| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale-Consiglio Nazionale delie Ricerche and Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare (B.D., R.I., T.D.P., R.N., L.N., R.D.L., M.Z.), Italy; S.E.M.M. European School of Molecular Medicine (M.G.B.), and CEINGE biotecnologie avanzate (M.G.B., R.D.L.) 80131 Naples, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mariastella Zannini, Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale-Consiglio Nazionale delie Ricerche, c/o Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare, Universita di Napoli Federico II, via Pansini, 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy. E-mail: stella{at}szn.it.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Regulation of gene expression occurs mostly at the transcriptional level. A large variety of transcriptional mechanisms have been delineated, and most of them are based on the capacity of transcription factors to recognize specific DNA sequences and subsequently, by interfering with either the transcriptional machinery or chromatin structure, or interacting with other transcription factors, to modulate transcription of target genes. Therefore, the understanding of transcription factors function is an important goal for a better description of complex and important biological phenomena and diseases. Several genetic and functional approaches are available to study the function of a transcription factor. Sometimes, genetic ablation of a target gene is not the best approach to understand its role, and in such cases functional inactivation of the protein may be a better choice. Several methods have been widely and successfully used, such as antisense RNA, RNA interference technologies, or specifically engineered dominant-negative mutants. However, these methods cannot be considered universally applicable.
The oligomerization chain reaction (OCR) is a recently described strategy for the functional inactivation of a target protein: this technique is based on the fusion of the self-associating coiled-coil (CC) domain of the nuclear factor promyelocytic leukemia (PML) to a target protein. In acute promyelocytic leukemia, PML is fused to the retinoic acid receptor (RAR). In contrast with RAR, PML-RAR forms oligomeric complexes through the self-associating CC domain present in PML (1, 2, 3, 4). This property of the CC domain suggested that the presence of this region could be used to modify the function of a target protein. Indeed, two recent reports describe the OCR as an innovative strategy for the inactivation of target proteins that are able to self-associate (5) or that form heterocomplexes (6).
Thyroid cells are a good model system by which to study the mechanisms involved in the regulation of gene expression. In fact, they provide a coherent system to address several questions related to cell differentiation, organogenesis, and pathology. Differentiated thyroid cells are characterized by the expression of thyroid-specific genes such as thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroperoxidase (TPO), sodium/iodide symporter (NIS), TSH receptor, and two recently cloned genes encoding thyroid oxidases (ThOX1 and ThOX2) (7). Tg and TPO promoters have been extensively studied, and three transcription factors have been cloned that specifically bind to and activate these two promoters (8, 9). The three transcription factors are Pax8, thyroid transcription factor (TTF)-1, and Foxe1.
In recent years, we have focused our studies on the molecular mechanism of action of Pax8 and TTF-1. These two transcription factors are present together only in the thyroid tissue, suggesting that this unique combination could be responsible for early commitment and differentiation of the thyrocytes. The transcription factor TTF-1 is a homeodomain-containing protein and belongs to the Nkx-2 class of homeobox genes (10, 11). During mouse embryo development, TTF-1 is expressed in the thyroid anlage, in restricted areas of the developing brain, and in the lung bronchial epithelium (12). TTF-1 is required for proper development of these tissues, because null mice die at birth lacking lung parenchyma and the thyroid and have severe defects of the ventral area of the forebrain (13). In addition to its role in development, TTF-1 has been shown to regulate tissue-specific transcription in differentiated thyroid and lung cells (14, 15, 16, 17). Pax8 is a member of the murine Pax family of paired domain-containing genes and is expressed in embryonic and adult kidney and thyroid, and in neural tube (18, 19). The Pax gene family encodes for DNA-binding proteins that are involved in the regulation of development and differentiation of a variety of tissue in different species (20, 21, 22, 23). Interestingly, Pax8 knockout mice have a barely visible thyroid gland, which is deprived of follicles because thyroid follicular cells are missing in these mice (24).
Our laboratory has demonstrated that, in a thyroid cell line, Pax8 is required for the expression of all the differentiation markers (25). In addition, our data demonstrated that in the environment of the thyroid cell, Pax8 is able to transcriptionally activate the thyroglobulin gene in cooperation with TTF-1 (25). Recently, more evidence of a functional cooperation between these two transcription factors has been collected (26, 27). Specifically, studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that Pax8 and TTF-1 are able to interact directly in vitro and to form a functional complex in vivo responsible for a synergistic transcriptional activation of the Tg promoter (28).
To further assess the functional role of Pax8 and of the Pax8/TTF-1 heterocomplex, we have chosen a protein knockout approach. Hence, we investigated the possibility of using the OCR strategy to generate a dominant-negative Pax8 molecule.
Here we present data demonstrating that we have successfully inactivated the Pax8/TTF-1 transcription complex in thyroid cells in culture through OCR. To this end, we have generated a chimeric construct carrying Pax8 fused to the CC domain. The oligomerization reaction induced by the CC domain triggered the formation of aberrant, nonfunctional high-molecular mass complexes, leading to a functional inactivation of both Pax8 and TTF-1 transcription factors. In addition, this approach allowed us to successfully interfere with the expression of Pax8 and/or TTF-1 target genes in the context of a thyroid-differentiated cell line. In such a way we identified ThOX2, Foxe1, and TTF-1 as direct targets of Pax8 or TTF-1. Based on these results, we propose that the fusion of the CC domain to Pax8 generates an effective dominant-negative function of CC-Pax8 that alters the functional properties of wild-type Pax8 and TTF-1.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To this end, we fused the CC domain of PML to the N terminus of full-length Pax8, thus generating the 3xFlag-CC-Pax8 construct. At first, we analyzed the cellular distribution of the CC-Pax8 chimera by Western blotting of fractionated cellular extracts prepared from HeLa cells transiently transfected with either 3xFlag-Pax8 or 3xFlag-CC-Pax8. Immunodetection with anti-FLAG-M2 revealed that the CC-Pax8 protein was, at least in part, delocalized in the cytosol compartment, whereas the wild-type Pax8 protein showed an exclusive nuclear localization, as expected (Fig. 1
).
|
|
Transcriptional Inactivation of TTF-1 by Overexpression of CC-Pax8
Studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that Pax8 and TTF-1 are able to interact directly in vitro and to form a functional complex in vivo responsible for a synergistic transcriptional activation of the Tg promoter (28).
To investigate the possibility that the OCR strategy could be used to modify the function of the Pax8/TTF-1 transcription complex, a strict requirement for the chimeric Pax8 protein would be the ability to associate with TTF-1. To test whether CC-Pax8 could still interact with TTF-1 as wild-type Pax8, HeLa cells were transiently transfected with the expression vectors encoding for 3xFlag-CC-Pax8 and TTF-1. As positive control we have also transfected the cells with the expression vectors encoding for 3xFlag-Pax8 and TTF-1, whereas as negative control we have transfected the cells with the expression vectors encoding for 3xFlag-CC and TTF-1. Anti-Flag-agarose affinity gel was used to immunoprecipitate the 3xFlag-CC-Pax8, the 3xFlag-Pax8, and the 3xFlag-CC proteins from total extracts prepared from HeLa cells transiently transfected. Subsequently, the bound proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis after separation by SDS-PAGE. Western blot developed with a specific anti-TTF-1 polyclonal antibody showed the presence of TTF-1-coimmunoprecipitated protein in HeLa cells expressing the 3xFlag-CC-Pax8 and the 3xFlag-Pax8 proteins (Fig. 3A
, lanes 1 and 2), whereas TTF-1 was not immunoprecipitated in HeLa cells expressing the 3xFlag-CC (Fig. 3A
, lane 3). Therefore, we can conclude that the CC-Pax8 chimera, like the Pax8 protein, is able to interact with TTF-1 despite the presence of the CC oligomerization domain.
|
It was previously reported that, in transient transfection assays in HeLa cells, TTF-1 is able to significantly activate transcription from the Tg promoter (31), and that Pax8 and TTF-1 synergistically stimulate transcription from this promoter (28). We asked whether the CC-Pax8 chimera could interfere with TTF-1 transcriptional activity not only on a synthetic promoter, such as the C5 one, but also in a more physiological context represented by the Tg promoter. Moreover, we were very much interested in understanding whether the CC-Pax8 chimera could also interfere with the Pax8/TTF-1 transcriptional synergy on the Tg promoter. Therefore, we cotransfected expression vectors encoding for TTF-1, 3xFlag-Pax8, and 3xFlag-CC-Pax8 in HeLa cells together with the reporter construct Tg-CAT, separately or in combination. As a control we used the expression vector encoding for 3xFlag-CC. When transfected alone, TTF-1 enhances transcription of the Tg promoter, as expected (Fig. 3C
). Coexpression of TTF-1 and 3xFlag-CC-Pax8 led to a loss of transcriptional activation of the Tg promoter by TTF-1, as was seen for the C5 promoter (Fig. 3C
). Interestingly, the chimera CC-Pax8 completely prevented the synergistic transcriptional cooperation of Pax8 and TTF-1 on the Tg promoter, whereas the expression of 3xFlag-CC had no effect on transcriptional activity of the Pax8/TTF-1 transcriptional complex (Fig. 3C
).
These results, taken together, show that the CC-Pax8 chimera is able to interfere with the functional activity of Pax8 and TTF-1 transcription factors, either when these proteins act alone or when they act in cooperation, and that this interference is specifically due to the fusion of the CC domain to the target protein and not to the CC domain alone.
Subcellular Localization of CC-Pax8
The results described so far show that the CC-Pax8 chimera, like the Pax8 protein, retains the ability to associate with TTF-1, despite the presence of the PML-CC extraoligomerization domain. We have also demonstrated that the CC-Pax8 chimera acts as a dominant-negative molecule on wild-type Pax8 transcriptional activity and that the coexpression of TTF-1 and CC-Pax8 results in a functional inactivation of TTF-1. Moreover, we have shown that the fusion of CC domain to Pax8 prevents completely the synergistic transcriptional cooperation of Pax8 and TTF-1 on the Tg promoter.
It has been suggested that an oligomerization induced by the CC domain of PML would lead to the formation of aberrant, nonfunctional high-molecular mass complexes localized outside the nucleus (5, 6). To test whether the fusion of Pax8 to the CC domain of PML induced the formation of high-molecular mass complexes we analyzed cellular lysates from transiently transfected HeLa cells by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) followed by Western blot. 3xFlag-Pax8 and TTF-1 form a heterocomplex found after SEC peaked in fractions corresponding to an apparent molecular mass of about 330 kDa (Fig. 4A
). In contrast, the 3xFlag-CC-Pax8 fusion protein and TTF-1 were found in fractions corresponding to an apparent molecular mass ranging from 500 to 1000 kDa (Fig. 4B
). According to data reported in the literature (5, 6), the widespread distribution of the two proteins could be interpreted as a result of a heterogeneous population of differently sized heterooligomeric complexes.
|
|
It has been previously suggested that the transcription factor Pax8 may be involved in tumor cell growth (33, 34, 35). Therefore, we asked whether the dominant-negative CC-Pax8 chimera could allow us to characterize the role of Pax8 in the control of cell proliferation. By means of growth curve experiments, we compared the proliferation rate of wild-type PC Cl3 cells with that of the CC-Pax8-positive stable clones. The analysis shows that there is no significant difference in the proliferation rate of the CC-Pax8 clones analyzed compared with that of the wild-type PC Cl3 cells (Fig. 6A
).
|
This result was expected because it is well known that Pax8 and TTF-1 are key transcription factors for Tg expression (28). Hence we have chosen one stable clone expressing the CC-Pax8 chimera (clone CCP823) to further analyze the expression profile of other known thyroid differentiation markers. By quantitative real-time RT-PCR (Q-PCR), we analyzed the mRNA levels of several markers of thyroid differentiation. As control, the mRNA level of a housekeeping gene,
-1 tubulin, was also measured in each sample. After normalization of input cDNA for
-1 tubulin transcripts, mRNA levels for each gene were reported as the percentage of the level measured in parental PC Cl3 cells (Fig. 6C
). Our results confirm the highly significant down-regulation of Tg gene expression described previously in the Western blot analysis. Moreover, they also show a significant down-regulation of NIS, Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1 gene expression in this positive clone. Although statistically less significant, a small down-regulation of the TSH receptor gene is also observed.
Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1 Are Novel Targets of Pax8 and TTF-1
The down-regulation of Tg and NIS genes observed in the CCP823 clone is in agreement with previous evidence that describe both these two genes as direct targets of Pax8 (25, 30, 36, 37, 38, 39). To understand whether Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1 could be direct targets of Pax8, TTF-1, or both factors, we performed a computational analysis using the Transcription Factor Database (TRANSFAC pro 9.3; BIOBASE Co.). We searched for Pax8- and TTF-1-binding sites in a region of about 1000 bp in the 5'-flanking region of Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1, and the analysis showed the presence of either Pax8 or TTF-1 consensus sequences in the genomic regions analyzed. To confirm the predictions of the TRANSFAC analysis, we performed EMSAs with oligonucleotides derived from the putative Pax8-binding sites and TTF-1 binding sites found in Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1. The results show that oligonucleotides derived from the Pax8-binding site regions of Foxe1 and ThOX2, named Pax8-binding site-8 and Pax8-binding site-5, respectively, are able to form a protein-DNA complex when incubated with a nuclear extract prepared from PC Cl3 cells (Fig. 7A
). To further demonstrate that Pax8 is indeed able to bind to the analyzed sites, we performed the EMSAs also with the paired domain of Pax8, expressed in bacteria and affinity purified. Both the Pax8-binding site-8 and Pax8-binding site-5 oligonucleotides are able to form a protein-DNA complex with Pax8 paired domain (Fig. 7A
). In parallel, we performed EMSAs with the oligonucleotides derived from TTF-1 binding site regions of the analyzed genes. The results show that the oligonucleotide derived from the TTF-1 binding site regions of TTF-1 gene, named TBS-2, is able to form a protein-DNA complex when incubated with a nuclear extract prepared from PC Cl3 cells (Fig. 7B
). To further demonstrate that TTF-1 is indeed able to bind to the analyzed site, we performed a supershift experiment with a polyclonal antibody that specifically recognizes TTF-1. The protein-DNA complex observed with the TTF-1 binding sites-2 oligonucleotide is clearly supershifted by the TTF-1 antibody (Fig. 7B
). As control, in all our EMSAs, the nuclear extract or the Pax8 paired domain were incubated with an oligonucleotide derived from the Tg promoter (oligo C) containing a well-known binding site for both Pax8 and TTF-1 (30). Therefore, we can conclude that Pax8 is able to bind in vitro to the 5'-flanking region of Foxe1 and ThOX2 genes, whereas TTF-1 is able to bind in vitro to its own 5'-flanking region.
|
To determine whether the identified Pax8-binding sites and TTF-1 binding sites in the 5'-flanking region of Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1 genes could be effective transcriptional regulatory elements, we performed functional reporter gene assays. We subcloned the regions containing the Pax8- and TTF-1-binding sites investigated by EMSAs and ChIP experiments upstream from the LUC reporter gene in the pGL3-basic vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The generated reporter plasmids were named 5'-Foxe1-LUC, 5'-ThOX2-LUC, and 5'-TTF-1-LUC and were transiently transfected in HeLa cells in the absence or in the presence of increasing concentrations of the expression vectors encoding Pax8 or TTF-1. As shown in Fig. 8
, Pax8 activates transcription from both 5'-Foxe1-LUC and 5'-ThOX2-LUC, whereas TTF-1 activates transcription from the 5'-TTF-1-LUC reporter construct, in a concentration-dependent manner. These data indicate that we have identified functional Pax8- and TTF-1-binding sites in the Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1 5'-flanking regions and clearly demonstrate that these genes are direct downstream targets of the two transcription factors.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The OCR is a recently described strategy for the functional inactivation of a target protein, based on the fusion of the self-associating coiled-coil (CC) domain of PML to target proteins that are able to self-associate naturally (5) or that form heterocomplexes (6).
Our results show that the fusion of the CC domain to Pax8 results in an OCR that alters the functional properties of Pax8 itself and of the Pax8/TTF-1 complex. In fact, we demonstrated that the CC-Pax8 chimera is able to interfere with the functional activity of the Pax8 protein behaving as a dominant-negative molecule on the wild-type Pax8. Moreover, the CC-Pax8 chimera retains the ability to associate with the TTF-1 protein and completely prevents its functional activity on target promoters. Accordingly, with the molecular models proposed in previous reports (5, 6), the fusion of the CC domain with Pax8 induces the formation of aberrant high-molecular weight complexes, to which the TTF-1 protein is also recruited. Therefore, the generation of this aberrant complex likely prevents the correct intracellular localization of Pax8 and TTF-1 and prevents the transcription factors from binding to the DNA. In fact, the expression of the CC-Pax8 chimera in PC Cl3 cells causes an anomalous localization of the endogenous TTF-1 protein that colocalizes with CC-Pax8 in perinuclear domains. Most importantly, the stable expression of the CC-Pax8 chimera in differentiated thyroid cells leads to a significant down-regulation of endogenous Tg, NIS, Foxe1, ThOX2, and TTF-1 expression. These data provide strong evidence of the ability of the CC-Pax8 molecule to interfere with the transcription of Pax8 and/or TTF-1 target genes in a physiological chromosomal context.
Pax genes belong to a family of nine developmental control genes that encode transcription factors, which act as essential players during the organogenesis and the differentiation of several organs (21, 22, 23, 40). In particular, the analysis of transgenic and knockout mice revealed that Pax8 has a key role in development and differentiation of the thyroid gland. In fact, Pax8 knockout mice have a very small thyroid gland, which is deprived of follicular cells (24), and patients suffering from congenital hypothyroidism have been shown to carry mutations in the Pax8 gene (41). However, until now, very little has been known about in vivo targets of Pax8. It has been demonstrated that Pax8 is required for the expression of thyroglobulin, TPO, and the sodium/iodide symporter, all genes considered markers of the differentiated phenotype (25). Nevertheless, the finding that Pax8 knockout mice exhibit a total absence of thyroid follicular cells (24), although indicating an essential role for this gene in thyroid organogenesis, could not contribute to a definitive assessment of the role of Pax8 in controlling the expression of the thyroid-differentiated phenotype, because the thyroid cell precursors disappeared before the onset of the Tg, TPO, and NIS gene expression. Moreover, the association between mutations in the Pax8 gene with human thyroid dysgenesis (41) underlines an important role for this protein in the organogenesis but could not contribute to a further understanding of its involvement on the expression of thyroid-specific genes.
In addition, the evidence that the transcription factors involved in the expression of the thyroid-differentiated phenotype have a central role in the study of loss of differentiation observed in tumors is of great relevance. The expression of activated forms of different oncogenes in thyroid cells in culture leads to loss of differentiation and abnormal proliferation (25, 42). The fundamental role of Pax8 in thyroid differentiation and the link observed between the loss of thyroid differentiation and tumors suggest that this transcription factor could also be involved in molecular mechanisms of thyroid tumors.
Hence, a full understanding of Pax8 function and the identification of its targets represent a very important goal for a better knowledge of the physiological and the pathological processes occurring in the thyroid gland.
In this paper, we show that the CC-Pax8 chimera behaves as a dominant-negative molecule for both Pax8 and TTF-1. In addition, we demonstrate that the functional inactivation of Pax8 and TTF-1, by means of the OCR strategy, causes a down-regulation of the expression of thyroid differentiation marker genes such as Tg, NIS, ThOX2, Foxe1 and TTF-1.
Tg and NIS are two known target genes of Pax8 and TTF-1 (25, 30, 37, 38); therefore, the down-regulation of the expression of these genes observed in our experiments is in agreement with previous evidence.
ThOX2 is a recently cloned thyroid-specific gene (7). It encodes a Ca2+-dependent flavoprotein presenting a reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidase activity. The ThOX2 protein is colocalized with the TPO at the apical membrane of thyroid cells and represents the thyroid H2O2-generating system. The expression of this system is stimulated by the cAMP pathway through the TSH receptor, and its enzymatic activity is triggered by the Ca2+-phosphatidylinositol cascade (43). The results reported in this paper demonstrate that the expression of ThOX2 is under the control of the transcription factor Pax8. In fact, we have identified one Pax8-binding site in the 5'-flanking region of the ThOX2 gene, and we have demonstrated that Pax8 is indeed able to bind to this site and activate transcription from the DNA region containing it. Therefore, this is the first evidence that describes ThOX2 as a transcriptional target of Pax8.
Foxe1 is a member of the forkhead family of proteins. Recently, a report appeared in the literature in which the authors describe a dramatic decrease of Foxe1 protein levels in the thyroid of Pax8/ mice (44). Our findings show that Pax8 is able to bind to one site in the Foxe1 5'-flanking region both in vitro and in vivo and activates transcription from this DNA region. Hence, our data support the previous report and provide direct evidence that Foxe1 expression is indeed regulated by Pax8.
At last, we also show that TTF-1 is able to bind to one site in its own 5'-flanking region both in vitro and in vivo and activates transcription from this DNA region when challenged in a functional reporter assay. Such a finding suggests that TTF-1 expression is controlled by a mechanism of autoregulation mediated by the binding of the transcription factor to its own 5'-flanking region. This observation is further supported by a previous report in which a possible autoregulation of TTF-1 is described (45).
Thus, we conclude that the CC-Pax8 dominant-negative molecule has been a successful tool to interfere with the functional activity of the transcription factor Pax8 and of its partner TTF-1. This interference allowed us to identify ThOX2, Foxe1, and TTF-1 as novel targets of Pax8 or TTF-1 action.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CMV-CAT and CMV-LUC plasmids were used as internal controls in transfection assays. The DNA of all plasmids was prepared by QIAGEN cartridges (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and used for cell transfections.
Cell Culture, Transfection Experiments, and Cell Proliferation Assays
PC Cl3 and HeLa cell lines have been previously described (46). PC Cl3 cells were grown in Coons modified F-12 medium (EuroClone, Leeds, UK) supplemented with 5% calf serum and a six-hormone mixture and growth factors as described by Ambesi-Impiombato and Coon (47).
HeLa cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. For transient transfection experiments, 58 h before transfection HeLa cells were plated at a density of 3 x 105 cells/60-mm tissue culture dish, whereas PC Cl3 cells were plated at a density of 5 x 104 cells on 12-mm diameter glass coverslips 72 h before transfection. Transfections were carried out with the FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Diagnostic, Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturers directions. The DNA/FuGENE ratio was 1:2 in all experiments. After 48 h PC Cl3 cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence, or HeLa extracts were prepared to determine either the levels of CAT protein with a CAT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) or LUC activities as described previously (48).
Transfection experiments were done in duplicate and repeated at least three times.
To generate stable clones, PC Cl3 cells were transfected with the 3xFLAG-CC-Pax8. Cells were selected with 400 µg/ml of G418 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). After 2 wk, G418-resistant clones were isolated, expanded, and examined by Western Blot.
To measure cell growth parameters, PC Cl3 and CC-P8 clones were plated at 104 cells per 60-mm plate. The cells were grown in F12 medium with 5% calf serum and six-hormone mixture and growth factors. The medium was changed every 24 h, after which cells were collected and counted.
Protein Extracts and Western Blot
For LUC/CAT assays, total extracts were prepared as previously described (49). Total extracts from HeLa cells transiently transfected were prepared using the EBC buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and protease inhibitors (Sigma). Protein extracts were then centrifuged (12,000 x g) for 30 min at 4 C.
Cell fractionation into cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction was prepared by a variation of the standard protocol of Dignam (50). Briefly, the cells were scraped in buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8; 1.5 mM Mg Cl2;10 mM KCl; 0.5 mM DTT) and incubated at 4 C for 10 min; 10% Triton X-100 (1/30 of original volume) was added and extracts were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 1 min. To the supernatants were added 0.11 volume of buffer B (0.3 M HEPES, pH 7.8; 1.4 M KCl; 30 mM MgCl2), incubated at 4 C for 30 min rotating, and then centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 20 min at 4 C. The recovered supernatant corresponded to cytoplasmic extract. The pellets of nuclei were resuspended in 1/5 of the original volume of buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8; 25% glycerol; 0.42 M NaCl; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 0.2 mM EDTA; 0.5 mM DTT) and incubated at 4 C for 30 min, rotating. The protein extracts were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 20 min. The supernatant removed corresponded to nuclear extract.
The protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Proteins were separated by SDS-10% PAGE, and SDS-7% PAGE for Tg. Gels were blotted onto Immobilon P (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) for 1618 h, and the membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk for 2 h at room temperature. Immunodetection was performed by using a TTF-1-specific polyclonal antibody (12), a Tg-specific polyclonal antibody (51), and a monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma). Subsequently, the filters were developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection method (Pierce Chemical Co., Madison, WI) according to the manufacturers directions.
SEC and Coimmunoprecipitation
For SEC analysis 2 mg of total extract was loaded on a Superose 6 HR 10/30 gel filtration column equilibrated in sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 150 mM NaCl. For Western blot analysis, the indicated fractions were subjected to trichloroacetic acid precipitation before loading on SDS-PAGE.
The coimmunoprecipitation experiment was performed by incubating 2 mg of total protein extract with 20 µl of anti-FLAG-agarose affinity gel (Sigma) overnight at 4 C on a rotating wheel. The samples were centrifuged, and the agarose gel-bound proteins were washed several times with EBC buffer, resuspended in 2x SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and heated at 95 C for 35 min before loading on the gel.
Immunofluorescence and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy
Cells were transiently transfected on glass coverslips, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature, permeabilized for 7 min in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and incubated for 10 min in 0.1 M glycine in PBS. Coverslips were subsequently incubated for 20 min with an anti-TTF-1 polyclonal antibody (12) diluted 1:100 in 0.5% BSA in PBS and, after PBS washing, incubated for 20 min with a rhodamine-tagged goat antirabbit secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) diluted 1:50 in 0.5% BSA in PBS. After final washes with PBS, the coverslips were mounted on a microscope slide using a 50% solution of glycerol in PBS.
Images were collected with a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser scanning microscope, equipped with a 488-nm argon ion laser, a 543-nm HeNe laser, and a Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.4 oil-immersion objective. Emitted fluorescence was detected using a BP 505530 band pass filter for EYFP and a LP 560 long pass filter for tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate. Pairs of images were collected simultaneously in the green and red channels.
RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and Q-PCR
Total RNA was prepared using TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers directions. Total RNA (4 µg) was retrotranscribed using the Superscript First Strand Synthesis System for RT PCR (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR analysis was performed using an ABI Prism 7900HT sequence detection system and SYBR green chemistry (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Reactions were carried out in triplicate using, for each reaction, cDNA obtained from 130 ng of total RNA and 0.3 µM primers. The specific primers sets used for this analysis have been described previously (42).
ChIP
The cross-linking solution, containing 1% formaldehyde, was added directly to cell culture media. The fixation proceeded for 10 min and was stopped by the addition of glycine to a final concentration of 125 mM. PC Cl3 cells were rinsed twice with cold PBS plus 1 mM PMSF, and then scraped. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 800 x g for 5 min at 4 C. Cells were swelled in cold cell lysis buffer containing 5 mM piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (pH 8.0), 85 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM PMSF, and inhibitors cocktail (Sigma) and incubated on ice for 10 min. Nuclei were spun down by microcentrifugation at 2000 x g for 5 min at 4 C, resuspended in nuclear lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 10 mM EDTA, 0.8% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1 mM PMSF and inhibitors cocktail (Sigma), and then incubated on ice for 10 min. Samples were broken by sonication into chromatin fragments of an average length of 500/1000 bp and then microcentrifuged at 16,000 x g. The sonicated cell supernatant was diluted 8-fold in ChIP Dilution Buffer containing 0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1), and 167 mM NaCl, and precleared by adding Salmon Sperm DNA/Protein A Agarose (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) for 30 min at 4 C. Precleared chromatin from 1 x 106 cells was incubated with 1 µg of affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody (anti-Pax8, anti TTF-1 and an unrelated one), or no antibody and rotated at 4 C for 16 h. Immunoprecipitates were washed five times with RIPA buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 140 mM NaCl, and 1 mM PMSF; twice with LiCl buffer containing 0.25 M LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% Na-deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and then three times with TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8; 1 mM EDTA). Before the first wash, the supernatant from the reaction lacking primary antibody was saved as total input of chromatin and was processed with the eluted immunoprecipitates beginning at the cross-link reversal step. Immunoprecipitates were eluted by adding 1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3 and reverse cross-linked by addition of NaCl to a final concentration of 200 mM and by heating at 65 C for 16 h. Recovered material was treated with proteinase K, extracted with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and precipitated. The pellets were resuspended in 30 µl of TE and analyzed by PCR using specific primers for the analyzed regions. The input sample was resuspended in 30 µl of TE and diluted 1:10 before PCR.
EMSAs
Double-strand oligonucleotides were labeled with
-32P ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase and used as probes. The binding reactions were carried out in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 75 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 1 mg/ml BSA, and 3 mg/ml polydeoxyinosinic deoxycytidylic acid. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature, free DNA and DNA-protein complexes were resolved on a 5% nondenaturating polyacrylamide gel and visualized with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The antibody used in the supershift experiments was incubated with the protein extract for 20 min before adding the probe.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address for R.I.: International Max Planck Research School, Technische Universität Dresden, BioInnovationZentrum, Am Tatzberg 47, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Author Disclosure Summary: B.D., R.I., T.D.P., R.N., M.G.B., L.N., R.D.L., and M.Z. have nothing to declare.
First Published Online April 13, 2006
1 B.D. and R.I. equally contributed to the work. ![]()
Abbreviations: CAT, Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; CC, coiled coil; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; CMV, cytomegalovirus; DTT, dithiothreitol; EYFP, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein; NIS, sodium/iodide symporter; OCR, oligomerization chain reaction; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride; Q-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; SEC, size exclusion chromatography; Tg, thyroglobulin; ThOX1, thyroid oxidase 1; TPO, thyroperoxidase; TTF-1, thyroid transcription factor 1.
Received for publication November 18, 2005. Accepted for publication April 3, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) disrupts normal PAX8 or PPAR
transcriptional function and stimulates follicular thyroid cell growth. Endocrinology 147:367376