| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on April 1, 2004
Accepted on November 4, 2004
Steroid Hormones Section, NIDDK/LMCB, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steroids{at}helix.nih.gov.
Several factors modulate the position of the dose-response curve of steroid receptor-agonist complexes and the partial agonist activity of antagonist complexes, thereby causing differential gene activation by circulating hormones and unequal gene repression during endocrine therapies with antisteroids. We now ask whether the modulatory activity of three factors (homologous receptor, coactivator TIF2, and Ubc9) requires the same or different domains of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). In all cases, we find that neither the amino-terminal half of the receptor, which contains the AF-1 activation domain, nor the DNA binding domain is required. This contrasts with the major role of AF-1 in determining the amount of gene expression and partial agonist activity of antisteroids with most steroid receptors. However, the situation is more complicated with Ubc9, where GR N-terminal sequences prevent the actions of Ubc9, but not added GR or TIF2, at low GR concentrations. Inhibition is relieved by deletion of these sequences or by replacement with the comparable region of progesterone receptors but not by overexpression of the repressive sequences. These results plus the binding of C-terminal GR sequences to the suppressive N-terminal domain implicate an intramolecular mechanism for the inhibition of Ubc9 actions at low GR concentrations. A shift from non-cooperative to cooperative steroid binding at high GR concentrations suggests that conformational changes reposition the inhibitory N-terminal sequence to allow Ubc9 interaction with elements of the ligand binding domain. Collectively, these results indicate a dominant role of GR C-terminal sequences in the modulation of the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes. They also reveal mechanistic differences both among individual modulators and between the ability of the same factors to regulate the total amount of gene expression.
NURSA Molecule Pages Link:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. He and S. S. Simons Jr. STAMP, a Novel Predicted Factor Assisting TIF2 Actions in Glucocorticoid Receptor-Mediated Induction and Repression Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2007; 27(4): 1467 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yokota, H. Shibata, I. Kurihara, S. Kobayashi, N. Suda, A. Murai-Takeda, I. Saito, H. Kitagawa, S. Kato, T. Saruta, et al. Coactivation of the N-terminal Transactivation of Mineralocorticoid Receptor by Ubc9 J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1998 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Li, J. H. Heaton, and T. D. Gelehrter Role of Steroid Receptor Coactivators in Glucocorticoid and Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Regulation of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Gene Expression Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 20(5): 1025 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wang and S. S. Simons Jr. Corepressor Binding to Progesterone and Glucocorticoid Receptors Involves the Activation Function-1 Domain and Is Inhibited by Molybdate Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 19(6): 1483 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |