help button home button Endocrine Society Molecular Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on November 4, 2004
Molecular Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/me.2004-0332
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure and Legend
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/683    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daikoku, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dey, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daikoku, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dey, S. K.

Submitted on August 24, 2004
Accepted on October 27, 2004

Proteomic analysis identifies immunophilin FKBP52 as a downstream target of Hoxa10 in the periimplantation mouse uterus

Takiko Daikoku, Susanne Tranguch, David B. Friedman, Sanjoy K. Das, David F. Smith, and Sudhansu K. Dey*

Departments of Pediatrics, Cell & Developmental Biology, Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Cancer Biology, Division of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sk.dey{at}vanderbilt.edu.

The process of implantation absolutely requires synchronized development of the blastocyst to implantation competency, differentiation of the uterus to the receptive state and a reciprocal dialogue between the blastocyst and uterine luminal epithelium. Genetic and molecular approaches have identified several signaling pathways that are critical to this process. The transcription factor Hoxa10 is one such critical player in implantation. Hoxa10-/- female mice have implantation and decidualization failure particularly due to reduced uterine responsiveness to progesterone (P4) and defective stromal cell proliferation during uterine receptivity and implantation. However, the downstream signaling pathways of Hoxa10 in these events remain largely unknown. Using the proteomics approach of Difference Gel Electrophoresis (DIGE), we have identified an immunophilin FKBP52 as one of the Hoxa10 mediated signaling molecules in the uterus. We found that FKBP52, a co-chaperone protein known to influence steroid hormone receptor functions, is downregulated in stromal cells of Hoxa10-/- mice. More importantly, FKBP52 shows differential uterine cell-specific expression during the periimplantation period. While it is primarily expressed in the uterine epithelium on day 1 of pregnancy, the expression expands to the stroma on day 4 during the period of uterine receptivity and becomes localized to decidualizing stromal cells surrounding the implantation site on day 5. This suggests that FKBP52 is important for the attainment of uterine receptivity and implantation. Furthermore, FKBP52 shows differential cell-specific expression in the uterus in response to P4 and/or estrogen consistent with its expression patterns during the periimplantation period. Collectively, these results and the female infertility phenotype of FKBP52 suggest that a Hoxa10-FKBP52 signaling axis is critical to uterine receptivity and implantation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Lu, J. Hardt, and J.J. Kim
Global analysis of genes regulated by HOXA10 in decidualization reveals a role in cell proliferation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 14(6): 357 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
D. Vitiello, R. Pinard, and H. S. Taylor
Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Putative HOXA10 Downstream Targets in the Periimplantation Mouse Uterus
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2008; 15(5): 529 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Ray, F. Xu, H. Wang, and S. K. Das
Cooperative Control via Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1/T Cell Factor 3 and Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} for Uterine Gene Regulation by Estrogen
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1125 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. E Spencer, O. Sandra, and E. Wolf
Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 165 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Ray, F. Xu, P. Li, N. S. Sanchez, H. Wang, and S. K. Das
Increased Level of Cellular Bip Critically Determines Estrogenic Potency for a Xenoestrogen Kepone in the Mouse Uterus
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4774 - 4785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J.J. Kim, H.S. Taylor, Z. Lu, O. Ladhani, J.M. Hastings, K.S. Jackson, Y. Wu, S.W. Guo, and A.T. Fazleabas
Altered expression of HOXA10 in endometriosis: potential role in decidualization
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 13(5): 323 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. Hong, S. T. Kim, S. Tranguch, D. F Smith, and S. K Dey
Deficiency of co-chaperone immunophilin FKBP52 compromises sperm fertilizing capacity
Reproduction, February 1, 2007; 133(2): 395 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Chen, M. Nakai, R. J Belton Jr, and R. A Nowak
Expression of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer and matrix metalloproteinases during mouse embryonic development
Reproduction, February 1, 2007; 133(2): 405 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
D. B. Friedman, S. E. Wang, C. W. Whitwell, R. M. Caprioli, and C. L. Arteaga
Multivariable Difference Gel Electrophoresis and Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study on Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} and ERBB2 Signaling
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2007; 6(1): 150 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Mann, M. G. Backlund, F. G. Buchanan, T. Daikoku, V. R. Holla, D. W. Rosenberg, S. K. Dey, and R. N. DuBois
Repression of Prostaglandin Dehydrogenase by Epidermal Growth Factor and Snail Increases Prostaglandin E2 and Promotes Cancer Progression.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6649 - 6656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. K. Allan, D. Mok, B. K. Ward, and T. Ratajczak
Modulation of Chaperone Function and Cochaperone Interaction by Novobiocin in the C-terminal Domain of Hsp90: EVIDENCE THAT COUMARIN ANTIBIOTICS DISRUPT Hsp90 DIMERIZATION
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7161 - 7171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Tranguch, J. Cheung-Flynn, T. Daikoku, V. Prapapanich, M. B. Cox, H. Xie, H. Wang, S. K. Das, D. F. Smith, and S. K. Dey
From The Cover: Cochaperone immunophilin FKBP52 is critical to uterine receptivity for embryo implantation
PNAS, October 4, 2005; 102(40): 14326 - 14331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Wang, S. Tranguch, H. Xie, G. Hanley, S. K. Das, and S. K. Dey
Variation in commercial rodent diets induces disparate molecular and physiological changes in the mouse uterus
PNAS, July 12, 2005; 102(28): 9960 - 9965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. Shankar, N. Gude, F. Cullinane, S. Brennecke, A. W Purcell, and E. K Moses
An emerging role for comprehensive proteome analysis in human pregnancy research
Reproduction, June 1, 2005; 129(6): 685 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society