help button home button Endocrine Society Molecular Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on June 8, 2006
Molecular Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/me.2006-0105
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Gene Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/11/2656    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tung, L.
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tung, L.
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, K. B.

Submitted on March 3, 2006
Accepted on May 30, 2006

PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS (PR)-B AND PR-A REGULATE TRANSCRIPTION BY DIFFERENT MECHANISMS: AF-3 EXERTS REGULATORY CONTROL OVER COACTIVATOR BINDING TO PR-B

Lin Tung, Hany Abdel-Hafiz, Tianjie Shen, Djuana M.E. Harvell, Lisa K. Nitao, Jennifer K. Richer, Carol A. Sartorius, Glenn S. Takimoto*, and Kathryn B. Horwitz

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center at Fitzsimons, Aurora, Colorado, 80045

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: glenn.takimoto{at}uchsc.edu.

The two, nearly identical, isoforms of human progesterone receptors (PR), PR-B and PR-A, share activation functions (AF) 1 and 2, yet they possess markedly different transcriptional profiles, with PR-B being much stronger transactivators. Their differences map to a unique AF3 in the B-upstream segment (BUS), at the far N-terminus of PR-B, which is missing in PR-A. Combined mutation of two LXXLL motifs plus tryptophan 140 in BUS, to yield PR-BdL140, completely destroys PR-B activity, because strong AF3 synergism with downstream AF1 and AF2 is eliminated. This synergism involves cooperative interactions among receptor multimers bound at tandem hormone response elements and is transferable to AFs of other nuclear receptors. Other PR-B functions - N/C terminal interactions; SRC-1 coactivation; ligand dependent down-regulation - also require an intact BUS. All three are autonomous in PR-A, and map to N-terminal regions common to both PR. This suggests that the N-terminal structure adopted by the two PR is different, and that for PR-B, this is controlled by BUS. Indeed, gene expression profiling of breast cancer cells stably expressing PR-B, PR-BdL140 or PR-A shows that mutation of AF3 destroys PR-B dependent gene transcription without converting PR-B into PR-A. In sum, AF3 in BUS plays a critical modulatory role in PR-B, and in doing so, defines a mechanism for PR-B function that is fundamentally distinct from that of PR-A.


Key words: progesterone • steroid receptors • transcription • breast cancer • gene regulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. D. Conzen
Minireview: Nuclear Receptors and Breast Cancer
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2008; 22(10): 2215 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. A. Molenda-Figueira, S. D. Murphy, K. L. Shea, N. K. Siegal, Y. Zhao, J. G. Chadwick Jr., L. A. Denner, and M. J. Tetel
Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1 from Brain Physically Interacts Differentially with Steroid Receptor Subtypes
Endocrinology, October 1, 2008; 149(10): 5272 - 5279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
Y. H. Ibrahim, S. A. Byron, X. Cui, A. V. Lee, and D. Yee
Progesterone Receptor-B Regulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Stimulated Cell Migration in Breast Cancer Cells via Insulin Receptor Substrate-2
Mol. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 6(9): 1491 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Subtil-Rodriguez, L. Millan-Arino, I. Quiles, C. Ballare, M. Beato, and A. Jordan
Progesterone Induction of the 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 Promoter in Breast Cancer Cells Involves Coordinated Recruitment of STAT5A and Progesterone Receptor to a Distal Enhancer and Polymerase Tracking
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(11): 3830 - 3849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. P. Madauss, E. T. Grygielko, S.-J. Deng, A. C. Sulpizio, T. B. Stanley, C. Wu, S. A. Short, S. K. Thompson, E. L. Stewart, N. J. Laping, et al.
A Structural and in Vitro Characterization of Asoprisnil: A Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 21(5): 1066 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. D. Connaghan-Jones, A. F. Heneghan, M. T. Miura, and D. L. Bain
Thermodynamic analysis of progesterone receptor-promoter interactions reveals a molecular model for isoform-specific function
PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2187 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society