| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Surgical Research and Division of Information Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Shiuan Chen, Department of Surgical Research and Division of Information Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, California 91010. E-mail: schen{at}coh.org.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The third-generation aromatase inhibitors, developed in the early 1990s, including two nonsteroidal triazole derivatives [anastrozole (Arimidex, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, DE) and letrozole (Femara, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ)] and one steroidal derivative [exemestane (Aromasin, Pharmacia & Upjohn S.p.A., Ascoli Picerno, Italy)] (Fig. 1
), are widely used as the first-line drugs in the endocrine treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancer in postmenopausal patients (2, 3, 4). These drugs were found to be better tolerated than tamoxifen and were associated with lower incidences of endometrial cancer and contralateral breast cancer occurrence (5). Although these new aromatase inhibitors are shown to be very potent and specific, the structural basis of drug recognition by aromatase has remained elusive because the three-dimensional structure of this enzyme is not yet determined.
|
The detailed structure-function studies of aromatase need adequate amounts of purified active enzyme. A number of attempts have been devoted to the expression and purification of human recombinant aromatase (18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Unfortunately, these earlier studies were not successful in obtaining large amounts of the purified active enzyme due to its hydrophobic nature and instability. Kagawa et al. (20) reported the production of a recombinant aromatase (NmA264R) with improved yield in Escherichia coli based on coexpression with molecular chaperones GroES/GroEL. By modifying our previous approach (19), we have recently achieved the expression of a structurally stable and functionally active human aromatase in E. coli and have successfully purified the enzyme. Using this purified preparation, the detailed structure-function relationships of aromatase have been studied by UV/Vis spectral analysis and proteomic analysis. In addition to experiments using recombinant aromatase preparation, we have performed site-directed mutagenesis in a mammalian expression system and carried out computer modeling based on results generated from our and other laboratories.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NmChAro was solubilized from E. coli membrane with detergent (Tween 20)-containing buffer in the presence of its substrate, androstenedione, and purified using Ni Sepharose, hydroxyapatite, and Superdex 200 (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) FPLC chromatography columns. Superdex-200 chromatography was used for the last purification step to remove detergent and any aggregates. Figure 2
, A and B, summarizes the results of each step of the purification procedure. The purified NmChAro appeared as a single band with molecular mass of 55 kDa (55,446 based on its amino acid sequence). The aromatase activity was recovered with a 77% overall yield, having a specific activity of 68.2 nmol/mg·min.
|
The Km (Michaelis-Menten constant) and Vmax (maximum velocity) values of NmChAro were estimated to be 301 nM and 130 nmol/mg·min for androstenedione (Fig. 2C
). Kinetic parameters obtained in this study are compared with values previously reported in the literature (Supplement A, published as supplemental data on The Endocrine Societys Journals Online web site at http://mend.endojournals.org). The Km value of 301 nM is higher than previous reports of references21 , 25 , 26 , and 27 ; however, it is comparable with that of recombinant aromatase in Kagawa et al. (20). Perhaps the variations are due to differences in the assay conditions used. Our recombinant aromatase has a maximal turnover number of 8.3 min1, comparable with those previously reported in references20 , 21 , 26 , and 27 (Supplement A).
Spectral Characteristics of NmChAro
In the oxidized state, the Soret maximum of the purified NmChAro-androstenedione complex was at 394 nm (Fig. 3A
), indicating a typical substrate binding spectrum (see discussion below). The absorption maximum of the ultraviolet region was at 278 nm, and the A278/A394 ratio (protein vs. heme) was 1.03 (Fig. 3A
). Figure 3B
shows the time course-reduced carbon monoxide (CO)-difference spectra of the purified NmChAro-androstenedione complex. The absorbance difference between 450 nM and 490 nM was 0.043, indicating the P450 concentration is 0.47 µM (Fig. 3C
). The P450 content is 15.7 nmol/mg of protein, which is 87% of the expected value (18 nmol P450/mg protein) as calculated from the molecular weight of pure aromatase protein.
|
The type I binding spectrum induced by exemestane suggests that exemestane binds to the substrate-binding site during the first step of inhibition. It is well known that mechanism-based inhibitors cause time-dependent inactivation of aromatase only in the presence of cofactors such as NADPH (28). To better define exemestane as a mechanism-based inhibitor, exemestane was incubated with purified NmChAro in the presence of human NADPH-P450 reductase and NADPH. The reaction mixture was kept at 4 C subsequent to the 10 min incubation at 37 C, and the time course spectra were recorded. Gonzalez and Piferrer (29) previously showed that aromatase activity at 4 C is around 20% of the maximum at 37 C. We assume that the reaction slow down significantly at 4 C. The spectrum of NmChAro reduced by NADPH exhibited a greatly increased absorption between 300 and 400 nm, which prevented the examination of the absorption at 394 nm. However, the absorption at 420 nm could be recorded. At zero time, there was no peak at 420 nm in the reaction mixture with exemestane or androstenedione, whereas in the reaction mixture of ligand-free enzyme or with letrozole, an absorption peak at 420 nm was observed (Fig. 3E
). The absorption at 420 nm appeared in the reaction mixture with androstenedione after a 30 min incubation on ice (Fig. 3F
). However, the reaction mixture with exemestane failed to recover the 420-nm peak (Fig. 3F
) even after overnight incubation on ice. These results indicate that after the aromatization of androstenedione, estrone releases from the enzyme, allowing a water molecule to re-ligate to iron, switching it back to a 6-fold coordination state. In contrast, acting as a mechanism-based inhibitor, exemestane (or its intermediates) fails to release once it binds to the enzyme.
Proteolytic Analysis of NmChAro
Based on the published crystal structures of P450s, the overall fold is maintained in all P450s (30). There are two domains in P450s: the
-domain is associated with the catalytic center, and the ß-domain is associated with substrate recognition and the access channel (31). The heme group is sandwiched between the helices I and L, whereas the helices B, C, F, and G contribute to substrate recognition (17).
To study the three-dimensional folding of human aromatase, we have performed time-dependent proteolytic digestion of purified NmChAro. Purified NmChAro preparation was incubated with trypsin in nondenaturing conditions for various time periods, and the proteolytic products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4A
). As a control, digestion of denatured protein (preheat NmChAro preparation in a 37 C water bath for 2 h, a P450 peak shifted to a P420 peak in reduced CO-difference spectra) produced different fragmentation patterns by SDS-PAGE analysis (data not shown). According to the crystal structures of P450s complexed with their ligands, conformational changes within the active site can be induced by the binding of substrate or inhibitor (30). To demonstrate whether binding of ligands to aromatase induces conformational changes, the proteolytic products of NmChAro complexed with androstenedione, exemestane, or letrozole were compared with those of the ligand-free enzyme. Androstenedione, exemestane, and letrozole protect aromatase from proteolysis by trypsin (Fig. 4B
). These results demonstrate aromatase adopts a more compact conformation when bound to ligands.
|
The fragmentation patterns were aligned with the amino acid sequence of aromatase as shown in Fig. 5
. In the time-course digestion study, it was found that trypsin cleavage started from the carboxyl terminus of NmChAro (i.e., the
-domain). After a 5-min digestion, trypsin cleaved the peptide bonds in the flanking loops of the L helix, while leaving the L helix intact. These regions are on the surface of the three-dimensional model from Favia et al. (17). After a 10-min digestion, further cleavage occurred in the C terminus, including the L helix itself. After a 20-min digestion, more peptides were detected within the C terminus. Moreover, cleavage occurred among the B-C loop, C and D helices, and the C-D turn. After a 30-min digestion, besides previous fragmentation products, cleavage also occurred in the ß-domain of the protein, including the B helix, ß-sheets 1-4, 1-3, 2-1, and 2-2, and the N terminus (the transmembrane segment, removed for solubility, is not included).
|
-domain of the enzyme (except the F helix and F-G loop), followed by digestion of the center of the
-domain, and lastly in the compact ß-domain. The presence of the intact F helix and F-G loop after a 30-min digestion is thought to result from the direct intermolecular interactions among them in the symmetric dimer. Some P450s have demonstrated dimer formation in crystals through the interaction of the helices F and G region, such as P450 2C5 (15) and 2C8 (24). In addition, our gel-filtration experimental results demonstrated that a dimer of NmChAro forms in solution (results not shown).
|
Reaction Intermediate Studies
The biosynthesis of estrogen from androgen by aromatase proceeds in three hydroxylation steps. The first and second hydroxylations occur at the 19-methyl group by the classical enzyme-mediated hydrogen atom abstraction-hydroxyl radical rebound mechanism (32, 33). Various mechanisms (34, 35, 36, 37) have been proposed to explain the mysterious third hydroxylation step, which cleaves the C10-C19 bond, resulting in aromatization of the steroid A-ring and release of formic acid. Model reaction studies, including data from our group, support mechanism that an enolization of a carbonyl group at C-3 toward the C-2 position would be a prerequisite for the cleavage of the C10-C19 bond (38, 39). Recently, Hackett et al. (40) further demonstrated that 1ß-hydrogen atom abstraction by an iron-oxo intermediate from substrates in the presence of the 2, 3-enol encounters strikingly low barriers (5.37.8 kcal/mol), whereas barriers for this same process rise to 17.027.1 kcal/mol in the keto tautomer. The residues involved in the enolization of C-3 toward C-2 would be critical for the final catalytic step, although these critical residues have not yet been determined.
Our previous data showed that more 19-hydroxyandrostenedione (19-ol) intermediate was generated by both S478A and S478T than the wild-type (WT) enzyme, and significantly more 19-ol and 19-oxoandrostenedione (19-al) intermediates were detected for both mutants H480K and H480Q than for the WT enzyme (39). Our results indicate that these mutations affect the final aromatization step that lead to the accumulation of 19-ol and 19-al intermediates.
To better understand the molecular basis for the aromatization reaction, we further determined the reaction intermediate profiles of 10 mutants (K119R, K119N, E129D, E129Q, F134Y, F134L, I305A, I305V, H475A, and H475A) and compared those to that of WT aromatase. These five amino acids were thought to be located at the substrate binding pocket, according to our computer model based on mammalian P450 2C5 as the template (14). These mutants were prepared and analyzed using a mammalian cell expression system. The expression levels of WT aromatase and the ten mutants were similar in transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells by immunoprecipitation analysis (Supplement D). The catalytic properties of the aromatase mutants have been determined using an in-cell aromatase assay, and the apparent Km and Vmax values are shown in supplement E. The reaction intermediate profiles showed no significant differences of 19-ol or 19-al intermediates between the WT and each mutant (data not shown). Interestingly, significant amounts of 19-nor-4-androstene-3, 17-dione (19-nor) were produced by F134Y (Fig. 7A
), approximately 4-fold higher than that of WT levels, and 19-nor was suggested to be artifactually derived from 19-oic-androsteneione as a result of degradation (41).
|
Molecular Basis for Exemestane Irreversible Inhibition
Exemestane is an androstenedione derivative and has been shown to be a mechanism-based aromatase inactivator (28, 42). However, the molecular nature for the interaction of this compound with the enzyme is still unclear.
Compounds lacking a C19 methyl group did not cause a time-dependent decrease in aromatase activity (43). Incubation of another suicide inhibitor androst-4-ene-3, 6, 17-trione (AT) with human placental microsome yielded the 19-hydroxy-AT and 19-oxo-AT (44). These results lead us to propose that a reactive electrophile produced from the hydroxylation at the C19 of exemestane binds to the active site in an irreversible manner, resulting in inactivation of aromatase.
To better understand the molecular basis for the interaction of exemestane with aromatase, we first performed inhibitory profile analyses of the WT and 12 mutants (K119R, I229V, I133Y, I133W, F134Y, E302D, I305A, A306G, D309A, T310S, S478T, and H480Q) transfected in CHO cells. Our results showed that exemestane was significantly less potent in inhibiting the mutants, E302D (IC50 = 96 nM), D309A (IC50 = 40 nM) and S478T (IC50 = 64 nM), than WT aromatase (IC50 = 22 nM) (Fig. 7B
). The IC50 value of 22 nM for WT aromatase is similar to the inhibition constant value of 26 nM reported by Giudici et al. (42).
Next, a time course study of the inhibition of WT aromatase, and mutants E302D, D309A, and S478T by exemestane was performed. Aromatase activity was measured after various incubation periods with exemestane. A definitive time-dependent inhibition of WT aromatase by exemestane was observed, as expected for a suicide inhibitor (Fig. 7C
). The time required for 50% inhibition was also similar to the t1/2 value of 13.9 min reported by Giudici et al. (42). However, time-dependent inhibition of these three mutants could not be clearly demonstrated (Fig. 7C
). These results indicate that E302, D309, and S478 may participate in the mechanism responsible for suicide inhibition of aromatase by exemestane. These results will be discussed below.
Substrate Binding and Catalytic Mechanism
In an effort to better understand the molecular mechanism of the aromatization reaction and to investigate the roles of active site amino acids discussed above, androstenedione was docked into the three-dimensional model from Favia et al. (17). In this model, the heme iron is ligated by a conserved cysteine (Cys437) and the propionates of the heme interact with the side chains of R115, W141, R145, R375, and R435. The active site pockets from this model and previous models (9, 10) are in agreement except in the region of the B'-C loop and the ß-4 sheet. In this model, I125-P138 of the B'-C loop penetrates into the interior of the molecule so that I132-F134, rather than H128-K130 in the model from Graham-Lorence et al. (9), are located in or adjacent to the active site. E129 and K130 are now thought to stabilize this turn structure: E129 forms a hydrogen bond with N135 and K130 forms a hydrogen bond with N136. In addition, sheet ß4 protrudes into the active site, placing L477-H480 above the active site pocket, whereas L473-D476 is further away from the active site. Instead of directly interacting with the substrate in the active site pocket, L473-D476 is now thought to localize within the putative substrate access channel.
The substrate binding site of aromatase was selected according to the x-ray crystal structure of cytochrome P450eryf with androstenedione bound (PDB ID: 1EUP), and further refined by Tripos LITHIUM (currently marketed as Benchware 3D Explorer; Tripos, St. Louis, MO). As shown in Fig. 8
, the C19 methyl group, which undergoes the first and second hydroxylation reactions, is centered over the heme-bound iron atom, and is 3.3 Å from T310. It is believed that the conserved threonine (T310) plays an important role in the oxygen-oxygen bond cleavage. D309, S478, and H480, which flank the A-ring of androstenedione (Fig. 8
), form a catalytic triad consistent with our previously proposed mechanism (39). D309 is thought to play important roles in all three hydroxylation steps. The first and second hydroxylations at the C19 methyl group are consistent with any other P450-catalyzed hydroxylation (Fig. 9A
). Molecular oxygen is bound by the reduced heme iron, forming peroxide. After forming the iron-oxo intermediate facilitated by T310, T310 is immediately reprotonated by the neighboring D309. These two hydroxylation steps produce 19-ol and 19-diol, respectively. It is unclear whether 19-diol or 19-al is the true intermediate for the second hydroxylation step. Studies from Hackett et al. (40) do not support the dehydration of the 19-diol before the final catalytic step. Here we assume that the 19-diol remains hydrated until the final decarbonylation. The detection of 19-al from our reaction intermediate analysis may be due to dehydration from the unstable form of 19-diol under experimental conditions.
|
|
The B'-C loop also appears to play an important role in orienting the substrate. The D-ring is anchored by Val der Waals forces from I133 and F134, particularly the aromatic side chain of F134 on the C-18 methyl group. I133 is important in providing hydrophobic interactions with the substrate, stabilizing it in the active site pocket. We believe that the aromatic
-cloud of F134 interacts with C18, rather than C19 as believed in the model proposed by Auvray et al. (10), and this positions the substrate inside the active site. When F134 is mutated to a tyrosine residue, the polar side chain of tyrosine might decrease its interaction with the substrate, affecting the position of C-2 with D309 and retarding the enolization of C-3 toward C-2 in the aromatization step. Therefore, the accumulation of 19-nor in F134Y would be a result of degradation from 19-oic-androsteneione, due to a hindrance in the 2,3-enolization.
Implications for the Mechanism of Exemestane Irreversible Inhibition
To investigate the molecular mechanism of irreversible inhibition, exemestane is docked into the same site as androstenedione. As shown above, E302, D309, and S478 may participate in the mechanism of suicide inhibition of aromatase by exemestane. We will focus on the molecular interaction of these three residues with exemestane.
The function of E302 is ambiguous. Mutant E302L was found to be unstable and inactive in our group (7), as well as mutant E302A (10). Graham-Lorence et al. (45) also reported that mutant E302D had 30% of the activity of the WT enzyme, and mutant E302Q had minimal activity. These mutagenesis results suggest that the acidic group at this position is important, and lead us to propose that E302 interacts with the substrate and is involved in the first and second hydroxylations (39). However, E302 is now judged as being too far from the substrate. Our present results from the irreversible inhibitory analysis of exemestane emphasize the role of E302, which participates in the mechanism of suicide inhibition of aromatase by exemestane. Furthermore, E302 was aligned with D293 of the P450 2C9 template. In the crystal structure of P450 2C9, D293 forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone nitrogen of I112. In the present model, we proposed E302 forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone nitrogen of I133 and F134 of the B'-C loop, preventing this important loop from drifting away. It is consistent with other groups (9, 17) that E302 maintains the structure of the active site cavity, although they have suggested that E302 forms a salt-bridge with K130. The mutant E302D would be too far to form a hydrogen bond with the backbone nitrogen of I133 and F134, and therefore the critical penetrating loop structure of the B'-C loop might not be stabilized. This minimizes the interaction between I133 and F134 with exemestane (or its intermediates), so that exemestane (or its intermediates) may not be stabilized in the active site pocket.
As discussed above, the function of D309 is in agreement among different groups. The mutant D309A was remarkably resistant to a great number of inhibitors (13, 46). Interestingly, the present inhibitory analysis of exemestane shows that D309A fails to maintain a time-dependent inhibition of exemestane. Furthermore, previous data from our lab showed that neither 19-hydroxyandrostenedione nor 19-oxoandrostenedione intermediates were produced in D309A and D309N mutants (7). We propose that the D309A mutant retards the hydroxylation of C19 of exemestane, so that it fails to produce exemestane intermediates to cause a time-dependent inhibition. Based on our analysis, we also hypothesize that D309 is involved in the irreversible binding of exemestane intermediates.
In the exemestane-bound model, S478 is located near the A-ring, forming a hydrogen bond with the C-3 keto oxygen to stabilize exemestane (or its intermediates). The larger side chain of the mutant T478 may cause conformational conflicts with exemestane; therefore, the threonine side chain must rotate, and as a result the hydrogen bond is lost. This weaker interaction between exemestane (or its intermediates) and the mutant enzyme causes exemestane (or its intermediates) to be less stable in the active site pocket, and possibly accounts for the loss of irreversible inhibition.
Therefore, we propose the mechanism of irreversible inhibition of exemestane. Firstly, exemestane binds to the substrate-binding site, particularly by Val der Waals forces from I133 and F134 of the B'-C loop and the hydrogen bond formed between S478 and C-3 keto group. Exemestane is then converted to reactive intermediates by heme through the hydroxylation of C19 group, helped by D309. Finally, the intermediates irreversibly bind to the enzyme cause suicide inhibition, in which D309 may be involved.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While we are expecting to solve the x-ray structure of aromatase, detailed structure-function analysis using experimental methods described in this report has provided useful structural information. We propose a new clamping mechanism of substrate/exemestane binding to the active site that involves the heme, I helix (between E302 and T310), B'-C loop (containing I133 and F134), and the ß-4 sheet (containing S478 and H480), particularly the clamping motion of the B'-C loop when the enzyme binds to androstenedione or exemestane. This new clamping mechanism explains most of the site-directed mutagenesis results from this and other laboratories, and helps us to understand the molecular action of substrate/drug recognition by aromatase. These studies have produced valuable information to design the next generation of aromatase inhibitors for the prevention and the treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancer.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
70% full power, 3 x 1 min). NmChAro was isolated from the pelleted membranes with buffer B (buffer A containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 0.5 M NaCl), and purified by metal-ion affinity chromatography (Ni Sepharose 6 Fast Flow; Amersham). After elution of NmChAro with a linear imidozole gradient from 50 mM to 300 mM in buffer B, the red fractions were pooled, desalted, applied to a hydroxyapatite (Bio-Rad) column for the elimination of minor contaminants, and eluted with a linear gradient of 01 M NaCl in buffer C (buffer A containing 0.1% Tween 20). Purified NmChAro was loaded on a gel-filtration column (Superdex 200) to remove aggregates and Tween 20 detergent, eluted with buffer D [25 mM Na-HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), 0.15 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10 µM androstenedione], and concentrated using a centrifugal device (Ultra-15 30K; Millipore, Billerica, MA). Purified and concentrated NmChAro was stored in buffer D. For the ligand-free NmChAro preparation, the sample was eluted from a gel-filtration column in buffer D without adding its substrate androstenedione.
Aromatase Activity Assay
Aromatase activity was determined according to the published tritiated water-release method (19), with a modification. The standard in vitro assay was reconstituted with 100 nM human NADPH-P450 reductase (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) in a 500-µl reaction buffer containing 67 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4), 0.1% BSA, 10 µM progesterone, and 500 nM [1ß-3H]androstenedione at 37 C in a shaking water bath for 20 min. The incubation was initiated by the addition of 300 µM of NADPH, and terminated by the addition of 500 µl 20% trichloroacetic acid. The reaction was mixed with charcoal-dextran to remove any trace amount of unreacted substrate. After centrifugation of the mixture, the radioactivity of the supernatant was counted by a liquid scintillation counter (LS 6500; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA). Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay method (47).
In the in-cell aromatase assay, aromatase-transfected CHO cells were seeded in six-well plates, and 1 ml serum-free media containing 100 nM [1ß-3H] androstenedione, as well as 1 µM progesterone, were added to each well. To determine protein concentration, cells remaining in each well were solubilized with 0.5 M NaOH and subjected to the Bradford assay method.
UV/Vis Spectral Analysis
The absorption spectra of the purified preparation were measured by a UV-1700 PharmaSpec UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD) with a quartz cuvette having a 1-cm optical path. To measure the reduced CO-difference spectra, the samples were aliquoted into two cuvettes, followed by a baseline spectrum recording between 650 and 350 nm. After bubbling carbon monoxide slowly into the sample cuvette, a few milligrams of sodium dithionite was added to the sample cuvette, mixed, and the spectrum difference was recoded. The specific P450 content was determined by Beers Law, with a molar extinction difference of 91 mM1·cm1 between 450 and 490 nm.
Proteomic Analysis
For the time-course digestion, purified aromatase preparations were incubated with trypsin (NmChAro:trypsin = 100 µg:1 µg) in the absence of ligand in a 37 C water bath for 5, 10, 20, and 30 min. For the ligand-protected digestions, preparations were incubated with different ligands (NmChAro:ligand = 1:1) for 30 min on ice, then the unliganded or liganded samples were treated with trypsin (NmChAro:trypsin = 20 µg:1 µg) in a 37 C water bath for 30 min. The digestions were terminated by the addition of acetic acid until the pH dropped below 4, then analyzed by the MALDI-TOF MS.
MALDI-TOF MS
Samples were desalted and concentrated with ZipTip C18 pipette tips (Millipore), eluted with 50% acetonitrile solution, mixed with MALDI matrix
-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid (
-cyano), which is suitable for small peptides with peptides mass-to-charge below 10,000, spotted on a MALDI plate, and directly applied on MALDI-TOF MS (Voyager-DE STR; PerSeptive Biosystems Inc., Framingham, MA).
Site-Directed Mutagenesis
The mutant cDNAs were generated by the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using the WT aromatase expression plasmid pHß-Aro (48) as template, then transformed into DH5
cells. All mutations were verified by DNA sequencing. For stable transfections, mutant plasmids were transfected into CHO cells using lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). After 2 wk of G418 selection, transfected cells were maintained in media containing 600 µg/ml G418.
Reaction Intermediate Analysis
The aromatase or mutant transfected cells were incubated with 100 nM [1ß-3H]androstenedione. After a 1-h incubation, the reaction media were extracted with an equal volume of chloroform, and the chloroform solvent was removed by vacuum evaporation. The sample was dissolved in 100 µl of acetonitrile; a 50-µl aliquot was mixed with 10 µl of internal standards (200 nM each of 19-ol A, 19-al A, 19-nor A, and androstenedione). The reaction intermediates were separated by reverse-phase HPLC on a C18 column (218TP54; VYDAC, Hesperia, CA). One-milliliter fractions were collected manually, and 1-ml aliquots were counted in 3 ml of Scintisafe liquid scintillation fluid (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Retention times of 19-ol A, 19-al A, 19-nor A, and androstenedione were determined based on the internal standards at 9, 16, 25, and 32 min, respectively. The radioactivity associated with each peak was used to calculate the amount of each intermediate.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online November 9, 2006
Abbreviations: 19-al, 19-Oxoandrostenedione; AT, Androst-4-ene-3, 6, 17-trione; CO, carbon monoxide; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; DTT, dithriothreitol; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry; NADPH, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; 19-nor, 19-nor-4-androstene-3, 17-dione; 19-ol, 19-hydroxyandrostenedione; WT, wild type.
Received for publication July 7, 2006. Accepted for publication October 30, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||