1 and TNF
are well documented, i.e. both cytokines are being produced at sites of local inflammation and the stimuli that produce either IL-1 or TNF
are common. Although the receptors for TNF
and IL-1 are clearly different, most of their signal transduction pathways and postreceptor events are very similar (19, 20). Furthermore, IL-1 and TNF
each enhances its production with each other and acts synergistically (20). Compared with the huge numbers of reports on the roles of TNF
as an endogenous mediator of insulin resistance (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18), studies on the relationship between IL-1 and insulin signaling are scarce. Dinarello et al. (21) have reported that the production of IL-1 is increased in diabetic patients as well as in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or with cancers, suggesting that IL-1 may play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus. However, it remains unclear whether, or how, IL-1 affects insulin signaling at the cellular level.
We recently have reported altered insulin signaling as the cellular mechanism for insulin resistance observed after the treatment with insulin. Briefly, serine/threonine kinases, including mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), are activated by insulin, and phosphorylate insulin receptor substrates (IRSs). IRSs phosphorylated on serine residues are then ubiquitinated and finally degraded in proteasomes. Through the process of serine phosphorylation and the sequential decrease of IRS proteins, the insulin signal is negatively regulated (9, 22). IL-1
also activates some serine/threonine kinases, such as c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) or I
B kinase (IKK), which are reported to phosphorylate IRS proteins after other ligands stimulations (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Thus, we have hypothesized that IL-1
may also induce cellular insulin resistance by phosphorylating IRSs on serine residues. In the current study, we examined the mechanisms of IL-1
-induced insulin resistance focusing on the activation of serine kinases and the subsequent changes of insulin signaling in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhibits Insulin Signaling at the Level of IRS-1
causes insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, we first examined the effect of IL-1
treatment on insulin signaling at different signaling levels. IL-1
treatment from 5 min to 4 h failed to alter the expression level and tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor (Fig. 1A
treatment (Fig. 1
treatment inhibits insulin signaling at the level of IRS-1.
|
Induces Serine Phosphorylation of IRS-1
treatment might be due to its serine phosphorylation. We examined serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 by using phospho-specific IRS-1 antibodies that recognize different serine residues on IRS-1, i.e. Ser307, Ser612, and Ser636. Remarkable responses of serine phosphorylation on the three residues were observed 530 min after IL-1
stimulation (Fig. 2
inhibited tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and the association with p85 possibly through the serine phosphorylation. The maximal response on Ser307 was around 30 min, whereas Ser612 or Ser636 were phosphorylated in around 15 min, suggesting that different serine kinases would be involved in the phosphorylation of Ser307 and Ser612/636.
|

stimulation. We first compared the time course of IL-1
-induced activation of several serine kinases including IKK, JNK, ERK1/2, p70S6K, and p38. As shown in Fig. 3
transiently stimulated phosphorylation of IKK, JNK, ERK1/2, p70S6K in around 1030 min when the maximal response of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation was also observed. On the other hand, p38 was activated after 30 min IL-1
stimulation with the maximum response around 4 h, when the maximal response of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation was restored to the basal level (Fig. 3E
stimulation using phosphor-specific Akt antibodies (data not shown). These results suggest that serine kinases such as JNK, IKK, ERK1/2, and p70S6K may phosphorylate IRS-1 and it is less likely that p38 or Akt is involved in serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 after IL-1
stimulation.
|
treatment, we next examined the effects of kinase inhibitors on IL-1
-induced IRS-1 serine phosphorylation (Fig. 4
stimulation (data not shown), inhibition of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation by PI3-kinase inhibitor may not be through the inhibition of Akt, but probably due to the inhibition of PI3-kinase itself. These studies do not directly determine the relative importance of each kinase, but suggest that multiple serine kinases are involved in IRS-1 serine phosphorylation after IL-1
treatment.
|
treatment. The effects of the same inhibitors used in Fig. 4
treatment. However, these two inhibitors recovered insulin signaling to the levels higher than the control without IL-1
treatment. To exclude a possibility that they may cancel the inhibitory effects by another pathway besides IL-1
, we examined the effects of the inhibitors on insulin signaling in the absence of IL-1
. SP600125 and 15d-PGJ2 slightly enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and the association with p85 (
10%), but the effects of these inhibitors were clearly less than their effects observed in the presence of IL-1
(Fig 5B
.
|
and IL-6 Synergistically Inhibit Insulin Signaling
-induced partial and transient inhibition of insulin signaling at the level of IRS-1 led to the inhibition of its downstream signaling. Insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose (2-DOG) uptake showed a tendency to decrease by approximately 10% at 15 min, but the inhibition was not statistically significant (Fig. 6A
treatment around 530 min (Fig. 6B
treatment inhibits insulin signaling only at IRS-1 level, but the partial inhibition is not great enough to suppress its downstream signaling. Because synergistic effects of several cytokines on insulin signaling are previously reported in the different tissues (30, 31, 32, 33), we hypothesized that the inhibitory effects of short-term IL-1
treatment might also be enhanced in the presence of other cytokines. We could not observe enhanced IL-1
s effects on insulin signaling even with the coexistence of IL-1ß or TNF
(data not shown). When the cells were treated with IL-1
for 15 min, after 45 min treatment with IL-6, the activations of insulin signaling, at the level of tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, the association of IRS-1 and p85 and Akt phosphorylation, were synergistically inhibited (Fig. 6
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-6. In this study, we first examined the effect of IL-1
on the initial step of insulin signaling at the cellular level using 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and its association with p85 was inhibited partially and transiently around 1030 min with IL-1
stimulation, whereas expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor were not altered. These results indicate that IL-1
may cause cellular insulin resistance, and the direct target of insulin signaling is not insulin receptor but IRS-1.
We and other groups have recently reported that serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 is enhanced by various ligands stimulations, such as TNF
or insulin, causing diminished activation of IRS-1 (9, 10, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). Thus, we hypothesized that partial and transient inhibition of IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation observed after IL-1
treatment was also due to its serine phosphorylation. We compared the time course of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and the activation of several serine kinases. IRS-1 was transiently phosphorylated on Ser307, Ser612, and Ser636 around 1030 min after IL-1
stimulation, when several serine kinases, IKK, JNK, ERK, and p70S6K were activated. And chemical inhibitors for the kinases inhibited serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 partially or completely. These results suggest that IRS-1 is phosphorylated by multiple serine kinases after IL-1
stimulation. Interestingly, these three serine residues were phosphorylated with a little different time course, i.e. only the maximal response on Ser307 was observed around 30 min, whereas that on Ser612 or Ser636 was around 15 min. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of each chemical inhibitor was different among the residues, suggesting a possibility that different kinases phosphorylate the different serine residues. To examine which kinases are actually involved in the mechanisms for the inhibition of insulin signaling, we next compared the effects of the inhibitors on the activation of IRS-1. As shown in Fig. 5
, insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and the association with p85 were recovered only by IKK inhibitor or JNK inhibitor, suggesting the specific involvement of these two kinases in the mechanisms for insulin resistance induced by short-term IL-1
treatment. Because these two inhibitors recovered insulin signaling to the levels higher than the control, we wondered whether the inhibitors might cancel the inhibitory effects by another pathway besides IL-1
. But the effects of these inhibitors without IL-1
treatment were clearly less than the effects in the presence of IL-1
as shown in Fig 5B
. Thus, we believe that SP600125 and 15d-PGJ2 mainly inhibits IL-1
signaling, and that JNK and IKK play important roles especially in the presence of IL-1
treatment. Yet we cant completely deny the possibility that these inhibitors enhanced insulin signaling through the inhibition of IKK and JNK, which were slightly activated by unknown stimuli or through the nonspecific inhibition of unknown kinases, we could not examine in the current study. Further experiments are necessary to address these possibilities. Furthermore, SP600125 inhibited not only JNK but also p70S6 kinase as shown in Fig. 4B
. This result may be explained by the nonspecificity of SP6000125 on these kinases, or a possibility that p70S6 kinase may be regulated downstream of JNK. In any case, p70S6 kinase might also be involved in the mechanisms for insulin resistance after IL-1
treatment. However, because rapamycin, a specific inhibitor for mTOR-p70S6 kinase, failed to enhance tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 (Fig. 5
), the involvement of p70S6 kinase is less likely. Because the other kinase inhibitors could not enhance IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, although they actually suppressed the serine phosphorylation, serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 is not the only mechanism for the diminished insulin signaling by IL-1
treatment. Some other possible mechanisms should be addressed in the future.
The cytokine family is generally known to elicit their functions not only by themselves but also by producing some other cytokines. Thus, we tried to exclude the possibility that IL-1
stimulated the production of some other cytokines that caused serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and/or inhibition of insulin signaling. We measured the concentrations of IL-6 and TNF
in the cell culture media after IL-1
stimulation because their productions are widely known to be induced by IL-1
in other cells or tissues (36, 37, 38), and they may cause insulin resistance. IL-1
treatment from 530 min did not increase the concentration of either IL-6 or TNF
remarkably, suggesting that serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 observed after IL-1
treatment was not through the production of IL-6 or TNF
, but probably through the activation of IL-1
signaling itself. Interestingly, in contrast to TNF
, the production of IL-6 was enhanced after IL-1
treatment longer than 4 h (data not shown). Thus, the influence of IL-6 production should be considered when the effects of longer term IL-1
treatment on insulin signaling would be studied. Next, we examined the involvement of SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signaling) as a mediator of insulin resistance in our system. SOCSs were originally reported as a negative regulator for Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway in cytokine signaling (39), and some recent studies have revealed that SOCS-1 or SOCS-3 inhibit insulin signaling by degrading IRS-1 or inhibiting tyrosine kinase activity of insulin receptor to IRS-1 (40, 41, 42, 43, 44). The expression of SOCSs is induced by various cytokines or hormones. Thus, we examined whether IL-1
induces SOCSs in 3T3-L1 adipocytes using real-time RT-PCR. SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 mRNA expressions were enhanced by IL-1
stimulation longer than 4 h, but the expressions of these genes could not be detected around 530 min (data not shown). These results indicate that short-term IL-1
treatment induces IRS-1 serine phosphorylation with decreased tyrosine phosphorylation not through the production of some other cytokines, such as IL-6 and TNF
nor induction of the expressions of SOCS, but through the activation of some serine kinases stimulated directly by IL-1
.
Acute IL-1
treatment partially but significantly decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and the association between IRS-1 and PI3-kinase, whereas Akt phosphorylation and glucose uptake were unaltered (Fig. 6
, A and B). Two explanations are possible as the reasons for the failure to observe inhibited downstream insulin signaling. The first explanation is that insulin signaling other than IRS-1 was increased and compensated for the inhibition of IRS-1 pathway. However, as far as we examined, tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 was also inhibited partially (
20%) and transiently as IRS-1 was (data not shown). Another possible explanation is as follows. In the current study, IL-1
treatment caused inhibition of insulin signaling at IRS-1-PI3 kinase level by approximately 25%, and the residual 75% of the maximum activation may be strong enough for the full activation of the downstream insulin signaling, including Akt phosphorylation or glucose uptake. We confirmed the latter possibility by using different concentrations of wortmannin, a chemical PI3-kinase inhibitor. For example, when a lower concentration of wortmannin inhibited insulin-stimulated PI3 kinase activity by 50%, it did not alter Akt phosphorylation or glucose uptake. Insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation and glucose uptake were inhibited by higher concentration of wortmannin, which inhibited PI3-kinase by more than 80%. These results suggest that approximately 75% of IRS-1-PI3 kinase activity observed after short-term IL-1
treatment may fully activate the downstream signaling. Thus, the greater inhibition at IRS-1 level would be necessary to suppress glucose uptake or Akt phosphorylation. Recent studies have demonstrated that there are synergistic effects of several cytokines on insulin signaling in the different tissues (30, 31, 32, 33). For example, Ling et al. (32) have reported that IL-1
and TNF
synergistically inhibit insulin-stimulated muscular glucose uptake and suppression of hepatic glucose production in rat infusion study. We hypothesized that the effects of short-term IL-1
treatment might also be enhanced in the presence of other cytokines. The effects of IL-1
treatment for 15 min on insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 or Akt phosphorylation were examined either in the presence or absence of TNF
, IL-1ß, or IL-6. In contrast to the report of Ling et al., synergistic effects of IL-1
with IL-1ß or TNF
were not observed (data not shown), probably because we used different cells. As shown in Fig. 6C
, only the combination of IL-1
and IL-6 caused the remarkable inhibition of insulin signaling at the levels of IRS-1 and Akt. Importantly, the time course study revealed that IL-6 treatment alone up to 2 h had no significant effects on insulin signaling (Fig. 6E
). The great inhibition of insulin signaling was not the additive effects of IL-1
and IL-6, but the enhancement of the effect of IL-1
by IL-6. Thus far, the mechanisms for the enhancement have not been clarified. Our recent preliminary results have shown that IL-6 treatment transiently enhances the expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3 in around 3060 min. Coexistence of SOCS and serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 might be a mechanism for the remarkable inhibition of insulin signaling. Further experiments will be necessary to address this issue.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, anti-IKKß, antiphospho-IKK (Ser180/Ser181), anti-I
B, anti-ERK1/2, antiphospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), anti-p70S6K, antiphospho-p70S6K (Thr421/Ser424), anti-p38, antiphospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182), anti-Akt, and antiphospho-Akt (Thr308/Ser473) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). IL-1
was kindly provided by Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). All other reagents were from standard suppliers.
Cell Culture and IL-1
Treatment
Murine 3T3-L1 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Cells were cultured, maintained, and differentiated as described previously (9). Briefly, cells were plated and grown for 2 d after confluence in DMEM/high glucose supplemented with 100 U/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum in a 10% CO2 environment. Differentiation was induced by changing the culture medium to the same one containing 0.5 mmol/liter 3-isobutyl-1 methyxanthine, 1 µmol/liter dexamethasone, and 1 µmol/liter insulin for 3 d, followed by the culture in the medium containing 0.8 µmol/liter insulin for another 3 d. The medium was then changed every 3 d until the cells were used for experiment, i.e. 1416 d after the induction of differentiation, when more than 95% of the cells had the morphological and biological properties of adipocytes. IL-1
dissolved in PBS with 0.1% BSA was added to the cell culture medium from 5 min to 4 h.
Western Blotting and Immunoprecipitation
3T3-L1 adipocytes were lysed in a cell-solublizing buffer containing 30 mmol/liter Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 10 mmol/liter EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mmol/liter phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µmol/liter leupeptin, 1 mmol/liter Na3VO4, and 50 mmol/liter NaF. For immunoprecipitation, the whole cell lysates were centrifuged at 4 C for 20 min to remove the insoluble materials and the supernatants were incubated with the indicated antibody for 4 h, followed by incubation with protein G-Sepharose for 1 h at 4 C and washing the beads with cell lysis buffer three times. The cell lysates or immunoprecipitates were boiled with Laemmli sample buffer for 5 min, resolved by 7.5% or 12% SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) in the Trans-Blot cell apparatus (Bio-Rad). The membranes were blocked and incubated with the indicated antibodies, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The proteins were visualized with chemiluminescence reagents according to the manufacturers protocol (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). In some experiment, the intensities of blots were quantitated using a scanning densitometer.
2-DOG Uptake Assay
Fully differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes in 12-well plates were deprived of serum for 3 h and then were stimulated with 20 nmol/liter insulin for 15 min in Krebs-Ringer phosphate buffer [10 mmol/liter HEPES (pH 7.4), 131.2 mmol/liter NaCl, 4.7 mmol/liter KCl, 1.2 mmol/liter MgSO4, 2.5 mmol/liter CaCl2, 2.5 mmol/liter NaH2PO4] with 1% BSA at 37 C. Unlabeled 2-DOG and [3H]-2-DOG (0.1 mmol/liter, 0.74 kBq/well) were added and the cells were incubated for 4 min. Reaction was stopped by adding 10 µmol/liter cytochalasin B and washing cells with ice-cold PBS three times. The cells were solubilized in 1 ml of 0.2% SDS and 0.2 N NaOH. The radioactivity was quantitated in a liquid scintillation counter. The results were corrected for nonspecific absorption determined by [3H]-2-DOG uptake in the presence of 10 µmol/liter cytochalasin B. Nonspecific absorption was always less than 10% of total uptake.
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean ± SE. The statistical comparison between groups was carried out using Students t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
First Published Online September 8, 2005
Abbreviations: 2-DOG, 2-Deoxyglucose; 15d-PGJ2, 15d-prostaglandin J2; IKK, I
B kinase; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; JNK, c-Jun-N-terminal kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PI3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PY, monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibodies; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling.
Received for publication March 2, 2005. Accepted for publication August 31, 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
inhibits signaling from the insulin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:48544858
- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Science 271:665668[Abstract]
inhibits insulin signaling through stimulation of the p55 TNF receptor and activation of sphingomyelinase. J Biol Chem 271:1301813022
function. Nature 389:610614[CrossRef][Medline]
and anisomycin leads to impaired insulin signaling through serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS proteins. J Biol Chem 277:89618969
B kinase complex. J Biol Chem 277:4811548121
stimulate phosphorylation of IRS-1 at inhibitory Ser307 via distinct pathways. J Clin Invest 107:181189[CrossRef][Medline]
B. Nat Med 11:183190[CrossRef][Medline]
and interferon-
inhibit insulin secretion and cause DNA damage in unweaned-rat islets. Extent of nitric oxide involvement. Diabetes 45:183189[Abstract]
in the adipose tissue of obese mice. J Biol Chem 276:4794447949This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Weise, S. Kralisch, G. Sommer, U. Lossner, M. Bluher, M. Stumvoll, and M. Fasshauer Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 mRNA production and protein secretion are induced by interleukin-1{beta} in 3T3-L1 adipocytes J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 169 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Park, V. Wong, X. Guan, A. I Oprescu, and A. Giacca Salicylate prevents hepatic insulin resistance caused by short-term elevation of free fatty acids in vivo J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 195(2): 323 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ishizuka, I. Usui, Y. Kanatani, A. Bukhari, J. He, S. Fujisaka, Y. Yamazaki, H. Suzuki, K. Hiratani, M. Ishiki, et al. Chronic Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Treatment Causes Insulin Resistance via Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Serine Phosphorylation and Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling-3 Induction in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes Endocrinology, June 1, 2007; 148(6): 2994 - 3003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Vick, A. A. Adams, B. A. Murphy, D. R. Sessions, D. W. Horohov, R. F. Cook, B. J. Shelton, and B. P. Fitzgerald Relationships among inflammatory cytokines, obesity, and insulin sensitivity in the horse J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1144 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jager, T. Gremeaux, M. Cormont, Y. Le Marchand-Brustel, and J.-F. Tanti Interleukin-1{beta}-Induced Insulin Resistance in Adipocytes through Down-Regulation of Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Expression Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 241 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |