help button home button Endocrine Society Molecular Endocrinology ENDO 08 Sessions Library
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Molecular Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/me.2006-0205
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints, Permissions and Rights
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, S.
Molecular Endocrinology 21 (1): 148-158
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Methylation Status of a Single CpG Locus 3 Bases Upstream of TATA-Box of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand (RANKL) Gene Promoter Modulates Cell- and Tissue-Specific RANKL Expression and Osteoclastogenesis

Riko Kitazawa and Sohei Kitazawa

Division of Molecular Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Sohei Kitazawa, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Molecular Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan. E-mail: kitazawa{at}med.kobe-u.ac.jp.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B ligand (RANKL) expression is tissue specific and limited to certain subsets of T-lymphocytes and stromal/osteoblastic cells. Even among osteoblasts, RANKL is expressed on about 20% of osteoblasts of the normal mouse. To clarify the mechanism of population-specific RANKL expression, we analyzed the effect of CpG methylation on its transcription, mRNA and protein expression as well as on osteoclastogenesis. Subpopulations of ST2 cells were used: P9, which expresses RANKL and supports osteoclastogenesis, and P16, which does not. By sodium bisulfite mapping, the rate of CpG methylation of the –65/+350 region, especially of CpG locus no. 1 three bases upstream of the TATA-box, was higher in P16 than in P9 ST2 cells. ChIP and gel shift assay showed that methylated CpG locus no. 1 was a target of MeCP2 binding that, in turn, blocked the binding of the TATA-box binding protein to the TATA-box. In vitro methylation by SssI of the promoter construct reduced its transcriptional activity at the steady state and its response to 1{alpha},25(OH)2 vitamin D3. Conversely, treatment with DNA methylase inhibitor, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, significantly restored RANKL expression and osteoclastogenesis in P16 cells. Except for primary cultured osteoblasts, CpG locus no. 1 was frequently methylated in various normal mouse tissues. We propose that the methylation status of the CpG locus three bases upstream of the TATA-box modulates the control of cell- and tissue-specific expression of RANKL gene and osteoclastogenesis. The heterogeneity of stromal/ osteoblastic cells in response to bone-resorbing stimuli may be attributed, in part, to the methylation status of the RANKL gene promoter.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
BONE DEVELOPMENT, GROWTH, modeling, and remodeling are on-going, life-long processes controlled by an interactive complex of osteoblasts and osteoclasts whose balance defines bone mass (1, 2, 3). Skeletal tissue is formed during embryonic life through mostly endochondral and partly membranous ossification processes whereby constantly moving interface among cartilage, invading blood vessels, and bone is also strictly regulated between formation by osteoblasts and resorption by osteo(chondro)clasts (4). These opposite functions are coupled; resorption precedes formation, and osteoblasts, or their precursors, stromal cells, regulate osteoclast formation and activity (3, 5, 6). Recently, a member of the TNF family of membrane-bound ligands and its receptor have been identified as critical regulators of osteoclastogenesis: receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B ligand (RANKL) expressed on stromal cells and osteoblasts (7, 8, 9), and its cognate receptor, RANK (9, 10), expressed at high levels on osteoclast precursors. These observations have provided a solid molecular understanding of the coupling between osteoblastic bone formation and osteoclastic bone resorption.

RANKL gene expression is, on the other hand, tissue-specific and limited to certain subsets of T-lymphocytes and stromal/ osteoblastic cells (11). Even among stromal/osteoblastic cells, RANKL-expressing cells are heterogeneously distributed, comprising about 20% of otherwise morphologically indistinguishable stromal/ osteoblastic cells lining the bone surface in normal mouse bone tissue, as revealed by our previous in situ hybridization studies (12, 13). Probably reflecting such heterogeneity and selected populations of RANKL-expressing cells, bone formation and resorption, during remodeling, takes place not as a generalized event but as a localized packet of bone, called bone-remodeling unit (14), whose distribution density and pattern ultimately define the response to mechanical loading, bone-seeking steroids and other cytokines (2). To explain cell- and tissue-specific expression of the RANKL gene, the contribution of tissue-specific transcription factors such as Runx2 (15), Sp1 and 3 (16), and activating transcription factor (ATF)-4 (17) has been postulated. Additionally, a higher chromatin structure including an epigenetic conformation and other far upstream elements are also assumed to be required for full induction and tissue-specific RANKL gene expression (18, 19).

In this study, because epigenetic regulation by CpG methylation at the promoter region is often associated with both tissue-specific and diverse or heterogeneous expression of genes (20, 21), we analyzed the contribution of CpG methylation of the promoter and that of MeCP2, a major methyl-CpG binding protein, in mouse RANKL gene expression.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Osteoclastogenesis and RANKL Expression in Response to Vitamin D3 among ST2 Cell Subpopulations
In the coculture of mouse bone marrow macrophages and ST2 cells between passages 8 (P8) and 17 (P17), osteoclastogenesis in response to 1{alpha},25(OH)2 vitamin D3 (vitamin D3) decreased significantly in the subpopulations after passage 12; tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-positive multinucleated cells were hardly generated after passage 14 (Fig. 1AGo). RANKL and osteoprotegerin (OPG) mRNA expression in representative subpopulations, P9 and P16, was then assessed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Mirroring the results of osteoclastogenesis in the coculture, vitamin D3 caused a 17-fold increase of RANKL mRNA in P9 but not in P16: it reduced OPG mRNA expression equally in both P9 and P16 ST2 cells (Fig. 1BGo). Reduction in the osteoclastogenesis of P16 correlated with the lack of responsiveness of the RANKL gene to vitamin D3


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Comparison among ST2 Cell Subpopulations of their Ability to Promote Osteoclastogenesis and RANKL mRNA Expression

A, Osteoclastogenesis of ST2 cells (passages 8–17) in the coculture with mouse bone marrow macrophages for 7 d. In the presence of 10 nM vitamin D3 (Vit D3), ST2 cells of passages 8–13 generated a large number of osteoclasts, but those after passage 14 did not. Results are expressed as the means ± SD of four culture wells. B, By quantitative RT-PCR, in the presence of 10 nM vitamin D3, RANKL mRNA increased significantly in P9, but not in P16. On the other hand, OPG transcripts detected in both P9 and P16 ST2 cells were almost equally suppressed by vitamin D3. Results are expressed as the means ± SD of the relative mRNA amount standardized by GAPDH from four cultures.

 
Comparison of P9 and P16 ST2 Cells for Expression of Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) and Its DNA Binding
Western blotting showed that VDR protein was expressed equally in both P9 and P16 ST2 cells (Fig. 2AGo). Because mainly VDR-retinoid X receptor (RXR) ß heterodimer binds to vitamin D-responsive element (VDRE) (–937/–922) of the mouse RANKL gene promoter (22), the binding of VDR-RXRß and the oligonucleotide spanning VDRE in P9 and P16 ST2 cells was assessed by EMSA. In both P9 and P16, protein DNA binding, supershift by anti-VDR antibody and blockshift by anti-RXRß antibody were also equally demonstrated (Fig. 2BGo).


Figure 2
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Comparison between P9 and P16 ST2 Cells of their Ability to Conduct Vitamin D3 Signaling

A, The expression of VDR protein was assessed by Western blotting. P9 and P16 cells were treated with 10 nM vitamin D3 (VitD3) or the vehicle for 48 h, and subjected to protein extraction, electrophoresis and blotting with an anti-VDR antibody or, after stripping the antibody, reblotting with an anti-ß-actin antibody. Both P9 and P16 ST2 cells expressed almost equal amounts of VDR protein (arrow). B, A double-stranded oligonucleotide (–942/–917) spanning VDRE was 32P-labeled and subjected to the binding reaction with nuclear extract from P9 and P16 ST2 cells with or without 10 nM vitamin D3. Antibodies against VDR and RXRß were added for the supershift reaction. The VDRE/nuclear protein complex (arrowheads) and the supershift bands with an anti-VDR antibody (arrows) and the blockshift with an anti-RXRß antibody were detected in both P9 and P16 ST2 cells in the presence of vitamin D3. C, P9 and P16 ST2 cells were transiently transfected with RANKL gene promoter luciferase reporter constructs (pGL3-1005 or –723; upper) together with phRG-TK, then treated with 10 nM vitamin D3 or the vehicle for 24 h before luciferase assay. Results are expressed as the means ± SD of the relative luciferase activity standardized by phRG-TK promoter activity obtained from four independent cultures.

 
Transient Transfection Studies
We have previously characterized mouse RANKL gene promoter and generated promoter and luciferase reporter constructs, pGL3-1005 and pGL3–723 (15, 22) (Fig. 2CGo). The transiently introduced transcriptional activity of promoter constructs was assessed in P9 and P16 ST2 cells with or without vitamin D3 treatment. Each of the promoter constructs showed almost the same level of activity at the steady state. The pGL3-1005 construct containing VDRE demonstrated increased luciferase activity in response to vitamin D3, but pGL3–723 lacking VDRE did not. Thus, in vitro, the exogenously transfected RANKL gene promoter constructs showed similar transcriptional activity in both P9 and P16.

Methylation Status of CpG Loci and Chromatin Acetylation of the Mouse RANKL Gene Promoter in P9 and P16 ST2 Cells
Because quantitative or functional deterioration of VDR was not observed in P16 ST2 cells, the cis-regulating mechanism of the endogenous RANKL gene promoter was examined. In the 5'-flanking region of the mouse RANKL gene, clusters of CpG loci were identified in region A (9 CpG loci downstream of VDRE) and in region B (39 CpG loci around the transcription and the translation start sites). Bisulfite mapping using genomic DNA extracted from P9 and P16 ST2 cells showed that the CpG loci in region A were totally methylated in both P9 and P16 (Fig. 3AGo); the CpG loci in region B were rarely methylated in P9, whereas CpG, especially cytosines no. 1 (three bases upstream of the TATA-box) and nos. 3–7 (around the transcription start site), nos. 17–21 (around the translation start site) and nos. 28–37 were frequently methylated in P16 (Fig. 3BGo). Regardless of the total methylation of the CpG loci located in region A, H4 histone acetylation in response to vitamin D3 was observed in P9, suggesting that CpG methylation in region A does not interfere with vitamin D3-induced chromatin relaxing in either –950/–680 (Fig. 3CGo) or –250/+10 (Fig. 3DGo). CpG methylation in region B that accumulated in P16 ST2 cells, on the other hand, affected vitamin D3-induced histone acetylation in both –950/–680 and –250/+10.


Figure 3
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Methylation Status of CpG Loci and Chromatin Acetylation of the Mouse RANKL Gene Promoter in P9 and P16 ST2 Cells

A and B, Genomic DNA extracted from P9 and P16 ST2 cells was subjected to sodium bisulfite modification, PCR amplification using the sets of primers covering CpG loci A (–920/–721) and B (–66/+357) and cloning. Twelve clones derived from each sample were sequenced. The black slices of pie charts represent the ratio of methylated clones of the 12 clones examined. Nine CpG loci were 100% methylated in both P9 and P16 ST2 cells (A). Bisulfite mapping showed a higher rate of methylation in cytosines 1, 3, 4–8, 10, 16–22, 24, 26, 28, 29, 31, 35, and 37 in P16 than in P9 ST2 cells (B). C and D, ChIP assay of the acetylation of histones H3 and H4 on the mouse RANKL gene promoter. P9 and P16 ST2 cells with or without 10 nM vitamin D3 (VitD3) treatment were subjected to immunoprecipitation. Input and immunoprecipitated DNA with either antiacetylated histone H3 or H4 antibodies were assessed by PCR using the sets of primers designated to amplify regions –950/–680 (C) containing VDRE and –250/+10 (D) containing the transcription start site. In both areas, H4 histone acetylation in the presence of vitamin D3 was clearly detected in P9, but not in P16.

 
In Vitro Methylation of the Mouse RANKL Gene Promoter Construct
The effect of CpG methylation of the RANKL gene promoter on its transcriptional activity was assessed by transfection studies with or without SssI methylase treatment. The SssI-treated construct showed a 5.8-kb protected band after HpaII digestion (arrow, Fig. 4AGo). When transfected into ST2 cells, the promoter activity of the methylated construct decreased to less than 30% of the original construct at the steady state and failed to increase promoter activity in response to vitamin D3 in both P9 and P16 (Fig. 4BGo), suggesting that methylation of the RANKL gene promoter suppresses its transcriptional activity and responsiveness to vitamin D3.


Figure 4
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effect of SssI Methylase on Transcriptional Activity of the RANKL Gene Promoter

A, The promoter construct pGL3-1005 with or without treatment with SssI methylase was digested with methylation-sensitive HpaII and subjected to electrophoresis. In vitro methylation by SssI was confirmed by the presence of a 5.8-kb protected band (arrow). B, The promoter construct with or without SssI methylase treatment was transfected into P9 and P16 cells and treated with vitamin D3 (VitD3) or the vehicle for 24 h, then subjected to luciferase assay. Luciferase activity of the methylated construct decreased to 30% of that of the original construct and failed to respond to vitamin D3 in both P9 and P16.

 
Effect of 5-aza-dC on RANKL Expression and Osteoclastogenesis in the Coculture
As assessed by quantitative RT-PCR, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) increased RANKL mRNA expression in both P9 and P16 at the steady state; 5-aza-dC-treated P16 cells increased RANKL mRNA expression in response to vitamin D3 (Fig. 5AGo), suggesting that demethylation increases transcription and vitamin D3 responsiveness of the RANKL gene. Western blotting showed that, 5-aza-dC restored RANKL protein expression in P16 ST2 cells in the presence of vitamin D3 (Fig. 5BGo). As assessed by immunohistochemistry, 5-aza-dC-treated P16 cells showed focal expression of RANKL protein in response to vitamin D3 (Fig. 5CGo). To examine whether demethylation restored osteoclastogenesis as well as RANKL expression in P16 ST2 cells, 5-aza-dC-treated ST2 cells were cocultured with bone marrow macrophages with or without vitamin D3. P16 ST2 cells treated with 5-aza-dC supported a significant number of osteoclasts in response to vitamin D3 in the coculture, although the increase in the number of osteoclasts was less than that in P9 ST2 cells (Fig. 5DGo).


Figure 5
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Effect of 5-aza-dC on RANKL Expression and Osteoclastogenesis in Response to Vitamin D3

A, ST2 cells were seeded (104/cm2) for 24 h then treated with a combination of 2 nM 5-aza-dC and vitamin D3 (VitD3) for 3 d. The effect of 5-aza-dC on RANKL mRNA expression was assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. Results are expressed as the means ± SD of the relative mRNA amount standardized by GAPDH from four independent cultures. B, Effect of 5-aza-dC on RANKL protein expression assessed by Western blotting. C, Effect of 5-aza-dC on RANKL protein expression in P16 cells assessed by immunohistochemistry. 5-aza-dC restored heterogeneous RANKL expression in P16 cells in the presence of vitamin D3. D, The effect of 5-aza-dC on osteoclastogenesis was assessed by coculturing P9 or P16 ST2 cells with mouse bone marrow macrophages. In P16 cells, 5-aza-dC treatment significantly restored osteoclastogenesis in the presence of vitamin D3. Results are expressed as the means ± SD of four culture wells.

 
Status of CpG Methylation of the Mouse RANKL Gene Promoter in Vivo
The methylation status at the CpG island (–100/+350) of the mouse RANKL gene was assessed in mouse visceral organs and bone. When probed with a 580-bp DNA fragment downstream of the transcription start site, methylation-protected bands were detected broadly among the organs and bone tissue (Fig. 6AGo). Bisulfite mapping of osteoblastic cells, however, revealed that the CpG loci at –100/+350 except CpG no. 9 were almost nonmethylated in both 8-wk- and 12-month-old mice (Fig. 6BGo). On the other hand, organs such as the heart, lung, liver, small and large intestine, cerebellum and testis had a high rate of methylation at CpG locus no. 1 (Fig. 6Go, C and D), and CpG loci nos. 10–39 showed less than 10% methylation (data not shown).


Figure 6
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Status of CpG Methylation in Mouse Genomic DNA

A, Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA extracted from 8-wk-old male BALB/c mice. Each DNA was subjected to restriction endonuclease digestion by either methylation-resistant MspI or methylation-sensitive HpaII. When probed with a 580-bp DNA fragment downstream of the transcription start site of the mouse RANKL gene, methylation-protected (arrows) and -unprotected bands (arrowheads) were observed. B, Bisulfite mapping of CpG loci of –100/+350 of the RANKL gene promoter in genomic DNA of osteoblastic cells isolated from 8-wk- and 12-month-old male BALB/c mice. Black slices of pie charts represent the ratio of methylated clones of the 12 clones examined. In both 8-wk- and 12-month-old mice, osteoblastic cells showed hypomethylation in region –100/+350 of the RANKL gene. C, Bisulfite mapping of CpG loci –100/+120, nos. 1 to 10, of the RANKL gene promoter in the heart, lung, liver, small and large intestine, cerebellum and testis of 8-wk-old male BALB/c mice. The black slices of pie charts represent the ratio of methylated clones out of 12 clones examined. D, Representative DNA sequences from osteoblasts and the liver of 8-wk-old mouse (left) and RANKL expression assessed by in situ hybridization (right). RANKL was strongly expressed in osteoblasts (arrowheads in upper right panel) but not in osteocytes (small arrowheads) of the bone. Hepatocytes of the liver were negative (lower lane). Methylated cytosine of the CpG located three nucleotides upstream of the inverted TATA-box was detected in the liver (arrow), but not in osteoblasts. Note that all cytosine except methylated cytosine have been converted to uracil, namely thymidine, by sequencing.

 
Effects of Methylation at the CpG Locus Adjacent to TATA-Box on MeCP2 Binding and Chromatin Inactivation
P9 and P16 ST2 cells were subjected to chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay using either an anti MeCP2 or an anti-TBP (TATA-box binding protein) antibody to amplify region –96/+12 containing the inverted TATA-box of the mouse RANKL gene promoter. P16 ST2 cells, but not P9, had a high rate of methylation at CpG locus no. 1 located three bases upstream of the TATA-box (Fig. 3BGo). A reactive PCR product reflecting endogenous MeCP2 binding within –96/+12 was observed in nuclear precipitate from methylation-prone P16 cells. Conversely, a PCR product reflecting TBP binding was found only in P9 and those reflecting H4 and H3 histone acetylation were detected predominantly in P9 (Fig. 7AGo). The effect of introducing single-CpG methylation adjacent to the TATA-box on the TATA binding protein and MeCP2 was further analyzed by EMSA. A distinct difference between methylated and unmethylated probes was observed. The unmethylated oligonucleotide containing an inverted TATA-box (–42/–13) showed a clear protein DNA binding complex (arrow in Fig. 7BGo, lane 2). The specificity of the DNA-TBP binding was verified by the supershift with an anti-TBP antibody (lane 3) and by the competition assay with an excess amount of the unlabeled oligonucleotide containing a consensus TATA-box sequence (lanes 5 and 6). The oligonucleotide with a methyl-cytosine introduced at CpG locus no. 1 showed a strong protein DNA binding complex at higher position (arrowhead in Fig. 7BGo, lane 8), which was selectively and completely blockshifted by an anti-MeCP2 antibody (lane 10). The methylated probe also showed a protein DNA binding complex at the same position as of the unmethylated probe, which was washed out by the unlabeled consensus TATA oligonucleotide (lanes 11 and 12), and conversely, which increased by the addition of an anti-MeCP2 antibody (lane 10).


Figure 7
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Effects of CpG Methylation on Binding with MeCP2 and TBP

A, ChIP assay of MeCP2 and TBP on the mouse RANKL gene promoter. P9 and P16 ST2 cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation. Input and immunoprecipitated DNA with either anti-acetylated histone H3, H4, anti-MeCP2 or anti-TBP antibodies were assessed by PCR using the sets of primers designated to amplify region –96/+12 containing an inverted TATA-box. A reactive PCR product reflecting endogenous MeCP2 binding within –96/+12 was found only in P16. Conversely, a PCR product reflecting TBP binding was found only in P9 and those reflecting H4 and H3 histone acetylation were detected predominantly in P9. B, Double-stranded oligonucleotides spanning the TATA-box (–42/–13), an unmethylated one and a single-CpG methylated 5'-GCTCTCTCCA[5Me-dC]GAGGTTTATAAGAGTTAGG-3', were 32P-labeled and subjected to the binding reaction with nuclear protein extracts from ST2 cells. The unmethylated oligonucleotides containing an inverted TATA-box (–42/–13), not in the non-TATA oligonucleotide (lane 1), showed a clear protein DNA binding complex (arrow in lane 2) which was supershifted with an anti-TBP antibody (lane 3) and washed out with a 10- to 100-fold excess amount of the oligonucleotide containing the consensus TATA-box sequence (lanes 5 and 6), not with that containing the non-TATA sequence (lane 7). A single-CpG methylated probe at CpG locus no. 1 showed a strong protein DNA binding complex at a high position (arrowhead in lane 8), which was selectively and completely blockshifted by the addition of anti-MeCP2 antibody (white arrowhead in lane 10). A single-CpG methylated probe also showed weak binding at the same position as of the unmethylated probe (arrow in lane 8), which was washed out with a 10- to 100-fold excess amount of the oligonucleotide containing the consensus TATA-box sequence (lanes 11 and 12).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Osteoclastogenesis is mediated by a membrane-bound ligand cytokine, RANKL (7, 8), expressed on stromal/osteoblastic cells, and most of the bone-seeking steroid hormones and cytokines are known to modulate osteoclastogenesis by regulating RANKL gene expression through VDR, cAMP protein kinase A, and IL-6/IL-11-glycoprotein 130 pathways (3, 6). While examining vitamin D3-inducible RANKL expression and osteoclastogenesis, we found a passage number-dependent decrease in osteoclastogenesis and RANKL gene expression in ST2 cells (Fig. 1Go). Both VDR expression and its in vitro DNA binding capacity were of almost the same level in P9 and P16 ST2 cells (Fig. 2Go, A and B). Furthermore, the transient transfection study showed that the external RANKL gene promoter containing VDRE had almost the same level of activity in P9 and P16 ST2 cells. These data suggested that the passage number-dependent lack of responsiveness of the RANKL gene to vitamin D3 was due not to the deterioration of VDR expression and its binding capacity to VDRE, but probably to the epigenetic alteration of the RANKL gene. Consequently, we focused on the CpG methylation status of the intrinsic RANKL gene promoter in P9 and P16 ST2 cells.

By sodium bisulfite mapping (Fig. 3BGo), P16 exhibited accumulation of methylation at the CpG loci in –10/+350 of the RANKL gene promoter, especially around no. 1 (three bases upstream of TATA-box), nos. 3–7 (downstream of the transcription start site) and nos. 17–21 (around ATG codon). A CpG at no. 1 located three nucleotides upstream of the TATA-box was highly methylated in P16 ST2 cells that did not express RANKL. In light of a recent observation that DNA-enriched fragments containing A/T-rich bases (more than four continuous A/T sequences) adjacent to methyl-CpG are required for MeCP2, a most abundant methyl-binding domain protein, to selectively bind to the target DNA (23), we noticed that methylation at the CpG locus no. 1 located just 3 nucleotides upstream of the inverted TATA-box (CGaggTTTATAA) was a typical MeCP2 target region and could, therefore, be a critical site for silencing the RANKL gene. In agreement with this hypothesis, both ChIP assay and EMSA showed that CpG locus no. 1 was a target of MeCP2 binding and that the recruitment of MeCP2 at the TATA-box interferes with the binding of the TBP to the TATA-box (Fig. 7AGo). Moreover, the methylated oligonucleotide (–42/–13) showed a TBP binding at the TATA-box sequence, which was increased by blocking the DNA-MeCP2 binding by the addition of an interfering anti-MeCP2 antibody (Fig. 7BGo, lane 10). From these ChIP and gel shift assay studies, we speculated that the TATA-box of the mouse RANKL gene promoter cannot be co-occupied by TBP and MeCP2 and that the occupancy of the TATA-box by MeCP2 may shut down RANKL gene transcription. This hypothesis would explain the sudden decrease in osteoclastogenesis and RANKL gene expression starting at P12 and P13 ST2 cells (Fig. 1AGo). In fact, in drug-resistant human breast cancer cells, CpG methylation close to the TATA-box is also associated with the silencing of the WTH3 gene (24). Besides such site-specific methylation critical for TBP binding, generalized accumulation of methylation at a CpG island in the mouse RANKL gene promoter may result in the recruitment of histone deacetylase (25) and chromatin condensation leading to the stable epigenetic silencing of the RANKL gene. Indeed, mirroring the accumulation of methylation in P16, acetylation of histone H4 was not observed in P16 even after vitamin D3 treatment (Fig. 3Go, C and D). The in vitro observation that SssI-methylated RANKL gene promoter showed reduced transcriptional activity and poor response to vitamin D3 (Fig. 4BGo) and that DNA methylase inhibitor, 5-aza-dC, treatment partially restored RANKL mRNA (Fig. 5AGo), protein expression (Fig. 5Go, B and C) and osteoclastogenesis in methylation-prone P16 ST2 cells (Fig. 5DGo) also supported our hypothesis. Because the effects of vitamin D3 on gene transcription are mediated through the recruitment of coregulators containing histone acetylase activity, the converse (26), DNA methylation is interpreted by a family of methyl-CpG binding domain proteins that repress transcription through the recruitment of corepressors with histone deacetylase activity (27); thus, the inducible effect of vitamin D3 may partly be counteracted by CpG methylation at the histone modification level.

Next, to address the issue of whether or not methylation of the RANKL gene promoter is related to the tissue-specific expression of the gene, we analyzed the in vivo status of CpG methylation by Southern blotting and bisulfite mapping. In all genomic DNA from mouse tissues examined, methylation-protected bands were observed even in whole bone tissue (Fig. 6AGo). By sodium bisulfite mapping, stromal/ osteoblastic cells isolated from 8-wk- and 12-month-old mice (both of which support osteoclastogenesis and express RANKL in the presence of vitamin D3; data not shown) showed no methylation at CpG locus no. 1 of the RANKL gene promoter (Fig. 6BGo), whereas other organs without RANKL expression presented a high rate of methylation at CpG locus no. 1 (Fig. 6Go, C and D). In view of the fact that RANKL expression is limited among stromal/ osteoblastic cells and a small subset of T-lymphocytes (9, 28), we speculate that methylation of the RANKL gene promoter region is associated with the tissue-specific expression of the gene. Alterations of the methylation status, on the other hand, have been implicated as a consequence of aging. Whereas age-related global hypomethylation probably attributable to decreased methyltransferase activity has been reported in genes lacking a CpG island (29), accumulation or increased methylation in CpG islands of certain genes is observed in an age-dependent manner (the so-called type A methylation) (30). In comparing primary cultured stromal/osteoblastic cells isolated from 8-wk- and 12-month-old mice, no difference of methylation in the RANKL gene promoter was noted (Fig. 6BGo). We speculate that methylation of RANKL gene promoter does not belong to type A methylation but is related to differentiation and tissue-specific RANKL gene expression.

In conclusion, our data suggest that CpG methylation of the RANKL gene promoter reversibly suppresses RANKL gene activation by vitamin D, and that this epigenetic mechanism is one of the factors defining the heterogeneity and diversity of stromal/ osteoblastic cells in response to bone-resorbing stimuli as well as to the tissue-specific expression of the RANKL gene.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture and Osteoclast-Like Cell Formation
Mouse bone marrow stromal cell line ST2 (31) (Riken, Tsukuba, Japan) was cultured and maintained in {alpha}MEM (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma). ST2 cells were passed every 7 d and, after being treated with 0.25% trypsin/ EDTA (Sigma), were subcultured at a dilution of 1:10 (104/cm2). The cells cultured in phenol red-free {alpha}MEM supplemented with 2% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum were treated with 10 nM of 1{alpha},25(OH)2 vitamin D3 (vitamin D3) for 12–24 h and subjected to quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting. ST2 cells were seeded at a density of 5 x 105 cells/ 60 mm-diameter dish for 24 h then treated with 1 µM of 5-aza-dC (Sigma). After 48 h, the cells were subjected to quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting. Mouse bone marrow mononuclear cells (2 x 105/cm2), prepared as previously described (5), were cocultured with ST2 cells (2 x 104/cm2) sequentially from passage 8 (P8) or passage 17 (P17) for 7 d in the presence of 10 nM vitamin D3 in multiwell plates (Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ); at the end of the culture, the cells were stained for TRACP with a commercial kit (Sigma), and the number of osteoclast-like TRACP-positive multinuclear (>3) cells was counted. The coculture experiment was repeated three times and the representative results are expressed as the means ± SD of the number of osteoclast-like cells obtained from four culture wells.

Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from ST2 cells treated with or without 10 nM of vitamin D3 and/or 1 µM of 5-aza-dC by standard methods using an RNeasy Protect Mini kit (Qiagen KK, Tokyo, Japan). To assess the amount of mRNA of RANKL, OPG and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 1 µg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed to produce cDNA, which was then amplified and quantified by the ABI PRISM 7300 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using sets of primers and probes (assay ID of RANKL: OPG: Mm00441908, Mm00435452 and Taq Man Rodent GAPDH no. 4308313). The amount of RANKL and OPG mRNA was quantified relative to that of GAPDH in each reaction according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Applied Biosystems).

Western Blotting
P9 and P16 ST2 cells with or without 10 nM vitamin D3 and/or 1 nM of 5-aza-dC treatment were lysed with 1.0 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 50 µm/ ml aprotinin]. After sonication for 1 min, the lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant, equalized by protein concentrations, was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to the nylon membrane, Hybond-P (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) and immunoblotted with polyclonal antibodies against ß-actin (BT-560; Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA), RANKL (sc-7627) and VDR (sc-1008; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Immunocomplexes were visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting system (Amersham) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunohistochemistry
P9 and P16 ST2 cells (105/cm2) were seeded onto Lab-Tek Chamber Slides (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY) before treatment with a combination of 2 nM of 5-aza-dC and/or 10 nM vitamin D3 for 48 h. After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde and blocking endogenous peroxidase with 3% H2O2, the cells were incubated with an anti-RANKL polyclonal antibody (sc-7627; Santa Cruz) at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml for 1 h at a room temperature. Nonimmunized goat serum was used for preparing negative controls. A rabbit antigoat Ig as the second antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) and a DAKO LSAB kit (Dako) of the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method were used. Final development was carried out with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine containing 0.03% H2O2.

In Situ Hybridization
Tibiae and visceral organs such as the heart, lung, liver, small and large intestine, cerebellum, and testis were excised from 8-wk-old mice, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, decalcified with 20% EDTA in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer, and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections 5 µm thick were used for hematoxylin and eosin staining and in situ hybridization. The cDNA fragments from the coding region of mouse RANKL (RANKL-1: 364–613 and RANKL-2: 1096–1422) were amplified and used as templates for the digoxigenin (DIG)-labeling procedure in the presence of DIG-deoxyuridine triphosphate (DIG DNA labeling mixture; Roche, Basel, Switzerland). DIG-labeled single-stranded antisense DNA probes for mouse RANKL were generated with antisense primer-primed unidirectional PCR, as previously described (12). For negative controls, DIG-labeled sense probes were generated with sense primer-primed unidirectional PCR. The mouse tissue sections were pretreated and incubated with the hybridization medium containing 1 µg/ml of antisense DNA probes (RANKL-1 and -2) at 50 C for 12 h, as previously described (12). After hybridization, the slides were incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (Roche) and subjected to the colorimetric reaction with a solution of nitroblue tetrazolium salt and bromo-4-chloro-3-indol phosphatase (Roche).

Mouse RANKL Gene Promoter Construct and Transient Transfection Study
The 5'-flanking region of the mouse RANKL gene was cloned, and nested deletion mutants were subcloned into the pGL3-Basic vector, as –1005-luc and –723-luc by PCR as previously described (15, 22); –1005-luc with AGGTCAGCCTGGTTCA (VDRE: –937/–922), and –723-luc lacking VDRE. Each of the plasmid constructs and the pRL-TK vector (Promega, Madison, WI) were cotransfected into the ST2 cells by the liposome-mediated technique, Lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Transfected ST2 cells cultured in phenol red-free {alpha}MEM supplemented with 2% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum were treated with 10 nM vitamin D3 or the vehicle (0.1% ethanol) 24 h before harvesting, then luciferase activity of firefly and Renilla from cell lysates was determined with a luminometer (ATP-3010; Advantec, Tokyo, Japan). The transfection study was repeated three times; the representative data are expressed as the means ± SD of relative luciferase activity standardized by thymidine kinase (TK) promoter activity obtained from four culture wells.

SssI Methylase Treatment
Promoter construct pGL3-1005 was treated with SssI methylase (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA) in the presence of S-adenomethionine. Part of the DNA purified by ethanol precipitation was digested with HpaII and electrophoresed to monitor the SssI treatment. Methylated pGL3-1005 was transfected into P9 and P16 cells, treated with vitamin D3 or vehicle for 24 h and then subjected to luciferase assay, as described above.

EMSA
Nuclear protein extracts were prepared from P9 and P16 ST2 cells cultured with or without 10 nM vitamin D3, as previously described (22, 32). For EMSA, the double-stranded oligonucleotide spanning VDRE of the mouse RANKL gene promoter (–942/–917), 5'-GTTTGAGGTCAGCCTGGTTCATATAG-3', was 5'-end labeled with {gamma}32P-ATP (3000 Ci/ mmol) by T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega). The binding reaction was carried out by preincubating the labeled nucleotide with nuclear extract protein (5 µg) in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 50 mM of NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.1 mM of dithiothreitol, and 1 µg poly (deoxyinosine-deoxycytosine) at room temperature for 15 min. Antibodies against VDR, sc-1008, and RXRß, sc-831, (Santa Cruz) were added to the binding reaction for 45 min at 4 C. Samples were electrophoresed on a 5% polyacrylamide gel at room temperature for 3 h at 100 V, and then the gel was dried and analyzed with image analyzer BAS-EWS 4075 (FUJIX, Tokyo, Japan). Nuclear protein extracts from ST2 cells were subjected to the binding assay using the double-stranded oligonucleotide spanning the inverted TATA-box (–42/–13) with one or without methylated-CpG dinucleotide (Operon Biotechnologies, Huntsville, AL), 5'-GCTCTCTCCACGAGGTTTATAAGAGTTAGG-3' (–42/–13), or 5'-GCTCTCTCCA[5Me-dC]GAGGTTTATAAGAGTTAGG-3'. An anti-TBP antibody (ab818; Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and an anti-MeCP2 antibody (ab2828) were used for the binding reaction. Unlabeled oligonucleotide containing the consensus TATA-box, 5'-GGGCACAGCCCAGAGGGTATAAAACAGTGCTGGA-3' (adapted from the human osteocalcin gene promoter) and that containing the non-TATA sequence (shuffled sequence of the consensus TATA-box), 5'-GGGCAGACACGCACAGTGATGAGATAGCACTGGA-3', were used for the competition assay.

ChIP Assay
According to the instructions of the Acetyl-Histone H3/ H4 Immunoprecipitation Assay Kit (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), soluble chromatin was prepared from 1 x 106 ST2 cells fixed with formaldehyde, precipitated with salmon sperm DNA/ protein A agarose-50% slurry, then 2 ml of the supernatant solution was incubated with an antiacetyl-Histone H3 or H4 antibody overnight at 4 C with rotation. The immunoprecipitate was collected after treatment with salmon sperm DNA/ protein A agarose slurry for 1 h at 4 C with rotation, and then washed. From the eluted immunoprecipitate, DNA was recovered by phenol/ chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, and resuspended with 1x Tris-EDTA buffer. PCR with the above DNA solution as a template was conducted with the following sets of primers covering regions 1 (–950/–680) and 2 (–250/+10):

5'-GTTTGAGGTCAGCCTGGTTCATATAG-3':RANKL-C1 (sense)

5'-AGCCTCACTGCTTAAGAAATCCTTATG-3':RANKL-C1 (antisense)

5'-GGACCCAACCCACAGCCTCCA-3':RANKL-C2 (sense)

5'-GAGATGGCAGGGTACCCCAGGCAG-3':RANKL-C2 (antisense)

The soluble chromatin was also incubated with an anti-MeCP2 antibody (ab2828) or an anti-TBP antibody (ab818). DNA was recovered from the eluted immunoprecipitate and subjected to PCR to amplify the 108-bp region (–96/+12) containing the inverted TATA-box with the following primers,

5'-AGATGTGGGAGTGAAAGAGGCAC-3' (sense)

5'-AGATGGCAGGGTACCCCAGGCAG-3' (antisense)

Southern Blotting
Genomic DNA was extracted from the heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, small and large intestine, cerebrum, cerebellum, thyroid, pancreas, testis, and femoral bone of 8-wk-old male BALB/c mice. In total, 10 µg of each DNA were digested for 24 h at 37 C with 3 µl of either MspI or HpaII, electrophoresed and transferred onto high bond n + nylon membranes (Amersham). A 580-bp DNA fragment downstream of the transcription start site of the mouse RANKL gene was used as a probe. The membrane was hybridized at 65 C for 12 h, washed twice in 2x SSPE containing 0.1% SDS, twice in 1x SSPE containing 0.1% SDS, at 65 C, and then analyzed with a BAS-2000 image analyzer (FUJIX).

Mapping of Methylation Site by Sodium Bisulfite Modification
Genomic DNA was extracted from P9 and P16 ST2 cells, the primary cultured bone-explanting cells from minced tibiae of either 8-wk- or 12-month-old male BALB/c mice and visceral organs such as the heart, lung, liver, small and large intestine, cerebellum and testis from 8-wk-old mice. The bisulfite reaction was carried out as previously described (33). A quantity of 1 µg of DNA in a volume of 50 µl of Tris-EDTA was denatured by NaOH (final concentration, 0.2 M) for 10 min at 37 C. Freshly prepared 30 µl of 10 mM hydroquinone and 520 µl of 3 M sodium bisulfite at pH 5 were added to the samples. Each sample was incubated under mineral oil at 50 C for 16 h. Modified DNA was purified with Wizard DNA purification resin according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol (Promega) and eluted into 50 µl of H2O. Modification was completed by NaOH (final concentration, 0.3 M) treatment for 5 min at room temperature, then by ethanol precipitation. DNA was resuspended in 20 µl of H2O and used immediately or stored at –20 C. Bisulfite-modified DNA (100 ng) was amplified with nested PCR using the following sets of converted primers covering the CpG loci (A, –920/–721), and (B, –66/+357),

5'-GAGGTTAGTTTGGTTTATATAGTAAGTTTTAG-3': A-sense

5'-CAAAACTAATATCAAAATTAAACCTCACTACT-3': A-antisense

5'-ATAGTAAGTTTTAGGTTAGTTTAGTTTAT-3': A-nested-sense

5'-CAACTAATAAAAACACTTACAACTTATCTTA-3': A-nested-antisense

5'-AAGGAGGGTAGATGTGGGAGTGAAAGAGGTATT-3': B-sense

5'-AATACAAAAACAAAACAATACAAACCACCT-3': B-antisense

5'-GAGGTTGATTGGTTTTGGAGGTTAGT-3': B-nested-sense

5'-CAATACTACAAACCACCTTTCCCAATC-3': B-nested-antisense

The PCR condition was as follows: 30 cycles of 94 C for 30 sec, 60 C for 30 sec, 72 C for 30 sec, and the final elongation step for 5 min at 72 C. The PCR mixture contained 1x buffer (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) with 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 20 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mM of deoxynucleotide triphosphates, and bisulfite-modified DNA (50 ng) in a final volume of 50 µl. Each PCR product was loaded onto a 3% agarose gel, and the purified DNA from the gel was cloned into the pCR 2.1 plasmid vector (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands). After transformation and culturing of the competent bacteria (INV{alpha}F’; Invitrogen) overnight on an LB/agar/ampicillin plate, colonies (at least 12) were randomly selected, and the recombinant plasmid was recovered for DNA sequencing with an M13F or M13R primer. The sequencing reactions for the cloned PCR products were carried out with a DNA sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and the reaction products were analyzed on a 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). In all molecules examined, all cytosine residues not preceding guanine residues were converted by bisulfite treatment. Bisulfite treatment, PCR, cloning and sequencing analysis of DNA were repeated independently.

Statistical Analysis
The significance of the data was analyzed by Student’s t test (two tailed).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Takeshi Kondo, Kiyoshi Mori, Shuichi Matsuda, and Noriko Sakamoto in our laboratory for their assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan (to S.K.) and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (to S.K., No. 16590278; and to R.K., No. 16590313), and for 21st Century COE Program, Center of Excellence for Signal Transduction Disease: Diabetes Mellitus as Model from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to S.K.).

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online September 28, 2006

Abbreviations: ChIP, Chromatin immunoprecipitation; DIG, digoxigenin; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; OPG, osteoprotegerin; P, passage; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B ligand; RXR, retinoid X receptor; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; TBP, TATA-box binding protein; TRACP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; VDR, vitamin D receptor; VDRE, vitamin D-responsive element.

Received for publication May 12, 2006. Accepted for publication September 20, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Teitelbaum SL 1993 Bone remodeling and the osteoclast. J Bone Miner Res 8(Suppl 2):S523–S525
  2. 2. Martin TJ, Sims NA 2005 Osteoclast-derived activity in the coupling of bone formation to resorption. Trends Mol Med 11:76–81[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP 2003 Genetic regulation of osteoclast development and function. Nat Rev Genet 4:638–649[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Lian JB, Stein GS 1992 Concepts of osteoblast growth and differentiation: basis for modulation of bone cell development and tissue formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 3:269–305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Takahashi N, Yamana H, Yoshiki S, Roodman GD, Mundy GR, Jones SJ, Boyde A, Suda T 1988 Osteoclast-like cell formation and its regulation by osteotropic hormones in mouse bone marrow cultures. Endocrinology 122:1373–1382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT, Martin TJ 1999 Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families. Endocr Rev 20:345–357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, Yamaguchi K, Kinosaki M, Mochizuki S, Tomoyasu A, Yano K, Goto M, Murakami A, Tsuda E, Morinaga T, Higashio K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Suda T 1998 Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3597–3602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senaldi G, Guo J, Delaney J, Boyle WJ 1998 Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93:165–176[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Anderson DM, Maraskovsky E, Billingsley WL, Dougall WC, Tometsko ME, Roux ER, Teepe MC, DuBose RF, Cosman D, Galibert LA 1997 homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function. Nature 390:175–179[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Nakagawa N, Kinosaki M, Yamaguchi K, Shima N, Yasuda H, Yano K, Morinaga T, Higashio K 1998 RANK is the essential signaling receptor for osteoclast differentiation factor in osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 253:395–400[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kartsogiannis V, Zhou H, Horwood NJ, Thomas RJ, Hards DK, Quinn JM, Niforas P, Ng KW, Martin TJ, Gillespie MT 1999 Localization of RANKL (receptor activator of NF-{kappa}B ligand) mRNA and protein in skeletal and extraskeletal tissues. Bone 25:525–534[Medline]
  12. Kitazawa S, Kitazawa R 2002 RANK ligand is a prerequisite for cancer-associated osteolytic lesions. J Pathol 198:228–236[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Mori H, Kitazawa R, Mizuki S, Nose M, Maeda S, Kitazawa S 2002 RANK ligand, RANK, and OPG expression in type II collagen-induced arthritis mouse. Histochem Cell Biol 117:283–292[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Pogoda P, Priemel M, Rueger JM, Amling M 2005 Bone remodeling: new aspects of a key process that controls skeletal maintenance and repair. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S18–S24
  15. Kitazawa R, Kitazawa S, Maeda S 1999 Promoter structure of mouse RANKL/TRANCE/OPGL/ODF gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1445:134–141[Medline]
  16. Liu J, Yang H, Liu W, Cao X, Feng X 2005 Sp1 and Sp3 regulate the basal transcription of receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B ligand gene in osteoblasts and bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Biochem 96:716–727[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Elefteriou F, Ahn JD, Takeda S, Starbuck M, Yang X, Liu X, Kondo H, Richards WG, Bannon TW, Noda M, Clement K, Vaisse C, Karsenty G 2005 Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature 434:514–520[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Fu Q, Foote IP, Manolagas SC, O’Brien CA 2004 An evolutionarily conserved CREB-binding enhancer, in an unusually remote location 74 kb upstream from the initiation site, confers the stromal/osteoblast-specific control of RANKL transcription by PTH, 1,25(OH)2D3, and gp130 cytokines. J Bone Miner Res 19(Suppl 1):S28
  19. Song F, Smith JF, Kimura MT, Morrow AD, Matsuyama T, Nagase H, Held WA 2005 Association of tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (TDMs) with differential gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3336–3341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mori K, Kitazawa R, Kondo T, Maeda S, Yamaguchi A, Kitazawa S 2006 Modulation of mouse RANKL gene expression by Runx2 and PKA pathway. J Cell Biochem 93:1629–1644[CrossRef]
  21. Chan HW, Kurago ZB, Stewart CA, Wilson MJ, Martin MP, Mace BE, Carrington M, Trowsdale J, Lutz CT 2003 DNA methylation maintains allele-specific KIR gene expression in human natural killer cells. J Exp Med 197:245–255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kitazawa R, S Kitazawa S 2002 Vitamin D3 augments osteoclastogenesis via vitamin D-responsive element of mouse RANKL gene promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290:650–655[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Klose RJ, Sarraf SA, Schmiedeberg L, McDermott SM, Stancheva I, 2005 Bird AP DNA binding selectivity of MeCP2 due to a requirement for A/T sequences adjacent to methyl-CpG. Mol Cell 19:667–678[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Tian K, Jurukovski V, Wang XP, Kaplan MH, Xu H 2005 Epigenetic regulation of WTH3 in primary and cultured drug-resistant breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 65:10024–10031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Jones PL, Veenstra GJ, Wada PA, Vermaak L, Kass SU, Landsberger N, Strouboulis J, Wolffe AP 1998 Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet 19:187–191[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Aranda A, Pascual A 2001 Nuclear hormone receptors and gene expression. Physiol Rev 81:1269–1304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cameron EE, Bachman KE, Myohanen S, Herman JG, Baylin SB 1999 Synergy of demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in the re-expression of genes silenced in cancer. Nat Genet 21:103–107[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I, Tan HL, Timms E, Capparelli C, Morony S, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, Van G, Itie A, Khoo W, Wakeham A, Dunstan CR, Lacey DL, Mak TW, Boyle WJ, Penninger JM 1999 OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 397:315–323[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Zhang Z, Deng C, Lu Q, Richardson D 2002 Age-dependent DNA methylation changes in the ITGAL (CD11a) promoter. Mech Ageing Dev 123:1257–1268[Medline]
  30. Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Issa JP 1999 CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8681–8686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ogawa M, Nishikawa S, Ikuta K, Yamamura F, Naito M, Takahashi K, Nishikawa S 1998 B cell ontogeny in murine embryo studied by a culture system with the monolayer of a stromal cell clone, ST2: B cell progenitor develops first in the embryonal body rather than in the yolk sac. EMBO J 7:1337–1343
  32. Dyer RB, Herzog NK 1995 Isolation of intact nuclei for nuclear extract preparation from a fragile B-lymphocyte cell line. Biotechniques 19:192–195[Medline]
  33. Kitazawa S, Kitazawa R, Maeda S 1999 Transcriptional regulation of rat cyclin D1 gene by CpG methylation status in promoter region. J Biol Chem 274:28787–28793[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DNA ResHome page
J. Gimenez, C. Montgiraud, G. Oriol, J.-P. Pichon, K. Ruel, V. Tsatsaris, P. Gerbaud, J.-L. Frendo, D. Evain-Brion, and F. Mallet
Comparative Methylation of ERVWE1/Syncytin-1 and Other Human Endogenous Retrovirus LTRs in Placenta Tissues
DNA Res, August 1, 2009; 16(4): 195 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Miyamoto, T. Tsukiyama, Y. Yang, N. Li, N. Minami, M. Yamada, and H. Imai
Cell-Free Extracts from Mammalian Oocytes Partially Induce Nuclear Reprogramming in Somatic Cells
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2009; 80(5): 935 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. L. Foley, J. M. Craig, R. Morley, C. J. Olsson, T. Dwyer, K. Smith, and R. Saffery
Prospects for Epigenetic Epidemiology
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2009; 169(4): 389 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints, Permissions and Rights
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kitazawa, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals