| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pediatrics (B.M.K.) and Department of Internal Medicine (B.M.K., A.R.Z.), McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development (B.M.K., T.G., K.P.T., Y.W., A.R.Z.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas 75390-8591
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Bassil M. Kublaoui, Department of Pediatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75390-8591. E-mail: bassil.kublaoui{at}utsouthwestern.edu or andrew.zinn{at}utsouthwestern.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heterozygous inactivation of the murine Sim1 gene (Sim1+/–) leads to an analogous phenotype of hyperphagic obesity and increased linear growth, with enhanced sensitivity to diet-induced obesity (6, 7). Homozygous Sim1 knockout mice die shortly after birth and exhibit failure of terminal migration and differentiation of the neurons of the paraventricular (PVN), supraoptic (SON), and anterior periventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus (8, 9), which produce the neuropeptides arginine vasopressin (Avp), oxytocin (Oxt), CRH, TRH, and somatostatin (Sst). Michaud et al. (7) reported that Sim1+/– mice have a 24% reduction in PVN cellularity measured by Nissl staining, with no specific neuropeptide subtype affected, leading them to propose that the phenotype of hyperphagic obesity is due to a hypothalamic developmental defect. By contrast, we found no difference in the number of PVN Sim1 neurons in Sim1+/– vs. Sim1+/+ mice, using a Sim1-enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic reporter to mark these neurons (10). In the absence of a gross neuroanatomic defect in Sim1+/– mice, it is unclear which PVN neurons are important for the regulation of feeding behavior by Sim1. Of the neuropeptides produced in the PVN, Oxt (11, 12, 13, 14), TRH (15, 16), and CRH (17, 18, 19, 20) have consistently been shown to have an anorectic effect when given centrally to rodents.
Sim1 is expressed postdevelopmentally in the PVN and supraoptic nucleus (SON) as well as the basomedial amygdala and a subset of lateral hypothalamic neurons (6). The Sim1+/– phenotype is suggestive of defective hypothalamic melanocortin signaling (21), and we hypothesized that Sim1 physiologically regulates body weight by modulating PVN Mc4r signaling (6). Consistent with this hypothesis, PVN neurons of Sim1+/– mice showed impaired activation in response to peripheral injection of melanotan II, a melanocortin receptor agonist (10). Furthermore, transgenic overexpression of human SIM1 partially suppressed both diet-induced and Agouti yellow (Ay) obesity by reducing feeding (22). Moreover, viral-mediated overexpression of Sim1 in the PVN of adult mice reduced food intake, whereas small interfering RNA-mediated inhibition of Sim1 expression increased food consumption (23). These findings suggest that Sim1 acts postdevelopmentally to regulate feeding.
Leptin secreted by adipocytes activates receptors in the arcuate nucleus (ARC), increasing proopiomelanocortin expression and stimulating release of
-MSH by ARC neurons that project to the PVN and LH (24). This hypothalamic adiposity signal is integrated with hindbrain satiety signals such as cholecystokinin (CCK), mediated by vagal afferents (25, 26, 27, 28, 29). Neuroanatomic evidence suggests that the PVN is central to this interaction (30, 31). In rats, the neurons responsible for this interaction may be parvocellular oxytocinergic neurons in the posterior PVN projecting to the hindbrain and spinal cord (32, 33, 34, 35). Fourth ventricular injection of an Oxt receptor antagonist attenuated the effect of leptin on food intake, suggesting that Oxt itself is an important signal in addition to classical neurotransmitters (36). Interestingly, patients with Prader-Willi syndrome, a human genetic disorder characterized by severe obesity, have a 42% reduction of parvocellular PVN Oxt neurons (37). Additionally, the levels of circulating Oxt in these patients are abnormally low for their degree of obesity (38). The gene regulatory network that controls Oxt cell development is conserved in vertebrate species as diverse as zebrafish, chicks, and mice (39, 40). Zebrafish Sim1 is required for the development of neurons that produce isotocin, the fish homolog of Oxt (39). It is not known whether the Oxt gene is also a transcriptional target of Sim1.
To further examine the effect of Sim1 haploinsufficiency on PVN neuronal function, we evaluated expression of PVN neuropeptides in Sim1+/– mice. We also compared the regulation of Oxt and CRH in these mice in response to fasting and refeeding. We further investigated the effect of an oxytocin receptor antagonist, OVT (d(CH2)5, Tyr(Me)2,Orn8-Oxytocin) on food intake in Sim1+/– vs. wild-type mice and tested whether PVN Oxt neurons in wild-type mice are activated by an Mc4r-selective agonist. Finally, we measured the effect of chronic intracerebroventricular (icv) Oxt injections on food intake and body weight of Sim1+/– and wild-type mice. Our findings support the role of PVN Oxt neurons and Oxt itself in the regulation of feeding and suggest a neuroendocrine mechanism for the hyperphagia of Sim1+/– mice.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Central Oxt Receptor Antagonist Administration Exacerbates Hyperphagia of Sim1+/– Mice
We hypothesized that reduced Oxt neuropeptide levels in Sim1+/– mice might render these mice hypersensitive to further inhibition of Oxt signaling. To test this hypothesis, we treated Sim1+/– mice and wild-type littermates icv with the Oxt receptor antagonist OVT (d(CH2)5, Tyr(Me)2,Orn8-Oxytocin). An OVT dose of 0.5 µg did not affect feeding of wild-type mice but increased the food intake of the already hyperphagic Sim1+/– mice by approximately 50% (Fig. 5
).
|
|
1–4 µg) (11, 12, 13) but not mice (45). ICV OVT blocks anorexia in rats at doses of 9 nmol (
9 µg). Doses of Oxt as high as 1 µg failed to inhibit food intake in wild-type mice (Fig. 7A
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sim1 is necessary for the development of all PVN neurons. Given that mouse Sim1 is required for the development of neurons of the PVN, SON, and anterior periventricular nucleus expressing AVP, Oxt, CRH, TRH, and Sst, we hypothesized that one or more of these neuronal populations may be affected by Sim1 haploinsufficiency and that this may mediate the hyperphagic obesity of Sim1+/– mice. Microarray expression profiling revealed that Oxt mRNA was reduced in the hypothalamus of Sim1+/– mice compared with controls (data not shown). These results were confirmed in the present study using quantitative RT-PCR, revealing a marked (
80%) reduction in Oxt expression in Sim1+/– mice, with a similar decrease in Oxt peptide as measured by immunohistochemistry. The reduction in Oxt peptide in the PVN appeared to be global and likely affected both magnocellular and parvocellular neurons, although these populations cannot be distinguished morphologically or anatomically in mice (Ref. 46 and J. Elmquist, personal communication). Other PVN neuropeptide mRNAs were reduced in Sim1+/– mice, but to a much lesser degree than Oxt.
It is unclear whether reduced Oxt expression in Sim1+/– mice was due to a decreased number of Oxt neurons or to decreased Oxt expression in most of these neurons below the threshold for immunodetection. Presently we have no way other than Oxt expression to mark these neurons. By contrast, CRH neurons did not show measurable reduction in either number or peptide expression, suggesting that Sim1 haploinsufficiency preferentially affects Oxt neurons. These findings are consistent with a conserved role for Sim1 in development of Oxt (or isotocin in zebrafish) neuronal lineages (39).
The Oxt promoter has not been well characterized, even in the well-known context of regulation by estrogen (47, 48). Inspection of the upstream or downstream 5 kb of genomic sequence with Regulatory VISTA (rVISTA) (49) and the UCSC Genome Browser (50) did not reveal any conserved binding sites for Sim1 or its heterodimer partner Arnt2, suggesting that if Sim1 physiologically regulates Oxt expression, the mechanism is indirect.
There is a large body of literature supporting the role of Oxt and Oxt neurons in regulation of feeding in both humans and rodents. Patients with Prader-Willi syndrome have a 42% reduction of parvocellular PVN Oxt neurons (37). Plasma Oxt levels are elevated in subjects with common obesity and decrease after gastric banding (51), suggesting that there may be Oxt resistance analogous to leptin resistance. Centrally administered Oxt has been shown to reduce food intake in rats, and this effect is blocked by Oxt receptor antagonists (11, 12, 13). Oxt is secreted into the bloodstream by magnocellular neurons in response to exogenous CCK, and serum Oxt levels are directly proportional to the degree of inhibition of food intake by this treatment (42). Despite these observations, peripheral administration of Oxt at physiological levels does not modulate food intake in rats, suggesting that peripheral release takes place in parallel with central effects on feeding. Peripheral administration of Oxt in rats at high doses has been shown to reduce food intake by some investigators (12, 13) but not others (52).
Neuroanatomic and pharmacological studies in rats point to parvocellular PVN Oxt neurons that project monosynaptically to the hindbrain as being important in satiety. Oxt receptor expression in the mouse hindbrain is greatest in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). A known satiety center (53), and there is evidence that Oxt preferentially regulates food intake in the hindbrain (36). Furthermore, oxytocinergic projections to the nucleus of the solitary tract in newborn rats come solely from the PVN (33). Disruption of PVN oxytocinergic fibers projecting to the hindbrain leads to hyperphagic obesity (34). Furthermore, PVN Oxt neuron axonal projections interact with NTS neurons that are activated by CCK (35). Finally, Baskin and colleagues (35, 36) characterized a subset of parvocellular PVN Oxt neurons that both respond to leptin and project to the NTS and showed that injection of OVT into the fourth ventricle attenuated the effect of leptin on food intake. These results support the notion that PVN parvocellular Oxt neurons transmit hypothalamic adiposity signals to the NTS, where they are integrated with gut satiety signals. Furthermore, there is evidence that the parvocellular PVN itself also integrates adiposity signals such as leptin with satiety signals from the NTS. This integration is then followed by modulation of NTS neurons that reduce meal size. This evidence comes from the work of Moran and colleagues (54), who showed that leptin modulates CCK-induced c-Fos in both the PVN and NTS, as well as the work of Verbalis and colleagues (55), who showed that CCK activates oxytocinergic parvocellular PVN neurons that then project to the dorsal vagal complex (dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus and NTS).
Further evidence for the role of PVN Oxt neurons in feeding regulation comes from a report showing an effect of ghrelin on these neurons (56). In this study, Levine and colleagues showed that the Oxt receptor antagonist OVT exacerbated ghrelin-induced hyperphagia. Others have shown that parvocellular and magnocellular PVN Oxt neurons are activated by insulin (57). Hypothalamic Oxt has also been implicated in the regulation of food intake during pregnancy (58).
Studies of a Sim1-GFP transgenic mouse showed that essentially all cells in the PVN expressing NeuN, a marker of neurons but not glial cells, were also GFP positive (our unpublished results). Based on these and other data (59), we proposed that all adult mouse PVN neurons express Sim1 (10). Here we showed that Oxt colocalized in a subset of Sim1 neurons (Fig. 4A
). Colocalization of Oxt and Mc4r has been previously demonstrated in mouse PVN neurons (32). It is also clear from the work of Balthasar et al. (59) that Mc4r is expressed in PVN Sim1 neurons. Together, the data indicate that a subset of PVN neurons coexpress Sim1, Mc4r, and Oxt. Our previous results suggest that Sim1 functions downstream of Mc4r (10), and we show here that proper Oxt expression is dependent upon Sim1. Thus, there may exist a molecular pathway from Mc4r to Sim1 to Oxt within PVN neurons, although the notion of a linear relationship is likely an oversimplification of the relevant circuits.
Our results further bolster the relevance of PVN Oxt neurons in the melanocortin feeding circuitry by showing that these neurons are activated by a centrally administered Mc4r-selective agonist (Fig. 4B
). Regulation of Oxt neurons by melanocortin agonists is not limited to the PVN but has also been shown in the SON, where
-MSH induces the release of Oxt from the dendrites of magnocellular neurons while inhibiting its secretion from nerve terminals in the posterior pituitary (60, 61).
A key question is whether reduced expression of Oxt is causally related to the hyperphagia of Sim1+/– mice. To answer this question, we examined the effect of both an Oxt receptor antagonist and Oxt on food intake in Sim1+/– vs. wild-type. We reasoned that if Oxt simply marks absent or defective PVN neurons in Sim1+/– mice but is not itself involved in feeding regulation, then treatment with Oxt or an Oxt receptor antagonist should not differentially affect food intake of Sim1+/– vs. wild-type mice. On the other hand, if Oxt deficiency is mechanistically related to the hyperphagia of Sim1+/– mice, then administration of an Oxt receptor antagonist might exacerbate and administration of Oxt might ameliorate their hyperphagia.
The results of our pharmacological experiments clearly support the conclusion that Oxt neuropeptide deficiency per se contributes to the hyperphagic obesity in Sim1+/– mice. Further experiments are required to address the neuronal mechanism of Oxt action. For instance, Oxt may act as a neuromodulator of synaptic signaling by classical neurotransmitters released in the NTS by parvocellular PVN neuronal projections.
Despite the large body of evidence implicating Oxt in food intake regulation, wild-type and Oxt–/– mice ingest similar amounts of standard chow ad libitum, after overnight food deprivation when drinking water is available, and after systemic administration of either CCK or D-fenfluramine (62, 63). On the other hand, Oxt–/– mice display an increased intake of both sweet and nonsweet carbohydrate solutions (64). Oxt receptor-deficient mice have been generated, but no characterization of their food intake or body weight has been published (65). There are several possible explanations for the apparent discrepancy between genetic models and anatomic and pharmacological data. Oxt may mark the identity of neurons projecting from the PVN to the NTS but not be critical for their action in meal termination, which could be mediated by classical neurotransmitters such as GABA or glutamate. Our results argue against this possibility. Alternatively, Oxt may be an important physiological regulator of feeding in normal mice, but there could be developmental mechanisms that compensate for its absence in Oxt–/– mice. Functional and developmental compensation by hypothalamic neurons has been demonstrated, most notably in Npy/Agrp neurons. Despite compelling pharmacological evidence for a prominent role for these two peptides in energy homeostasis, mice deficient in Npy, Agrp, or both have no demonstrable feeding phenotype (66). On the other hand, partial ablation of Npy/Agrp neurons postnatally leads to the expected lean phenotype, and complete ablation in adulthood leads to starvation (66, 67, 68, 69, 70). Developmental compensation by these neurons appears to take place postnatally, because neonatal ablation had minimal effects on body weight or feeding regulation (67). We hypothesize that similar developmental compensation explains the absence of a feeding phenotype in Oxt–/– mice. These compensatory mechanisms may involve compensation by other PVN neuropeptides implicated in feeding regulation, i.e. CRH or TRH. These compensatory mechanisms may be intact in Oxt–/–mice and impaired in Sim1+/– mice, which show moderately decreased mRNA levels of CRH and TRH.
Another explanation for the lack of a feeding phenotype in Oxt–/–mice may be species differences. Our results do not support this possibility. Whereas icv Oxt consistently reduces food intake of rats (11, 12, 13), no such hypophagic effect has been demonstrated in mice (45). We too could not find such an effect of icv Oxt on wild-type mice. On the other hand, we were able to demonstrate that OVT increased food intake in wild-type mice. These results in wild-type mice, coupled with our results in Sim1+/– mice, support the hypothesis that Oxt exerts a tonic inhibition of feeding in mice. This is consistent with the work of Blevins et al. (35) in rats, who also concluded that Oxt exerts a tonic stimulatory effect on NTS neurons that reduce meal size by showing that fourth ventricular administration of OVT blunted CCK-induced satiety.
Further experiments are needed to determine the site of action of Oxt in rescuing the hyperphagia of Sim1+/– mice and whether Sim1 haploinsufficiency leads to a developmental reduction in Oxt neurons or a postdevelopmental reduction of Oxt expression. Any reduction in the number of PVN neurons must be subtype specific. Because there is no difference in the total PVN Sim1 neuron count of Sim1+/– mice vs. wild-type mice (10), a reduction in the number of Oxt neurons may be due to fate switching. Additional experimental approaches, such as conditional postnatal Sim1 inactivation, are needed to determine whether the decrease in Oxt expression in Sim1+/– mice is developmental or regulatory. Regardless, our results support the importance of the oxytocinergic pathway from the PVN to the NTS in feeding regulation and suggest that reduced Oxt expression is responsible for much of the hyperphagia of Sim1+/– mice (Fig. 8
). Further study of the PVN to NTS oxytocinergic pathway may be relevant to our understanding of other genetic causes of human obesity such as Prader-Willi syndrome or MC4R mutations.
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Real-Time PCR
Hypothalami from fresh brains were dissected with a block (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA) as described (71), using the following landmarks: posteriorly, posterior aspect of median eminence; anteriorly, 5 mm anterior to the median eminence; dorsally, the thalamus; laterally, medial to the dentate gyrus. Total RNA was extracted using Tripure reagent (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using an ABI 3700 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the QuantiTect HotStart SYBR green qPCR kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Neuropeptide measurements were normalized to β-actin or GAPDH mRNA levels. Primers sequences were 5'-GAGGACCTGCGACTAGACTGAC-3' and 5'-CAGCAGCTCTGCCAAGAAGTA-3' (Sst); 5'-CGTTGAGAGACTGAAGAGAAAGG-3' and 5'-GGACGACAGAGCCACCAG-3' (CRH); 5'-CTTTGATCTTCGTGCTAACTGGT-3' and 5'-CTTCAACGTCTTCCTCCTTCTC-3' (mTRH); 5'-CTCTGACATGGAGCTGAGACAG-3' and 5'-AGGGCAGGTAGTTCTCCTCCT-3' (AVP); 5'-TGGCTTACTGGCTCTGACCT-3' and 5'-AGGCAGGTAGTTCTCCTCCTG-3' (Oxt).
Taqman primers were used for determining Oxt and CRH mRNA levels for feeding state experiments (4331182 and 4351372; Applied BioSytems, Foster City, CA).
5'-GAC GAT GCT CCC CGG GCT GTA TTC-3' and 5'-TCT CTT GCT CTG GGC CTC GTC ACC-3' (β-actin) and GAPDH (4352339E, Applied BioSytems) were used for normalization. All reactions were performed at 53 C annealing temperature.
Cannulation (icv)
Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (117 mg/kg) and xylazine (7.92 mg/kg). After shaving the head and applying a microbicide, each animal was placed in a stereotaxic chamber (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL). A sagittal section was cut and the skin was clipped back. Bregma coordinates were visually determined, and the location of the lateral ventricle was calculated (0.2 mm posterior; 1.0 mm lateral; 2.1 mm deep to skull surface). The site of cannulation on the skull surface was marked. The skull was punctured using an engraving Dremel bit. The guide cannula (C315GS-4/spc; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) was inserted and glued to the skull surface with dual cure paste (031458550; Den-mat, Santa Maria, CA). A dummy cannula (or dust cap) was placed inside the guide cannula (C315DCS-4/spc; Plastics One). The scalp was closed with dissolvable sutures. Upon waking, the animal was injected ip with 0.1 mg/kg of Buprenex (buprenorphine hydrochloride) for analgesia. Mice were then allowed to recover for 1 wk. Cannula placement was tested by examining the effect of 0.2 µg of angiotensin II on drinking behavior as described elsewhere (72).
Injections (icv)
Individually housed mice were habituated to handling and injections with aCSF for at least 1 wk before experimentation. Single injections were made manually using an internal cannula (C315IS-4/spc; Plastics One) connected to PE-50 tubing and a Hamilton syringe. Drug or vehicle (2 µl) was injected over a 30-sec period.
OXT Wild-Type vs. Sim1+/–.
Female mice (6–12 wk of age) were equally divided into the following groups matched for age and weight (wild-type aCSF, n = 7; wild-type Oxt, n = 7; Sim1+/– aCSF, n = 5; and Sim1+/– Oxt, n = 8). After 1 wk of habituation to twice daily icv injection, mice were injected with 10 ng of Oxt (H2510; Bachem Bioscience, Inc., King of Prussia, PA) or vehicle, twice a day for 12 d (at the onset of the dark cycle and 6 h later). Food intake and body weight were recorded daily. Food intake was analyzed by two-way ANOVA (group vs. time) and body weight change was analyzed with one-way ANOVA (group). Both analyses were done with a Bonferroni posttest to determine intergroup significance. On d 24, 12 d after the last injection, body weight was measured again and compared with body weight on d 12. Posttreatment body weight change for the groups was compared using one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni posttest.
Wild-Type OVT vs. Sim1+/–.
Mice were icv injected at the onset of the dark cycle with 2 µl aCSF to determine baseline food intake. Mice were injected 24 h later with 0.5 µg OVT [d(CH2)5, Tyr(Me)2,Orn8-Oxytocin; H4928, Bachem]. Food intake was measured at 1-h intervals for 6 h. The experiment was repeated the following week. Food intake from the two aCSF measurement days was averaged for each mouse, and food intake from the two OVT measurement days was averaged for each mouse. OVT food intake was normalized to aCSF food intake for each mouse. Means were calculated for each treatment and compared using a paired t test.
Wild-Type Oxt.
After 1 wk of habituation to daily icv injection, 6- to 10-wk-old female wild-type mice were injected at the onset of the dark cycle with aCSF, 50 ng, 250 ng or 1 µg of OXT. Food intake was normalized to aCSF food intake. Means were calculated for each treatment, and the groups at each time point were compared using one-way ANOVA.
Wild-Type OVT.
After 1 wk of habituation to daily icv injection, 6- to 10-wk-old female wild-type mice were injected at the onset of the dark cycle with aCSF on d 1 and 1.5 µg OVT on d 2. Food intake was normalized to aCSF food intake for each mouse. Means were calculated for each treatment, and the groups at each time point were compared using a paired t test.
Immunohistochemistry
For colocalization of c-Fos and Oxt, 8-wk-old female C57BL/6 mice received 1 µg colchicine icv 24 h before subsequent experimental procedures. For c-Fos experiments, mice were icv injected with 3 µg of the Mc4r-selective agonist or vehicle (aCSF) 4 h before intracardiac perfusion. The Mc4r-selective agonist cyclo(β-Ala-His-D-Phe-Arg-Trp-Glu)-NH2 was purchased from Phoenix Pharmaceuticals (Burlingame, CA). Sim1 GFP transgenic mice were not colchicine treated, and immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously (10). Mice were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital (7.5 mg /0.15 ml, ip) and transcardially perfused with 10 ml of heparinized saline (10 U/ml, 2 ml/min) followed by 10 ml of phosphate-buffered 4% paraformaldehyde (2 ml/min). Brains were removed, postfixed for 24 h in 4% paraformaldehyde, and then equilibrated in 30% sucrose in PBS for 72 h. Immunohistochemistry was performed as described elsewhere (10, 70). Briefly, brains were coronally sectioned (35 µm) on a freezing microtome (Leica SM 2000R; Wetzlar, Germany) and stored in PBS at 4 C. Sections were incubated for 16 h in mouse anti-Oxt antiserum (MAB5296, 1:5000, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) or rabbit anti-CRH antiserum (AB-02, 1:800; Advanced Targeting Systems, San Diego, CA) and then incubated with either Cy-3 affiniPure goat antimouse IgG secondary antiserum or Cy-3 affiniPure goat antirabbit IgG secondary antiserum (115–165-166, 111–165-003, 1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) for 2 h at room temperature. Sections were placed in 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (0.2 µg /ml, 236276; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and then mounted and coverslipped using Vectashield (H-1000; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images of sections containing PVN were captured on an Olympus BX61 microscope using Cytovision software (Applied Imaging Corp., San Jose, CA). For fluorescent c-Fos and Oxt double labeling, sections were incubated for 16 h in rabbit anti-Fos antiserum (Ab-5; 1:3000 dilution; Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and mouse anti-Oxt antiserum. Sections were then incubated with Cy-3 goat antirabbit IgG secondary antiserum and Cy-2 affiniPure goat antimouse IgG secondary antiserum (115–225-166, 1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 2 h at room temperature. Sections were treated with DAPI and mounted as described above. For fluorescent GFP and Oxt double labeling, sections were incubated for 48 h in rabbit anti-GFP antiserum (A6455, 1:5000; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and mouse anti-Oxt antiserum. Sections were then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate goat antirabbit IgG secondary antiserum and Cy-2 affiniPure goat antimouse IgG secondary antiserum (115-225-166, 1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 2 h at room temperature. Sections were treated with DAPI and mounted as described above. Cell counts and densitometry were determined using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Each side of a section was counted separately, and counts from six sides were averaged for each animal. Densitometry was performed on images that were captured with identical settings using the Integrated Density function after background subtraction.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and plotted using Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Values are means ± SEM. Unless otherwise noted, means were compared using two-tailed t tests, with Welchs correction if F test indicated unequal sample variances. Differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: B.K., T.G., K.T., Y.U., and A.Z. have nothing to declare.
First Published Online May 1, 2008
Abbreviations: ARC, Arcuate nucleus; Avp, arginine vasopressin; CCK, cholecystokinin; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; GFP, green fluorescent protein; NTS, nucleus of the solitary tract; OVT, d(CH2)5, Tyr(Me)2,Orn8-oxytocin; Oxt, oxytocin; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; SON, supraoptic nucleus; Sst, somatostatin.
Received for publication February 29, 2008. Accepted for publication April 24, 2008.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-melanotropin action at human melanocortin receptor 4: their synthesis and biological evaluation in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286:641–645[CrossRef][Medline]
-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone and oxytocin: a peptide signalling cascade in the hypothalamus. J Neuroendocrinol 18:703–710[CrossRef][Medline]
-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone stimulates oxytocin release from the dendrites of hypothalamic neurons while inhibiting oxytocin release from their terminals in the neurohypophysis. J Neurosci 23: 10351–10358This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Camerino Oxytocin Thinks Globally and Acts Locally: The Oxytocinergic Regulation of Bone Mass IBMS BoneKEy, August 1, 2009; 6(8): 295 - 300. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Blouet, Y.-H. Jo, X. Li, and G. J. Schwartz Mediobasal Hypothalamic Leucine Sensing Regulates Food Intake through Activation of a Hypothalamus-Brainstem Circuit J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8302 - 8311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Traurig, J. Mack, R. L. Hanson, M. Ghoussaini, D. Meyre, W. C. Knowler, S. Kobes, P. Froguel, C. Bogardus, and L. J. Baier Common Variation in SIM1 Is Reproducibly Associated With BMI in Pi ma Indians Diabetes, July 1, 2009; 58(7): 1682 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. L. Tung, M. Ma, S. Piper, A. Coll, S. O'Rahilly, and G. S. H. Yeo Novel Leptin-Regulated Genes Revealed by Transcriptional Profiling of the Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus J. Neurosci., November 19, 2008; 28(47): 12419 - 12426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |