help button home button Endocrine Society Molecular Endocrinology ENDO 08 Sessions Library
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Molecular Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/me.2005-0355
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow NURSA Molecule Pages Link
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mellon, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brake, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mellon, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brake, P. B.
Molecular Endocrinology 21 (1): 89-105
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Translin Coactivates Steroidogenic Factor-1-Stimulated Transcription

Synthia H. Mellon, Susanna R. Bair, Christophe Depoix, Jean-Louis Vigne, Norman B. Hecht and Paul B. Brake

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences (S.H.M., S.R.B., C.D., J.-L.V., P.B.B.), The Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Center for Research on Reproduction and Women’s Health (N.B.H.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Synthia H. Mellon, Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0556, San Francisco, California 94143-0556. E-mail: mellon{at}cgl.ucsf.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Transcription of the rat P450c17 gene in Leydig cells requires steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) (NR5A1), nerve growth factor-inducible protein B (nurr77), COUP-TF, and SET. The –447/–419 region of this promoter contains two binding sites for orphan nuclear receptors that are required for activation by SF-1, nerve growth factor-inducible protein B, and cAMP. We identified a novel factor, steroidogenic factor-inducer of transcription-2, that binds to this –447/–419 region. We have now purified steroidogenic factor-inducer of transcription-2 from mouse Leydig MA-10 cells and identified it by mass spectrometry as translin, a 27-kDa protein that exerts many functions. By itself, translin cannot activate a P450c17-promoter/reporter construct in HeLa cells; however, translin increased SF-1-stimulated transcription 2-fold, indicating cooperativity between SF-1 and translin. Mutation of both SF-1 binding sites in the –447/–419 sequence eliminated activation by SF-1 and translin. Translin did not augment SF-1-stimulated transcription from all SF-1-responsive elements, suggesting that the activation is specific for the sequence of the SF-1 response element. Gel shift analysis of double- and single-stranded DNA showed that translin binds to single-stranded DNA, but its transcriptional activation is independent of DNA binding. The hinge region of SF-1 is necessary for activation by translin; deletion of hinge amino acids 170–225 in SF-1 eliminates translin’s ability to augment SF-1-dependent transcription. A translin-like protein, called translin-associated factor X, can substitute for a translin moiety; translin homomers and translin/translin-associated factor X heteromers activated SF-1-stimulated transcription equally. Thus, we have identified a new factor that works together with SF-1 to augment gene transcription in a DNA-specific fashion.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
THE ARRAY OF STEROIDS produced by a tissue depends on which steroidogenic enzymes are expressed in that tissue. One steroidogenic enzyme, P450c17, has two major activities, 17{alpha}-hydroxylase, producing 17-hydroxy C21 steroids and C17,20 lyase, producing C19 steroids. These two activities are regulated by posttranslational modification (1, 2) and by allosteric factors (3, 4); hence, steroid production is regulated both transcriptionally and posttranslationally (reviewed in Ref. 5). Hydroxylase and lyase activities are necessary for the development and maintenance of reproductive function (5), and appear to be important for production of neurosteroids that regulate neural differentiation and function (6) and for early embryonic development (7).

Transcriptional regulation of P450c17 is both species-specific and tissue-specific, and involves transcription factors that vary among mammalian species and among steroidogenic tissues (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). P450c17 is expressed in the gonads of all vertebrates, in the adrenals of primates (21) and ungulates (22), but not rodents (23, 24), and it is expressed in placenta of rodents (25, 26), but not primates (21). P450c17 expression is also regulated developmentally. The mammalian fetus expresses P450c17 in the testis but not the ovary (10, 21, 27), and it is required for male sexual differentiation (21, 28). It is also expressed transiently in the neonatal rat liver (29) in the developing rodent nervous system (30). In the mouse embryo, its expression appears to be essential for development beyond embryonic day 7 (7), although human beings lacking P450c17 activity develop to term.

P450c17 of all species is regulated by steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) in those steroidogenic tissues that express SF-1 (12, 13, 14, 18, 31, 32, 33, 34). Rat P450c17 transcription is also regulated by developmentally regulated factors (9, 10), by tissue-specific factors (11, 12), and by multiple orphan nuclear DNA-binding receptors (12, 13, 14).

We have identified and characterized several transcriptionally regulated regions in the rat P450c17 gene in detail (9, 12, 13, 14). We found that the region of the rat P450c17 gene at –447/–419 is regulated by SF-1 together with two novel factors we termed steroidogenic factor-inducer of transcription-1 and -2 (StF-IT-1 and StF-IT-2) (12, 35). We subsequently identified StF-IT-1 as a phosphoprotein called SET, which inhibits cell cycle (36, 37) and is an inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (2, 38) in addition to regulating transcription (9, 10). We have now identified StF-IT-2 as the protein known as testis brain RNA-binding protein (TB-RBP) (39, 40) also known as translin (41), and we now show that translin activates SF-1-mediated transcription in a DNA-specific manner.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Purification and Identification of StF-IT-2
We previously identified StF-IT-2 as a nuclear protein in mouse Leydig MA-10 cells by EMSAs using the –447/–419 segment of the rat P450c17 gene promoter (12, 35). To purify StF-IT-2, we used homogenates from MA-10 cells as an abundant source of protein. Initial steps at StF-IT-2 purification included using whole-cell vs. nuclear extracts, ammonium sulfate precipitation, sizing columns, reversed-phase columns, and heparin columns. In addition, various gradients of elution buffers were used on these columns, and on the fast protein liquid chromatography and HPLC columns that were ultimately used.

Our established protocol for purification of StF-IT-2 began with fast protein liquid chromatography of MA-10 whole-cell extracts; fractions containing StF-IT-2 were identified by EMSAs (gel shift assays), combined, and purified further by HPLC on a MonoQ column (Fig. 1Go). SDS-PAGE showed that the fractions containing StF-IT-2 DNA binding activity were enriched for a protein of approximately 25 kDa. The approximately 25,000 molecular mass protein from fraction 29, which contained the majority of the StF-IT-2 binding activity, was excised, digested with trypsin, purified by HPLC, and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) (Table 1Go). The sample contained three different proteins, each of which could be identified by three or more peptides. Two were proteins of approximately 25 kDa: translin (26.2 kDa) and 14-3-3{zeta} (27.7 kDa); the other was nexin 2 (58 kDa), which was not considered further, because its molecular mass did not match that identified by SDS-PAGE. The peptide masses identified by mass spectrometry encompassed 37% coverage of the sequence of translin and 24% coverage of the sequence of 14-3-3{zeta} but only 7% of nexin 2.


Figure 1
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Purification of StF-IT-2

A, Gel shift analysis of aliquots of fractions from the final Mono-Q HPLC column. StF-IT-2 is enriched in fractions 28–31. B, Silver-stained SDS polyacrylamide gel from aliquots of the final MonoQ HPLC column. A protein of approximately 25 kDa was enriched in fractions 28–31, where the majority of the StF-IT-2 binding activity was identified in A. The remainder of fraction 29 was purified on a preparative SDS polyacrylamide gel, stained with Coomassie blue, and the 25-kDa protein band was excised and analyzed by MS/MS, after trypsinization and HPLC purification. SM, Starting material.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. MS/MS Analysis of Purified StF-IT-2

 
Neither translin nor 14-3-3 proteins are known transcriptional activators; however, both are attractive candidates based upon their expression patterns and known cellular functions. Translin is a 228-amino acid, 27-kDa protein encoded by a single copy gene on human chromosome 2 (mouse chromosome 1) (41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46). It is expressed in most eukaryotes, including yeast, plants, insects, frogs, and mammals. Translin is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian tissues, with highest abundance in testis and brain (47, 48, 49). It was originally identified in human beings as a DNA-binding protein at breakpoint junctions of chromosomal translocations of lymphoid malignancies (44), and subsequently shown to accelerate cell proliferation when overexpressed in HEK cells (50). It also functions in mRNA transport and/or stabilization and in translational regulation (51, 52), and serves as a linker protein binding specific mRNAs to microtubules (49, 53). Translin was identified independently in mice and given the name TB-RBP (47, 48). Human and mouse translin/TB-RBP are 90% identical at nucleotide level and greater than 98% identical at amino acid level (three changes of 228 amino acids) (40). The DNA-binding function of translin is dependent upon formation of a multimeric structure, probably mediated through the leucine zipper in the carboxyl terminus (54).

The family of 14-3-3 proteins are approximately 30-kDa acidic proteins, so-named because of their purification profile (55, 56, 57). They are a highly conserved, ubiquitously expressed protein family composed of at least seven isoforms. They bind to phosphoserine and phosphothreonine (58) and hence can interact with a wide variety of proteins yielding many different functions (59, 60, 61, 62, 63). These functions include modulating enzymatic activity, modulating protein localization, preventing dephosphorylation, promoting protein stability, and inhibiting and mediating protein interactions.

Translin Antibodies Supershift StF-IT-2:DNA Complex
To determine whether translin or 14-3-3{zeta} were StF-IT-2, we performed gel shift assays using antibodies against each of these proteins (Fig. 2Go). Using the –447/–419 rP450c17 oligonucleotide as probe, MA-10 cell extracts produced two protein:DNA complexes. The more rapidly migrating complex was an SF-1:DNA complex, identified previously by antibody supershift assays (35) and competition assays (12), and the more slowly migrating complex was StF-IT-2:DNA. Addition of an antibody against mouse translin/TB-RBP caused a specific supershift of the St-F-IT-2:DNA complex obtained from MA-10 cell protein (Fig. 2Go, lane 4) and from fraction 28 of the MonoQ column (Fig. 2Go, lane 7). Addition of preimmune serum (Fig. 2Go, lane 5), or antibodies against either 14-3-3{zeta} or 14-3-3ß (Fig. 2Go, lanes 11 and 12) did not alter the migration of this complex. Immunodepletion of MA-10 extracts with the antibody against translin, but not with preimmune serum, decreased the intensity of the StF-IT-2:DNA complex (data not shown). Thus, the StF-IT-2:DNA complex contains translin and does not contain 14-3-3{zeta} or 14-3-3ß.


Figure 2
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Antibody Supershift of StF-IT-2;DNA Complexes with a Translin Antibody

Extracts from MA-10 cells (left panel, lanes 1–5; right panel, lanes 9–12) or fraction 28 (middle panel, lanes 6–8) from the StF-IT-2 purification (Fig. 1Go) were incubated with the –447/–419 oligonucleotide (lanes "Probe"). Two protein:DNA complexes, SF-1:DNA and StF-IT-2:DNA, are formed with MA-10 cell extracts (left panel, lane 2), indicated by arrows. A single complex corresponding to StF-IT-2:DNA formed with fraction 28 (middle panel, lane 6). The SF-1:DNA and StF-IT-2:DNA complexes are competed by 100-fold excess –447/–419 oligonucleotide (lane 3, +cold). Addition of an antibody against translin supershifts the StF-IT-2:DNA complex, and forms another complex, StF-IT-2' (lanes 4 and 7). Addition of preimmune serum (lanes 5 and 8) or addition of antibodies against 14-3-3{zeta} or 14-3-3ß (right panel, lanes 11 and 12) has no effect.

 
Translin Activates Transcription of the Rat P450c17 Gene
To determine whether translin could activate P450c17 gene transcription, we sought a cell line that contained little or no translin. Gel shift assays of cell extracts from various cell lines suggested that HeLa cells contained no StF-IT-2 binding activity, whereas MA-10 cells contained substantial StF-IT-2 binding activity (12). Hence, we determined whether translin could affect rat P450c17 gene transcription in HeLa cells. To assay the effect of translin on the relevant region of the rat P450c17 gene, we inserted the –447/–419 segment upstream from the minimal prolactin promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene (p36Luc) (64). In the absence of any other construct, this –447/–419-luciferase reporter construct had very low basal activity when transfected into HeLa cells (Fig. 3AGo, lane –447/–419). Cotransfection with a translin expression construct did not increase basal activity, whereas cotransfection with an SF-1-expression construct (65) increased luciferase activity 4-fold. However, when the –447/–419-luciferase reporter construct was transfected with both the SF-1 and the translin expression vectors, luciferase activity increased 10-fold. Thus, translin has no effect by itself, but increases SF-1-mediated transcription about 2- to 3-fold.


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Luciferase Activity in HeLa Cells

A, HeLa cells transfected with a wild-type –447/–419 p36Luc construct (447/–419, 1 µg DNA) alone, with a translin pCDNA expression vector (+translin), with an SF-1 pCDNA expression vector (+SF-1), or with both a translin and SF-1 expression vector (+Translin/SF-1) and assayed 48 h after transfection. B, HeLa cells transfected with mutant –447/–419 p36Luc reporter constructs. HeLa cells were transfected with wild-type, mutant 1 (Mut 1), mutant 2 (Mut 2), or mutant 1/2 (Mut1/2) p36Luc reporter constructs in the presence of nothing (basal), or expression vectors for translin, SF-1, or both SF-1 and translin, and assayed 48 h after transfection. Transfection efficiencies were controlled using the dual Renilla/firefly luciferase assay system. Data are shown as mean ± SE from three experiments.

 
Translin Stimulates SF-1 Activation through a Single Orphan Nuclear Receptor Binding Site
SF-1 activation of the –447/–419 region of the P450c17 gene is unusual, because it appears to require two orphan nuclear receptor binding sites and/or binding of StF-IT-2 (35). To explore the apparent interactions between SF-1 and translin, we first used a single functional SF-1 site. We individually mutated each SF-1 site in the –447/–419 luciferase reporter construct (Mut 1 and Mut 2) or both sites (Mut 1/2). SF-1 can bind to either of these sites, but the –447/–419 DNA segment has greatly reduced transcriptional activity when only a single SF-1 binding site is present (35). These luciferase reporter constructs were then cotransfected into HeLa cells along with expression vectors for translin, SF-1, or both (Fig. 3BGo). In comparison with the wild-type –447/–419 luciferase reporter construct that could be stimulated approximately 4-fold by SF-1, Mut 1 and Mut 2 had low basal activity that could be stimulated about 1.5- to 2-fold by SF-1 and Mut 1/2 could not be stimulated by SF-1 (Fig. 3BGo). Translin increased SF-1-mediated transcription from either the Mut 1 or Mut 2 constructs about 2-fold, similar to the stimulation that translin elicited from the wild-type construct. However, when Mut 1/2 was used as reporter, SF-1 could not stimulate transcription with or without translin. Thus, the action of translin requires only a single SF-1 site and SF-1 binding and stimulation are required for translin action. Hence, translin appears to act as an SF-1 coactivator, rather than as a transcription factor.

Translin Binds to Single-Stranded DNA
Translin can bind to single-stranded RNA (39, 47, 48, 49) and to single-stranded DNA sequences found at breakpoints of chromosomal translocations (41). To determine whether translin bound to the –447/–419 region of the rat P450c17 gene as single- and/or double-stranded DNA, we assessed the binding of translin prepared by an in vitro transcription/translation system to labeled sense and antisense oligonucleotides and to the annealed double-stranded –447/–419 oligonucleotide. Gel shift assays showed that translin could bind to the gel-purified, double-stranded oligonucleotide (Fig. 4AGo, DS Kinase), but the degree of binding was much greater with either single-stranded oligonucleotide probe (Fig. 4AGo; only single-stranded sense strand probe, SS-S, is shown). These data suggest that translin can bind to either double- or single-stranded DNA. However, these experiments were done with probes labeled with [{gamma}-32P]ATP and polynucleotide kinase, and such kinased probes may contain a small amount of single-stranded DNA. Therefore, we also synthesized a double-stranded probe that was labeled using [{alpha}-32P]dCTP and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase, which cannot label a single-stranded probe. Incubation of this probe with translin did not yield any protein:DNA complex (Fig. 4AGo, DS Klenow). By contrast, when the double-stranded, Klenow end-labeled probe was incubated with MA-10 extracts that contain SF-1 and translin, only SF-1 yielded its protein:DNA complex, indicating that SF-1 could bind to this double-stranded probe, as expected, whereas translin could not (Fig. 4BGo). These data suggest that translin only binds to single-stranded DNA.


Figure 4
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Translin Binds to Single-Stranded DNA

A, Gel shift assay of recombinant translin using double-stranded and single-stranded –447/–419 rP450c17 oligonucleotides as probes. Recombinant translin was incubated with double-stranded oligonucleotides that were end-labeled using [{gamma}-32P]dATP and kinase (lanes labeled "DS Kinase") or with double-stranded oligonucleotides that were end-labeled using [{alpha}-32P]dCTP and Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase (lanes labeled "DS Klenow"). Recombinant translin was also incubated with a single-stranded, sense strand of the –447/–419 oligonucleotide that was end-labeled using {gamma}-32P and kinase (lanes "SS-S"). Lanes "Pr" contain each specific probe and no recombinant translin; lanes marked 1 and 3 indicate the number of microliters of recombinant translin used in the binding assay. Arrowhead marked "Tr" indicates the translin:DNA complex. A translin:DNA complex is seen using a kinase-labeled double-stranded DNA probe or using a single-stranded DNA probe; no translin:DNA complex is seen when the double-stranded probe was end-labeled using Klenow DNA polymerase. B, Gel shift assay comparing DNA binding using extracts from MA-10 cells vs. DNA binding using recombinant translin. DS Kinase lanes contain double-stranded –447/–419 oligonucleotide probes end-labeled using [{gamma}-32P]dATP and kinase; DS Klenow lanes contain double-stranded –447/–419 oligonucleotide probes end-labeled using [{alpha}-32P]dCTP and Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase. Lanes "Pr" contain each specific probe alone, with no MA-10 extract or recombinant translin. The arrowhead marked "Tr" indicates the translin:DNA complex; the arrowhead marked "SF-1" indicates the SF-1:DNA complex, seen only with MA-10 extracts. No translin:DNA complex is seen using either MA-10 extracts or recombinant translin and the double-stranded oligonucleotide probe end-labeled using Klenow DNA polymerase. C and D, Competition gel shift assays, using recombinant translin and single-stranded –447/–419 sense strand as probe. Single-stranded competitor oligonucleotides, both sense and antisense strands, were used at 250-fold excess. Mut 1, Mut 2, and Mut 1/2 refer to the oligonucleotides in which one or both SF-1 sites within the –447/–419 oligonucleotide were mutated, shown in Table 2Go. Sequences of other rP450c17 oligonucleotides (–418/–399 and –84/–55) and of a P450c21 oligonucleotide that contains and SF-1 site (–95/–58) are shown in Table 2Go.

 
We determined whether translin bound to specific single-stranded DNA sequences. We used a single-stranded –447/–449 rP450c17 oligonucleotide as probe, and used recombinant translin in gel shift assays (Fig. 4CGo). Our data show that 250-fold excess of both the sense and antisense strands of –447/–419 oligonucleotide can compete with the labeled –447/–419 sense strand for translin binding.

Because this –447/–419 oligonucleotide contains SF-1 or estrogen response element half-site-like binding sites, we used additional oligonucleotides that contained previously identified SF-1 or similar binding elements as competitors. These oligonucleotides were the –418/–399 and –84/–55 regions of the rat P450c17 gene, as well as the –95/–58 region of the mouse P450c21 gene. Our gel shift data indicate that both the sense and antisense strands of each of these oligonucleotides could compete with the –447/–419 sense strand for translin binding (Fig. 4CGo).

As competitors for translin binding, we also used –447/–419 oligonucleotides in which the SF-1 sites were mutated (Fig. 4DGo). In the oligonucleotides, listed in Table 2Go, each SF-1 site was mutated independently (Mut 1, Mut 2), or together (Mut 1/2). Competition gel shifts demonstrate that, when of either of the SF-1 sites within the –447/–419 oligonucleotide were mutated, the resulting sense and antisense oligonucleotides were able to compete with wild-type –447/–419 sense oligonucleotide for translin binding. In addition, oligonucleotides that contained mutations of both SF-1 sites also competed for translin binding.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Oligonucleotides Used in these Studies

 
Translin also binds to DNA sequences unrelated to estrogen response element half-sites or SF-1 sites (66, 67). We also used some of these sequences, listed in Table 2Go and named Prm-2, GS-1, and Bcl-Cl1, to assess translin binding. We confirmed that translin binds to these single-stranded DNA sequences, as others had shown previously (data not shown). Thus, whereas other laboratories have described a consensus translin binding site that may resemble an SF-1 site (41, 68), other DNA sequences that do not resemble SF-1 sites are also bound by translin. Hence we did not identify specific single-stranded DNA sequences to which translin bound.

Translin’s Activity Does Not Require DNA Binding
To determine whether translin needed to bind to DNA to elicit its effects, we created a previously described variant of translin containing three mutations, R86T, H88N, and H90N; this form of translin cannot bind to nucleic acid (54). We expressed recombinant wild-type and mutant translin in bacteria, and used these proteins in gel shift assays to determine whether mutant translin could bind to the –447/–419 DNA. Gel shift assays confirmed that the mutant translin could not bind to DNA (Fig. 5AGo). To determine whether the lack of DNA binding affected translin’s ability to stimulate transcription, we subcloned the wild-type and mutant translins into a mammalian expression vector. We cotransfected HeLa cells with either of these translin-expression vectors together with the –447/–419 luciferase reporter and the SF-1 expression vector. Luciferase assays demonstrated that, whereas neither the wild-type nor mutant translin could stimulate P450c17 transcription alone, both the wild-type and mutant translins increased SF-1-stimulated transcription about 2- to 3-fold (Fig. 5BGo). Taken together, the data suggest that translin does not need to bind to DNA to increase SF-1-stimulated transcription.


Figure 5
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. DNA Binding and Transcriptional Activation by Mutant Translin

A, Gel shift assay. Recombinant mouse translin (wild type) or mutant translin (Mut) were incubated with a double-stranded, kinased 32P-labeled –447/–419 oligonucleotide probe (DS), or with a single-stranded sense (SS-S) or antisense (SS-AS) oligonucleotide probe. Wild-type translin, but not mutant translin, forms a protein:DNA complex with these probes. B, Luciferase activity in HeLa cells after transfection with luciferase reporter constructs (1 µg) –447/–419 p36Luc, and expression vectors containing wild-type translin, mutant translin, SF-1, or a combination of translin (wild type or mutant) plus SF-1. Transfected cells were assayed 48 h after transfection. Transfection efficiencies were controlled using the dual Renilla/firefly luciferase assay system. Results are means ± SE from triplicate wells from three experiments.

 
Translin Does Not Increase SF-1 Binding to DNA
To elucidate the mechanism by which translin augments the action of SF-1 on the –447/–419 segment of the rat P450c17 promoter, we first determined whether translin could affect the degree to which SF-1 bound to DNA. SF-1 and translin prepared by an in vitro transcription/translation system were used in gel shift assays, in which the amount of SF-1 was kept constant, and the amount of translin was increased. Gel shift assays (Fig. 6Go) demonstrate that increasing the amount of translin has no effect on SF-1 binding to DNA. These data suggest that translin does not alter SF-1 binding to DNA.


Figure 6
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Translin Does Not Affect SF-1 Binding to DNA, Assessed by Gel Shift Assays

Mouse translin synthesized in vitro in a transcription/translation system, was incubated in increasing concentrations with a 32P-labeled –447/–419 oligonucleotide probe plus empty vector (pCDNA, left lanes) or with a constant amount of SF-1 synthesized in vitro in a transcription/translation system (SF-1, right lanes). The translin:DNA and SF-1:DNA complexes are indicated. A nonspecific protein:DNA complex is indicated as "ns."

 
Translin Binds to SF-1
The above studies suggested that translin might bind directly to SF-1; therefore, we created a glutathione-S-transferase (GST)/translin fusion protein to use in GST pull-down assays (Fig. 7Go). When [35S]translin, synthesized in vitro, was incubated with GST-translin bound to a glutathione-Sepharose 4B matrix, the [35S]translin was retained on the matrix, indicating that translin could bind to itself (Fig. 7AGo), consistent with previous data showing that translin forms multimers (44). The signal for labeled translin was relatively weak because translin contains a single methionine residue. We then prepared [35S]SF-1 in vitro and incubated it with GST-translin bound to the glutathione-Sepharose 4B matrix (Fig. 7BGo). Whereas a small amount of [35S]SF-1 was retained by the matrix that contains only GST, there was a substantially greater amount of [35S]SF-1 retained by the matrix containing GST-translin. Thus, SF-1 binds directly to translin. Although these pull-down assays show an interaction between SF-1 and translin, this interaction was not detected by gel shift analysis (Fig. 6Go); such receptor:coactivator:DNA interactions are typically undetected by gel shift analyses.


Figure 7
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. GST Pull-Down Assays

A, SF-1 binds to translin. [35S]SF-1 was incubated with GST (lane GST) or GST-translin (lane GST-translin) bound to the glutathione-Sepharose matrix, and specifically bound proteins separated on 12% SDS polyacrylamide gels. The lane [35S]SF-1 contains 10% of the [35S]SF-1 applied to the beads. Similarly, [35S]translin was incubated with GST (lane GST) or with GST-translin (lane GST-translin) bound to the glutathione-Sepharose matrix, and specifically bound proteins were separated on 12% SDS polyacrylamide gels. The lane [35S]translin contains 10% of the [35S]translin applied to the matrix. Arrows indicate the 35S-labeled SF-1 and the 35S-labeled translin. B, Regions of SF-1 that bind to translin. Various regions of SF-1 used in the pull-down assays were cloned as indicated by the amino acid numbers below the cartoon; the regions of SF-1 included in these constructs are indicated by horizontal lines below the SF-1 line cartoon, on the left. Each of these constructs was labeled with [35S]methionine in vitro, and incubated with GST-translin bound to the glutathione-Sepharose matrix. The lanes input contain 10% of the 35S-labeled SF-1 fragments applied to the beads. DBD, DNA binding domain (amino acids 1–79); LBD, ligand binding domain (amino acids 225–451); AF2, activating function 2 domain (amino acids 451–462). C, Translin activation of SF-1 hinge mutants. Three deletional hinge mutants of SF-1 were cloned into p36Luc and transfected with the –447/–419 luciferase reporter into HeLa cells in the presence of nothing or translin expression vector. SF-1 mutants had deletions in amino acids 101–169 (SF-1 {Delta}101–169), amino acids 101–225 (SF-1 {Delta}101–225), or amino acids 170–225 (SF-1 {Delta}170–225). D, Translin activation of SF-1 serine 203 mutant. A serine 203 to alanine mutant of SF-1 (Ser 203 Mut) was transfected with the –447/–419 luciferase reporter into HeLa cells in the presence of nothing or translin expression vector. Transfected cells were assayed 48 h after transfection. Transfection efficiencies were controlled using the dual Renilla/firefly luciferase assay system. Results are means ± SE from triplicate wells from three experiments.

 
Translin Interacts with the Hinge Region of SF-1
To determine which region of SF-1 interacts with translin, various regions of recombinant mouse SF-1 were prepared by in vitro transcription/translation to test for binding to GST-translin (Fig. 7BGo). These SF-1 mutants are shown in cartoon form on the left panel of Fig. 7BGo. As shown in Fig. 7AGo, full-length SF-1 binds to GST-translin. When we deleted the carboxyl-terminal activation function-2 (AF2) domain ({Delta}AF2, amino acids 451–462 deleted from full-length SF-1) or the ligand binding domain ({Delta}LBD, amino acids 225–462 deleted from full-length SF-1), the remaining SF-1 fragments could still bind to GST-translin. Thus, a region of SF-1 between amino acids 1 and 225 binds to translin. The ligand binding/AF2 domains alone (LBD, amino acids 225–462) do not bind to GST-translin. However, when amino acids 79–225 comprising the hinge region are added to the LBD construct ({Delta}DBD), binding to translin is restored. Thus, the GST-pull-down experiments suggest that the hinge region of SF-1 encompassing amino acids 79–225 is necessary for translin binding. We expressed amino acids 79–225, the hinge region of SF-1 alone, in the absence of any additional regions of SF-1. This peptide, however, did not bind GST-translin. Because this is only a small SF-1 peptide, the lack of binding to GST-translin could have been due to a lack of proper three-dimensional structure. Hence, we created additional full-length SF-1 mutants that lacked only specific segments of the hinge region, to test directly their ability to be activated by translin in cell culture.

To determine whether the hinge region of SF-1 is important for translin activation, we created three SF-1 mutants: two SF-1 mutants deleted the proline-rich region and lacked either amino acids 101–169 (SF-1{Delta} 101–169) or lacked amino acids 101–225 (SF-1{Delta} 101–225), and one mutant contained this proline-rich region but lacked amino acids 170–225 (SF-1{Delta} 170–225). Each of these constructs was transfected into HeLa cells with the –447/–419 luciferase reporter, plus or minus the translin expression vector (Fig. 7CGo). Transfection data demonstrate that both the SF-1{Delta} 101–169 and SF-1{Delta} 101–225 could not activate transcription of the –447/–419 luciferase reporter, suggesting that the proline-rich region of SF-1 is required for SF-1’s transcriptional activity. However SF-1{Delta} 170–225 could stimulate transcription from the –447/–419 luciferase reporter, although this stimulation was about half of that seen with the full-length SF-1. Translin cotransfected with SF-1{Delta} 170–225 could not activate transcription of the –447/–419 luciferase reporter. Translin also could not activate the SF-1 mutants lacking the proline-rich region. These data suggest that the hinge region of SF-1 between amino acids 170 and 225 are important for translin’s ability to augment SF-1 transcriptional activation.

The 170–225 region of the SF-1 hinge contains serine 203 that has been shown to be important for SF-1’s transcriptional activity (69). We created a seine 203 to alanine mutant of SF-1 (Ser 203 Mut) in our SF-1-expression vector, and transfected this mutant construct together with the –447/–419 luciferase reporter construct into HeLa cells (Fig. 7DGo). Ser 203 Mut SF-1 could stimulate luciferase activity from the P450c17 reporter construct about 5-fold (Fig. 7DGo). Translin could also increase this SF-1-stimulated transcription 2-fold further. These data demonstrate that serine 203 does not play a role in mediating the effects of translin.

Translin Activation of SF-1-Stimulated Transcription Is Dependent upon DNA Sequence
To determine whether translin augments the transcription of other genes that are regulated by SF-1, we cloned several different SF-1-responsive elements into the p36Luc reporter construct. These included another region of the rat P450c17 gene, –84/–55 (13, 14), the rat P450aro gene, –87/–68 (70, 71, 72), and the mouse P450c21 gene, –95/–58 (65, 73). These three elements are proximal SF-1 regulatory elements, and each is located within 100 bp of the TATA box of each gene. When these luciferase reporter constructs were transfected into HeLa cells, they had very low basal activity (Fig. 8AGo). Cotransfection of these reporter constructs with an SF-1-expression construct increased luciferase activity 4-, 13-, and 4-fold, respectively. When we cotransfected the reporter constructs containing the SF-1 binding domains from the rat P450c17 –84/–55, rat P450aro, or mouse P450c21 with SF-1 and translin expression vectors, luciferase activity was not significantly different from the activity obtained with the SF-1 expression vector alone (Fig. 8AGo). Transfection with the luciferase reporter constructs plus translin gave luciferase activities no different from basal activity. Thus, translin had little effect on SF-1-stimulated transcription of these three SF-1-responsive elements.


Figure 8
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Translin Activation of SF-1-Dependent Elements

A, Four SF-1-responsive regions were cloned into p36Luc and transfected into HeLa cells in the presence of nothing, or expression vectors for translin or SF-1. The SF-1-responsive elements are the –84/–55 region of the rat P450c17 gene, the –87/–68 region of the rat P450aro gene, and the –95/–58 region of the mouse P450c21 gene. These are compared with the –447/–419 region of the rat P450c17 gene. B, A p36Luc construct containing two –84/–55 SF-1 elements was used as reporter in cell transfection assays, as described in A. C, A p36Luc construct containing five mouse P450c21 elements (–95/–58) was used as a reporter in cell transfection assays, as described in A. Transfected cells were assayed 48 h after transfection. Transfection efficiencies were controlled using the dual Renilla/firefly luciferase assay system. Results are means ± SE from triplicate wells from three experiments.

 
Because the translin-responsive region at –447/–419 contains two potential SF-1 sites, we created a duplicated –84/–55 SF-1 site in the p36Luc reporter construct. When this construct was transfected into HeLa cells, SF-1 stimulated luciferase activity to a level about twice that seen with the single element (Fig. 8BGo). However, cotransfection with SF-1 and translin expression vectors did not significantly increase luciferase activity compared with that obtained with the SF-1 expression vector alone. Thus, the presence of two SF-1 elements does not necessarily create a translin-responsive site.

We also used a concatamer of the P450c21 element containing five repeated SF-1-responsive elements, which had been used originally to demonstrate SF-1-dependent transcription (65, 73). This DNA was cloned into p36Luc, and transfected into HeLa cells. SF-1 stimulated luciferase activity 200-fold, substantially greater than the 4-fold stimulation obtained when a single SF-1 site was used. Furthermore, whereas translin alone had no effect, cotransfection of translin and SF-1 expression vectors further augmented SF-1-stimulated transcription 2.5-fold. Therefore, translin appears to discriminate among SF-1-response elements, and only activates transcription from a subset of these elements.

Translin-Associated Factor X (TRAX) Also Augments SF-1-Dependent Transcription
TRAX is a 33-kDa protein that is 28% identical with translin and has been shown to interact with translin (66, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78). Both translin and TRAX have putative leucine zipper regions, found in the carboxyl terminus of translin and in the mid-region of TRAX (41, 46). Although these two proteins are known to interact, TRAX, unlike translin (79), does not form homomultimers. TRAX alone does not bind directly to nucleic acids, although heterodimers of translin and TRAX can bind to DNA (76). Although we did not identify TRAX in our MS/MS analysis of StF-IT-2, we determined whether TRAX was found in MA-10 cells, whether TRAX could also be part of the StF-IT-2:DNA complex, and whether TRAX could augment transcription.

To determine whether TRAX was part of the StF-IT-2:DNA complex, the –447/–419 oligonucleotide probe was incubated with MA-10 cell extracts in the presence of anti-TRAX antibodies (Fig. 9AGo). TRAX antibodies, but not preimmune serum, supershifted the protein:DNA complex that was identified as StF-IT-2, in a manner similar to that seen when the translin antibody was used (Fig. 2BGo). However, TRAX does not bind directly to the –447/–419 DNA. Unlike translin, which binds to the –447/–419 DNA, recombinant TRAX prepared in bacteria does not bind to this DNA (Fig. 9BGo). Thus, because the TRAX antibody could supershift the StF-IT-2:DNA complex, the data suggest that translin and TRAX probably form heteromers in MA-10 cells, and these heteromers bind to DNA.


Figure 9
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. TRAX Is Part of the StF-IT-2:DNA Complex

A, Gel shift assay using MA-10 cell extracts, incubated with a 32P-labeled –447/–419 oligonucleotide. Addition of an antibody against TRAX (66 ) supershifts the StF-IT-2 complex, and forms another complex, StF-IT-2'. Addition of preimmune serum has no effect. B, Gel shift assay using recombinant TRAX and translin prepared in bacteria. Recombinant TRAX or translin were incubated with a 32P-labeled –447/–419 rP450c17 double-stranded (DS) or single-stranded (SS) oligonucleotide probe; TRAX does not bind to DNA because there is no protein:DNA complex, whereas translin prepared in a similar fashion binds to the –447/–419 oligonucleotide. C, Luciferase activity in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were transfected with the –447/–419 p36Luc reporter construct together with expression vectors for translin, TRAX, SF-1, or a combination of the three vectors. Transfections with translin or TRAX alone contained 0.15 µg of plasmid; transfections with both translin and TRAX contained either 0.075 µg of each plasmid [+SF-1/(Trans/Trax)/2], or 0.15 µg of each plasmid (+SF-1/Trans/Trax). Transfected cells were assayed 48 h after transfection. Results are means ± SE from triplicate wells from three experiments.

 
We also determined whether TRAX, like translin, could act as an SF-1 coactivator. HeLa cells were transfected with the wild-type –447/–419 luciferase reporter construct in the absence or presence of SF-1, translin, and/or TRAX (Fig. 9CGo). As shown previously for translin, using a translin expression vector (Fig. 3AGo), TRAX (0.15 µg) had no effect on transcription from the wild-type –447/–419 luciferase reporter construct. When SF-1 was cotransfected, TRAX (0.15 µg) had only a slight effect on SF-1 stimulated transcription. HeLa cells were transfected with SF-1 and an equal mixture of TRAX (0.075 µg) and translin (0.075 µg). In this transfection (Fig. 9CGo, eighth bar on graph, +SF-1/(Translin/Trax)/2), the total amount of translin and TRAX together equaled the amount of translin or TRAX added individually (shown in the sixth and seventh bars, +SF-1/Translin; +SF-1/Trax). Transfection of this equal mixture of translin and TRAX resulted in a 2-fold activation of SF-1-stimulated transcription, similar to that seen with translin alone plus SF-1. When 0.15 µg of TRAX plasmid was transfected with 0.15 µg of translin plasmid, SF-1-stimlated transcription was now stimulated 4-fold (ninth bar in graph, +SF-1/Translin/Trax). Thus, TRAX appears to work together with translin to activate SF-1-stimulated transcription.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Translin and TRAX can now be added to the growing list of coactivators and corepressors that can regulate SF-1-mediated transcription. These include Dax-1, glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 (GRIP1), silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT), SRC-1, and WT-1 (Wilms’ tumor), C/EBPß , CREB, SREBP1a, and RIP 140 (80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90). SF-1 is centrally involved in the adrenal and gonadal regulation the genes that encode steroidogenic enzymes (91, 92, 93, 94), and hence SF-1 is a key factor determining production of mineralocorticoids, glucocorticoids, and sex steroids. SF-1 also plays a central role in adrenal and gonadal differentiation, hypothalamic function, and sexual development (91, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99). Disruption of the SF-1 gene in mice results in absence of adrenal glands, gonads, and the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, which leads to loss of the pituitary cell types. Identifying the target genes controlled by SF-1 and the molecular partners with which it interacts to modulate expression of these genes is essential for understanding how SF-1 exerts its pleiotropic effects.

Translin is a 228-amino acid protein that has many cellular roles. It is involved in DNA rearrangements through binding to single-stranded DNA sequences at breakpoints (44), cell proliferation (50), mRNA transport and/or stabilization and translational regulation (51, 52), and as a linker protein that binds specific mRNAs to microtubules (39, 53). Translin’s interactions with mRNAs have been found in the nucleus, in cytoplasm, and between male germ cells, implicating translin as a protein that is involved in RNA transport between cells (52). Translin binds {gamma}- and {alpha}-tubulins, consistent with a role in microtubule organization, stabilization, and/or chromosome segregation. In neurons, inhibition of translin results in a lack of mRNA sorting for those mRNAs bound by translin, including ligatin and calcium- or calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II{alpha} (100). The role of nuclear receptor coactivators in RNA processing, as well as in a variety of other activities has recently been reviewed (101). Several splicing-related coactivators such as p68, p72, CAPER, and PGC-1, have RNA binding motifs. One unique coactivator, SRA, is an RNA that may be important structurally for coactivation (102). Because translin is an RNA binding protein, it may likewise act as a coactivator of SF-1 through RNA binding.

The domains of SF-1 that interact with DNA and with other proteins have been identified (69, 80, 81, 84, 91, 103, 104). As with other members of the nuclear hormone receptor family of transcription factors, SF-1 contains a zinc finger motif that is responsible for DNA binding. Immediately downstream from the zinc-finger motif lies a basic region (termed the Ftz-F1 box) that facilitates binding of SF-1 to specific DNA sequences, and which is similar to the A box seen in other nuclear hormone receptors. SF-1 also contains an LBD at the C terminus. Recently, potential phospholipid ligands for SF-1 have been identified through crystallization studies (105, 106, 107). The LBD is usually the dimerization site for those nuclear hormone receptors that act as homodimers or heterodimers, but SF-1 acts as a monomer (104). Transactivation by SF-1 appears to depend on a region in the LBD, termed the AF2 region, and a region consisting of the Ftz-F1 box and an adjacent proline cluster (103). However, our previous data suggest that transactivation by SF-1 within the –447/–419 region of the P450c17 gene does not require the AF2 region (35). In addition to the AF2 region, an N-terminal AF1 region crucial for ligand-independent transactivation by other nuclear hormone receptors is needed for maximal SF-1-mediated transcription and interaction with nuclear receptor cofactors (103). This interaction requires phosphorylation of serine Ser 203 located in the hinge region (69). Our GST-pulldown assays and SF-1 deletional mutants suggest that translin interacts with the hinge region of SF-1. This region is important for stabilizing the ligand binding domain (108) and interacts with other proteins (86). Phosphorylation of Ser 203 in the hinge region enhances the interaction of GRIP1 and SMRT with the AF1 and AF2 regions of SF-1 (69), whereas sumoylation of lysines within the hinge region increase interactions with DEAD-box proteins, and result in transcriptional repression (85, 86). Mutation of serine 203 in our studies did not affect translin’s ability to stimulate SF-1-mediated transcription, indicating that the mechanism by which translin augments SF-1’s activity is different from that of other coactivators like GRIP1 and SMRT.

The mechanism by which translin augments SF-1-stimulated transcription is unclear, but it appears to depend on the DNA sequence to which SF-1 binds. Our previous data suggested that there are sequence-specific differences in SF-1 binding to DNA, and we could assess these differences by the degree to which SF-1 could bend DNA (35). Furthermore, the different putative ligands recently identified for SF-1 may play distinct roles in SF-1 regulation of gene expression, and may also determine the nature of the coactivators/corepressors that interact with SF-1. Recent studies identifying novel ligands for SF-1 have indicated that exogenously added C12–C16 fatty acids increased interaction between SF-1 and TIF2 coactivators (106). Such ligand-dependent differences in coactivator/corepressor recruitment have also been demonstrated for other nuclear hormone receptors (109, 110, 111, 112, 113). Thus, translin may discriminate between the SF-1:DNA interactions that may be mediated by different ligands.

The role of translin in the SF-1-mediated transcription of the rat P450c17 gene is not known. Mice in which the translin gene has been ablated are viable, small at birth, and have behavioral and reproductive abnormalities (114). Translin knockout mice have slightly elevated concentrations of FSH and slightly reduced concentrations of LH, progressively reduced sperm counts in male mice, and reduced fertility and litter size in female mice that are not due to obvious abnormalities in reproductive organs. Plasma or gonadal steroid concentrations were not reported, but are likely to be within normal ranges, because alterations may have been reflected in abnormal gonadotropin concentrations. Gene array analysis of testis mRNA from wild-type and translin knockout mice did not detect differences in expression of steroidogenic enzyme mRNAs, suggesting that changes, if any, would be less than 2-fold (N. Hecht, unpublished data). Recent behavioral analysis of translin knockout mice indicate that these mice exhibit sex-specific differences in learning and memory, locomotor activity, anxiety-related behavior, as well as tonic-clonic seizures induced by handling (115). Some of these behavioral abnormalities may be related to alterations in monoamine neurotransmitter levels in several forebrain regions that are seen in the translin knockout mice, and may be modified by gonadal hormones.

Ablation of translin also causes reduction in TRAX protein but not mRNA, suggesting that these two proteins may stabilize one another (114, 116). By use of small interfering RNA, we were unable to reduce translin protein expression in MA-10 cells to any great extent, suggesting that translin is both abundantly expressed and relatively stable in mouse Leydig MA-10 cells (our unpublished data). Our previous results suggested that SF-1 and translin were coexpressed in the developing gonad and in mouse Leydig MA-10 cells suggesting that the –447/–419 region of the rat P45017 gene could be coactivated by both of these factors during development as well as in the adult gonad (35).

Thus, there are many coactivators and corepressors regulating SF-1 transcriptional activity in a variety of tissues, contributing to the pleiotropic effects of SF-1. Translin and TRAX are new additions to this family.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation of Soluble Cellular and Tissue Extracts
Animal experimentation was performed in accordance with protocols and guidelines approved by the Committee for Animal Research at the University of California, San Francisco. Cellular extracts from mouse MA-10 Leydig cells and rodent tissues were prepared as previously described (13, 117). Tissues were homogenized in homogenization buffer [60 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 15 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 14 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 0.3 M sucrose, plus proteinase inhibitors; Sigma, St. Louis, MO] using a tissue homogenizer (Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX) and kept on ice. The soluble fraction of proteins was isolated by centrifuging the homogenate at 15,000 x g for 20 min at 4 C to remove debris and mitochondria, and then centrifuging the postmitochondrial supernatant at 100,000 x g (S100) for 60 min at 4 C. The soluble supernatant fraction was collected and kept at –70 C until needed. Protein concentrations were determined by the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

Purification of StF-IT-2
The S100 fraction was adjusted to 0.5 M ammonium sulfate by adding solid ammonium sulfate under constant stirring. The high salt S100 fraction was then loaded onto a 30-ml phenyl Sepharose 6 fast flow column (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden), which had been previously equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate buffer containing 0.5 M ammonium sulfate (pH 7.0). The protein elution was monitored at 280 nm.

To determine which fractions contained the StF-IT-2 protein, gel shift assays were performed as described previously (13). Fractions containing StF-IT-2 were then pooled and further purified on a 1 ml MonoQ column (Amersham Biosciences). Before loading, the pooled fractions were dialyzed against 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0), and the column was equilibrated in the same buffer. Increasing NaCl concentrations linearly to 0.4 M, in 20 bed volumes of 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), eluted retained proteins. Eluted proteins were detected at 280 nm. Fractions were analyzed for StF-IT-2 by gel shift assays. Eluted proteins were also characterized by separation on a 10% polyacrylamide gel by electrophoresis followed by a Coomassie blue staining. The approximately 30-kDa proteins from fraction 29 were excised from the polyacrylamide gel, and sent to the Proteomic Core Facility at The Rockefeller University (New York, NY) for analysis. Protein from this band was treated with trypsin, purified by HPLC, and analyzed by MS/MS.

Gel Shift Assays
Gel shift assays were performed as described previously (13). Oligonucleotides corresponding to the –447/–419 region of the rat P450c17 gene promoter and mutants of this region (12) were used in these studies, and are presented in Table 2Go. Sense and antisense oligonucleotides were mixed in a 1:1 molar ratio, boiled, and reannealed slowly at room temperature before end-labeling using [{gamma}-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase, or labeling with [{alpha}-32P]dCTP and Klenow DNA polymerase, and mixed with the cellular extracts (150,000 cpm/reaction) in the presence of 100 µg/ml polydeoxyinosinic deoxycytidylic acid, 50 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mg/ml BSA, and incubated at room temperature for 45 min. For antibody supershift assays, 1–3 µl of antiserum was added to the gel shift reaction mix (75, 118, 119). Antisera were affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit antibodies directed against recombinant mouse TB-RBP (75) or were polyclonal rabbit antibodies directed against the C-terminal amino acids of translin or TRAX (118, 119), or commercially available antibodies against 14-3-3 proteins (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). One third of the total reaction was loaded onto a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel and run in 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA as running buffer, to separate the free labeled probe from probe bound by protein. The gel was then dried and exposed to a phosphorimager screen or x-ray film at –70 C using an intensifying screen.

Transient Transfections and Reporter Gene Assay
Luciferase reporter constructs were prepared using the minimal mouse prolactin promoter linked to the firefly luciferase gene in the vector p36Luc (64). Double-stranded oligonucleotides were cloned into this vector using BamHI restriction sites. All clones were sequenced to ensure proper orientation and to ensure that only a single copy of each oligonucleotide was cloned into the vector. Cells were transfected with the reporter gene constructs containing wild-type or mutant –447/–419 regions using a lipofection reagent (Fugene 6; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and cells were assayed for luciferase activity 48 h later. All transfections used pRLTK-Renilla luciferase as internal standard for transfection efficiency. Firefly and Renilla luciferases were assayed using a dual-luciferase reagent and protocol according to manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI).

Preparation of Translin and TRAX
Mouse translin (40) was cloned into the pTarget mammalian expression vector (Promega). Mouse TRAX cDNA was obtained by RT-PCR amplification of MA-10 cell RNA, and was cloned into the pCDNA3.1 mammalian expression vector for use in transfections (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). These cDNAs were also used to create recombinant protein using an in vitro transcription/translation system (Promega). These cDNAs were also cloned in the EcoRI/BamHI sites of pET42A (Novagen, Madison, WI; emdbiosciences.com) to obtain recombinant protein in bacteria, and to obtain GST-fusion proteins. Bacterially expressed GST-fusion proteins were purified on a glutathione-Sepharose 4B matrix. The GST was cleaved from the fusion protein with Factor Xa (Promega), and protein was eluted from the matrix.

Glutathione-Sepharose 4B Column Chromatography
GST-translin and GST-TRAX were created in pET42A, an N-terminal GST-fusion vector. Recombinant protein was prepared from BL21DE3pLysS bacteria that were transfected with the fusion proteins; proteins were induced by isopropyl ß-D-thiogalactoside treatment of bacteria for 3 h. After induction, bacteria were precipitated, resuspended in 300 µl PBS, and sonicated to lyse cells, and the lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 x g. The supernatant was then mixed with glutathione-Sepharose 4B matrix. Protein was bound in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100, for 30 min at room temperature, and the matrix was washed five times in binding buffer containing 10% glycerol.

For pull-down assays, proteins were labeled in vitro with [35S]methionine using a transcription/translation system, and then added to the GST-protein matrix, incubated 1 h, and washed five times with binding buffer to remove nonspecific binding. Specifically bound proteins were resuspended in SDS gel loading buffer, boiled 5 min, separated on 12% SDS polyacrylamide gels, and exposed to x-ray film and intensifying screens at –70 C overnight.

Preparation of Full-Length and Fragments of Mouse SF-1
Full-length mouse SF-1 cDNA (65) was cloned into the EcoRI site of pBlueBacHis2B, and were used to infect Sf9 insect cells at a multiplicity of infection of 10:1. Cells were grown at 27.5 C for 36–48 h, sonicated, and recombinant protein containing a 6-His-tag at the amino terminus was purified over a cobalt affinity resin (TALON column; Clontech, Palo Alto, CA).

Full-length mouse SF-1 cDNA was also cloned into the EcoRI/BamH1 site of pCDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was used in a coupled transcription/translation reaction (Promega) to generate recombinant protein, or was used directly as a eukaryotic expression plasmid in cell transfections. Fragments of SF-1 protein were created by PCR amplification of full-length mouse SF-1 cDNA. The oligonucleotides used to create these peptides and internal SF-1 mutants are listed in Table 2Go. SF-1{Delta}AF2 was created by site-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange; Promega), mutating amino acid 451 from Asn to a stop codon. Serine 203 mutant was also created by changing the serine to an alanine by site-directed mutagenesis


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Holly Ingraham (University of California, San Francisco, CA) for the antibody against SF-1, Dr. Jay M. Baraban (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) for antibodies against translin and TRAX, and Dr. Keith Parker (University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX) for the pCMV-SF-1 expression vector. We also thank Arpi Siyahian and Yesmina Zavala for assisting with the transcriptional analyses.


    FOOTNOTES
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant HD27970 (S.H.M.). P.B. was supported by Pediatric Endocrinology NIH Training Grant T32 DK07161.

Present address for P.B.B.: IBM Healthcare and Life Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.

S.H.M., S.R.B., C.D., J.-L.V., N.B.H., and P.B.B. have nothing to declare.

First Published Online October 19, 2006

Abbreviations: AF2, Activation function-2; GRIP1, glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; LBD, ligand binding domain; MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry; SF-1, steroidogenic factor-1; SMRT, silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor; StF-IT-1, steroidogenic factor-inducer of transcription-1; TB-RBP, testis brain RNA-binding protein; TRAX, translin-associated factor X.

Received for publication August 31, 2005. Accepted for publication October 12, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Zhang LH, Rodriguez H, Ohno S, Miller WL 1995 Serine phosphorylation of human P450c17 increases 17,20-lyase activity: implications for adrenarche and the polycystic ovary syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:10619–10623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pandey AV, Mellon SH, Miller WL 2003 Protein phosphatase 2A and phosphoprotein SET regulate androgen production by P450c17. J Biol Chem 278:2837–2844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Auchus RJ, Lee TC, Miller WL 1998 Cytochrome b5 augments the 17,20-lyase activity of human P450c17 without direct electron transfer. J Biol Chem 273:3158–3165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Geller DH, Auchus RJ, Miller WL 1999 P450c17 mutations R347H and R358Q selectively disrupt 17,20-lyase activity by disrupting interactions with P450 oxidoreductase and cytochrome b5. Mol Endocrinol 13:167–175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Miller WL, Auchus RJ, Geller DH 1997 The regulation of 17,20 lyase activity. Steroids 62:133–142[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Compagnone NA, Mellon SH 1998 Dehydroepiandrosterone: a potential signalling molecule for neocortical organization during development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4678–4683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bair SR, Mellon SH 2004 Deletion of the mouse P450c17 gene causes early embryonic lethality. Mol Cell Biol 24:5383–5390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rodriguez H, Hum DW, Staels B, Miller WL 1997 Transcription of the human genes for cytochrome P450scc and P450c17 is regulated differently in human adrenal NCI-H295 cells than in mouse adrenal Y1 cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:365–371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Compagnone NA, Zhang P, Vigne JL, Mellon SH 2000 Novel role for the nuclear phosphoprotein SET in transcriptional activation of P450c17 and initiation of neurosteroidogenesis. Mol Endocrinol 14:875–888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Zhang P, Compagnone NA, Fiore C, Vigne JL, Culp P, Musci TJ, Mellon SH 2001 Developmental gonadal expression of the transcription factor SET and its target gene, P450c17 (17{alpha}-hydroxylase/c17,20 lyase). DNA Cell Biol 20:613–624[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Zhang P, Hammer F, Bair S, Wang J, Reeves WH, Mellon SH 1999 Ku autoimmune antigen is involved in placental regulation of rat P450c17 gene transcription. DNA Cell Biol 18:197–207[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Zhang P, Mellon SH 1997 Multiple orphan nuclear receptors converge to regulate rat P450c17 gene transcription: novel mechanism for orphan nuclear receptor action. Mol Endocrinol 11:891–904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Givens CR, Zhang P, Bair S, Mellon SH 1994 Transcriptional regulation of rat cytochrome P450c17 expression in mouse Leydig MA-10 and adrenal Y-1 cells: identification of a single protein that mediates both basal and cAMP-induced activities. DNA Cell Biol 13:1087–1098[Medline]
  14. Zhang P, Mellon SH 1996 The orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 regulates the cAMP-mediated transcriptional activation of rat cytochrome P450c17. Mol Endocrinol 10:147–158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wickenheisser JK, Quinn PG, Nelson VL, Legro RS, Strauss III JF, McAllister JM 2000 Differential activity of the cytochrome P450 17{alpha}-hydroxylase and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoters in normal and polycystic ovary syndrome theca cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2304–2311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Bischof LJ, Kagawa N, Moskow JJ, Takahashi Y, Iwamatsu A, Buchberg AM, Waterman MR 1998 Members of the meis1 and pbx homeodomain protein families cooperatively bind a cAMP-responsive sequence (CRS1) from bovine CYP17. J Biol Chem 273:7941–7948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lin CJ, Martens JWM, Miller WL 2001 NF-1C, Sp1, and Sp3 are essential for transcription of the human gene for P450c17 (steroid 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase) in human adrenal NCI-H295A cells. Mol Endocrinol 15:1277–1293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Flück CE, Miller WL 2004 GATA-4 and GATA-6 modulate tissue-specific transcription of the human gene for P450c17 by direct interaction with Sp1. Mol Endocrinol 18:1144–1157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wickenheisser JK, Nelson-DeGrave VL, Quinn PG, McAllister JM 2004 Increased cytochrome P450 17{alpha}-hydroxylase promoter function in theca cells isolated from patients with polycystic ovary syndrome involves nuclear factor-1. Mol Endocrinol 18:588–605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Brentano ST, Picado-Leonard J, Mellon SH, Moore CCD, Miller WL 1990 Tissue-specific, cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-induced, and phorbol ester-repressed transcription from the human P450c17 promoter in mouse cells. Mol Endocrinol 4:1972–1979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Voutilainen R, Miller WL 1986 Developmental expression of genes for the stereoidogenic enzymes P450scc (20,22-desmolase), P450c17 (17{alpha}-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase), and P450c21 (21-hydroxylase) in the human fetus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 63:1145–1150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ogo A, Haji M, Ohashi M, Nawata H 1991 Decreased expression of cytochrome P450 17{alpha}-hydroxylase mRNA in senescent bovine adrenal gland. Gerontology 37:262–271[Medline]
  23. Mellon SH, Vaisse C 1989 cAMP regulates P450scc gene expression by a cycloheximide-insensitive mechanism in cultured mouse Leydig MA-10 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:7775–7779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Voutilainen R, Tapanainen J, Chung B, Matteson KJ, Miller WL 1986 Hormonal regulation of P450scc (20,22 desmolase) and P450c17 (17{alpha}-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase) in cultured human granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 63:202–207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Johnson D, Sen M 1990 The cytochrome P450c17 {alpha} (17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C17,20 lyase) activity of the junctional zone of the rat placenta. J Endocrinol 125:217–224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Durkee TJ, McLean MP, Hales DB, Payne AH, Waterman MR, Khan I, Gibori G 1992 P45017{alpha} and P450scc gene expression and regulation in the rat placenta. Endocrinology 130:1309–1317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Conley AJ, Rainey WE, Mason JI 1994 Ontogeny of steroidogenic enzyme expression in the porcine conceptus. J Mol Endocrinol 12:155–165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Greco TL, Payne AH 1994 Ontogeny of expression of the genes for steroidogenic enzymes P450 side-chain cleavage, 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, P450 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C17–20 lyase, and P450 aromatase in fetal mouse gonads. Endocrinology 135:262–268[Abstract]
  29. Vianello S, Waterman MR, Dalla Valle L, Colombo L 1997 Developmentally regulated expression and activity of 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/C-17,20-lyase cytochrome P450 in rat liver. Endocrinology 138:3166–3174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Compagnone NA, Bulfone A, Rubenstein JLR, Mellon SH 1995 Steroidogenic enzyme P450c17 is expressed in the embryonic central nervous system. Endocrinology 136:5212–5223[Abstract]
  31. Bakke M, Lund J 1995 Mutually exclusive interactions of two nuclear orphan receptors determine activity of a cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-responsive sequence in the bovine CYP17 gene. Mol Endocrinol 9:327–339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sewer MB, Nguyen VQ, Huang CJ, Tucker PW, Kagawa N, Waterman MR 2002 Transcriptional activation of human CYP17 in H295R adrenocortical cells depends on complex formation among p54(nrb)/NonO, protein-associated splicing factor, and SF-1, a complex that also participates in repression of transcription. Endocrinology 143:1280–1290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sewer MB, Waterman MR 2002 Adrenocorticotropin/cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-mediated transcription of the human CYP17 gene in the adrenal cortex is dependent on phosphatase activity. Endocrinology 143:1769–1777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Hanley NA, Rainey WE, Wilson DI, Ball SG, Parker KL 2001 Expression profiles of SF-1, DAX1, and CYP17 in the human fetal adrenal gland: potential interactions in gene regulation. Mol Endocrinol 15:57–68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Brake PB, Bair SR, Mellon SH 2005 DNA sequence-dependent regulation of SF-1-mediated transcription. DNA Cell Biol 24:148–160[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Kellogg DR, Murray AW 1995 NAP1 acts with Clb1 to perform mitotic functions and to suppress polar bud growth in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 130:675–685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Estanyol JM, Jaumot M, Casanovas O, Rodriguez-Vilarrupla A, Agell N, Bachs O 1999 The protein SET regulates the inhibitory effect of p21(Cip1) on cyclin E-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 activity. J Biol Chem 274:33161–33165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Li M, Makkinje A, Damuni Z 1996 The myeloid leukemia-associated protein SET is a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A. J Biol Chem 271:11059–11062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Han JR, Yiu GK, Hecht NB 1995 Testis/brain RNA-binding protein attaches translationally repressed and transported mRNAs to microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9550–9554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wu XQ, Gu W, Meng X, Hecht NB 1997 The RNA-binding protein, TB-RBP, is the mouse homologue of translin, a recombination protein associated with chromosomal translocations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5640–5645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Aoki K, Suzuki K, Sugano T, Tasaka T, Nakahara K, Kuge O, Omori A, Kasai M 1995 A novel gene, Translin, encodes a recombination hotspot binding protein associated with chromosomal translocations. Nat Genet 10:167–174[Medline]
  42. Aoki K, Nakahara K, Ikegawa C, Seto M, Takahashi T, Minowada J, Strominger JL, Maziarz RT, Kasai M 1994 Nuclear proteins binding to a novel target sequence within the recombination hotspot regions of Bcl-2 and the immunoglobulin DH gene family. Oncogene 9:1109–1115[Medline]
  43. Kasai M, Aoki K, Matsuo Y, Minowada J, Maziarz RT, Strominger JL 1994 Recombination hotspot associated factors specifically recognize novel target sequences at the site of interchromosomal rearrangements in T-ALL patients with t(8;14)(q24;q11) and t(1;14)(p32;q11). Int Immunol 6:1017–1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Kasai M, Matsuzaki T, Katayanagi K, Omori A, Maziarz RT, Strominger JL, Aoki K, Suzuki K 1997 The translin ring specifically recognizes DNA ends at recombination hot spots in the human genome. J Biol Chem 272:11402–11407[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kasai M, Maziarz RT, Aoki K, Macintyre E, Strominger JL 1992 Molecular involvement of the pvt-1 locus in a {gamma}/ä T-cell leukemia bearing a variant t(8;14)(q24;q11) translocation. Mol Cell Biol 12:4751–4757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Aoki K, Inazawa J, Takahashi T, Nakahara K, Kasai M 1997 Genomic structure and chromosomal localization of the gene encoding translin, a recombination hotspot binding protein. Genomics 43:237–241[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Kwon YK, Hecht NB 1991 Cytoplasmic protein binding to highly conserved sequences in the 3' untranslated region of mouse protamine 2 mRNA, a translationally regulated transcript of male germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3584–3588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Kwon YK, Hecht NB 1993 Binding of a phosphoprotein to the 3' untranslated region of the mouse protamine 2 mRNA temporally represses its translation. Mol Cell Biol 13:6547–6557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Han JR, Gu W, Hecht NB 1995 Testis-brain RNA-binding protein, a testicular translational regulatory RNA-binding protein, is present in the brain and binds to the 3' untranslated regions of transported brain mRNAs. Biol Reprod 53:707–717[Abstract]
  50. Ishida R, Okado H, Sato H, Shionoiri C, Aoki K, Kasai M 2002 A role for the octameric ring protein, Translin, in mitotic cell division. FEBS Lett 525:105–110[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Morales CR, Lefrancois S, Chennathukuzhi V, El-Alfy M, Wu X, Yang J, Gerton GL, Hecht NB 2002 A TB-RBP and Ter ATPase complex accompanies specific mRNAs from nuclei through the nuclear pores and into intercellular bridges in mouse male germ cells. Dev Biol 246:480–494[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Morales CR, Wu XQ, Hecht NB 1998 The DNA/RNA-binding protein, TB-RBP, moves from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and through intercellular bridges in male germ cells. Dev Biol 201:113–123[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Wu XQ, Hecht NB 2000 Mouse testis brain ribonucleic acid-binding protein/translin colocalizes with microtubules and is immunoprecipitated with messenger ribonucleic acids encoding myelin basic protein, {alpha} calmodulin kinase II, and protamines 1 and 2. Biol Reprod 62:720–725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Aoki K, Suzuki K, Ishida R, Kasai M 1999 The DNA binding activity of Translin is mediated by a basic region in the ring-shaped structure conserved in evolution. FEBS Lett 443:363–366[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Moore BW, Perez VJ 1967 Specific acid proteins in the nervous system. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  56. Aitken A, Collinge DB, van Heusden BP, Isobe T, Roseboom PH, Rosenfeld G, Soll J 1992 14-3-3 Proteins: a highly conserved, widespread family of eukaryotic proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 17:498–501[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Dougherty MK, Morrison DK 2004 Unlocking the code of 14-3-3. J Cell Sci 117:1875–1884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Muslin AJ, Tanner JW, Allen PM, Shaw AS 1996 Interaction of 14-3-3 with signaling proteins is mediated by the recognition of phosphoserine. Cell 84:889–897[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Aitken A 2002 Functional specificity in 14-3-3 isoform interactions through dimer formation and phosphorylation. Chromosome location of mammalian isoforms and variants. Plant Mol Biol 50:993–1010[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Fu H, Subramanian RR, Masters SC 2000 14-3-3 Proteins: structure, function, and regulation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40:617–647
  61. Tzivion G, Avruch J 2002 14-3-3 Proteins: active cofactors in cellular regulation by serine/threonine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 277:3061–3064[Free Full Text]
  62. van Hemert MJ, Steensma HY, van Heusden GP 2001 14-3-3 Proteins: key regulators of cell division, signalling and apoptosis. Bioessays 23:936–946[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Muslin AJ, Xing H 2000 14-3-3 Proteins: regulation of subcellular localization by molecular interference. Cell Signal 12:703–709[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Crenshaw III EB, Kalla K, Simmons DM, Swanson LW, Rosenfeld MG 1989 Cell-specific expression of the prolactin gene in transgenic mice is controlled by synergistic interactions between promoter and enhancer elements. Genes Dev 3:959–972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Lala DS, Rice DA, Parker KL 1992 Steroidogenic factor I, a key regulator of steroidogenic enzyme expression, is the mouse homolog of fushi tarazu-factor I. Mol Endocrinol 6:1249–1258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Taira E, Finkenstadt PM, Baraban JM 1998 Identification of translin and trax as components of the GS1 strand-specific DNA binding complex enriched in brain. J Neurochem 71:471–477[Medline]
  67. Li Z, Baraban JM 2004 High affinity binding of the Translin/Trax complex to RNA does not require the presence of Y or H elements. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 120:123–129[Medline]
  68. Chalk JG, Barr FG, Mitchell CD 1997 Translin recognition site sequences flank chromosome translocation breakpoints in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines. Oncogene 15:1199–1205[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Hammer GD, Krylova I, Zhang Y, Darimont BD, Simpson K, Weigel NL, Ingraham HA 1999 Phosphorylation of the nuclear receptor SF-1 modulates cofactor recruitment: integration of hormone signaling in reproduction and stress. Mol Cell 3:521–526[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Hickey GJ, Krasnow JS, Beattie WG, Richards JS 1990 Aromatase cytochrome P450 in rat ovarian granulosa cells before and after luteinization: adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-dependent and independent regulation. Cloning and sequencing of rat aromatase cDNA and 5' genomic DNA. Mol Endocrinol 4:3–12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Lynch JP, Lala DS, Peluso JJ, Luo W, Parker KL, White BA 1993 Steroidogenic factor 1, an orphan nuclear receptor, regulates the expression of the rat aromatase gene in gonadal tissues. Mol Endocrinol 7:776–786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Fitzpatrick SL, Richards JS 1993 cis-Acting elements of the rat aromatase promoter required for cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate induction in ovarian granulosa cells and constitutive expression in R2C Leydig cells. Mol Endocrinol 7:341–354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Rice DA, Mouw AR, Bogerd AM, Parker KL 1991 A shared promoter element regulates the expression of three steroidogenic enzymes. Mol Endocrinol 5:1552–1561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Aoki K, Ishida R, Kasai M 1997 Isolation and characterization of a cDNA encoding a Translin-like protein, TRAX. FEBS Lett 401:109–112[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Wu XQ, Lefrancois S, Morales CR, Hecht NB 1999 Protein-protein interactions between the testis brain RNA-binding protein and the transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase, a cytoskeletal {gamma} actin and Trax in male germ cells and the brain. Biochemistry 38:11261–11270[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. Chennathukuzhi VM, Kurihara Y, Bray JD, Hecht NB 2001 Trax (translin-associated factor X), a primarily cytoplasmic protein, inhibits the binding of TB-RBP (translin) to RNA. J Biol Chem 276:13256–13263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Finkenstadt PM, Jeon M, Baraban JM 2002 Trax is a component of the Translin-containing RNA binding complex. J Neurochem 83:202–210[CrossRef][Medline]
  78. Yang S, Cho YS, Chennathukuzhi VM, Underkoffler LA, Loomes K, Hecht NB 2004 Translin-associated factor X is post-transcriptionally regulated by its partner protein TB-RBP, and both are essential for normal cell proliferation. J Biol Chem 279:12605–12614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Wu XQ, Xu L, Hecht NB 1998 Dimerization of the testis brain RNA-binding protein (translin) is mediated through its C-terminus and is required for DNA- and RNA-binding. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1675–1680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Nachtigal MW, Hirokawa Y, Enyeart-VanHouten DL, Flanagan JN, Hammer GD, Ingraham HA 1998 Wilms’ tumor 1 and Dax-1 modulate the orphan nuclear receptor SF-1 in sex-specific gene expression. Cell 93:445–454[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Crawford PA, Dorn C, Sadovsky Y, Milbrandt J 1998 Nuclear receptor DAX-1 recruits nuclear receptor corepressor N-CoR to steroidogenic factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 18:2949–2956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Ito M, Yu R, Jameson JL 1997 DAX-1 inhibits SF-1-mediated transactivation via a carboxy-terminal domain that is deleted in adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Mol Cell Biol 17:1476–1483[Abstract]
  83. Ito M, Yu RN, Jameson JL 1998 Steroidogenic factor-1 contains a carboxy-terminal transcriptional activation domain that interacts with steroid receptor coactivator-1. Mol Endocrinol 12:290–301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Crawford PA, Polish JA, Ganpule G, Sadovsky Y 1997 The activation function-2 hexamer of steroidogenic factor-1 is required, but not sufficient for potentiation by SRC-1. Mol Endocrinol 11:1626–1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  85. Ou Q, Mouillet JF, Yan X, Dorn C, Crawford PA, Sadovsky Y 2001 The DEAD box protein DP103 is a regulator of steroidogenic factor-1. Mol Endocrinol 15:69–79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Lee MB, Lebedeva LA, Suzawa M, Wadekar SA, Desclozeaux M, Ingraham HA 2005 The DEAD-box protein DP103 (Ddx20 or Gemin-3) represses orphan nuclear receptor activity via SUMO modification. Mol Cell Biol 25:1879–1890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Reinhart AJ, Williams SC, Clark BJ, Stocco DM 1999 SF-1 (steroidogenic factor-1) and C/EBPß (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-ß) cooperate to regulate the murine StAR (steroidogenic acute regulatory) promoter. Mol Endocrinol 13:729–741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Lopez D, Shea-Eaton W, Sanchez MD, McLean MP 2001 DAX-1 represses the high-density lipoprotein receptor through interaction with positive regulators sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1a and steroidogenic factor-1. Endocrinology 142:5097–5106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Shea-Eaton WK, Trinidad MJ, Lopez D, Nackley A, McLean MP 2001 Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1a regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene. Endocrinology 142:1525–1533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. Kennell JA, O’Leary EE, Gummow BM, Hammer GD, MacDougald OA 2003 T-cell factor 4N (TCF-4N), a novel isoform of mouse TCF-4, synergizes with ß-catenin to coactivate C/EBP{alpha} and steroidogenic factor 1 transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol 23:5366–5375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Val P, Lefrancois-Martinez AM, Veyssiere G, Martinez A 2003 SF-1 a key player in the development and differentiation of steroidogenic tissues. Nucl Recept 1:8[CrossRef][Medline]
  92. Beuschlein F, Keegan CE, Bavers DL, Mutch C, Hutz JE, Shah S, Ulrich-Lai YM, Engeland WC, Jeffs B, Jameson JL, Hammer GD 2002 SF-1, DAX-1, and acd: molecular determinants of adrenocortical growth and steroidogenesis. Endocr Res 28:597–607[CrossRef][Medline]
  93. Hu MC, Chiang EF, Tong SK, Lai W, Hsu NC, Wang LC, Chung BC 2001 Regulation of steroidogenesis in transgenic mice and zebrafish. Mol Cell Endocrinol 171:9–14[CrossRef][Medline]
  94. Peter M, Dubuis JM 2000 Transcription factors as regulators of steroidogenic P-450 enzymes. Eur J Clin Invest 30(Suppl 3):14–20
  95. Luo X, Ikeda Y, Parker KL 1994 A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation. Cell 77:481–490[CrossRef][Medline]
  96. Shen WH, Moore CCD, Ikeda Y, Parker KL, Ingraham HA 1994 Nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 regulates the mullerian inhibiting substance gene: a link to the sex determination cascade. Cell 77:651–661[CrossRef][Medline]
  97. Ikeda Y, Luo X, Abbud R, Nilson JH, Parker KL 1995 The nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 is essential for the formation of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus. Mol Endocrinol 9:478–486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  98. Hatano O, Takayama K, Imai T, Waterman MR, Takakusu A, Omura T, Morohashi K 1994 Sex-dependent expression of a transcription factor, Ad4BP, regulating steroidogenic P-450 genes in the gonads during prenatal and postnatal rat development. Development 120:2787–2797[Abstract]
  99. Parker KL, Rice DA, Lala DS, Ikeda Y, Luo X, Wong M, Bakke M, Zhao L, Frigeri C, Hanley NA, Stallings N, Schimmer BP 2002 Steroidogenic factor 1: an essential mediator of endocrine development. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:19–36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  100. Severt WL, Biber TU, Wu X, Hecht NB, DeLorenzo RJ, Jakoi ER 1999 The suppression of testis-brain RNA binding protein and kinesin heavy chain disrupts mRNA sorting in dendrites. J Cell Sci 112:3691–3702[Abstract]
  101. Lonard DM, O’Malley BW 2006 The expanding cosmos of nuclear receptor coactivators. Cell 125:411–414[CrossRef][Medline]
  102. Lanz RB, McKenna NJ, Onate SA, Albrecht U, Wong J, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1999 A steroid receptor coactivator, SRA, functions as an RNA and is present in an SRC-1 complex. Cell 97:17–27[CrossRef][Medline]
  103. Li LA, Chiang EF, Chen JC, Hsu NC, Chen YJ, Chung BC 1999 Function of steroidogenic factor 1 domains in nuclear localization, transactivation, and interaction with transcription factor TFIIB and c-Jun. Mol Endocrinol 13:1588–1598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  104. Wilson TE, Fahrner TJ, Milbrandt J 1993 The orphan receptors NGFI-B and steroidogenic factor 1 establish monomer binding as a third paradigm of nuclear receptor-DNA interaction. Mol Cell Biol 13:5794–5804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  105. Krylova IN, Sablin EP, Moore J, Xu RX, Waitt GM, MacKay JA, Juzumiene D, Bynum JM, Madauss K, Montana V, Lebedeva L, Suzawa M, Williams JD, Williams SP, Guy RK, Thornton JW, Fletterick RJ, Willson TM, Ingraham HA 2005 Structural analyses reveal phosphatidyl inositols as ligands for the NR5 orphan receptors SF-1 and LRH-1. Cell 120:343–355[CrossRef][Medline]
  106. Li Y, Choi M, Cavey G, Daugherty J, Suino K, Kovach A, Bingham NC, Kliewer SA, Xu HE 2005 Crystallographic identification and functional characterization of phospholipids as ligands for the orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1. Mol Cell 17:491–502[CrossRef][Medline]
  107. Wang W, Zhang C, Marimuthu A, Krupka HI, Tabrizizad M, Shelloe R, Mehra U, Eng K, Nguyen H, Settachatgul C, Powell B, Milburn MV, West BL 2005 The crystal structures of human steroidogenic factor-1 and liver receptor homologue-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7505–7510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  108. Desclozeaux M, Krylova IN, Horn F, Fletterick RJ, Ingraham HA 2002 Phosphorylation and intramolecular stabilization of the ligand binding domain in the nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 22:7193–7203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  109. Parker MG 1998 Transcriptional activation by oestrogen receptors. Biochem Soc Symp 63:45–50[Medline]
  110. Shibata H, Spencer TE, Onate SA, Jenster G, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1997 Role of co-activators and co-repressors in the mechanism of steroid/thyroid receptor action. Recent Prog Horm Res 52:141–164; discussion 164–165[Medline]
  111. Torchia J, Glass C, Rosenfeld MG 1998 Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10:373–383[CrossRef][Medline]
  112. Webb P, Nguyen NH, Chiellini G, Yoshihara HA, Cunha Lima ST, Apriletti JW, Ribeiro RC, Marimuthu A, West BL, Goede P, Mellstrom K, Nilsson S, Kushner PJ, Fletterick RJ, Scanlan TS, Baxter JD 2002 Design of thyroid hormone receptor antagonists from first principles. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 83:59–73[CrossRef][Medline]
  113. Cvoro A, Tzagarakis-Foster C, Tatomer D, Paruthiyil S, Fox MS, Leitman DC 2006 Distinct roles of unliganded and liganded estrogen receptors in transcriptional repression. Mol Cell 21:555–564[CrossRef][Medline]
  114. Chennathukuzhi V, Stein JM, Abel T, Donlon S, Yang S, Miller JP, Allman DM, Simmons RA, Hecht NB 2003 Mice deficient for testis-brain RNA-binding protein exhibit a coordinate loss of TRAX, reduced fertility, altered gene expression in the brain, and behavioral changes. Mol Cell Biol 23:6419–6434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  115. Stein JM, Bergman W, Fang Y, Davison L, Brensinger C, Robinson MB, Hecht NB, Abel T 2006 Behavioral and neurochemical alterations in mice lacking the RNA-binding protein translin. J Neurosci 26:2184–2196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  116. Cho YS, Chennathukuzhi VM, Handel MA, Eppig J, Hecht NB 2004 The relative levels of translin-associated factor X (TRAX) and testis brain RNA-binding protein determine their nucleocytoplasmic distribution in male germ cells. J Biol Chem 279:31514–31523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  117. Manley JL, Fire A, Cano A, Sharp PA, Gefter ML 1980 DNA-dependent transcription of adenovirus genes in a soluble whole-cell extract. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:3855–3859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  118. Finkenstadt PM, Jeon M, Baraban JM 2001 Masking of the Translin/Trax complex by endogenous RNA. FEBS Lett 498:6–10[CrossRef][Medline]
  119. Finkenstadt PM, Kang WS, Jeon M, Taira E, Tang W, Baraban JM 2000 Somatodendritic localization of Translin, a component of the Translin/Trax RNA binding complex. J Neurochem 75:1754–1762[CrossRef][Medline]

NURSA Molecule Pages Link:

Nuclear Receptors:   SF-1



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Shi, M. D. Schonemann, and S. H. Mellon
Regulation of P450c17 Expression in the Early Embryo Depends on GATA Factors
Endocrinology, February 1, 2009; 150(2): 946 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Z. Yu and N. B. Hecht
The DNA/RNA-Binding Protein, Translin, Binds microRNA122a and Increases Its In Vivo Stability
J Androl, September 1, 2008; 29(5): 572 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Russo, G. A. Balogh, I. H. Russo, and and the Fox Chase Cancer Center Hospital Network P
Full-term Pregnancy Induces a Specific Genomic Signature in the Human Breast
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 51 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow NURSA Molecule Pages Link
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mellon, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brake, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mellon, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brake, P. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals